Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 23111264)

Shh. It's completely free! You just need a good PC. None of that stuff that is required to actually get the most out of the software, like competent artists, a "set" of sorts, etc., matters. Why don't porn producers use this totally 100% free software to make epic porn? SMH.

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 23111265)

It's only zero cost if your time has no value - to produce something worth looking at you'll need months if not years of learning.

Or you have to pay someone who did that already.

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 23111266)

As we say in German: "Zwei Dumme, ein Gedanke" (two idiots, one thought)

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 23111270)

Yeah, it's pretty clear that neither one of them have any clue what they're talking about. Friend of mine's game studio just got funded and he's out about $400k in salaries just for Unreal artists to create models and all that.. just the salaries.

Pretty free, though. :winkwink:

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 23111270)

Yeah, it's pretty clear that neither one of them have any clue what they're talking about. Friend of mine's game studio just got funded and he's out about $400k in salaries just for Unreal artists to create models and all that.. just the salaries.

Pretty free, though. :winkwink:

Originally Posted by candyflip (Post 23111230)

This is completely different from what the process he’s trying to expose everyone to.

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 23111265)

It's only zero cost if your time has no value - to produce something worth looking at you'll need months if not years of learning.

Or you have to pay someone who did that already.

Originally Posted by trevesty (Post 23111270)

Yeah, it's pretty clear that neither one of them have any clue what they're talking about. Friend of mine's game studio just got funded and he's out about $400k in salaries just for Unreal artists to create models and all that.. just the salaries.

Pretty free, though. :winkwink:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark (Post 23110814)

You can do all of that for sure, but so far porn companies aren't applying this technology properly at all. And to really do it right requires money and time.

The main problem with VR porn is that it is video, and the user is too limited in what he can do. He can't walk around to get a better angle or view like he wants to, and he can't get close to the action like he wants to without the image turning ugly

VR in porn is good for 3D but only when the camera(s) are close to the action. If the camera(s) are over here and the girl-girl action is happening over there, the 3D effect is minimal, and the scene in general is boring as fuck.

If you want to take advantage of the current technology, here is what you have to do.

1. Create detailed 3D Scans of your models.
2. Create performance capture of your models (faces, bodies). The more data you can create here the more shallow the Unvanny Valley will be. (Part 1)
3. Create Motion capture models of your models.
4. Pay your models for their scanning time and image rights (important!) then kick them out as you don't need them anymore. :)
5. Place the 3D models in your scenes created in Unreal. Use some AI voice generators or AI Voice-changers to make them say what you want.
6. Play with the lighting. Learn what Sub-Surface scattering or your model's skin will look like plastic. This too will help keep them out of the uncanny valley.
7. Hold on to those image rights. If those models become stars, the 3D Data you own of them will be worth alot, especially when they age.

No matter what you do, your models will still look creepy and dead, but of course technology is improving all the time.

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 23111280)

I do not think this software needs a huge amount of learning.

No more than using a film editor.

What you have said could apply to everything.

You may as well say do not shoot porn as you will need to know about lighting, sound and so on.

Did you give this advice 20 years ago to people. Do not bother to learn how to do websites as it is hard work. Did you tell the chap who set up Amazon that it is a lot of work so do not bother.

I suspect if we go back many years to the dawn of time, my ancestors were trying to make fire and invent the wheel. Yours were probably telling mine, do not bother, it is too much work.

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 23111289)

With every post you make, you show how little you actually know.

And on top of that you are trying to explain something to me that is my daily business.

but then again - this is you

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 23111289)

With every post you make, you show how little you actually know.

And on top of that you are trying to explain something to me that is my daily business.

but then again - this is you

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 23111299)

Well I am not sure i will take advice from someone who has a website that looks like it was made in 2001, with content that looks like was shot on a cheap mobile phone.

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 23111299)

And before you say my sites also look naff and my content is not so hot, my reply is I do this for a hobby, and not a living.

But even my stuff i would suggest is better than the stuff you sell. Not sure if you shoot it or buy it from people, but I would not be insulting others if I was you.

And the reason I am posting this is because you have been insulting me over and over and I do not think I have ever insulted you.

So sod you, I will be as rude as you.

And I am only doing this as a one off because I fined these flame wars boring.

If you want to use this forum to insult people them people may think you are a fool and not buy from you.

Perhaps rather than posting abuse you could engage in the conversation.

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 23111299)

Fine if this softwear is not for you, but I think others will find it a great tool.

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 23111299)

But as I say, I would not dream of selling something as bad as this.

https://amazingcontent.com/images/fr...ex_0016_fs.jpg

Now I will ignore your abuse.

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 23111304)

I even told you before that I already work with it but reading is not your strong skill

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 23111304)

to be fair - it was made in 2006. and lots of the content was shot on cheap mobile phones

blabla

I even told you before that I already work with it but reading is not your strong skill

I agree - the pic looks like shit. Doesn't matter though, still sells. Exactly for that reason.

Originally Posted by plsureking (Post 23111327)

Yo Dalton that guy doesn't know shit. that's why i challenged him a couple dozen posts back. dont tell real and successful producers how to produce when you dont produce shit. i know a lot guys making money online with libraries shot 1-2-3 decades ago..

its an interesting tech discussion tho.. i'm pushing my kid towards unity dev...

#

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 23111299)

I do this for a hobby, and not a living.

Originally Posted by fuzebox (Post 23111338)

Shocker. :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 23111295)

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 23111309)

So because the software is not for you, we are supposed to conclude that no one wants to use it.

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 23111293)

Again, love that vid, and it shows I am happy to take risks and experiment.

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark (Post 23110813)

Um, nope! Unreal 5 is completely free. You can download it and start using it for zero cost.

Originally Posted by the_software_dev (Post 23111540)

Sorry for the misunderstanding.. I know Unreal is free (ish). What I meant is that learning Unreal takes a lot of time (which translates in high prices for hiring devs). And this can't really be compared to AI (as in the OP post), since AI requires a good prompt to generate decent images in a few seconds. If you want quality ofc AI is still not there when compared to Unreal with experienced devs, but Unreal is also far away in terms of costs.

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 23111546)

We shouldn't speak now.
There are people making 3d objects from prompts.
It's just may be a matter of time before we can generate this kind of content at lower costs

Originally Posted by sarettah (Post 23111537)

actually it shows that you are a creepy lunatic but you can look at it however you want.

.

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 23111549)

I tell you what people may find creepy and that is a chap posting on a forum pretending to be female

Originally Posted by sarettah (Post 23111555)

make that an obsessed, creepy, lunatic

.

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 23111549)

Does it?

I tell you what people may find creepy and that is a chap posting on a forum pretending to be female.

No, that is not creepy, that is messed up.

Originally Posted by Idigmygirls (Post 23111590)

Give me a couple more months. I've already put $40MM into this and it's launching later this year. I haven't wanted to discuss it yet because obviously we're not quite finished...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buCc8wCK7as

Originally Posted by Idigmygirls (Post 23111590)

Give me a couple more months. I've already put $40MM into this and it's launching later this year. I haven't wanted to discuss it yet because obviously we're not quite finished...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buCc8wCK7as

Originally Posted by Idigmygirls (Post 23111590)

Give me a couple more months. I've already put $40MM into this and it's launching later this year. I haven't wanted to discuss it yet because obviously we're not quite finished...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=buCc8wCK7as

Originally Posted by AmeliaG (Post 23111653)

I'd love this thread to be more of this and less dudes criticizing one another's photography in non-constructive ways.

I think a lot of GFYers do talk about Unreal and other new tech.

The willingness to try new ways of doing things is one of my very favorite things about this industry.