Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

it might be over your head... but that is nothing more than a theory of something that has not been proven to exist. why not just quote the Old Testament to support your arguments?

Originally Posted by 12clicks

hahaha, I love it when you show a kid a link and he challenges it with what he thinks.
:1orglaugh
I figured it was over your head.

Originally Posted by 12clicks

here you go, I wonder if these guys were eating icecream too:
http://www.you.com.au/news/1121.htm
"""Inconstant Speed of Light May Debunk Einstein """

Originally Posted by Lane

12clicks,

Are you familiar with the "theory of everything"? Its already 75% complete. Soon they will be able to explain the interaction of all forces in harmony.

Originally Posted by AlienQ

For example a sonic boom will not occur at the same exact speeds at different parts of the planet since the pressure is varied from different atmospheric climates and pressure.

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

we are all happy that you found google and that after many painfully awkward and frustrating attempts, you finally spelled something right to get relevent results. back to your original statement - you can't prove math to be wrong with philosophical suppositions ... you have to actually to show your work, present it to your peers and see if it holds up to scrutiny or not.

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

i am not saying i am smarter than you... i am simply saying that it's your lack of understanding of the physics involved, not some deeper understanding that has led you to your conclusions.

now that you have found the perfect ice cream for debunking 6 decades of physics and disproving dozens of Nobel Prize winners and proving the ignorance of the last centuries greatest scientific minds, perhaps you can find the perfect ice cream for completing unification theory? maybe chunky monkey?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Loryn-Adult.com

BTW I like this thread! :thumbsup :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

problem number 1 - you cant travel faster than the speed of light. I dont think Einstein ever suggested you could since this very fact represents the foundation of his work.

Originally Posted by $5 submissions

Any seen 12clicks around? Haven't seen much of him here lately.

Originally Posted by 12clicks

I've always known Einstein was wrong about time travel but I never felt I had the time to properly debunk it.
So tonight, I'm eating Ben & Jerry's "coffee heathbar crunch" icecream and a simple answer to the problem presented itself

The theory is that if you could travel at faster than the speed of light, you could travel through time. Here is why its wrong:

Time has no relationship to people. Time passes regardless of what a person does.
if something happends in another galaxy and it takes a year to see it because the light is traveling from so far away, by the time we see it, its already a year old (standard stuff)
But if we travel at faster than the speed of light towards that galaxy, we will get closer to seeing the galaxy in realtime. we will NOT be turning back the clock.
The proof of this is our ability to travel faster than the speed of sound.
If a sound takes 10 seconds to reach our ear because the action creating it was so far away, we hear an action that happened 10 seconds ago. Not unlike seeing something from the other galaxy that happened already.
Now, if we travel at the speed of sound towards the action that made the sound, we DO hear the sound sooner but we do not travel back in time.
Swap speed of sound with speed of light and you see why Albert Einstein is wrong. :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by BOSS1

This might be the most idiotic reasoning I read in a while :helpme
I suggest taking some physics courses at uni....

Thanks for making me feel more educated!

Originally Posted by MrJackMeHoff

I didnt read shit here but, its already been proven to be true so forget it.

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 9093874)

oh, how children love to chirp.
I'll bet you don't even like ice cream

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 9093874)

oh, how children love to chirp.
I'll bet you don't even like ice cream

Originally Posted by BOSS1 (Post 12254705)

I am lactose intolertant :)

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 1911574)

I've always known Einstein was wrong about time travel but I never felt I had the time to properly debunk it.
So tonight, I'm eating Ben & Jerry's "coffee heathbar crunch" icecream and a simple answer to the problem presented itself

The theory is that if you could travel at faster than the speed of light, you could travel through time. Here is why its wrong:

Time has no relationship to people. Time passes regardless of what a person does.
if something happends in another galaxy and it takes a year to see it because the light is traveling from so far away, by the time we see it, its already a year old (standard stuff)
But if we travel at faster than the speed of light towards that galaxy, we will get closer to seeing the galaxy in realtime. we will NOT be turning back the clock.
The proof of this is our ability to travel faster than the speed of sound.
If a sound takes 10 seconds to reach our ear because the action creating it was so far away, we hear an action that happened 10 seconds ago. Not unlike seeing something from the other galaxy that happened already.
Now, if we travel at the speed of sound towards the action that made the sound, we DO hear the sound sooner but we do not travel back in time.
Swap speed of sound with speed of light and you see why Albert Einstein is wrong. :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Goodings Media (Post 12256460)

Im not gonna read all of this thread but this post made me laugh... lol

Now I hope none of it pollutes my brain, my Cosmology and Relativistic Space Science exam is 5th June (1st year finals)

Originally Posted by 12clicks (Post 10229216)

check again, Einstein.:1orglaugh
http://www.physicsmyths.org.uk/timedilation.htm