Incel, seriously.
a member of an online community of young men who consider themselves unable to attract women sexually, typically associated with views that are hostile toward women and men who are sexually active.



LOL!
First I am not young.
Second, not hostile. At least not my intent.
Third, I have 4 children and as my oldest two daughter like to say "that I know of". Because I chose to share my poor behavior as a young man with my daughter to warn them off from young men, like I was. Before I learned different.
I dated more women (and probably bedded more woman) than most men will ever ask out. All I need to do is go out and I can get a date. (Certainly when the gold diggers find me.)

You infer what ever you like.
I am at a place in my life that SEX is not my primary goal or ambition.
Getting old I am.
Tired of the BS, that comes with dealing with the under informed public.
Finding a woman that is not a narcissist is very difficult.
Not saying women are narcissist, just saying, I must be talking to the wrong women, still.

Not sure about investigations being secured as a requirement for the statistical data.


Otherwise I agree.
Yes! stigma is out of control.
Still waiting until you can financial benefit to use that as motivation to report does not go well to proving the case.

Since we have been able to record, the number of false allegations that have been proven have grown exponentially.

Take the number of lawsuits again the police, since we started recording them and them using body cams, as an example of how reality is starting to be easier to prove with recordings. Also, dashcams.

Heck, Take the people damaging Teslas, that have 360 cameras as an example.

“Incel” is the go-to insult that the NPC crowd has been programmed to use to shut down any debate. Men are protectors but more and more of them are simply checking out of their natural roles. And NPCs have it twisted thinking men who want justice are “guys who can’t find women”.

One of the more shocking examples of “men checking out” is of a truck driver who saw a toddler walking down the street and his first thought was to jump out and help. However he was worried about any false accusations so he just minded his own business. The child ended up drowning after falling into a fountain. Why would he not help? How about the Good Samaritan who helped a woman with her car and she dreamed up a false allegation against him which led to his arrest and losing custody of his child before video was discovered and exonerated him. Simps and feminists instantly think the worst of any a man and any jury is also going to be dominated by NPC droids. Theway I see we make a point is to just separate from these dirtbags as much as possible. Record everything including your phone conversations. Use dash cams front and back and record audio. The courts are corrupt but video evidence and audio evidence (when there is a sign warning audio is being recorded) is still effective in shutting down false accusations. Cops are also notoriously biased and are mostly simps with the average IQ of about 90 so always tell them your respect them the moment you come into contact with them and remain calm while you show them your evidence. They almost always are biased wanting to arrest a man in any situation involving a woman.

I recently had to deal with a psycho woman and man in a business for over one year and every interaction was via text or recorded calls. Now I can show future customers that these people were desperate to continue to do business with me when they eventually slander me. Texts are better because you don’t have to pay for them to be transcribed for court. I buy new phone every few months and set perfectly good IPhones aside just to preserve evidence.

Now Shannon Sharpe is getting accused. Regardless of the truth he will be financially affected and people will always wonder about him for the rest of his life. If there were real consequences for false and flimsy accusations AND consequences for attorneys and prosecutors for entertaining these accusations then things would change fast. Do you think Casey Anthony dreamt up that sexual abuse accusation against her father on her own or do you think her fleabag Attorney Jose Baez encouraged her to dream it up? Amazing how those allegations came out at the exact moment she needed sympathy from the jury. Happens all the time. False accusations are a lucrative industry for attorneys and other people in the court system like therapists and psychologists.

Should be the video:

https://noodlemagazine.com/watch/-152298533_456240948

Nothing special except sucking feet and rimming, she looks quite eager and happy doing it.

Imo just another late career chick in decline without jobs trying to get attention and money.

A reason to avoid working with Western models.

Stats based on self reporting are useless in a society of people who love to victimize themselves.

How can one even stalking and rape sum up together? It's two totally different things.

is that the "consent video" though? I dunno obvs, just asking as it didn't include any discussion of acts to be performed. there was one part of the vid where the actress def did look hella uncomfortable; the portion where he kept spitting in her mouth. I'd throw up if someone did that, which I get is illogical as deep kissing exchanges saliva as well, but to me there is a huge difference. I'm getting the icks just thinking about it

at the beginning (but after the clap to start) he said he liked 'nasty girls' who spit in his mouth, but there was nothing about him returning the, uh, favour

that's not rape though, so who knows what actually transpired. the only way it makes sense is if the "consent video" is another piece of footage. the OP's article is woefully short on facts so understandably it leaves the situ open to a lot of interpretation based on peeps personal histories and pre-existing biases

oh well, at least this thread is an interesting series of diary entries

people who love to victimize themselves. true true
 

It is all the data I have.
I know more that did not report than did.

I know that people need to report and that is kinda the point.

At least realize who the reporters are.. WOMEN on WOMEN!

I am against most of this.
 

Back when I automated my tube sites, I also built in functionality to remove all videos with certain words, like rape.

This is the best video I could find, easily and quickly, to prove a point to many women and a few men.

https://youtube.com/shorts/FR4ZnC7ow...zDEZ2Qaw6T7rnW


Too many women lie about what really happened because their feelings were hurt.
I have experienced this, too many times. To the point I record all my interactions, including private ones.

The me too movement set women way back in being treated with respect and protected by society.

Watch the video to know why?

Understanding the Harvey Weinstein Case: Two Extremes and the Middle Ground
The Harvey Weinstein case is one of the most polarizing and high-profile legal battles in recent history. With over 80 women accusing him of sexual misconduct, ranging from harassment to rape, Weinstein became the face of the #MeToo movement. He was convicted in both New York and Los Angeles, but his case remains controversial. This post explores two extreme perspectives on the case and suggests that the truth likely lies somewhere in the middle.


Extreme 1: Weinstein is a Monster
On one side, Weinstein is portrayed as a predator who abused his power in Hollywood for decades. Here’s why:

Over 80 Accusers: The sheer number of women who came forward paints a picture of systemic abuse.
Detailed Testimonies: In court, several women provided graphic accounts of their encounters, some of which were corroborated by medical evidence (e.g., descriptions of Weinstein’s physical abnormalities due to surgery).
Convictions: Weinstein was found guilty in both New York (2020) and Los Angeles (2022), with sentences totaling decades in prison.
Cultural Impact: The #MeToo movement used his case to highlight widespread sexual misconduct in the entertainment industry, framing him as a symbol of unchecked power.

In this view, Weinstein is a clear-cut villain, and the legal system finally delivered justice.


Extreme 2: Weinstein Was Framed
On the other side, some argue that Weinstein was unfairly targeted, and the case against him was flawed. Here’s why:

Questions of Credibility: Critics suggest that some early accusations were dismissed because the women couldn’t accurately describe Weinstein’s physical characteristics (due to his surgery), raising doubts about their claims.
Media Bias: The #MeToo frenzy led to a “guilty until proven innocent” narrative, with the media amplifying every accusation without always verifying the facts.
Lack of Physical Evidence: Despite the number of accusers, no definitive physical evidence (like DNA) was presented in court. Convictions relied heavily on testimony and circumstantial evidence.
Potential Coordination: With so many accusers, it’s possible that some exaggerated or fabricated claims, especially in a climate where public opinion had already condemned Weinstein.

In this view, Weinstein may have engaged in questionable behavior, but the full extent of the accusations might be overblown or even orchestrated.


The Middle Ground: A Nuanced Truth
The reality likely falls between these two extremes:

Power Abuse is Real: Weinstein probably did abuse his position, as the volume of similar accusations and some corroborated details suggest a pattern of misconduct.
But Doubts Remain: The absence of hard evidence, the media’s rush to judgment, and the possibility of false or exaggerated claims muddy the waters. High-profile cases like this can attract opportunists or lead to groupthink.
Complexity of Justice: Weinstein’s convictions are significant, but his New York conviction was overturned in 2024 due to procedural errors, showing that even the legal process wasn’t flawless.

The truth may be that Weinstein is guilty of some serious wrongdoing, but not necessarily every accusation leveled against him. The case highlights the difficulty of untangling fact from narrative in the court of public opinion.


Conclusion
The Weinstein case isn’t black and white. It’s a reminder that in high-profile trials, especially those fueled by cultural movements, the truth can get lost in the noise. By understanding both extremes, we can better appreciate the complexity of justice—and why it’s crucial to look beyond headlines.

Share your thoughts: Where do you think the truth lies?

fifty diary entries

against most of what? that was your post title quoting what I wrote and I'm unsure what you're referring to


I think one of us (quite possibly me) is confused about what the term 'consent video' means. I interpret that to be a filmed discussion between the parties as to what acts will be performed, performer boundaries, etc. not consent as in consenting to acts as they're occurring. in this interpretation, the concept of rape wouldn't be a factor, it's talk that takes place before any action transpires

as an example, a friend of mine started off shooting her own stuff and went on to create a successful studio wherein she hires some pretty well known performers. on her website, in the sample vids section, she posted one of the pre-shoot process

she lays out the script, runs through each scene with the performers and as a result everyone knows what to expect before the actual performances start. I'm sure there must be some ad-libbing and spontaneity as the action unfolds, but point is, everyone's boundaries have been made clear beforehand, and it's all captured on film

her method probs has a lot to do with her being a performer herself as well, but it's also a good way to ensure everyone is comfortable with what goes down during the shoot

re your own site, pretty sure most legal tubes would block problematic words like rape, etc so not sure what that has to do with this situation

I dunno, the article as written is pretty vague and absent concrete details everyone reads what they want into it. this thread being a case in point. not sure it's helpful to either 'side' to engage in this type of supposition but whatever

I am seriously surprised by these two fellas... well, not so much by VikingMan... he was always an asshole, but this dude gotonudecom is a real khazer... one might wonder what you might need to do to a person to record everything you do in your daily life? I mean, holy shit.

I can't even comment on VikingMan's shit because he somehow managed to get child abuse into all of this (delusional much, lol?) but gotonudecom has some serious issues and all of this feels like a really bad Twilight Zone episode, to be honest...

Dear Incels, "bitches" aren't out there to get you... well, maybe they are, but it could be your fault, if:"you want a bitch from the city, pussy good, titties pretty, cook a meal...":



You either want a 10, thinking that the money will keep her subdued, or you're an asshole. But, either way... key to a good relationship is understanding and common goals.... same vision for long term life.. if you don't have that, then you will go around like a loon recording people 24/7 thinking everyone is out to get you just because a relationship turned bitter. But, like always, try to walk a mile in their shoes first...

I tried to understand the both of you, but the only time when I can't empathize with someone's POV is usually when they're a POS, or when it's against everything I was raised as a man. :2 cents:

Nobody is accusing you of being a man. Real men stand up for children and this false accusation gravy train destroys thousands of them every year while lining the pockets of fleabag attorneys. Your simp mind can’t comprehend what I’m talking about. I’m not gonna explain any further.

You're a funny one, champ.

I will be the first one to stand up for the children, and women's rights.

I am the last one to come to defense of abusers, and men who suffer from low self-esteem, and deem it appropriate to bring women down, simply because they feel "hurt". Cry me a river, bitch.

The world owes you absolutely nothing, nor does your domestic partner. If shit came to an end, it came to an end. It's the same for both genders, but you don't see the latter gender cooking up ideas for how to fuck them over, and not give them their rightful share of the assets. It's the one that think that they are "men" that do so... at least, from what I have witnessed... but who knows, maybe I am the crazy one? Simp, though? Hahah, definitely not that. That much I could attest to in any court of law. You could accuse me of many things, but being a simp isn't one of them. I suppose, you could call me an old-school feminist, that learned to appreciate women from a very young age, and the sacrifices that most women make to make ends meet, and clothe their boys and girls... and in general, survive in the society that is quick to shun them... :)

Don't get me wrong, shitheads are shitheads. Regardless of their gender, or ethnicity... but let's be real for a moment... if you tell me that most of the scenes aren't coerced, you are absolutely full of shit.

I had the BTS, the "why" doesn't matter, and I watched the "final" scenes, and they are definitely not one and the same... and regardless of what our lovely Duke would want to portray here, he is not as innocent as he claims to be. How many of his performers would be able to pass any drug test? For any drug? Literally... any illegal substance? Please, tell me.

But, hey, what do I know... I am only a "simp". Even though, I would say, I don't trust the media. I don't trust the law enforcement. I don't trust the authorities, period. I trust the people. I trust the social cues. I trust their stories, and I weigh their stories accordingly. I trust the evidence. Evidence tells me that something is rotten in the state of Denmark. :)

Anyway, as far as the media, and the fucking pigs go... :)

I do not like the idea of rape videos. I am against rape videos. I think the human mind is to fragile to put out violence towards anyone for any reason. Too many weak minded people that see stupid on video then go attempt to repeat it.

I think that is what my title meant by my title.

Too often I have read about and heard about, 'consent videos' that were NOT really 'consent videos'.

Which seems to be what started this thread.

Supposition is a very good description of what is going on.
Supposition can be a useful approach for discussing controversial topics as it allows for exploring ideas hypothetically, fostering open dialogue without immediate judgment. However, it requires mutual respect and clear communication to avoid misunderstandings.

Most everyone is attempting that here in this thread.

PIG? I am certainly not greedy!
 

No FN shit!

Last call with my last X, two days ago.
She started shit with me.
Then denied starting shit with me and said I started it, which I certainly did not.
Then said "well you record everything go listen to the recording, and you will see that you started it", cause she knows I record.

I did, and sent her a copy.
Guess what.. she started it.
Of course, no confirmation of apology.
She at least has a reminder that I am recording. Keeps her in line, most of the time.

I am working on a contract to sell something. The company is FN me around.
To document the issue it must be recorded. To make the record I must send them in writing a notice.
This is law. I take this process to the next level with all my interactions and make a record constantly because I live in a messed up Twilight zone movie where people are constantly attempting to pull something on me.

Keeps me honest, too!

You stuck in the past gramps, but it's 2025, times change. Turning against other men to defend women just because they are women is simping.