Is a competitor :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

He is on the GFY.

:winkwink:

https://gfy.com/members/blindcat/ :) . . .

Yeah, of course he is. Who fucking cares?

Welcome back buddy @Relic Long time no talk :pimp

Danny, Mr Porn Geek's Headmaster, took care of it . . .

it sounds like the guy doesn't understand phone sex occurs over the phone. he's probably never even had phone sex except with his mom. i'd give him some free tokens and change his mind.

i'd also add some line like "models listed on the site are for example purposes. this isn't Russian webcams, its an erotic phone experience. call to find out who's live right now". the review doesn't believe the models shown on your site are on the other end of the line. that was his only argument. he needs to realize that doesn't matter. its a phone business not a web business.

:2 cents:

#

You can't really control whether some random blogger wants to write shit about your website, lots of these guys trying to throw up reviews for every site on earth to try and get some SE traffic.

Best you can do is try and control your brand rankings with multiple sites and make sure you outrank him for your brand as well as "is a scam", "is legit", etc...

You admit lying and at the same time you complain that he wrote a "bad" review?? :1orglaugh

So where exactly is he wrong with his claims??? I believe that all shitty porn sites that lie and rip off their customers should be treated exactly this way because they damage the business of honest site operators and content producers. :2 cents:

I agree with the part about shitty porn sites that damage the business of honest site operators. You know what I mean?

microaggression !!! :1orglaugh

I prefer to call it reaffirming a positive position.:pimp

mi·cro·ag·gres·sion
/ˌmīkrōəˈɡreSHən/

noun
a statement, action, or incident regarded as an instance of indirect, subtle, or unintentional discrimination against members of a marginalized group such as a racial or ethnic minority.

if you complain that the girl on the picture is not the girl the caller is actually talking to, you have not understood how phone sex works.

but i can assure that all girls on the pics are real girls. ;)

Captain Howdy, I'm scared of what that means "Danny, the head Geek took care of it". I'm not even going back to look.

BUT...inspired me, you guys!

You can all go fuck yourself =) Thank you for the reality check I always appreciate it.

I feel much better about it. I think I was just having a bad day.

I mean where on that website - ANYWHERE - does it say the girl in the photo is the girl you are talking to???

Pretty sure phone sex was around before online porn content producers....and NEWSFLASH.....The photos weren't the girl you were talking to.

Or, did you believe those girls were sitting in the cubicles masturbating when people dialed the 900 numbers too? Did you??? lol

Thank you Mister! =) I can always count on you.

The last phone sex I called I could swear it was a lonely guy named Barry from Toledo. But he called himself Linda so I went with it.

:pimp

my review
 

Your site looks completely fine to me and you are clear in the costs involved and how things work, so thats good.

Only thing is....first girl that appeared in your list of phone sex women is popular porn actress Connie Carter. Not sure its a good idea to use her photos and mis-represent her like that unless she really works for you lol

I believe your bad review was motivated and started when guy lands on your site and sees you claiming you can have phone sex with connie carter herself... btw if she does work there book me for 20 mins asap I wanna ask her if she'll consider a scene with me personally instead of that same dude as always (her husband?).

All my rambling aside, in regards to the shitty shit you are feeling with this review out there. It's time to give this guy a call.

Him: Hello?

Your best phone sex operator: Hey baby this is Connie from Phone Sex Kingdom... you alone honey? We gotta cum to an understanding about that naughty review you posted. You are a bad boy... etc etc

In all seriousness, if you reach out to him personally in a completely friendly manner, who knows what you could do? Explain you are a good hard working person living on a farm who runs a legitimate phone sex business that lots of people enjoy... that his review is misguided. You simply got off on the wrong foot :P And if that doesn't work....Better Call Connie!

man I'm going to be embarrassed if that girl on your site wasn't actually Connie and I was just high lmao.

In case someone needs Connies number...

(but nah, not giving it to anyone)

when I do phone I'm always in thigh highs and lingerie and totally not in boxers with my hair tied up and a cat and a book in my lap :upsidedow

perfect track for moments like this




:2 cents:

Rightttt??? :helpme

You didn't respond to my question... what exactly is not true on those claims??

He is basically 100% right. :2 cents:

"site is a lot of shit and doesn’t offer what they claim"

We claim to sell phone sex. Nothing more than phone sex. We 100% offer what we claim to sell.

"I mean where on that website - ANYWHERE - does it say the girl in the photo is the girl you are talking to???"

One could just as easily say, where on the website does it say the girl in the photo is NOT the girl you are talking to? I personally have zero problem and wouldn't give you a negative review, but some people would consider it misleading the way the girls are presented... just a matter of opinion. Unfortunately some people publish their opinions as reviews... why not reach out to him and just ask him directly what about your site bothered him and if there's anything you could do to get him to reconsider. I'm serious. If you can manage to get him to flip his review into a positive one it might give you some business. Although as others have mentioned even negative publicity could be bringing you business too funny enough....if his review is even getting traffic.

btw the fact you joined this website in 2002 and your site goes back to 1999... you've been in business a long time you must be doing something right :upsidedow all in all just keep calm and carry on.

Anyone that has ever dealt with phone sex knows this. The real issue with the review is that the reviewer did not even try the service. I'm not going to drive by a diner at 25 MPH and then write on the internet that the diner sucked and I wouldn't recomend it.

oh and then there is..
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...02/200/034.jpg

some fun facts for anyone who doesn't work phone...pics are not relevant

I've sold unique pics with 2257 to a woman who wanted to branch into sensual Domme and thought I had the face for it. whole bunch of phone sites I didn't use, nf I kept for myself when I used it

work with two women from the southern US, one a very white blonde and the other woman blue black. they both sound the same when they talk. they exchange pics for their different characters. this entertains me greatly and I admire them both

and in NO way are they perpetrating a scam, nor are the owners of those sites

fantasy. learn it, live it, love it

happy the review was removed MMG

In this thread you reaffirmed the generally known fact that these phone sex sites are all fantasy created by average looking women falsely presented as hot pornstars. That is exactly what I would describe as selling "a lot of shit". You can call it a fantasy... :winkwink:

He is absolutely correct in every single statement you posted here.

:2 cents:

I think Ford should just replace the images on their website with Mercedes-Benz photos. And when customers complain they can just say "where on the website does it say you get the car from the image, we just sell the Fantasy of drivning a mercedes"

you are comparing apples to oranges.

Phone sex is 100% done on the phone. If it was a webcam program that was posting hot girls photos and once you paid for the webcam show it was a fat old woman then that is misleading.

Phone sex operator's job is to get you off with their voice and personality.It's not like the girls are escorts and show up at your place. People still use phone sex cause it's one on one and they are more open to talk about anything.

I feel like people just like to argue :helpme

Prostitute's job is to get you off with her body. So if you order a sexy escort and they will send you an ugly whore you will be fine with that? No? Why not?? She will get the job done just as well as the hot chick and if you need to fantasize, just turn off the lights... :1orglaugh

I literally said that. Phone sex is not escorting or webcaming. It's just phone sex :1orglaugh


If you read erotic porn does it need to be written by a sexy author?

Ok I'm done feeding the trolls

I know, and you are right on both points:
1 - I come here to shoot the shit.. its what its about for me and many others
2 - I could not come up with a better comparison for what I think is a "bait and switch" business model

You dont have to agree or like me :pimp

The next review will be much different. I've been talking and working on a re-design for MakeMeGrrrrowl all weekend! It's going to be a complete overhaul that's going to kick ass :)

Webmasters in this business are VISUAL and have no idea what it's like to actually talk to a real live woman who isn't holding a dildo in one hand while she adjusts her webcam. I have been to conventions and seen you awkward nerdy geek trolls with your eyes POPPING OUT whenever a half-naked woman would walk by.

In short: what the fuck do any of you people know about AUDITORY STIMULATION? Zero.

If you can't SEE HER then what does it fucking matter what she looks like? All the "visuals" take place inside your own head. LOL

the only thing that is reaffirmed is that you should not talk about things you don't understand

In my experience, all reviews that you haven't paid for a quite fair

Zuzana to the rescue!

Although both can be 1-on-1 experiences, phone sex customers are very different than webcam customers. I agree that phone sex customers are primarily interested in the fantasy and voice, not the visuals.