GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - TRUMP reveals OCTOBER SURPRISE: Major tax cuts for middle class -- IT's OVER for Dems!

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 22353992)

I said nothing about Democrats. I just fine it goddamned amusing that when the polls are bad for Trump they are fake and unreliable. However, when they are good for Trump, they are the gospel.

You see the irony, right?

When you say "fake and unreliable" polls, you are of course talking about all the many BS polls from left leaning media outlets saying Trump stood zero chance whatsoever of becoming President and showing hillary as having a massive double digit lead... when that was obviously not the case?

Now when those same left leaning outlets start producing polls that make Trump look good.. Liberals default to the argument of questioning Republicans trust of polls as if thats germain at all to a very different set of facts, the poll itself and the results.

You see the irony, right?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22354007)

When you say "fake and unreliable" polls, you are of course talking about all the many BS polls from left leaning media outlets saying Trump stood zero chance whatsoever of becoming President and showing hillary as having a massive double digit lead... when that was obviously not the case?

Now when those same left leaning outlets start producing polls that make Trump look good.. you start questioning Republicans trust of polls as if thats germain at all to the poll itself and the results.

You see the irony, right?

Can you show me one poll, just one, that said Trump had 0% of winning?

Massive double digit leads? Going into the election every major polling group had Clinton ahead by anywhere from 2-6 points with one saying Trump had a two point lead. BTW, national polls gauge popular vote which Clinton won by 3 points so most of them were actually correct in that aspect. Even your boy OneHungLo admitted that the other day. The polls were off in a few states. they had Clinton winning by 3-7 points in Wisconsin and Michigan and, obviously, she lost there.

The polls showed that Clinton was very heavily favored to win. And she didn't. It doesn't mean they were wrong, it means Trump beat the odds. That is how odds work. If Clinton had an 85% chance of winning, and he election played out 100 times, she would likely win around 85 of those elections, but she would still lose 15.

BTW what I am saying is that Republicans are being intellectually dishonest because they bash something when it doesn't go their way then praise when it does.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 22353994)

You didn't understand what Kane was saying.

Republicans are saying Trump's approval rating right now before the midterms is higher than Obama's before the 2010 midterms. (When we say "higher" we really mean "slightly higher".) However, while the Republicans are trying to play this off like it's a great and beautiful thing, it really isn't. You are comparing Trump's "all time high" to what is really Obama's average.

At the time of the 2010 midterms, Obama had only 45% approval rating. This was during the height of the recession. The Democrat party didn't do too well during the 2010 midterms. While Republicans are trying to claim this is "great" the truth is Republicans are expected to fair poorly in the midterms.

I should add according to Wikipedia, Trump's all time highest approval was on the day he was elected at 45%. Obama's highest approval rate was 69%.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kane (Post 22354016)

BTW what I am saying is that Republicans are being intellectually dishonest because they bash something when it doesn't go their way then praise when it does.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh