I can only do the best that I can - I make no appologies for 100% effort.

However, in comparison there are substantially less words for vagina.

NO - half of your problem has been that you THINK I AM TRYING to break the law. This is not true.

You may not feel any sexual inequality but it does exist globally.

Yes - this is a penis dominated world.

US or Canadian?

I guess since you are unrealistic on values we will just wait the the US government takes you down for having a misleading name that is designed to attract minors to your site. Never thought I would have anything good to say about that law.

Adults need more sex education then minors ... IMO ...
We have learned more about sex in the lat 10 years then in the entire history of the world.

Ooops I am Canadian.

The sale of the domains is in the international trade of currency - US ... ; )

I'm taking a break.
Have a good day everyone.
POOF

John E. Beacock
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

whatever it is. its down

Ya - just passing by.
I thought the domain was as at Melbourne IT.
It turns out - previous requests for registrar changes failed.
SexEducation.com is at NetWorkSolutions.com

After this - temp - shut down.
It turns out the delay is my fault. lol


Should be on as soon as it propogates.
[fingers crossed...]

sexeducation:

I see you are still lying and trying to "debate" the finer points of your "magazine" - this issue is totally irrelevant in relation to the issues of both child porn and copyright infringement.

There is no way on earth you can claim "I have never published any images or video of children engaged in sexual acts". I cannot answer to any adventures you had into the video world, but can assure you YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PUBLISHING IMAGES OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTS WITH ADULTS.

In response to para B, I really don't care much about that, (you are just a waste of time!), but I know it IS illegal, not just under the Digital Millenium Act.

Concerning your domain names for sale - that is a joke!! You could not pay me to buy any of them - especially since this matter is not finished and they are the subject of concern, as are you and several others, with various law enforcement agencies.

Have a nice day :Graucho

My God, what is it about this site that made such a long threa? Anyone wants to make me a resume?

More fluff & fodder ...

QUOTE: "YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PUBLISHING IMAGES OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTS WITH ADULTS."

That is a lie - a complete fabrication.
Post the textual description of the picture/s OR more preferably post the HEAVILY censored graphic of your evidence.
Continued - libelous slander.

QUOTE: "I see you are still lying and trying to "debate" the finer points of your "magazine" - this issue is totally irrelevant in relation to the issues of both child porn and copyright infringement."
It was explained to me that free speech online has different laws then free speech offline. I admit I may have unknowingly made some copyright violations. I have deleted ALL GRAPHICS - ALL GRAPHICS ... including those licensed from Huslter.com, DavidLace.com, TopBucks.com, and more ... all graphics ... and each and every page I built over the years - will undergo a complete review before reposting.

It was debate over free speech in essence that was clouded by neither side truly understanding the other's point of view.

The conclusion is - I had made some mistakes that are being corrected.

In fact I am just waiting for my domain to begin resolving again - to really write about - what occured here, and on other boards I got banned from.

Do you have the actual licenses from these places? As far as I know, Topbucks does NOT give licenses to their content, and you CAN NOT use their affiliate content unless it's for promoting THEIR SITES. If you're just putting it up, you can have your affiliate status pulled.. Did you pay for the content from David Lace? The Hustler content.. did you buy it or is it affiliate content? If it's affiliate contnet, again you can ONLY use it to promote those programs.. NOTHING ELSE.. You better read a little better next time.

Yes - I did/do promote TopBucks.com - they provide a "picture of the day" and were the only picture of the day website linked on SexEducation.com. Got a few checks too.

NO - I did not pay for the DavidLace.com content - although - some of his I definitely would. It was free content - I gave credit for - and which I promote the DavidLace.com affiliate program for content.

Past mistakes have been corrected - LadyMischief.

The graphics are basically irrelevent to the most important issues I wish to discuss.

When a particular AVS terminated my account - I just swapped out the graphics of AdultSexTechniques.com with Swoit.com licensed graphics. The text barely changed. Have a look.

Almost every article on the old terminated SexEducation.com will be done the same way on the new globally accepted SexEducation.com ... : )

Is this thread in line for a prize?

I don't know ...
However - I do know Swoit.com has a "sig" program that should generate at least a case beer for this thread I figure. roflmao ...
; )

I was a Top 3 sig whore for a few days. Promoting the program too. :thumbsup :thumbsup

I picked Swoit.com for the quality of their graphics series. The sig program is just a bonous.... a why not sorta thing.

sexeducation:

Fluff & fodder - you still sexually abusing children and showing your "guests" images of child porn??

When I see a sick fucker like you spouting a load of crap about "free speech" I know you are warped and looking at jail time - all others I knew like you are serving time right now.

On images and your response above... there ain't such a thing as "unknowingly" - the law ain't too keen on idiots taking action out of sheer ignorance (alledgedly) - tis still an offense!

Once again YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PUBLISHING IMAGES OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTS WITH ADULTS. This is NOT a lie but a matter of record.



:321GFY

sexeducation:


Are you going to deny you have ever published images on the net which depicted both young kids naked and also sexual activity between adults and children?????

Take care in any answer you may give...

God Dammit stop already...

keep talking, DAD will not care...he's right in HIS mind and thats all that matters to him...

If you haven't already reported him, do it and stop giving this guy a nice long thread to spread his crap in...

NO - IT IS A LIE.
LIBELOUS - UNFOUNDED SLANDER.
I HAVE NEVER PUBLISHED PICTURES OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTIVITIES.

However, I would entertain a discussion of whether or not a "sex education magazine" would have right to publish nude pictures of minors ...as long as you drop the fluff & fodder and discuss it rationally.

Do you think no where - any where - nude pictures of minors should be allowed ... ANYWHERE?
And if there are places - where nude pictures of minors should be allowed - why there - and not on others?

You say your job is to discuss the truth..but you lie. You say in the same sentence that vaginal orgasm is a lie but then state it doesn't happend to the majority.

For some odd reason, everything takes you days to figure out in your head. If you say something is a lie, then it is a complete false...can't happen or didn't happen. If you state the majority doesn't have something, then you can't state that it is a lie.

Does someone have to go back to kindergarten to learn what a lie is?

If the majority of people believe something to be true - yet it does not happen for the majority of people - it is a global lie.

The word lie is specifically choosen for the attention it gets.
The message - as defined by my job - [email protected] - is getting out.


Vaginal orgasm - is a lie.

Without the IDs necessary to maintain 2257 information, how do you know that you never had pictures of minors having sex?

sexeducation:

IT IS A LIE that you are not responsible for publishing child porn.. you will have that explained to you shortly.

As for discussion.. I have no interest in "discussing" your "rights" on the subject of a "sex education magazine" - that is totally irrelevant in relation to your other offenses. You are clearly not qualified to say anything on the subject of sex education.

Meantime.. sue my ass off for my "libelous unfounded slander"!
:1orglaugh That is going to a source of amusement!

You are just nuts!! You ain't neither a webmaster, not do you have any operational domain called sexeducation.com!

What you did have was a "website" which was a cloak for child pornography!!

You "job" is gotta be cleaning out the toilets in jail.. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Thank you for showing just how dumb you are.

Did you teach your "kids" about lying? Did you use this reasoning?

Here is the defination of lie.

1. A false statement deliberately presented as being true; a falsehood.
2. Something meant to deceive or give a wrong impression.

You are doing #1 for sure. You are deliberately saying vaginal orgasm is a myth and doesn't happen. Yet it does in some. So you are the one lying by saying it doesn't happen. You are deceiving people. I never hear "hollywood" saying all women can have vaginal orgasm's. But I do hear you saying it is a lie and a myth.

Maybe you should use the word rare.

"It is rare for women to have a vaginal orgasm"

"Vaginal orgasm is rare"

But again...thanks for showing that you are spreading false information on a site you claim you want to help people with and spread the truth about. I guess the only way you figure to spread your information is lying.

Who is worse? "Hollywoods" respresentation of sex, or your resprentation of false info?

Because on the child pornography essay which caused all this hassle ...

which by the way - was read thousands of times - yet never had a single complaint - until I began posting ...
"NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE BODILY FLUIDS ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN" into adult webmaster boards like GFY ...

because... primary picture I think everyone is flipping out about ...
I still have her holding a picture of a magic marker sign to the domain name which does/did have 2257 on it's homepage.

The thing is ... no-one has described textually or by presenting a heavily censored graphic - any evidence - to which I can respond.

I am not talking about your sick child porn article illustrations. I am talking about the many images in your tour that are undocumented, either in terms of copyright or 2257 info. For example, an image early in your tour of a man having sex with someone of indeterminate gender, in what you call "a variation on the missionary position". Prove to me that they are both over 18.

you guys are just hell bent on taking down some one who disagrees with you.


:2 cents:


oh and for "lady mischef" the lady with the vendetta ahaha i have dirt i dug up on you = to that of an atomic bomb ahahha
if what i found out is correct ......i will know for sure by monday hahah:321GFY

Listen idiot..more of you.

For a long time, women were seen has not having sexual pleasure. There were no documented medical facts that women could even have orgasm's. Fortunately, women rights pushed for the sexuality of women.

Now you want to say because majority don't have a vaginal orgasm, that vaginal orgasm is a lie. You are pushing back the women sexual revolution. You are telling women that have vaginal orgasm's that they can't, because it is a lie...you are stating they are living a lie. Instead of helping, you are hurting by using those two words...lie and myth.

If you truely want to help others and sex educate, I suggest you choose better words. Teach that vaginal orgasm is possible, but rare. Don't make the ones that have it maybe rethink there sexual pleasure. Teach the truth by stating the truth, with the correct words.

Again, it is not a lie if some can do it or have done it.

But I am sure I am talking to a brain dead small bus kid who believes what he wants, and wants to spread his own propoganda...using a forum to he solicts as the truth to spread his own lies.

sexeducation:

First.. you can't even write an "essay" on fuck all.. don't you get it yet??? DUH??

Second... the "fuss" was the fact that you PUBLISHED CHILD PRONOGRAPHY your website.

Third... you INFRINGED THE COPYRIGHT OF OTHERS by publishing material you clearly had no rights on.. and in several instances, if you did ask for permission, - this would have been refused since the parties involved do not want the images used on A CHILD PORN WEBSITE...

GOT IT YET?????

sexeducation:

You suffering from Multiple Personality Disorder as well??

Umm.. if you would notice, I am no longer participating in this thread.. Let me know when you drop the "bomb". I'll get the popcorn.

LadyMischief;

I learned some things about this so far - No hurry.. tis going OK - may be tonight or in 3 months :glugglug

I'll update you when the bomb drops :-)

i do find it funny how you think that im dad....

goes to show how dumb you moran's really are


lady.....get ready!!!!!

monday........:321GFY

Haha go nuts. There's nothing you can say or do that's going to bother me in one way or another, however it might amuse me. Why not let loose? haha.

keep laughing it up ...... you can only be the worlds biggest net bitch for so long .......seing your close responses to my direct "information" fuck up on you ... you are "concerned"? worried??? ahahhah

Hahhaa... actually no the husband and I are sitting here yukking it up and waiting for you to drop this "bomb" haha..

keep laughing ha ha ha ha this board is being watched by the f.b.i ha ha ha any one that defends you in a thread is linked to you ha ha ha starting with your husband ha ha ha:winkwink:

sexeducation:

That is funny!! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I hope you enjoyed exploring "Dad's" valuable "sex education" site as you previously said. It must have been full of substance when you claim it to be of great value to you!

Now...:321GFY

That's nice, considering I'm in canada #1 and #2 all my records are 100% in order. I invite the authorities to come have a look for themselves :)

This is interesting ...
it's a world wide conspiracy of Dad's ...roflmao

sexeducation:

Mmm.. which "personality" am I talking to?? Hell, who cares!

I like that quote.... now that is meaningful!! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Dad's everywhere ... are coming out of the closet and admitting their "Fathers" .... lol

Dad power ...yehaaa

sexeducation:

Now we have one "personality" chatting with the other... Oh well, they can do that I understand....

Is this a defense brewing and an excuse for your various offenses against children, publishing child porn blah??

By the way, which "personality" is into horses?? :1orglaugh

thanx WMD ...
some people have courage ...
others here just don't want to bite the hand that feeds them ...


UPDATE: It's 9:00 PM here and the DNS is not resolving SexEducation.com ...

hopefully ... it works at 9:00 AM tomorrow ...
As 99% of the website is cgi based I could just flip it on under SexEducation.NET or SexEducation.ORG or others ...

But that does not resolve why this ocurred.
So I will wait until the powers that be ...
make their decisions...

Will there be a global magazine where all members are 100% anonymous and no sexual topic is barred?
Time will tell ... that is for sure.

have a good nite ...
you too FBI ... : )

Gone to watch a movie ...

John E. Beacock
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

Dad's everyone coming out of the closet and admitting their Fathers ...roflmao ... that's funny ...

tks again WMD ...
they know you're not me they can just check the IP address.

Who cares about WMD.. he is irrelvant and an obvious "guise".. something a child pornographer and molester knows all about.

Anyway... how is Bryan these days??

sexeducation:

hello????

Yes - it was explained to me by JFPDude that freedom of speech online is different then freedom of speech offline. Using that picture was a mistake and it has been removed. In fact - I deleted ALL graphics.

The previous background images of the tour were from a previous AVS which has requested anonymity and on my website anonymity is of the highest importance.

I will once again put up a series of similar graphics - that increase in "adultness" as one enters the website. At least that is my current thinking.