:thumbsup

I know..! That was pretty sweet. And you know Hillary Clinton is laughing her ass off tonight. Laughing at Trump, laughing at the Trumpers and the rest of the idiots... laughing... laughing...





*Boom Shaka-laka!*


Fearful laughter is an expression of submission. According to Preuschoft, the laughter is used to admit fear and communicate a desire to avoid conflict. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/...1992.tb00864.x


It's the same deal that Trump was offered 39 days ago. It's his fault, dumbass.

Sean Hannity approves of your use of Whataboutism so early in the discussion.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh


https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow/...-1411366467585
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Mark,

Can we do an honest hypothetical? I put this question to you as a Canadian and as someone who has made some concessions in the past.

What if it wasn't Trump who won the election but a different republican who also ran against Hillary and won in an upset-victory fashion.. (And by upset I mean outside of what the liberal media wanted and projected onto the people).

Eight years of Obama as the first black president, and here comes the first female president just around the corner.. But alas, she loses fair and square to a boring and very un-Donald Trump type of conservative president.

Do you think the mainstream institutions would have let the loss go in that case? Remember now.. First female president right after the first black president..

What if the American voters just flat out disagreed with the institutional narrative in a very simple honest way? What if the majority of Americans do not see life the same way as Californians do? What if the people at large were tired of being force fed conflict and issues that only a applied to a very small fraction of the population? Is that wrong?

Do you think liberal institutions might have gotten a little spoiled of having seamless control during the Obama years?

I am a white. Middle class. I saw many many people on both sides of the aisle lose their home, life savings, and health insurance (for the first time in their life) under the Obama administration.. and it wasn't just the middle class who got hurt. For most traditional people there were almost zero opportunities during that time, very very hard on small business owners as well.

Maybe those same people (seemed to effect the majority) really did genuinely want to take some time away from being "progressive" and to heal their own wounds/clean up their own back yard?

Genuinely curious as to your thoughts.

That's a good question!

I did not really know Trump before he ran. I knew of him but was never interested in watching his shows or listening to him in interviews. It was when he announced he was going to run is when I started to pay attention.

If Hillary lost to a republican other than Trump, and the loss was fair and square, then I wouldn't care much. I'm a lib so I'll always prefer to see a democrat in the white house, but a fair fight is a fair fight and congrats to the wiiner. I would also prefer to see a campaign that wasn't ugly to the other side (Both Dems and Goppers are guilty of this).

Out of all of the republicans in the 2016 Primary, I think I would have been more or less happy if John Kasich or Marco Rubio would have won against Hillary Clinton. They both have things about them I don't like, but Fucking Ted Cruz is shit on a stick. Ben Carson is an unqualified weakling, and Chris Christie is corrupt as hell too. (Bridgegate, NJ v Exxon, etc).

People and the news media are staying on top of the Trump situation because he is a flat-out terrible president, who's "good people" are all in legal trouble, and Russia meddled in the 2016 election to help Trump win. If Trump knew about this and was involved, then he broke the law, and is therefore an illegitimate president.

I don't think Hillary should have won just because she is female. And Obama wasn't a good president because he was black. But to me both of these are/were better Presidents than Trump could ever be.

I hope that answers your question!

Same thing was said in 2016. They put up Hillary. I switched parties to vote against her.

You'd need a law to actually indict a sitting president. There is no such law.

Who are you calling a Trump supporter?

Like you? You're a kiss ass know-nothing. Are you going to contravene Dept Justice policy and make up a law that doesn't exist allowing a sitting president to be indicted? Watch what happens. You're just fantasizing because you've never done anything real. What member of the republican party is going to force him to resign, dummy? You? Hilarious that a know nothing nick who has never been right now telling us what the republicans will do.

If you are even an American, people like you are a stain on the democrat party. You talk a big fucking game and know nothing.

Roger Stone responds

What country are you from?

Nobody is above the law, not even the president. Anyone can be indicted by the DOJ at any time.

Accept the fact there is no Russian collusion and there will be no indictment of the president.

Accept it and move on.

And we're supposed to take these clowns seriously why exactly?

Innocent until proven guilty. He has pleaded not guilty.

I wonder if the FBI team that arrested him was even paid to do so. From what I know, the government was shut down, which would mean that the agents that arrested him did so on their own time and without pay.

I might be wrong. I don't know how the whole thing works. But that would be pretty ironic that these people volunteered to do it while others are crying over the costs.

And this right here is Trump's supporters new defense/narrative:

The FBI are the Gestapo.

It wouldn't surprise me coming from such an uninformed, childish fool as yourself. Maybe you should do a little research on the Gestapo and come back to us the next time Mueller is sending people the gas chamber. You only continue to embarrass yourself with each post.

Helicopters, boats, heavily armed tactical teams, nighttime raids to serve a simple warrant to a 66 year old, unarmed man who is not in any way a flight risk, for lying in an investigation? You know, the guy who was so clearly not a threat at all that the judge allowed him to instantly walk right out of custody?

You don't see the problem in that... cause Orange Man Bad.

But yeah, that's a serious issue.... oh and then CNN is alerted and have a production crew in place to shoot the entire event. No FBI agenda here....

Nice that you don't care about Strozk, Page and other FBI agents/investigators lying

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Everyone around your boy tRump is going to jail or under investigation, and you refuse to believe that Trump is involved. Even Ivanka and Derp and Derper are in shit with the Trump charity). Who's delusional again?

It's interesting (and telling) how you are more concerned about the tactics of the FBI - men and women who put their lives at risk to you keep you safe domestically - than you are about possible treason. What does that say about you?

I'm sure this has been explained to you before, but here we go again: CNN was expecting Stone to be arrested and were staking out his house. Why did they expect it? Because there was a grand jury hearing the night before, and last time there was a grand jury hearing, Mueller made arrests. It's called connecting the dots and good reporting.

Your ridiculous conspiracy theory bullshit fools no one, except other Trump supporters who live in this fantasy world where the FBI are the bad guys and Trump and his team can do no wrong. I'm sure you'll continue with this silly line of reasoning (if it can be called that) until Trump is thrown in prison, and maybe after that as well.

LOL!

Yes the FBI had guns. They were arresting someone suspected of high crimes.
Yes the FBI wore night vision goggles. The arrest occurred while it was still dark.

The FBI were calm, cool and collect, walking around not sneaking around.

To compare his arrest to the raid of Bin Laden, and call the FBI GEstapo created by Goring and run by Himmler to kill jews? Fuck Stone, what an asshole.

Roger Stone is involved with communicating between the the Russian intelligence agencies (guccifer 2.0), Wikileaks, and the Trump Campaign handling information involving the hacking of a political party with the intention of swaying a presidential election.

This is treason.

Not a flight risk? Bullshit. He's been working with and communicating with the Russian government. It's not like Russia would love to have him move to Russia... You know, like Edward Snowden....

The entire Trump campaign was getting assistance from a foreign government to win an election. This is treason. This is a million times worse than Nixon and Watergate.

Look at this assclown

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/01...8524410784.jpg

100 Cunts

It's so much fun watching Roger Stone squirm....

He still has no idea what is about to hit him. The legal fees alone will bury him. He seems to think Mueller wants to work with him when Mueller has no interest in working with Stone at all.