Hey I'm all for stopping most of the aid we give out
But the fact remains that Pelosi wants to Dole out 54 billion

Crime rate is down because they stopped arresting people, crime is still high.

So you made a false statement and question my education, how fucking stupid are you?

tell me WHERE i made a false statement?

copy and paste it !!!!

the one who brings things out of context is you because you do not have ANY education in economy. you just catch some numbers and make a big win out of it and i show what you are hiding (or possibly don´t understand that what you have in your wallet always have to compared with the fact if it is your money or lend money)

you also think that economy is a US-thing. but it is not !
stock markets are reacting on international triggers. nobody gives a shit if US is running in a selfmade trouble with stupid trade wars. the world worried about china because they are MUCH more important for the world´s economy.

it is really not a big problem if you do not understand those things - a problem is when a person like you tells us that you HAVE a clue.
in normal circumstances I would take it as a joke - but as we see idiots like you can throw the world in trouble just because of their voting right.

You started the insults....

Awe but I talked about the post

Hey shit for brains, you talked about the lost jobs that weren't reported, I told you the new jobs were net, are you fucking retarded or something, or is it just bad meds?

King Twatwaffle aka King Shit For Brains starts another thread

Wrong again.

The Fiscal 2018 Budget for the State Department, FOREIGN operations including foreign aid WAS ALREADY $54 BILLION. Trump wants to CUT this to $42 Billion in 2019. The Senate Appropriations Committee, in a unanimous bipartisan vote, approved a budget of $54.4 billion. The Republicans control the Senate. So it was not just Democrats, it was not $12 billion over $54 billion and it was not all money for foreign aid but also money — about $12 billion — to keep the State Department running. My source? Your Actual Government Website: https://www.appropriations.senate.go...nate-committee

If you did your own fact-checking, you might be a smarter guy.

the OP used to be an employee and moderator of this board. How times have changed.

Don't forget the 400,000+ government workers who on furlough due to the government shutdown. However, due to the shutdown happening during the month, that statistic was not considered and they will only be counted in the month of January report.

So regardless if the 312k new jobs is gross or net, the actual result is a negative growth rate when you factor in all conditions.

https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-p...e-program.html

:1orglaugh


https://scontent.fapa1-2.fna.fbcdn.n...c3&oe=5CC00ECA

:thumbsup

The picture I posted of him was 20 years old so he could definitely look like your cartoon character by now :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Put a pretty wrapper on it. Those people still have jobs you moron.

Furloughed government contract workers like the 10,000 furloughed FEMA workers, will never be paid for the days they've been furloughed. That's not having a job. No pay. No work. No guarantee of work after the shutdown is over.

Furloughed workers sign up for unemployment benefits.

Or did you not know that?

Or are you just a lying piece of shit that think we don't know that?

A furlough is a layoff = No job. No pay.

What Is Unemployment Furlough?

Federal workers — in a panic about their pay — apply for unemployment

Yes, furloughed government contractors are eligible for unemployment during the government shutdown

You don't get it. The report excluded the 400,000 people that are NOT being paid, and may not get paid for a really long time. Trumps shutdown if anything, resulted in a net loss of employed people for at least the past week. Trump said the shutdown can go on for a long time. Exactly how are these people supposed to be employed? What if it was you? What if Obama did this?

Ok, in simpler terms:

312,000 new jobs - 400,000 jobs due to Govt shutdown = -(88,000) jobs.

Result: There are less jobs than before.

hey come one nobrainer - even you should be able to understand that a rising unemployment rate means MORE unemployed people than before.

you want reported numbers ?

ok here you get them - eat shit neanderthal man

want more, moron ?

here pick some sources you like

nope - this jobs are not in any official stats - but if trump goes on they might be. and btw this are not 88.000 or 400.000 these are 880.000

That is Vendzilla

You are insulting Neanderthals

Neanderthals were not morbidly obese :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

In all fairness, last time I saw Vendzilla he had lost a shit ton of weight. Haven't talked to him in a few years though...

you know what is the good thing on neanderthals?

they did not survive !!!!

there is still between 1 and 2% of there genetic in the modern human but i am pretty sure that the one with the 2% are all right wing neanderthals with the memory of an amoeba and the education of an earthworm.

these creatures are the actual cancerous ulcers of our society.

Good for him :thumbsup

It's one thing to be fat, but to be fat AND old is even worse.

They survived, look in the mirror!

Or the Democrats could stop being whiny shits and give in and get the funding for the wall. I have yet to hear one good reason for not building it other than it might hurt someone's feelings.

You really are a ignorant person, more people are entering the work force which will raise the unemployment rate, this is good for the economy you simple minded twatwaffle. https://www.marketwatch.com/amp/story/guid/66AB191A-1033-11E9-8D5F-533B6E1E86EF

Republicans refused to fund the wall for the last 2 years, and they are still refusing to fund the wall.

maybe you should read more than just listening to other morons in dive bars :2 cents:

And again you post about shit you know nothing about and offer nothing to the debate because your a fucking moron that knows shit about this country.

Name one good reason for not building a wall!

MarketWatch is a rightwing rag you moron :1orglaugh

The title of that article "Why the increase in the unemployment rate in December is good news for the economy" :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I can see it now "Why the market crashing is a good thing" :1orglaugh

who did you ever pay to get your education in economy?

tell them to give you the money back - thy did a BAD job !!!!

what you tell us here is that an unemployment rate of 10% is great because so many people WANT to work .......

btw. I am not an american but I ask you, as an obvious all knowing american a simple question:

do you know how the unemployment rate and the labor participation rate is collected?

i am really looking forward to get this answer from you, troll

I am quite sure that the MAJORITY in YOUR country plus the majority in the whole fucking world knows more about your country as you will EVER know

*you're

at least my English is better

You and Baddog (and a few more here) have become the epitomes of Maganism - obviously both of you listen/read(?) only whatever suits your tiny universe and then run around and insult everyone who has a different opinion.

There is a shitload of material about why a wall won't work (and that the large majority of illegals enters the country legally and then overstay their visa) and even simple logic already tells you that no wall on this planet will hold everyone back - not even when you shoot at the people who are trying to cross them.

But hey, keep screaming and yelling, fine with me.

i tell you 3

1. cost more money than you have
2. will not stop people to come illegal to the us as the MAJORITY does not enter through the southern border
3. the history have not only proven that it will not help a fuck but ist is a first step to lock you IN.

Who doesn't know shit about your country? You, obviously. Pay attention:

1) There are more jobs going to Mexico. Just look at GM. More Jobs going to Mexico means less interest in crossing to the US. The Real ID program makes it harder to work illegally in the US. U.S. Unauthorized Immigrant Total Dips to Lowest Level in a Decade

2) Border Crossings have gone down. https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/sw-border-migration

3) None of the 38 Texas Congressional Republicans in Texas offered a complete endorsement of the entire border wall plan. https://www.texastribune.org/2016/12...stands-trumps/

4) 60% of Americans oppose the wall. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/most-am...cbs-news-poll/

5) It will damage the environment and devastate wildlife: https://www.texastribune.org/2017/03...s-border-wall/

One of the areas impacted would be the Santa Ana National Wildlife Refuge containing 400 bird species and 300 butterfly species. Tourism infuses $463 million into the local economy and sustains 6,600 jobs. Source: https://www.fws.gov/uploadedfiles/na...b-2011_508.pdf

6) It might be illegal. The Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause states “nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.” However, nothing in that provision expressly gives Congress the power of eminent domain, which allows the government to acquire privately owned land if it’s for public use. "https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/posteverything/wp/2017/11/29/the-founders-would-have-opposed-seizing-land-for-trumps-border-wall/?utm_term=.5c9407742f07

Is that enough for you? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

(PS Vendy is pretending to have me on ignore so feel free to copy-paste this if you want).

Personally, I think he's self taught.