So you had a site that promoted Clickcash. Clever you.

And you were so clever other people couldn't do the same. So why are you scared to show us your sites?

From that screenshot it looks like 17 other people could do the same at the time. :upsidedow

The thing I find so hilarious about Mr. Paul Markham is he is constantly going on and on about how the quality of the product has to be great otherwise it won't sell regardless of how much traffic you throw at it. Pauls' got a point, of course. But the irony here is that Paul's OWN CONTENT is pure shit, shot poorly, boring as fuck and ultimately didn't sell on the Internet.

So the mastermind behind Paul Markham Teens is going to tell all of US about "quality" and what does or doesn't sell. It's highly entertaining. :1orglaugh

He also misses that quality means fuck all when talking cams promoted to people looking for "real" girls. In fact, same goes for any real amateur content. Quality = fake.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh So true! I sometimes enter some of these threads but after one or two replies I remember you can't fix stupid and bow out of the thread.

So point out sites that can sell crap content and I will point out sites that sell good content and we will see who is doing better.

Convincing the surfer the porn is real is the essence of porn. Whether it's Playboy or Amateur.

Do you really think surfers want to pay money to see models faking it badly?

Content driven traffic, TGPs and Tubes, rely on content to make the surfer click links. They have to think the models are getting off doing the scene, they do not want to see models going through scenes faking it badly, then see tours of more faked porn. The surfer has seen 1,000s of examples of good porn and bad porn he knows the difference. The better the porn the more traffic, the more joins, the more retains.

It's harder to find new fresh attractive models who can do a good scene, it's easy to ugly girls who will fake it. It's dead easy to shoot badly faked porn so anyone can do it. The market is flooded. It's tougher to shoot good porn. The market is under supplied. The surfers are more likely to pay, the sites are more likely to get affiliates.

Do Pornnerd's sites have as many sales, affiliates, content, success as Fake Taxi? Of course not. If it was just down to how much traffic was driven this wouldn't be the case, affiliates wouldn't care which sites they pushed, surfers wouldn't care what sites they joined, the amount of content wouldn't depend on only traffic, success wouldn't depend on the quality of the porn.

Does anyone here believe JSWENSON can make 7 figures from 4 sets?

Don't answer "If he could drive enough traffic." Because it means NO.

Did it. Was fun. We called our girls by 'name' when discussing how much we made that day. Your simple mind can't comprehend anything new so it's useless but some here have a clue.

So what did you use the 4 sets for?

I moved from Geocities and Angelfire to a $10 per gig host to see what happened. It converted worse, cost money to run and I let it die.

https://i.imgur.com/iPO7gAO.png

This always gets me as well :1orglaugh :1orglaugh