GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   "GirlsDoPorn" being sued for lying to girls. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1318417)

InfoGuy 10-12-2019 02:53 AM

50 Jane Does

Brian mike 10-12-2019 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InfoGuy (Post 22542044)
It's not so simple as to just say the girls should have gone to the police. In a perfect world, there would be justice for all. But I suspect in this type of situation, police would say that it's a contract dispute and a civil matter that is not under their jurisdiction.

Even if there was a crime, many victims don't report them. I'm not saying what happened to these girls with GDP was sexual assault, but some might perceive what happened as being a sexual crime. According to mcasa.org's Reporting Sexual Assault: Why Survivors Often Don’t,

^^^ This ^^^

CaptainHowdy 10-12-2019 05:36 AM

Guess that site was too good to be true (from a fapping standpoint) . . .

Cameltoepro 10-12-2019 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 22542019)
I think I heard at the time, 3-7K

Wow. They made good money..shit..I know girls who would line up for that all day and would not give a shit if it was posted in the Pope's newsletter

The Porn Nerd 10-12-2019 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cameltoepro (Post 22542947)
Wow. They made good money..shit..I know girls who would line up for that all day and would not give a shit if it was posted in the Pope's newsletter

Yes but I bet that 3-7K was the total cost of filming, including airfare, hotel, etc.
And I bet they charged the girls/deducted that from their fee.

Maybe not, who knows with these creeps.

InfoGuy 10-12-2019 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 22542953)
Yes but I bet that 3-7K was the total cost of filming, including airfare, hotel, etc.
And I bet they charged the girls/deducted that from their fee.

The .pdf of the FBI complaint that was posted in the other thread GirlsDoPorn Crew Arrested indicates that AF-1 (adult female) was paid $3,000, AF-2 was paid $2,000, AF-3 was paid $4,000 and AF-5 was paid $4,000. Most of these amounts were allegedly less than the originally agreed to amounts. Craigslist ads had titles like "Cute Teen Girls Make $5,000 Today".

el_mago 10-12-2019 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cameltoepro (Post 22542947)
Wow. They made good money..shit..I know girls who would line up for that all day and would not give a shit if it was posted in the Pope's newsletter

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...OwVbi-0gqByt6B

Hawkeye 10-14-2019 08:36 AM

UPDATE:

They are being charged in federal criminal court with sex trafficking and coercion, and could face life in prison.




https://breaking911.com/girls-do-por...ife-in-prison/

SAN DIEGO – The owners and two employees of the popular adult websites GirlsDoPorn and GirlsDoToys were charged in federal court today with sex trafficking crimes in connection with a scheme to deceive and coerce young women to appear in sex videos.

According to a complaint, owners Michael James Pratt and Matthew Isaac Wolfe along with adult film performer and producer Ruben Andre Garcia and administrative assistant Valorie Moser used deception and false promises to lure the victims, who had responded to ads for modeling jobs that would supposedly pay $5,000. Eventually the women were told the job was really for adult films.

InfoGuy 11-01-2019 12:36 PM

GirlsDoPorn - Plaintiffs' Trial Brief (3) (PDF)

GirlsDoPorn - Plaintiffs' Trial Brief (3) (text)

GirlsDoPorn.com (100% owned by Michael Pratt) is still up, but GirlsDoToys.com (50%/50% owned by Michael Pratt and Matthew Wolfe) is:

Quote:

503 Service Unavailable
No server is available to handle this request.

MaDalton 11-01-2019 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by InfoGuy (Post 22553662)
GirlsDoPorn - Plaintiffs' Trial Brief (3) (PDF)

GirlsDoPorn - Plaintiffs' Trial Brief (3) (text)

GirlsDoPorn.com (100% owned by Michael Pratt) is still up, but GirlsDoToys.com (50%/50% owned by Michael Pratt and Matthew Wolfe) is:

hmmm...

Quote:

In 2006 and 2007, an Australian named Lindsay Probin and a Kansan named Kevin Holloway assisted Pratt in setting up a web of international entities through which Pratt (who was not a citizen of the United States at the time) could direct revenues to himself.
Does this gentleman look familiar?

https://www.starnow.com/lindsayp

Profits of Doom 11-01-2019 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 22553692)
hmmm...



Does this gentleman look familiar?

https://www.starnow.com/lindsayp

He's still posting here under a different nick...

JSWENSON 11-01-2019 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Markham (Post 22541216)
So girls turn up to do swimwear and do hardcore porn instead?

What does the model release say?

Oh look. Blanket defense without considering the nuance involved in flying someone across the country to lie to them in a plethora of ways in order to coax them into doing porn. Who could have guessed? /s

JSWENSON 11-01-2019 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 22541614)
The interesting thing is these girls were more than willing to act like cock crazed sluts on film IF only a small number of people would see it.

I bet they are just pissed they didn't get paid enough rather than being shocked or shamed. Watch the videos. These girls are complete whores.

You're way out of line here. I can think of 1000 reasons I'd be ok with fucking on camera for 1 or 10 people vs millions. That you can't shows that you either haven't thought too far ahead or don't have the capacity to.

Let's start with #1.

I fuck in front of others for free. For someone to publish my shit online to make money would cost a lot fucking more than free.

You should be able to take it from there to think of everything else wrong with this shit.

JSWENSON 11-01-2019 02:08 PM

By the way, of course in the thread that shows these idiots are not only accused of crazy, detrimental shit that they are being charged in federal court we have so many dipshits on GFY calling them sluts, whores, idiots, and taking up for the assholes that trafficked women under the law.

Fuck each and every one of your stupid asses, legitimately. Different climate in 2019 but your responses are why porn was attacked for decades. Pathetic ass people.

Nitzer Ebb 11-01-2019 02:35 PM

Not surprised at all. Heard rumors about them long time ago.

blackmonsters 11-01-2019 03:09 PM

Bottom line : If they lied; they lose.

Life in prison when there are a million sluts that would have done it without a single lie.

:helpme

The Porn Nerd 11-01-2019 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSWENSON (Post 22553714)
By the way, of course in the thread that shows these idiots are not only accused of crazy, detrimental shit that they are being charged in federal court we have so many dipshits on GFY calling them sluts, whores, idiots, and taking up for the assholes that trafficked women under the law.

Fuck each and every one of your stupid asses, legitimately. Different climate in 2019 but your responses are why porn was attacked for decades. Pathetic ass people.


Yes these were young girls lured by money and I hate how they used these girls. They should go to jail, etc. ALL the content from that site should come down off every website out there but it's not, and probably won't. I still see it on tubes. :(

I even hate it when porn stars - who should know better - get used, hooked on drugs, commit suicide, etc. So I am not a monster. I do understand your point and I generally agree with it. But also there were girls who shot for that site who went on to do more porn and escorting. I was referring more to them than the ones clearly exploited.

The good news, I hope, is that the publicity from this will convince young girls not to fall for ads like they used or to fly across country to have sex on film thinking no one will ever see it. Predators prey on naïve girls who don't consider what they have to do to make that kind of money so maybe this will wake some girls up.

JSWENSON 11-01-2019 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 22553755)
Yes these were young girls lured by money and I hate how they used these girls. They should go to jail, etc. ALL the content from that site should come down off every website out there but it's not, and probably won't. I still see it on tubes. :(

I even hate it when porn stars - who should know better - get used, hooked on drugs, commit suicide, etc. So I am not a monster. I do understand your point and I generally agree with it. But also there were girls who shot for that site who went on to do more porn and escorting. I was referring more to them than the ones clearly exploited.

The good news, I hope, is that the publicity from this will convince young girls not to fall for ads like they used or to fly across country to have sex on film thinking no one will ever see it. Predators prey on naïve girls who don't consider what they have to do to make that kind of money so maybe this will wake some girls up.

Dude, I know dozens of escorts that won't nothing to do with porn. There is a huge difference between selling sex and selling sex for a few bucks that someone else can distribute far and wide for money into perpetuity. I'd say most escorts want nothing to do with actual porn.

blackmonsters 11-01-2019 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSWENSON (Post 22553759)
Dude, I know dozens of escorts that won't nothing to do with porn. There is a huge difference between selling sex and selling sex for a few bucks that someone else can distribute far and wide for money into perpetuity. I'd say most escorts want nothing to do with actual porn.

I have no idea why an escort would ever care about doing porn.

:2 cents:

The Porn Nerd 11-01-2019 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSWENSON (Post 22553759)
Dude, I know dozens of escorts that won't nothing to do with porn. There is a huge difference between selling sex and selling sex for a few bucks that someone else can distribute far and wide for money into perpetuity. I'd say most escorts want nothing to do with actual porn.

You are right, that is the case with most escorts. But there were cameras there and many "porn stars" only do porn in order to boost their escort rates. The lines are blurry in some case But there's no place for coercion or exploitation when there are plenty of willing girls to shoot. A similar scenario happened with a casting couch site in Arizona a few years back so this seems to be an old trick. Maybe it will stop now with this case getting so much publicity.

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 22553769)
I have no idea why an escort would ever care about doing porn.

:2 cents:

Because she can go from making $200-$300 a trick to thousands. Guys will pay extra to fuck a "porn star" so some girls do a handful of scenes then just do escorting.

SpicyM 11-01-2019 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSWENSON (Post 22553759)
You're way out of line here. I can think of 1000 reasons I'd be ok with fucking on camera for 1 or 10 people vs millions.

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 22553755)
The good news, I hope, is that the publicity from this will convince young girls not to fall for ads like they used or to fly across country to have sex on film thinking no one will ever see it.

Pretty sure the case is based on the deceptive story of swimwear shoot, not on the fact they were promised no one would see their porn scene publicly, that is not important here.
Porn is porn, no matter if public or not.

The point is that they were , with the use of deception, induced to do porn. They travelled a long distance and when it turned out to be a porn shoot, they could not just say "no" due to the fact they needed the money to get back home. It doesn't matter what kind of porn. There is a civil case, that is probably based on breaching the contract/model release when they published the content - and that's why I believe many of those models originally even didn't know this was a criminal case, it just turned out to be after they filed for the civil suit.

:2 cents:

blackmonsters 11-01-2019 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 22553770)
Because she can go from making $200-$300 a trick to thousands. Guys will pay extra to fuck a "porn star" so some girls do a handful of scenes then just do escorting.

I think you should have made the font size of "porn star" 5 times bigger.
Who dials up average porn stars just to pay more money than average escort?

Asking for a friend.

:1orglaugh

The Porn Nerd 11-01-2019 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters (Post 22553838)
I think you should have made the font size of "porn star" 5 times bigger.
Who dials up average porn stars just to pay more money than average escort?

Asking for a friend.

:1orglaugh

Well, define "average" first off. :)

It's big in LA - but perhaps they still call it "doing privates". Maybe the guy films it for himself or not, who knows. Maybe it happens in Indiana too now. You know, "as seen on Pornhub" or "as seen on Clips4Sale".

I stick with civilians now. :pimp

shimmy2 11-02-2019 02:14 AM

OK so after reading some facts on the doc, I'm seeing these girls were each paid $3,000usd+ for video work. And they signed 2257 model releases. And they were all 18+

That is a lot of money. The most I've paid ever was $900 a scene for agency pornstar and $700 for a fineass no-name amateur. These girls got $3000+, none of them gave the money back, all of them I assume finished their scene. I'm not feeling much sympathy here for the girls as a producer, talent, webmasters, etc myself. They were not exploited with that grade of pay. They would probably complain if they got $10k. I think it goes to show you too sometimes the more you pay the more you make yourself a target of exploitation. Speaking from experience. I've gone to jail before in DR for filming a 28yo amateur who I overpaid and went the extra mile for. I think the producers fucked themselves by overpaying initially and inflating their sense of self worth. Any girl can use google and find out what porn star rates are. I often have girls do this themself just to show them I am paying what is inline with industry rates. Unless these guys have a shit lawyer they should not do any time in my opinion. They are fighting a lot here though, feminism, hypergamy, entitlement, narcissism, and lets not forget the fact the girls are fucking white. had to say it. if they were dominicans, jews, navajos, or siouxs this would be a non issue. follow the money.

JSWENSON 11-02-2019 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shimmy2 (Post 22553992)
OK so after reading some facts on the doc, I'm seeing these girls were each paid $3,000usd+ for video work. And they signed 2257 model releases. And they were all 18+

That is a lot of money. The most I've paid ever was $900 a scene for agency pornstar and $700 for a fineass no-name amateur. These girls got $3000+, none of them gave the money back, all of them I assume finished their scene. I'm not feeling much sympathy here for the girls as a producer, talent, webmasters, etc myself. They were not exploited with that grade of pay. They would probably complain if they got $10k. I think it goes to show you too sometimes the more you pay the more you make yourself a target of exploitation. Speaking from experience. I've gone to jail before in DR for filming a 28yo amateur who I overpaid and went the extra mile for. I think the producers fucked themselves by overpaying initially and inflating their sense of self worth. Any girl can use google and find out what porn star rates are. I often have girls do this themself just to show them I am paying what is inline with industry rates. Unless these guys have a shit lawyer they should not do any time in my opinion. They are fighting a lot here though, feminism, hypergamy, entitlement, narcissism, and lets not forget the fact the girls are fucking white. had to say it. if they were dominicans, jews, navajos, or siouxs this would be a non issue. follow the money.

Well you didn't read too fucking far or you'd know how much they were paid is irrelevant to the story except for those that got underpaid. Some offered to give the money back and extra once they knew it was online. The feds have charged them with crimes in Federal court. Their employee flipped and is now a fact witness against them.

So, did you really read a single fucking thing or did you just want to come in here and talk about stupid girls being whores that got paid more than they're worth?

This shit is pathetic and you should stop.

OneHungLo 11-02-2019 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JSWENSON (Post 22554041)
Well you didn't read too fucking far or you'd know how much they were paid is irrelevant to the story except for those that got underpaid. Some offered to give the money back and extra once they knew it was online. The feds have charged them with crimes in Federal court. Their employee flipped and is now a fact witness against them.

So, did you really read a single fucking thing or did you just want to come in here and talk about stupid girls being whores that got paid more than they're worth?

This shit is pathetic and you should stop.

Yeah, I think he missed a little bit.

I don't think those guys would be sitting in jail if they just flew girls in and made a porn under the pretense it was going in some limited foreign / select market. That's more of a civil suit than a sex trafficking one. The problem is, and what shimmy missed, is that some of these girls were allegedly held against their will, forced to finish scenes that they initially didn't agree to or they wouldn't get paid (coercion), and some were allegedly raped by the performer, plied with alcohol, rushed through their contracts etc.

The plaintiffs built the entire case for the feds with all the witnesses, especially all the girls GDP had working for them, convincing the girls that their fictitious videos were great and nobody ever found out. Plus the had the old camera man and the secretary coordinating all this fraud.

When you pile it all together, I don't know how anyone could come to the conclusion that what transpired was OK and they'll somehow end up walking from this.

JSWENSON 11-02-2019 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneHungLo (Post 22554200)
Yeah, I think he missed a little bit.

I don't think those guys would be sitting in jail if they just flew girls in and made a porn under the pretense it was going in some limited foreign / select market. That's more of a civil suit than a sex trafficking one. The problem is, and what shimmy missed, is that some of these girls were allegedly held against their will, forced to finish scenes that they initially didn't agree to or they wouldn't get paid (coercion), and some were allegedly raped by the performer, plied with alcohol, rushed through their contracts etc.

The plaintiffs built the entire case for the feds with all the witnesses, especially all the girls GDP had working for them, convincing the girls that their fictitious videos were great and nobody ever found out. Plus the had the old camera man and the secretary coordinating all this fraud.

When you pile it all together, I don't know how anyone could come to the conclusion that what transpired was OK and they'll somehow end up walking from this.

Anyone familiar with their videos would know that these weren't exactly willing participants and it has been discussed online for years. I don't even pay attention to their content but remember girls being shocked at getting creampied, forced to sit there instead of running off to clean up as they obviously wanted, etc. They also often looked like they were being hurt with hard fucking, just watch their eyes / hands.

Some were more into it, but damn, these people were absolutely brutal and it is at least obvious in hindsight.

shimmy2 11-02-2019 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OneHungLo (Post 22554200)
Yeah, I think he missed a little bit.

I don't think those guys would be sitting in jail if they just flew girls in and made a porn

I've done a lot of things in adult industry since the 90s but I've never flown in (or bus, car) ANY girl especially from out of state. Then you're dealing with interstate commerce, mann act, and all the shit that real world pimps (not epimp webmaster nerds) get strung up for in court. I have instead human trafficked MYSELF to whatever location that girls happen to be at, be it Canada, Dominincan Republic, or some no-name dust farm native american/asian reservation, or Asia itself. You will never hear of any stories of mr shimmy cash paying for some chicks airplane ticket, or bus ticket, or whatever. It sounds innocent enough but all that cross state travel where you bring girls in (and laws vary state to state about what is immoral obscene and acceptable etc) makes shit really thick. I'm a hairy east african monkey and even I understand this concept. If a model wants work let her buy her own ticket and show up to the job. Pick her up at the airport or bus station or whatever in your bucket ass car, make the video, pay her, and keep it moving... but I won't do that send-a-bitch-a-ticket thing for video girls, nope not this ePimp


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123