GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   A complete guide to all 17 (known) trump and russia investigations (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1308931)

huey 02-06-2019 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22411747)
"But Hillary" has never been president...

Exactly and never will.

King Mark 02-06-2019 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by huey (Post 22411756)
Exactly and never will.

Be that as it may, when comparing Trump's investivations against pretty much anybody else... Trump's is only in the beginning. Infact, just today it intensified.

Waaaaaaay too early to be acting like he good.

2MuchMark 02-06-2019 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22411695)
Of course anyone who breaks the law should be punished. Democrat and Republican and especially Canadian.

So,.... what crime is Trump accused of?
What law is he accused of breaking?

Just asking for a friend.....

Why is that such a difficult question for all you unhinged fanatics to answer the question "what crime is Trump accused of committing"

You seem to be sooooo certain he's in biiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig trouble..


Hi Squealer,

All jokes aside, it did become a much bigger issue today.

Let's say Trump is completely innocent of everything - its possible that he is.

But what happened today is that Adam Schiff just made the scope of the investigation much wider. They are now looking for anyone in Trump's orbit, including his family, to see if any of them at all could be under any kind of Russian Influence.

Before you react, think about it a minute. It's possible that Donald T did notthing at all wrong, but maybe one of his kids did. If they did, and the Russians know about it, they can dangle that over Trump's head and demand favours.

The amount of influence could be weak, or it could be something stronger. Pooty wants sanctions lifted which he actually just got. Pooty wants the US out of NATO which Trump joked about recently. And if thats true, that means that Trump would be betraying you and your country just to protect a personal secret.

It could be possible that Putin has some dirt on 1 or more of Trump's family, or circle of friends, and is using it. THAT is what the expanded investigation is all about.

Maybe Jared did something illegal, and Trump has to keep it under wraps to save the marriage because Ivanka is begging him to... or maybe its something much much worse. Who knows? The investigation has to be allowed to continue, and you have to accept the outcome.

huey 02-06-2019 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22411775)
Be that as it may, when comparing Trump's investivations against pretty much anybody else... Trump's is only in the beginning. Infact, just today it intensified.

Waaaaaaay too early to be acting like he good.

I keep hearing this every week. I will keep the count running on his days in office. At 750 now.

J. Falcon 02-07-2019 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark (Post 22411781)
Hi Squealer,

All jokes aside, it did become a much bigger issue today.

Let's say Trump is completely innocent of everything - its possible that he is.

But what happened today is that Adam Schiff just made the scope of the investigation much wider. They are now looking for anyone in Trump's orbit, including his family, to see if any of them at all could be under any kind of Russian Influence.

Before you react, think about it a minute. It's possible that Donald T did notthing at all wrong, but maybe one of his kids did. If they did, and the Russians know about it, they can dangle that over Trump's head and demand favours.

The amount of influence could be weak, or it could be something stronger. Pooty wants sanctions lifted which he actually just got. Pooty wants the US out of NATO which Trump joked about recently. And if thats true, that means that Trump would be betraying you and your country just to protect a personal secret.

It could be possible that Putin has some dirt on 1 or more of Trump's family, or circle of friends, and is using it. THAT is what the expanded investigation is all about.

Maybe Jared did something illegal, and Trump has to keep it under wraps to save the marriage because Ivanka is begging him to... or maybe its something much much worse. Who knows? The investigation has to be allowed to continue, and you have to accept the outcome.

Watch him respond with either an insult or a meme.

TheSquealer 02-07-2019 07:59 AM

Again...
No accusation of a crime.
No charges.

Just a long fishing expedition snaring a lot of people who have ZERO to do with Trump / Russia collusion (which in itself is not a crime).

Still waiting....

You can't be both certain Trump is going to be in serious trouble and at the same time have no idea how or why.

You guys are seriously unwell.

Anyone who commits a crime should be punished accordingly. This means Trump. This means Hillary. The FBI however should not be weaponized for political purposes or go rogue because they don't like the election of an outcome. But then again, you were all too happy when Obama weaponized the IRS against it's own citizens and then they all collectively "lost" all the evidence and Lois Lerner refused to testify or answer questions. You didn't care that Hillary Clinton skirted the government regulations to do her own thing and avoid FOIA requests for communications, that she was mishandling top secret information and that she destroyed all the evidence or for the very fact that someone like Petreus got into severe trouble for simply sharing a schedule with someone who also had top secret clearance, just not the right level... but Clinton had personal assistants with no security clearance mishandling top secret communications routinely.

The most troubling thing about you unhinged fuckwits is that you absolutely do not care about the law or whats right or wrong. You care ONLY about a narrative. If you actually gave a shit about right and wrong, you'd be up in arms when Obama himself weaponized the IRS against opposition groups for example. But you weren't.

You don't care at all about right and wrong and the law. You don't care at all about free and fair elections. You don't care about due process. You don't care that anyone is innocent until PROVEN guilty. You don't mind when the government is weaponized against it's citizens as long as you believe it's to your benefit. Thats fucking insane.

Let's all cut the shit and stop pretending you care about the law or right and wrong.

You don't.

You guys only care about a single narrative - Orange Man Bad.... and you'll burn the nation down to "prove it".

Acepimp 02-07-2019 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark (Post 22411352)
I'm not saying I'm right. I'm just saying that if you believe your own words, then you have nothing to worry about, right? He's totally innocent, and an otherwise top-notch stand-up guy, right?

Because no politician has EVER launched a bogus investigation against an opponent? LOL. Innocent of what, exactly? Trump hasn't been charged or even accused of any wrongdoing. But to answer your question, no I'm not worried in the slightest because shifty Schiff is a known lying sleazebag. Trump will just laugh in his face. Schiff is a known leaker of classified info so his time will come.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22411334)
Mark, even if someone does not lie to investigators, they can still be charged with perjury if the investigators simply *believe* a lie was told. But for the most part you're right, Trump has nothing to worry about, especially since he himself is not under investigation. You guys seem to have trouble with that part :1orglaugh

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 22411372)
Good job of proving you have no idea how investigations work. Do you just post absurd stuff because reading your own nonsense makes you feel good? Forget about Mueller, the SDNY does not fuck around. They go after big time blue and white collar criminals. Do they just make up stuff too? Man you fucking trump cultists are to much.

Hello J.Falcon. No idea what you're referring to. I said nothing that's untrue. It's possible for someone to be charged with perjury even if they tell the truth. You're unhinged and i find it highly amusing. Also you misspelled "too", a one-syllable word. You've just made my "do not hire" list. :1orglaugh

PS- I'm an independent who voted for Obama and Bernie Sanders. But keep making wild assumptions- highly amusing :1orglaugh

J. Falcon 02-07-2019 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22411930)
Again... No accusation of a crime.
No charges.

No charges for Trump, but charges to his people for lying ABOUT RUSSIA.

Quote:

Just a long fishing expedition snaring a lot of people who have ZERO to do with Trump / Russia collusion
Manafort, Flynn, Cohen, Stone, etc... they have nothing to do with Trump? Honestly, I'm not surprised you would say something so blatantly false.

Quote:

(which in itself is not a crime).
See that bolded part right there, that's evidence you have no idea what you're talking about and are just repeating the usual Hannity / Rush Limbaugh talking points. Try to get your tiny brain around the concept that "collusion" is not a legal term.

Quote:

You can't be both certain Trump is going to be in serious trouble and at the same time have no idea how or why.
You just love using strawman arguments.

Nobody is "sure" that Trump did nothing wrong, but all the lying from Trump, his family and his associates ABOUT RUSSIA certainly indicates that there's warranted reason for an investigation, no matter how much you want to pretend otherwise.

I'll await your next meme.

J. Falcon 02-07-2019 08:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22411934)
It's possible for someone to be charged with perjury even if they tell the truth.

Oh really? Why don't you go ahead and tell us how that works, since it completely contradicts the definition of the word perjury.

TheSquealer 02-07-2019 08:28 AM

Again, since you're too fucking stupid to comprehend English (odd for a "writer")

Anyone who breaks the law should be punished.
Obama
Hillary
Mueller
Trump
etc etc etc etc etc

Hillary routinely lied and that was fine with you guys.

The IRS was weaponized and used against our own citizens... that was fine with you guys.

The law should apply evenly to everyone.

EVERYONE.

But you guys don't care about right or wrong and the law.

You only care about a narrative and nothing else.

You don't look at all the facts, only those which support the narrative you've been determined to prove.

You could care less about our own lead investigators on Trump in the FBI talking about how much they hate him, how they will stop him from being President etc etc etc.

You don't care about the FBI leaking info to the media

You don't care about anything but Orange Man Bad.

J. Falcon 02-07-2019 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22411942)
Again, since you're too fucking stupid to comprehend English (odd for a "writer")

Anyone who breaks the law should be punished.
Obama
Hillary
Mueller
Trump
etc etc etc etc etc

The law should apply evenly to everyone.

EVERYONE.

I can comprehend perfectly well, don't worry. I think it's you who has serious issues with both reading and expressing yourself, especially when you don't respond directly to anything I said. Good job on that by the way.

But to address your "point"

What are you saying?

1) Trump did nothing wrong

or

2) Others did wrong before Trump and went unpunished, so Trump should not be persecuted?

Make up your mind and try to keep up.

J. Falcon 02-07-2019 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22411942)


You don't care about...

.

How the fuck do you know what I (or anyone) care about? Stop using strawmans and argue like an adult for once.

RedFred 02-07-2019 08:35 AM

All Squeeler does is parrot right wing lies. I find it very strange that a guy who has openly admitted in the past to living in Russia is so loving of Trump, spends hours a day posting pro-Trump bullshit, and says it's not even a problem if he did collude with Russia.

Acepimp 02-07-2019 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 22411939)
No charges for Trump, but charges to his people for lying ABOUT RUSSIA.

^^ And here we see a prime example of someone who is misled by dishonest reporting (duped by fake news).


Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 22411939)
Manafort, Flynn, Cohen, Stone, etc... they have nothing to do with Trump? Honestly, I'm not surprised you would say something so blatantly false.

Manafort was charged for tax evasion from lobbying work 10+ years ago while working for the Podesta brothers- you know, Hillary and Obama's team.

Flynn: Talked to the well-known Russian ambassador in DC, because that was his job. Oh no he's a Russian agent! :1orglaugh

Cohen was guilty of some shit unrelated to Trump. Try harder.

Stone literally did nothing wrong. What, messaging Guccifer 2.0 on Twitter AFTER the election is a crime? He has no connection to Wikileaks or Assange, not that that's a crime if he did. When will you realize that the democrat mainstream media has been trying to mislead you and paint the Trump team in as bad a light as possible??

TheSquealer 02-07-2019 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 22411948)
How the fuck do you know what I (or anyone) care about? Stop using strawmans and argue like an adult for once.

Uhmmm... when you continually argue on side of an issue and ignore any and all facts which challenge your views and summarily dismiss them as false, it's pretty fucking obvious where your thinking is.

You don't give a shit about the country.
You don't give a shit about the law (evenly applied to everyone)
You don't give a shit about right and wrong.
You don't give a shit about what is right and wrong morally.

You, like the others here just frantically parrot 1/2 the story and keep chanting the same shit over and over and over. You could care less about everything wrong that the FBI has done,... so long as you get the outcome you want.

You guys are so completely unhinged that you see nothing but bad news every single day and think it's only getting worse because that is the bubble you live in... and you think someone else is the problem.

TheSquealer 02-07-2019 08:49 AM

Again,
no accusation of a crime
no criminal charges

But it's cool when Hillary is breaking a 100 laws, lying about it daily and destroying evidence.

Or it's ok when Obama weaponizes the IRS against it's own citizens, gets busted, all evidence is destroyed and everyone involved pleads the 5th.

It's ok when the FBI gives immunity for testimony to THE key witnesses in Hillarys illegal behavior and they provide no information whatsoever.

It's ok with the lead investigators in the Trump case hate Trump and have a massively long chain of texts saying among many other things "he'll never win the election, we'll stop him"

You guys are all full of shit.

Just a collection of emotionally unhinged butthurt pussies who can't stop crying because they didn't get what they wanted in Nov 2016.

You don't cheer for great jobs numbers
You don't cheer for strong manufacturing job growth
You don't cheer tor any success at all
You don't cheer tor decreases in illegal immigration
You don't cheer for bringing troops home and ending wars
You don't cheer for strong GDP growth
You don't cheer for all time low unemployment for Blacks, Hispanics and Women

You idiots don't acknowledge anything good at all that's happening around you.

It's just Orange Man Bad 24/7 for you clowns

Acepimp 02-07-2019 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 22411940)
Oh really? Why don't you go ahead and tell us how that works, since it completely contradicts the definition of the word perjury.

I already did. If the investigators simply *believe* someone said something that wasn't accurate then they can be charged with perjury, even if the investigators are mistaken or can't verify anything.

J. Falcon 02-07-2019 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22411958)
I already did. If the investigators simply *believe* someone said something that wasn't accurate then they can be charged with perjury, even if the investigators are mistaken or can't verify anything.

Can you show me a link that proves that? Because I'm pretty sure that in order to get an indictment you need actual proof of lies, not just hunches.

J. Falcon 02-07-2019 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22411957)

blah, blah, blah...I'm a fucking nut.

I'm done with you Squealer. You seriously sound like you're demented and in need of help. Or maybe this is the normal you. Either way, arguing with you is simply not worth the bandwidth. The only reason I don't ban you is because I want to enjoy your meltdown and embarrassment when things start to get worse for Trump.

RedFred 02-07-2019 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22411958)
I already did. If the investigators simply *believe* someone said something that wasn't accurate then they can be charged with perjury, even if the investigators are mistaken or can't verify anything.

You continually show just how clueless you are to both the American criminal system and America in general. Prosecutors need PROOF of any crime they charge someone with or they look incompetent to both the courts and the public. They don't say 'well I *believe* Joe Blow committed this crime so that's good enough'. Goddamn you're a fucking idiot.

Acepimp 02-07-2019 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 22411961)
Can you show me a link that proves that? Because I'm pretty sure that in order to get an indictment you need actual proof of lies, not just hunches.

Jerome Corsi. The investigators couldn't prove that he had inside knowledge about Wikileaks publishing John Podesta's leaked emails. Still charged him with perjury.



Quote:

Originally Posted by RedFred (Post 22411966)
You continually show just how clueless you are to both the American criminal system and America in general. Prosecutors need PROOF of any crime they charge someone with or they look incompetent to both the courts and the public. They don't say 'well I *believe* Joe Blow committed this crime so that's good enough'. Goddamn you're a fucking idiot.

And you are simply uniformed.

MUELLER GRAND JURY WITNESS SAYS HE WILL BE INDICTED FOR PERJURY

2MuchMark 02-07-2019 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22411942)
But you guys don't care about right or wrong and the law.

Not true. If Obama or Hillary are under suspected of breaking any laws, then yes an investigation should be launched, and if found guilty, punished. No one is saying no to this.

But currently, Trump is president. Currently, many people in his circle are suspected of criminal activity. It should be investigated, and their names should be cleared if no proof is found. Certainly you agree that they should be pronounced innocent once the investigations ends, right?

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22411942)
You only care about a narrative and nothing else.

Not really but I can understand why you would say that. Trump is in the new all day long, and his people are in the news too. We, yourself included, talk about whats going on "now".

For some people, its all about "getting" Trump. I don't like the guy and am the first to champion Mueller and the rest for going after him. More importantly though I care about what could be a very serious crime committed against you and my other American friends.

If Trump is found innocent, I will be the first one on GFY to say I was wrong. I may be a dickhead sometimes but I always admit when I've made a mistake.

J. Falcon 02-07-2019 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22411954)
^^ And here we see a prime example of someone who is misled by dishonest reporting (duped by fake news).

Ah, yes, we've all been misled by the corrupt fake news media, you know, those once famous world renowned companies such as The Washington Post and BBC, quite respected until Trump came along and convinced you not to trust them.

I'm tired of being lied to and tricked. Tell me where you get your news from so I'll never be duped again.

Seriously, tell me.

Quote:

Flynn: Talked to the well-known Russian ambassador in DC, because that was his job. Oh no he's a Russian agent! :1orglaugh
You've must have missed the part where a judge (who has access to evidence we've never seen) scolded Flynn for selling out his country.


Quote:

Cohen was guilty of some shit unrelated to Trump. Try harder.
Michael Cohen was sentenced to three years in prison for crimes committed while working for Trump, including breaking campaign finance laws.


Quote:

Stone literally did nothing wrong. What, messaging Guccifer 2.0 on Twitter AFTER the election is a crime? He has no connection to Wikileaks or Assange, not that that's a crime if he did. When will you realize that the democrat mainstream media has been trying to mislead you and paint the Trump team in as bad a light as possible??
Sure, nothing wrong except lying under oath (about Russia) and threatening to kill a witness and his dog. Stop lying.


Regardless, I was responding to that idiot Squealor's post where he said the people indicted where not connected to Trump, not specifically what they were indicted of.

Is this how you always argue your points? Dishonestly? Try again.

J. Falcon 02-07-2019 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22411983)
Jerome Corsi. The investigators couldn't prove that he had inside knowledge about Wikileaks publishing John Podesta's leaked emails. Still charged him with perjury.

Why do you keep lying? Corsi has yet to be indicted of anything.

That's your proof?

As expected, you have nothing to back up your bullshit.


What the hell does that link prove? Nothing. Just Corsi running his mouth and making wild predictions.

Interesting that you would choose to use Coris an DailyCaller to prove your "point."

Acepimp 02-07-2019 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 22412003)

Interesting that you would choose to use Coris an DailyCaller to prove your "point."

Yes, it's interesting that I would use a source that has reporters on Capitol Hill and some of the best investigative journalists in DC. So they didn't charge Corsi yet. Ok, I'm still not wrong that someone could be charged for perjury even if they don't lie.

J. Falcon 02-07-2019 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22412026)
Yes, it's interesting that I would use a source that has reporters on Capitol Hill and some of the best investigative journalists in DC. So they didn't charge Corsi yet. Ok, I'm still not wrong that someone could be charged for perjury even if they don't lie.

Yes, you are wrong. Very wrong. And ignorant, too.

If not, show us actual proof of someone who has been charged for perjury without actually lying? I'll wait.

J. Falcon 02-07-2019 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acepimp (Post 22412026)
Yes, it's interesting that I would use a source that has reporters on Capitol Hill and some of the best investigative journalists in DC. .

Quote:

The Daily Caller is not a news site, it’s an opinion site. Its “opinions” run heavily to the far right, which is understandable because its founder, Tucker Carlson, also runs heavily to the far rightIf you’re looking to see what the latest right-wing talking points are, it’s a good place to go. If you’re looking for straight news with a minimum of bias, it’s not.
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/The_Daily_Caller

Quote:

The Daily Caller is a conservative/Republican news spin organization founded by conservative reporter Tucker Carlson and former Dick Cheney aide Neil Patel
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/daily-caller/

Quote:

Overall, we rate the Daily Caller strongly right biased based on story selection that almost always favors the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to numerous failed fact checks. The Daily Caller is a source that needs to be fact checked on a per article basis.
Hey Acepimp, is this where you go to not get "duped" by fake news?

King Mark 02-07-2019 10:13 AM

This is how leftards and rightards work:

-have your own set of beliefs and biases.

-find media sources that validate your own set of beliefs and biases. Don't bother with fact checking, leave that job to anyone who wants to debate with you.

-copy and paste articles and memes from said media sources to stir the pot.

-call anything that differs "fake news", deny and deflect everything else and commence name calling if someone actually fact checks and proves you wrong during a debate.

-repeat, starting from the top

King Mark 02-07-2019 10:32 AM

Bonus: see sig for a head start on your marathon of shenanigans.

TheSquealer 02-07-2019 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22412041)
This is how Religious beliefs work:

-have a set of beliefs and biases beat into your head by your parents and community.

-find sources that validate your own set of beliefs and biases. Don't bother with fact checking, leave that job to anyone who wants to debate with you.

-call anything that challenges your views Islamophobia, call anyone who challenges your views Islamophobic, deny and deflect everything else and commence name calling if someone actually fact checks and proves you wrong during a debate.

-repeat, starting from the top

What a great post.

King Mark 02-07-2019 10:37 AM

^^^exhibit A (deflect)

TheSquealer 02-07-2019 07:47 PM

https://images.dailykos.com/images/2...-large-169.jpg

Senate Intelligence chairman: No evidence of Trump-Russia collusion

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr said Thursday that his committee's Russia investigation has yet to find evidence of collusion between President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and the Kremlin but will soon release a report on the Obama administration's response to Russian interference in the last presidential election.



Awweeeee.... another miss by Dems as the nation thrives.

In other news you fuckwits will pretend didn't happen...
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-f...-idUSKCN1PW21C

Ford investing $1 billion, adding 500 jobs in Chicago

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Ford Motor Co said on Thursday it is investing more than $1 billion in its Chicago operations and adding 500 jobs as it prepares to launch three new SUVs this year and end production of the Taurus.



http://scribol.com/wp-content/upload...eat-again1.jpg

RedFred 02-07-2019 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 22412266)
https://images.dailykos.com/images/2...-large-169.jpg

Senate Intelligence chairman: No evidence of Trump-Russia collusion

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr said Thursday that his committee's Russia investigation has yet to find evidence of collusion between President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign and the Kremlin but will soon release a report on the Obama administration's response to Russian interference in the last presidential election.


Ooooh....a Trump lackey in the Senate says Trump dindo nuffin, wow that's breaking news.

:1orglaugh

TheSquealer 02-07-2019 08:24 PM

Oh... I see the part you turds willfully ignore.


Let me help you....

The BIPARTISAN committee found nothing

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

TheSquealer 02-07-2019 11:19 PM

https://i.redd.it/64cosblgm9f21.jpg

King Mark 02-08-2019 12:58 AM

Im not even going to roast ThePorker to shreds right now like I want. I'm going to practice restraint, and educate him:

first, learn what this is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...Intellige nce

then, learn about who this guy is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Burr

Now, please explain to us how that shit you keep posting has anything to do with this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specia..._investigation

huey 02-08-2019 02:18 AM

Orange man bad 751

TheSquealer 02-08-2019 04:59 AM

Here's an education.

Know what this is a pic of?

It's what a New York city skyline without Islam looked like.

https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/54e...t=510&fit=crop

J. Falcon 02-08-2019 05:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22412370)
Im not even going to roast ThePorker to shreds right now.

He's officially gone off the deep end. We're all better off just ignoring his rants and memes.

Bladewire 02-08-2019 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 22412419)
He's officially gone off the deep end. We're all better off just ignoring his rants and memes.

I've had him blocked for over a year and it makes GFY more tolerable.

It sucks that surfers who aren't members have to be exposed to his mental illness.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123