500


This thread is to long.. what's the cliff notes on it?

The guy admitted that he doesn't credit his "sources" in line with fair use, he admitted he doesn't have 2257 info for explicit content, and he admitted he has photos of naked minors on his site. Now he's trying to rationalize that what he does is legal.

Oh and all his hosting got pulled.. hahaha.

When I began the SexEducation.com website I contacted iServer.com to ask them what they felt. They said not to host SexEducation.com on their servers. I pointed the domain to where it could be hosted. Duh!

Yes - maybe - and maybe not - with regards to Verio.com pulling my DNS. I might be able to call them tomorrow morning - unsure of my schedule right now.

QUOTE: "HE HAS SINCE REGISTERED WITH 3 HOSTING PROVIDERS" This is a complete fabrication and lie. ANOTHER WITCHHUNT FACT based on some type of circumstantial evidence...forcing pieces of a puzzle together where they do not belong. I have NOT contacted any hosting providers. I am sorting out with current supplier what went on - when I have time.


QUOTE: "been aware of this thread and the proof and he has been unsuccessful in finding new hosting for the dns" .... Incorrect. I have not been presented any proof - and the final and absolute victory will come by the taped backups that Verio.com makes of the sites as they will reveal no distribution of child pornography.

There has NOT been any proof presented to me or this thread of these CONVICTED CHILD MOLESTOR or CHILD PORN DISTRIBUTION charges ... even when asked to describe any graphics textually (color,position , anything ...) a HEAVILY CENSORED graphic ... nothing ever ... NO PROOF EVER PRESENTED.

QUOTE "the domain resolved to an ip of 64.246.44.170 as do all his other domains." Yes - one master domain ... that branches out into other smaller portals of communities is my intention. To do that you use the "domain" variable of the web browser ... and when you click to enter ... lets say BibleSexEducation.com it discusses biblical issues and has biblical links. If you came to FamilySexEducation.com it would go into more family orientated content and links. I think thats a kewl strategy - and still do.

Apparently, you don't seem to realize JUST who JFPdude is and HOW it is that he knows what he does about your activities as far as hosting. You are acting like we're a bunch of newbies. Listen pal, most of us have been doing this since before you knew what a computer was, stop trying to "dummy" your explainations.. Instead, why not try actually READING AND PAYING ATTENTION to what it is WE are saying to YOU? STOP MAKING EXCUSES. Have you read the link I gave you yet? Come on, read it.

You also are apparently too hung-up to realize that any REALLY DEFINITIVE proof has already been submitted to the proper authorities, and nobody would post it on a PUBLIC MESSAGE BOARD, and perhaps comprimise it's integrity. If you don't already feel the noose tightening, get a little more comfy.. you won't know it until it hits you.

Suffice it to say that your hosting would NOT have been pulled on a witchhunt.. HOsts do NOT WANT TO PULL WEBSITES... They want your money. If they hadn't checked FOR THEMSELVES and found you in violation of the law, your site would still be there.

I have not contacted Verio.com yet.
I have contact RackShack.net.

Nor have I made any changes to any content.
Nor have I deleted any files and still have access to them all.
Nor has all my domains shut off.
Nor has anything but a complete CLUSTER-FUCK occurred which I have no time to deal with - but have been forced to do so.

I am still having a problem accessing my [email protected] email - which hopefully Verio.com will solve OR present this mysterious "proof" ...


[PLUG]
Female Genital Mutilation exists because we don't talk about it.
"Any cowardly father that permits circumcision of their daughter should be castrated." Dad@

It's not so mysterious if you go back and read some of JFPdude's posts. You don't do your research.. not so smart. And the idiotic plugs about female genital mutilation certainly aren't making an impression.

The billboard is in public, so I am assuming yes. You put something up in public, then it could happen. But I could be wrong..been wrong in the past..and been right on things.

But adult content is not a billboard in public view. And a website is not a newspaper.

I have never seen your members section...does your members section just list pictures, or does it have more articles?

No I do not know who this JFPdude is.

Yes - the link you provided is to the Government of Canada law website. The copyright act specifically. I read it - and it is a mumble jumble of legal jargon referencing subparagraphs and exclusions.

On the same website ...

It says I have a right to "free speech".
I intend to quote publicly made statements, in reference to graphics that means content posted in the "free tour" areas.
And discuss those graphics ....

The average of internet pornography is affecting society.
We have much proof of this when you examine the introduction of television into emergining nations. Quite simply - what you see is what you want.

However, the average of internet pornography is NOT how normal people have sex.

There is no such thing as a vaginal orgasm - it is a lie propagated by pornography.

Now don't get me wrong - I am not saying we should not have pornography - I am just saying that we need to do a MUCH better job of teaching HOW TO HAVE SEX.

The proof of this poor record is that 50% of women never have an orgasm and 70% of men complain of premature ejaculation.

It has pictures but they have NOTHING to do with the articles.. they are just there.. most of them still with the tags... I'd show you but well..his site isn't there.


And he REALLY needs to read that link I sent him... DO YOUR RESEARCH, DAD.

Are you referring to the "file server" ?
The primary purpose of the "file server" is to allow a person to block the graphics contained in the articles.
Once again - never anything specific.

And I will keep doing my research and SexEducation.com will continue to grow and evolve as my knowledge does.

I am not saying I have never made mistakes.
I do say that I have tried my best.

The tour of the website is the most important research I have done - and everything else on the website - is really just discussion - sexual intercourse. Interesting, punchy, sometimes angry - blogs - of this worlds sexual hypocrisy as witnessed here in this thread.


[PLUG]
No aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids on any directly accessed domain name.

I can't believe you COMPLETELY glossed over that? What kind of idiot are you, really? It's not just legal jargon, it's all laid out VERY PLAINLY what is legal and what isn't.

Fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study does not infringe copyright.

9.1 Fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review does not infringe copyright if the following are mentioned:

(a) the source; and

(b) if given in the source, the name of the

(i) author, in the case of a work,

(ii) performer, in the case of a performer's performance,

(iii) maker, in the case of a sound recording, or

(iv) broadcaster, in the case of a communication signal.

and...

29.3 (1) No action referred to in section 29.4, 29.5, 30.2 or 30.21 may be carried out with motive of gain.
(like monetary gain..you had this behind and avs, that's for profit and that's motive of gain)

Does this apply? I don't think so:
Copies of articles for research, etc.


(2) It is not an infringement of copyright for a library, archive or museum or a person acting under the authority of a library, archive or museum to make, by reprographic reproduction, for any person requesting to use the copy for research or private study, a copy of a work that is, or that is contained in, an article published in

(a) a scholarly, scientific or technical periodical; or

(b) a newspaper or periodical, other than a scholarly, scientific or technical periodical, if the newspaper or periodical was published more than one year before the copy is made.

How about this.... I doubt everyone who's "work" you were using was aware of your use... How's this for a definition...


Consolidated Statutes and Regulations
Main page on: Copyright Act
Disclaimer: These documents are not the official versions (more).
Source: http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-42/38008.html
Updated to December 31, 2002

[Previous]




PART III
INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT AND MORAL RIGHTS AND EXCEPTIONS TO INFRINGEMENT


Infringement of Copyright


General

Infringement generally


27. (1) It is an infringement of copyright for any person to do, without the consent of the owner of the copyright, anything that by this Act only the owner of the copyright has the right to do.

Secondary infringement


(2) It is an infringement of copyright for any person to

(a) sell or rent out,

(b) distribute to such an extent as to affect prejudicially the owner of the copyright,

(c) by way of trade distribute, expose or offer for sale or rental, or exhibit in public,

(d) possess for the purpose of doing anything referred to in paragraphs (a) to (c), or

(e) import into Canada for the purpose of doing anything referred to in paragraphs (a) to (c),

a copy of a work, sound recording or fixation of a performer's performance or of a communication signal that the person knows or should have known infringes copyright or would infringe copyright if it had been made in Canada by the person who made it.

Knowledge of importer


(3) In determining whether there is an infringement under subsection (2) in the case of an activity referred to in any of paragraphs (2)(a) to (d) in relation to a copy that was imported in the circumstances referred to in paragraph (2)(e), it is irrelevant whether the importer knew or should have known that the importation of the copy infringed copyright.

Plates


(4) It is an infringement of copyright for any person to make or possess a plate that has been specifically designed or adapted for the purpose of making infringing copies of a work or other subject-matter.

Public performance for profit


(5) It is an infringement of copyright for any person, for profit, to permit a theatre or other place of entertainment to be used for the performance in public of a work or other subject-matter without the consent of the owner of the copyright unless that person was not aware, and had no reasonable ground for suspecting, that the performance


DO YOUR RESEARCH. Shall I continue?
I've only hit three sections... there's lots left.

well, it's kinda hard to present proof to YOU when YOU claim any links presented to you have broken images so you cant see them.
what fucking ever dude. you are such a lowlife loser.
:321GFY

Are you really this dumb? I have been married to a system administrator for many years, I probably know better than you what a file server could do, in fact I could also probably rip it apart and put it back together blindfolded with one hand tied behind my back. Would you stop acting like you know something special? YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT.

Your "knowledge" is shit. I read most of your articles, and most of them are WRONG... anatomically, theoretically, and even gramatically. You have NO clue about sex education, you are NOT a qualified instructor.. Stop trying to teach people.

You look the picture ...
you say ... has a female approx age.
sitting on the side of a bed ... sheets X color ...
a male is touching her on the ...whatever ...
and that the graphic is included in the article discussing ...whatever ...

Is that so hard to do?

no, that isnt hard....is it so hard to know what pictures are on your OWN site????

also
is it so hard to run your site within the scope of the law?

get a fucking clue.

It's illegal if not accompanied by proper custodial information AND a proper license to use it. Even non-erotic photography requires the use of a license or some form of permission, and unless you are a REGISTERED news agency or periodical, you don't count bub. How do I know? BECAUSE IT'S MY JOB TO KNOW. I've sued more than enough idiots just like yourself into oblivion for IMPROPERLY AND ILLEGALLY utilizing my images. You don't read much, do you? Too busy studying "sex education" to actually study the laws that MIGHT just keep your ass out of jail?

how would we know what age someone is in your pics.....even you dont know.....it's all stolen.

:321GFY

I call it a "file server" on my website. It really is custom filtering code. I'm glad you have better programming skills then I do. I do my best though.

I do know something special.
There is a new GENDER NEUTRAL MANNER in which to explain how to have sex. The SexEducation.com magazine discusses those issues that created this SPECIAL AND UNIQUE manner in which to explain to someone how to have sex ... where both partners experience orgasm.

I did that - and it is special - and it is true.

Do you charge for access to your hardcore members section? And are there pictures in your hardcore members section that are not owned or copyrighted by you?

If so, how do you justify this?

You can take two people who've never been around other people, a male and a female, and put them together at the right time, and instint takes over.. How the hell are you teaching anyone anything? You aren't, that simple.

dear god you are fucked in the head.

hey, your adult website is not a magazine. just thought you should know.

Oh - come on ...
I am sure you can guess someone who is 20 or 80 years old.
Give me a break ...

You may not have the skill set to come within a year or two of a persons age - but I do.

All I am asking for is a general description of this proof you are saying you have. Supposedly - screen captures were taken and sent to my suppliers - JUST HEAVILY EDIT THE PICTURE.

You can not do that either - right?
Post a censored picture - or describe it ....
quit making excuses ...

and do you HONESTLY think it's so special that both partners experience orgasm? Like it's never happened before? There are a LOT of very knowledgable people in the area of sex here.. I myself am EXTREMELY multi-orgasmic, and I know several other women on this board who, FROM EXPERIENCE will tell you and your articles that you're both full of shit.

Do you charge for access to your hardcore members section? And are there pictures in your hardcore members section that are not owned or copyrighted by you?

If so, how do you justify this? Do you feel good about yourself making money off of others work?

Can you always 100% tell the differece between a 16 year old girl or an 18 year old girl? If you say yes, I claim bullshit.. I've seen 12 year old girls that looked 20, and 20 year olds that looked 11. Oh, sorry, you like em young.. But that aside, can you PROVE, if the authorities knock on your door that the people in the images on your crackpot website are of legal age? Can you provide custodial information or model releases and ids? No. You would go right to jail.

There are people 8 feet tall too ...

Yes - I would say it is "special that both partners experience orgasm" and that most partner sex couples would like this to occur.

And there is no reason for it not to.

Premature Ejaculation is "cured" with knowledge.
Inhibited female orgasm is "cured" with knowledge.

if the board's were never broughten to this site the whole sexeducation.com would have been eraticated easily but with people on the board ranting raving like children with vendettas surly in some point in time dad @ sexeducation would have been notified . hmm also note this site www.sexed.com notice how this site is undisputable proof as to dad's cause and war on porn and natural sex in todays society

vaginal mutilation

:2 cents:

what!?!?
youve made excuses through this whole thread! you are so fucking full of it.
you were given links to pictures on your website....that should be enough....no one needs to describe shit to you.....unless of course you are fucking blind?

multiple personalities dont help anyones cause. stay in one character 'dad'

I have dealt with THOUSANDS of people which use absolutes ...
"always", "never", "they" ,"them" ...

The answer is no person can be 100% exact all of the time.
(an absolute question - will get an absolute answer.)

Yes - for the ones I think are generating all this commotion.
Yes - DESCRIBE THE PICTURE ...

I have no idea what you are talking about.

just like you have no idea what you are doing wrong.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

So is illegal activity and jailtime. Too bad it's too late for you.

NO - ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA ...
I'VE NEVER SAID ANYTHING CORRECT ... EVER - RIGHT?



(another absolute statement - with another absolute reply)

Time will prove one of us right.
Will the other appologize?

Maybe third time is a charm.

Do you charge for access to your hardcore members section? And are there pictures in your hardcore members section that are not owned or copyrighted by you?

If so, how do you justify this? Do you feel good about yourself making money off of others work?

The one in your tour, with two young looking people having sex? Hundreds saw it that *I* know of. Provide me license information for those images. Provide me with documentation that proves those people are of legal age to engage in those activites on camera. In fact, provide licensing information for everything on your site, or your notices of permission, photographer's releases, etc.. Let's see them.. This is what the cops will want when they show up on your doorstep. Too bad you don't have it.
You are in the hotseat here, pal, not me. And very nice of you to COMPLETELY IGNORE my posts DIRECTLY QUOTING canadian law on copyright infringement which you are clearly commiting. Sweet.

you dont need to apologize to us. just send gfy a postcard from prison.

I doubt Bubba's going to have his dick out of your mouth for long enough for you to stutter sorry, but I can hope, right?

I'm gone for the night.
I will be back as usual.

However, will there be a description of the "proof" or will there be a heavily censcored graphic of this "proof" presented here ...

Not likely ... fluff & fodder. right?

John E. Beacock
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

[PLUG]
Every person that is reproductively capable has a self evident right to an understanding of such.

as usual you completely ignore the proof.

go eat a dick you fucktard.

The only fluff and fodder present here is your not so deft avoidance of questions, direct quotes of the law and more.. Just because you ignore it doesn't mean it doesnt' exist. You might not acknowledge these questions/posts, but everyone else sees that you've avoided them. Any credibility you might think you had is completely abolished.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by malakajoe


Maybe third time is a charm.

Do you charge for access to your hardcore members section? And are there pictures in your hardcore members section that are not owned or copyrighted by you?

If so, how do you justify this? Do you feel good about yourself making money off of others work?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Very enlightening response.

I do NOT have a "hardcore" section.

I do have an "advanced" section, where even more adult discussions take place.

If you ask a question - I will reply.
If you start this "bubba crap" again - without adding value to the discussion - you will be ignored.

I thought I did a good job - of explaining - my points of view without "dodging" and without swearing. (excluding a temporary emotional - flipout ...lol)

DOUBLE POOF
CYA - tomorrow.
HEY - thats 24 hours to figure out how to describe a picture or censor one. ; )

That was a GFY blimp.
Can you see that every sentence - every word - even things beyond my control - are being criticized. That is the definition of a witch hunt ...

Bubba fuckin what? You getting people confused again?

You did a shitty job explaining yourself. Ok..you call it an advanced section. In your "advanced" section, do you charge access for this? In your "advanced" section, do you own or have the copyright to all images?

that's pretty sick.. burn baby burn...