I stated that before I watched the entire vid, but... since you asked:
I’m cumming, i’m squirting, you’re the best etc etc. it’s not a lie as in “did you or did you not murder mr burns” but it’s a lie in as much a performance isn’t truthful.

Keep in mind I said this before watching the entire thing
Apologies

That kind of a lie! lol

My illusions have all been shattered. Thanks a billion. :(

Lmao
Enjoy the weekend! Thumbs up

Respect for watching the full video and at least partially recognizing the producer fucked up. :thumbsup

The production team tells her the lies to say so your point is not a good one. At the end of the day talent should be given what the scene requires before she shows up. This guy added a bunch of extra things and when asked why he said girls seem to be more willing to say yes on the set. That screams creepy.

This reminds me of that creep from AZ that would tell girls it was a solo masturbation and when they showed up he told them it's a boy-girl scene with him or nothing

This is my takeway.

Lol at throwing in extra off-camera pissing at the last second. These fucking guys.

It’s cringe for sure

True, what was he thinking

I agree with you. My camera never rolls without everyone on the same page. It doesn’t stop until they leave.
I just wish more people were in it for the product than their own kinks—if that makes sense

She got "emotional roller coaster" right tough . . .

Fiddy confusing scenarios... :(

look at your keyboard and the "U" is 2 letters away from the "O" she used. But yeah call her stupid for that when all of her other words are correct. I love a teen that doesn't write in slang.

I'm still not 100% sure what it is whats happened? Perhaps someone could fill me in?

I've gathered so far that this girl was booked to do X,Y,Z sex acts, on camera with a guy wearing a mask. Let's say she was due to get an agreed $1000 for X Y & Z. Scene is over, guy is still horny, turns off cameras, removes masks and asks the girl to do extra stuff, for his own enjoyment, without the mask and he offers to pay her extra money to do it?

Girl doesn't want to do anything off camera and complains? That's the problem?

But then I hear the cell phone recording, where dude is patronisingly telling her that exchange money for sex is illegal, and that its 'part of the shoot' - Then theres talk of kill fees...

So am I correct in thinking that despite performing the x,y,z on camera (with him in mask as agreed) ie The Scene that she is owed $1000 for, dude is saying that unless you perform extra off camera (non mask) stuff then I will call the shoot a failure and just give you say $300 as a kill fee instead of the agreed $1000 for the stuff that's already 'in the can' and filmed?

Like I say, I don't fully understand it - I do however think the mask is fucking stupid. If you are gonna do porn, do porn. Don't hide behind a fucking mask, cause you think you are 'better' than everyone else, and your 'anonymity' allows you to take the fucking piss. :2 cents:

PLUS - Why turn the cameras off if not for a sketchy reason? If you just wanna get your jollies, but don't want it released online etc, then just don't upload it? Keep it for your own private spank bank collection on a hard drive somewhere. Turning the cameras off implies that there's something gonna happen that you DON'T want ANY record of.

Like I say, Im genuinely confused. I mean the concept of paid 'extras' has been around since porn began... My wife used to get asked all the time... No big deal - Just say no or earn some extra cash... Why is the girl so shocked by it?

The part you are missing is she still had 2 more scenes to film and she said she wasn't doing any more work when she found out that he wasn't recording the peeing on him scene. So the kill fee came into play but the agent was able to get her $300 over the $200 kill fee.

That part where he kept asking her to swallow his pee 4 or 5 times was so cringe :helpme

Got yah :thumbsup I thought they had finished.

Like I said, I just found it genuinely confusing

i didnt call anybody stupid. why you reading into it? i already got a wife guessing what i am thinking all the time :1orglaugh

and there's no space in that word.

everybody should stay in school :winkwink:

#

:uhoh :uhoh

That makes me want to throw up. He absolutely violated her, she should have had someone come and beat the shit out of him immediately, while she was there.

PornDude should file a police report. I'm sure he's contracted for a specific thing, you know legal and binding. If he misrepresented I'm sure there's a case for the business and victim.

Let’s spin this for arguments sake. What if he wanted to he poo’d on, CS? What then? Lol

Then why not just make it the main feature of the shoot? Forget all the pointless boring sex nonsense, and shoot a real turn on video, and not wear a stupid mask?

But if the girl began 'indulging him' BEFORE the agreed shoot had been completed, then more fool her.

From what I understand there's faults on both sides tbh, and again, being honest, having the entire thing play out over twitter doesn't help me understand it at all. I've never been a twitter user, and trying to follow one short tweet to another, when there's other stuff unconnected and replies in the form of screenshots etc, I lose the track of things.

I'd much prefer she had made a full post on a forum, that I could read from start to finish, and understand it, but hey - That's MY fault for not keeping up with twitter - Not her fault for simply using the tools that she understands... :2 cents:

But whatever was agreed / not agreed etc pails into nothing when the element of the cameras being switched off comes into play - At that point, something else could well be happening / about to happen. Thats the real point of my concern...

I was not talking about the crux of her point. I was strictly talking poo lol

Here is the statement:

https://porndudecasting.com/statement-6-20-2021.html

So was I !

The first line / paragraph of my reply :thumbsup

It’s a shitty situation lol

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

it should be easy:
- performer need to know beforehand in detail what is expected from them - and agree to it
- off camera shit has no place in a professional production
- no means no

But I also know there are plenty sketchy producer around who expect sexual favors for more work or even withhold payment until they get what they want.

How you you see yourself in a giant mascot head?

You should hand your production to someone like MaDalton, PD . . .

Let's say I am very camera shy.

And also don't do production for almost 4 years now ;)

https://i.imgflip.com/5dyg6z.jpg

this is what she says? :helpme

Uh oh that's not good at all.

Holy shit man. Your fucked if thats you

:1orglaugh

"Sammy is the only owner. He is pretending to be multiple people. It’s 1 guy running the company"

What she also said

We get unlawful counters (via Google) from some guy claiming to be in Belgium for the main site.

You realize that 2nd link isn't even law and was never passed or anything, right?

It's not him. That producer probably lied to get some ass. :1orglaugh

Producer was a dumb fuck, but this another case of model not knowing what the fuck they're talking about. :2 cents:

You know The Porn Dude?

I know for a fact that the owner doesn't live in the US and he's most certainly not named "Sammy", nor are they interested in being their own stunt cock. :thumbsup