GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Do you support the mass migration? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1305399)

Paul Markham 11-06-2018 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard (Post 22361917)
So your saying those that escape war torn countries are only the uneducated, because the educated know if they wait there and further expose themselves to the risks, the processing time has to be less than 3-4 years

see it doesn't add up because refuges are normally escaping in haste

In no way can the USA allow a group this large just to walk in, but its a situation that needs to be delicately handled, not started with mismanagement by sending in 7000 troops.

7000 extra to process them all over night maybe, or even better just have the USA get along better with Mexico so they deal with these problems before they reach the USA.

So when they get to the border they can apply for asylum. That's the border of the first safe country they arrive in. Not the one that will give them the most money.

Claiming asylum and getting it are two different things. Those escaping persecution must establish that persecution exists. Race. Religion. Nationality. Membership in a particular social group (Most LGBTQ individuals who apply for asylum qualify under this category), Political opinion. Escaping poverty isn't good enough. Single males of working age would have to bring proof they were being personally persecuted. It's not up to the US to establish it.

Quote:

Asylum applicants don't qualify for a work permit until their case is won or 180 days have passed with no decision. Under U.S. immigration laws, only certain immigrants are allowed to work, usually after they apply for a work permit called an Employment Authorization Document (or EAD).
Quote:

Are asylum-seekers eligible for benefits such as SNAP/Food Stamps & Medicaid? In general, asylum seekers are not eligible for federally funded benefits until they receive asylum. Eligibility for state funded programs varies by state.
I suggest everyone reads this last one. Frequently Asked Questions for Asylum Seekers.

NewNick 11-06-2018 04:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 22361183)
I migrated bring jobs to my new home. .

Fuck off Markham, you migrated so that you could take photos of naked girls cheaper than you could in the UK.

You are an economic migrant, and the most unpleasant hypocrite. You are also a drain on your adopted country.

You are a citizen of a perfectly stable country with a decent standard of living, you were not hungry, you were not persecuted. You chose to go and live in a low cost country for one reason only - so that you could make more money than you would in the UK because the girls were cheap and plentiful.

The starving people in the caravan are WALKING hundreds of miles with their children in the hope of a better life. You miserable OLD TWAT.

What a fucking hypocrite.

.

itx 11-06-2018 04:31 AM

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22361607)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

dude you are the definition of low skilled migrant...what the fuck do you mean checz people could not run the company? anybody could do better than you did LOL

you are literally a migrant button presser...a human tripod...I bet 90% of those migrants could take better photos than you did on their very first try...


Paul Markham 11-06-2018 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 22362291)
Fuck off Markham, you migrated so that you could take photos of naked girls cheaper than you could in the UK.

You are an economic migrant, and the most unpleasant hypocrite. You are also a drain on your adopted country.

You are a citizen of a perfectly stable country with a decent standard of living, you were not hungry, you were not persecuted. You chose to go and live in a low cost country for one reason only - so that you could make more money than you would in the UK because the girls were cheap and plentiful.

The starving people in the caravan are WALKING hundreds of miles with their children in the hope of a better life. You miserable OLD TWAT.

What a fucking hypocrite.

.

You talk out of your ass. I'm in favour of regulated migration.

However if you're for unregulated migration. I close border control at the Mexico/US borders. And all other border controls.

Bladewire 11-06-2018 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 22362419)
You talk out of your ass. I'm in favour of regulated migration.

Nobody is for unregulated migration.

So you're in favor of blacks & Muslims migrating to your town as long as it's regulated right? 20 high quality, skilled, wealthy blacks & Muslims a month.

ANAL PASTE 11-06-2018 09:02 AM

We always had mass migration in the US. Irish, Italians, Russian Jews etc. Its not like they moved here because everything was peachy back home and they wanted to see the Hudson Bay and make few selfies. Fucking Trump wants more immigrants from Norway not Haiti :1orglaugh:1orglaugh What kind of idiot would move from a country which constantly ranks in top 3 counties of the world to live in to the US? Of course during 1930's depressions tons of Norwegians moved to US, but only because life sucked back than. Now days? Zeero .

Paul Markham 11-06-2018 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22362424)
Nobody is for unregulated migration.

So you're in favor of blacks & Muslims migrating to your town as long as it's regulated right? 20 high quality, skilled, wealthy blacks & Muslims a month.

Yes. My opposition isn't based on race. It's based on what they bring to the table.

My opposition to unregulated migration is what happens now with 1,000s walking across the borders, unregulated, unchecked and needing money very fast. That applies to every colour.

Are you saying any caravan of migrants should be allowed in with minimal checks or only Brown and Black migrants?

Paul Markham 11-06-2018 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ANAL PASTE (Post 22362438)
We always had mass migration in the US. Irish, Italians, Russian Jews etc. Its not like they moved here because everything was peachy back home and they wanted to see the Hudson Bay and make few selfies. Fucking Trump wants more immigrants from Norway not Haiti :1orglaugh:1orglaugh What kind of idiot would move from a country which constantly ranks in top 3 counties of the world to live in to the US? Of course during 1930's depressions tons of Norwegians moved to US, but only because life sucked back than. Now days? Zeero .

Are you comparing legal migrants to illegal migrants? Why?

Trump wants more rich, qualified, skilled migrants. He's not anti migration.

Rochard 11-06-2018 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 22361798)
What would you suggest they do to stop illegal migration?

If I was in charge.... We would continue what we are going, although if someone is caught in the United States illegally they would be arrested and thrown in prison. First offense, one year. Second offense, two years, third offense, four years.... And then fines on top of it.

The Republicans are making it out so that illegal immigration is surging and it's a huge, massive wave. It's not. In fact, illegal immigration has been down.

Rochard 11-06-2018 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 22361816)
Correct me if I'm wrong. I recall times when the National Guard were used to police in America. Even to the extent of killing people.

And this is exactly why we have such laws, and why such laws need to remain in place. Politicians should not be allowed to order the US Military into action locally inside of the US for political reasons, which is exactly what is happening right now.

Bladewire 11-06-2018 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 22362448)
Are you saying any caravan of migrants should be allowed in with minimal checks or only Brown and Black migrants?

I've stated my stance on immigration so many times here Paul.

I'm against sanctuary cities.

I am for legal migration.

I am for 20,000 more permanent boots on the ground at the border to protect our sovereignty.

I think the illegals in America that have American spouses and/or children should be given the path to citizenship as long as they have no major previous negative legal issues and are not on public assistance.

MFCT 11-06-2018 10:35 AM

As long as they're voting Democrat, sure why not? We need all the help we can get against those Russian bots that Trump is colluding with.

ANAL PASTE 11-06-2018 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 22362449)
Are you comparing legal migrants to illegal migrants? Why?

Trump wants more rich, qualified, skilled migrants. He's not anti migration.

You tell me. Back in 1700's when you were young, it took one signature on arriving card to "immigrate" to beautiful USA. Today, it takes few years just to get the process going. Some never get to finish it and die. Mexicans have backlog that goes 20 years. I think immigration is processing people who applied back in late 90's. So you want to compare immigration process back than and now? Hope not.

pimpmaster9000 11-06-2018 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ANAL PASTE (Post 22362525)
You tell me. Back in 1700's when you were young, it took one signature on arriving card to "immigrate" to beautiful USA. Today, it takes few years just to get the process going. Some never get to finish it and die. Mexicans have backlog that goes 20 years. I think immigration is processing people who applied back in late 90's. So you want to compare immigration process back than and now? Hope not.

paul is an anchor husband...he never went the "official way" as he likes to claim...he married for a visa...like sum bitch...he is literally a british white gypsy migrant living off of his UK pension in a country where he does not even speak the local language...

but everybody must go the "official" way says anchor husband paul :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

paul is scuba diving deep in his own irony, a low skilled migrant anchor husband bitching about migrants...unreal shit :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Paul Markham 11-07-2018 03:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ANAL PASTE (Post 22362525)
You tell me. Back in 1700's when you were young, it took one signature on arriving card to "immigrate" to beautiful USA. Today, it takes few years just to get the process going. Some never get to finish it and die. Mexicans have backlog that goes 20 years. I think immigration is processing people who applied back in late 90's. So you want to compare immigration process back than and now? Hope not.

Are you comparing legal migration to illegal migrants? Why?

_Richard_ 11-07-2018 05:22 AM

not sure about using the word 'support', but there seems to be a lot of kids in this group.. not sure how it's classified as an invasion

ANAL PASTE 11-07-2018 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 22363032)
Are you comparing legal migration to illegal migrants? Why?

Are you aware of any legal permits whites obtained from the indians? I know you were there, so you tell me.

Just like Serb gypsy said, your status in Czech Republic is a sham. You married a girl to drop your anchor so you wouldn't have to go back to UK and face the music. Remember what happened?

Bladewire 11-07-2018 09:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ANAL PASTE (Post 22363162)
Are you aware of any legal permits whites obtained from the indians? I know you were there, so you tell me.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Paul Markham 11-07-2018 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ANAL PASTE (Post 22363162)
Are you aware of any legal permits whites obtained from the indians? I know you were there, so you tell me.

Just like Serb gypsy said, your status in Czech Republic is a sham. You married a girl to drop your anchor so you wouldn't have to go back to UK and face the music. Remember what happened?

Do tell me what I fled the UK for. I went there last year and have been back and forward for the last 20 years.

mrmarcman 11-08-2018 04:19 AM

The immigration here in Sweden has been a disaster...luckily..starting to change..as in most western european countries..

Paul Markham 11-08-2018 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmarcman (Post 22363721)
The immigration here in Sweden has been a disaster...luckily..starting to change..as in most western european countries..

The strange thing in Europe is politicians want it and the people don't.

pimpmaster9000 11-08-2018 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 22363213)
Do tell me what I fled the UK for. I went there last year and have been back and forward for the last 20 years.

you left the UK because you found 12euro/shoot models to exploit and sell out your country as quick as you could...then you got a taste of the cheap life and never looked back...you are now siphoning cash away from the UK with your pension in a country where you do not even speak the local language...

you are the definition of opportunist economic migrant-anchor husband :thumbsup

ANAL PASTE 11-08-2018 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22363861)
you left the UK because you found 12euro/shoot models to exploit and sell out your country as quick as you could...then you got a taste of the cheap life and never looked back...you are now siphoning cash away from the UK with your pension in a country where you do not even speak the local language...

you are the definition of opportunist economic migrant-anchor husband :thumbsup

Oh, there is more to it. :2 cents:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc