GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Danny Masterson is sentenced to 30 years in prison for raping two women (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1368287)

Huggles 09-11-2023 01:22 PM

Lie, cheat, steal... it is how people make it rich!

Don't forget the porn industry has seen many of these people like DeeCash rip off people in massive ways and get away with it 100%...

J. Falcon 09-11-2023 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladida (Post 23175424)
It's mostly bullshit that will implode on it's own. Seeing as they are celebs/have money. They must have never taken drugs. Must have never been drunk af. Must have not hard parties where everyone attending was drugged out of their mind not remembering what happened tomorrow.

Yet they remember exactly what happend 20 years a go :))) Yea, i don't do drugs at all. I rarely drink on occasions, i have trouble remembering normal events from 20 years a go. Give me a break.

Do you also defend guys like Bill Cosby and Keith Raniere?

Here's a better question: do you know the role the Church of Scientology played in covering up the accusations of rape? The threats and harassment the victims faced for speaking out?


Danny Masterson used drugging, Scientology to get away with rape, prosecutor says


Quote:

Anson took aim at the Church of Scientology, of which Masterson is a member and all three women are former members, throughout her argument, emphasizing that church authorities kept the women from accepting what had happened to them and from reporting it to police for years.

“The church taught his victims, ‘Rape isn’t rape, you caused this, and above all, you are never allowed to go to law enforcement,’” she said. “In Scientology, the defendant is a celebrity and he is untouchable.”

The church has denied having any policy discouraging members from going to law enforcement.

Actor Leah Remini, a former member of the church who has become one of its most prominent public opponents, sat in the courtroom, her arm around one of the accusers, who testified during both trials that Masterson raped her in 2003.

Huggles 09-11-2023 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 23175441)
Do you also defend guys like Bill Cosby and Keith Raniere?

I don't want to say too much because I still know people in B.C. film, but... that Allison woman on the set of Smallville was openly recruiting women and flaunting her connections to people all the time. People who work in B.C. film all know who the abusers are (there are many) but the film industry is extremely incestuous... if you don't conform, you're fucked... I dated an actress who had credits for speaking roles in many local productions, and she was straight up with me and said she didn't get lead roles because she wasn't willing to "do what she had to do" in the industry. Allison tried to get her to go on "trips" with her to various places and not once did she agree to it, but many other actresses did. Allison basically tried to recruit women 24/7 on or off the Smallville set and everyone knew it.

People who like to "make believe" in film, carry that same attitude in the rest of their lives. The world's a stage, and they practice acting and manipulating people whether there is a camera there or not. Why do you think people used to not trust actors?

Remember, Zelenskyy is an actor... but I digress.

Also, I know a woman who went on to star in one of Netflix's bigger shows, and she went from being a somewhat normal person to her Twitter being a non-stop flow of pro-democrat propaganda. She's not even American! I don't even think she runs her Twitter, but she became a completely different person after making it in Hollywood. I think she even has a trans toddler now.

Even Morgan Spurlock was less up his own ass than my former friend who went onto stardom with Netflix. I think going from a normal person to an instant celebrity overnight and making massive money made her tow the line pretty quick!

DVTimes 09-11-2023 03:44 PM


ladida 09-12-2023 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 23175441)
Do you also defend guys like Bill Cosby and Keith Raniere?

I'm not defending anyone. I don't know these people nor do i care about any one of them. All i know is there is no undeniable evidence to prove someone did something 20 years a go to his then girlfriend, that did not report anything at the time, and there were massive amounts of drugs and alchohol and power and fame surrounding the case. That's it. And its like that for all of these "high profile" cases.

All these "scientology", "coverup" etc. That's all there to make it easier for you to try and justify the undeniable, and that is, there is no undeniable proof. Not 20 years later. Without that, there can be no conviction.

Huggles 09-12-2023 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladida (Post 23175576)
All these "scientology", "coverup" etc. That's all there to make it easier for you to try and justify the undeniable, and that is, there is no undeniable proof. Not 20 years later. Without that, there can be no conviction.

We have no idea what goes on behind the scenes.

But we know in the world of "make believe" AKA film and TV, the "make believe" goes beyond the screen and the entire industry is probably more rotten than we could imagine. Just from the little involvement I've had in the film industry and the one actress I dated in film and TV, it is full of predators. The Smallville set was Allison Mack's hunting ground for new recruits.

J. Falcon 09-12-2023 05:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladida (Post 23175576)
I'm not defending anyone. I don't know these people nor do i care about any one of them. All i know is there is no undeniable evidence to prove someone did something 20 years a go to his then girlfriend, that did not report anything at the time, and there were massive amounts of drugs and alchohol and power and fame surrounding the case. That's it. And its like that for all of these "high profile" cases.

All these "scientology", "coverup" etc. That's all there to make it easier for you to try and justify the undeniable, and that is, there is no undeniable proof. Not 20 years later. Without that, there can be no conviction.

Testimony under oath is considered evidence.

What Was The Evidence and Proof Against Danny Masterson Resulted in Conviction?

Quote:

The proof against Danny Masterson included testimony from three women who said he sexually assaulted them at his Hollywood home between 2001 and 2003. The women said he gave them drugs before the assaults. They also said he gave them drinks in 2003, and they became woozy or passed out before he raped them. The allegations against Masterson first surfaced in March 2017. In November 2017, Out team reported that a fourth woman had accused Masterson of raping her in the early 2000s.Masterson starred on That ’70s Show, which was airing at the time of his crimes. The jury found Masterson guilty of two of the three charges. He was sentenced to 30 years to life in prison.

ladida 09-12-2023 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 23175613)
Testimony under oath is considered evidence.

You're quite stupid. Talking to you lowers my intelligence so i'll stop here. I said (at least to you) what i had on this matter.

J. Falcon 09-12-2023 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladida (Post 23175637)
You're quite stupid. Talking to you lowers my intelligence so i'll stop here. I said (at least to you) what i had on this matter.

Have a nice day.

jscott 09-13-2023 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladida (Post 23175637)
You're quite stupid. Talking to you lowers my intelligence so i'll stop here. I said (at least to you) what i had on this matter.

Dude is a trolling raging lunatic, don't take him too seriously. :2 cents:

rhon23 09-13-2023 08:30 AM

Danny Masterson drugged and raped women. Then tried to use his celeb/scientology status to get out of the charges. IMHO 30 years isnt enough. what a POS

SevY 09-15-2023 04:04 PM

Since I'm following this thread very accurately I have to say something.

There's a case in my country involving the son of a politician, from a very very rich family.

The story, from almost 3 years ago, was that the young 19yo boy (from now on "the guy") was at a club with other 3 friends (from no on "friends") all of an age between 18 and 20. Here they met 2 girls (respectively 22 and 23), so after some chill and drinks all together they went by the guy's car up to the guy's house where the guy's parents, the full time cleaning lady and a family friend were all already sleeping.

One of the two girls was too exhaust therefore she fell asleep on the couch in the bedroom. The other (from now on "the girl") decided she was excited or high enough to have some group sex with the four guys.

Here starts her accuse towards all of em.

After a night of alleged sexual assault nobody heard a single thing, no noise, no screams. Nobody including the fainted girl in the same room which was supposed to hear her friend screaming. The female friend will then testimony she slept all the time. The girl who had group-sex first got some sleep then she woke up to have a shower. Then she woke up her friend and they all moved to a gas station's tobacco shop to get some smokes, then to a nearby coffee shop to have a breakfast. All proven by security cam tapes. Then 2 guys moved away and the remaining two escorted the girls to their hotel.

This would be enough to say she clearly lied about the violence. However if this is not enough, there's another "strange happening" of that day. They apparently didn't know who actually the main guy was. In fact when the two girls got back to the hotel, the receptionist reports they were OK, since they first went to her room, then the moved to the beach to lay in the sun. After around three days the girls started asking around trying to get as more information as possible about the main guy, even asking to the hotel receptionist.

Only 4 days later, presumably once one of them figured out who the main guy was, the girl decided to go to the police to report the violence. So the case exploded, bringing to the court all of the guys. She reported she was to drunk to refuse the sex but ta the same moment sober enough to remember all the guys who filmed the sex night with their cellphones. A very strange way of being sloshed.

Then the case went on for three years. I'll spare you the details, just know that:

1) A neighbor reported the morning after the alleged sexual abuse she saw a girl on the patio wearing a white bathrobe and a white towel on her head wrapped for drying hair while smoking a cigarette and talking to the phone.

2) The phones' content was seen in court. It was supposed to be the evidence of foul play, however they made no difference since it was established the videos couldn't prove neither the violence against the girl nor the innocence of the four.

3) The girl's phone was seized as well and all the chats with the friend were all like "I made a mistake last night", "what will my friends think about me", "if somebody talks about this my reputation is screwed", "I don't want people think I'm a slut", etc...

4) Best of all, a girl's male friend testified against her about something happened 2 years before. While the two were having sex in a car, the girl's jealous ex-boyfriend recorded them then sent her the video and messaged her threatening to share the record with all their common friends to let them know what a slut she was. After that episode she confessed to the male friend she had sex with he will to report the ex-boyfriend for sexual violence. She first went to the police to formalize the sue, then she retired the accuse.

After all of this, the case is still in the court simply because the public opinion has been heavily influenced by a wide group of feminists which wants to get the guy in jail even with no evidence.

At this point I can't avoid to ask how can it be possible that there are still people (especially men) who believe in anything a woman says even if in front of the evidence that she is lying.

I really can't figure out why people don't understand that when money is at stake people become greedy, especially if this people are women and if the money is a lot.

DVTimes 09-18-2023 05:05 PM


jscott 09-18-2023 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVTimes (Post 23178112)

Great vid, lots of truth & logic. The Left will hate it.

Btw, things are not adding up with it all, example:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F6SieslW...ebp&name=small

how did she continue coming back for more, for 6 months, if she was being raped?

Also, Channel 4 was contacting 100's people and offering incentives to come out with negative stories about Brand. IMO this is a coordinated attack from BigPharma (for his Bill Maher comments and similar videos), or from the Radical Left.

dcortez 09-19-2023 02:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rhon23 (Post 23176092)
Danny Masterson drugged and raped women. Then tried to use his celeb/scientology status to get out of the charges. IMHO 30 years isnt enough. what a POS

Actually, even worse, according to the following report, Scientology allegedly play full on defense for him, and harassed his victims, into first not reporting the crimes, and then handled their characterization of the "incidents" to police.

Scientology’s devious tricks to hold its members hostage for life | 60 Minutes Australia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Na0EfFTp50

Ya, I know, 60 Minutes Australia is totally tabloid, but given how litigious Scientology is, that report would probably have been disappeared by now, if it was off-base.

:2 cents:

ladida 09-19-2023 03:23 AM

Yea, it's a tabloid, but in this case, they are publishing what i want to hear so it's relevant and good source then. Yep, logic wins today again.

J. Falcon 09-19-2023 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladida (Post 23178316)
Yea, it's a tabloid, but in this case, they are publishing what i want to hear so it's relevant and good source then. Yep, logic wins today again.

And you're here making excuses for a convicted rapist, about a case you very little about, based on a hunch. Oh yeah, and because you don't understand how the justice system works in the US.

ladida 09-21-2023 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 23178343)
And you're here making excuses for a convicted rapist, about a case you very little about, based on a hunch. Oh yeah, and because you don't understand how the justice system works in the US.

Look at this guy trying to lower my intelect by baiting me to talk to him. Dude just stop, there's people on the local playground chugging alcohol that are better suited for your intelect.

The Porn Nerd 09-21-2023 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ladida (Post 23179217)
Look at this guy trying to lower my intelect .... better suited for your intelect.

Yes he's a real intelectual. :1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc