Do you charge for access to your hardcore members section? And are there pictures in your hardcore members section that are not owned or copyrighted by you?

If so, how do you justify this?

You can take two people who've never been around other people, a male and a female, and put them together at the right time, and instint takes over.. How the hell are you teaching anyone anything? You aren't, that simple.

dear god you are fucked in the head.

hey, your adult website is not a magazine. just thought you should know.

Oh - come on ...
I am sure you can guess someone who is 20 or 80 years old.
Give me a break ...

You may not have the skill set to come within a year or two of a persons age - but I do.

All I am asking for is a general description of this proof you are saying you have. Supposedly - screen captures were taken and sent to my suppliers - JUST HEAVILY EDIT THE PICTURE.

You can not do that either - right?
Post a censored picture - or describe it ....
quit making excuses ...

and do you HONESTLY think it's so special that both partners experience orgasm? Like it's never happened before? There are a LOT of very knowledgable people in the area of sex here.. I myself am EXTREMELY multi-orgasmic, and I know several other women on this board who, FROM EXPERIENCE will tell you and your articles that you're both full of shit.

Do you charge for access to your hardcore members section? And are there pictures in your hardcore members section that are not owned or copyrighted by you?

If so, how do you justify this? Do you feel good about yourself making money off of others work?

Can you always 100% tell the differece between a 16 year old girl or an 18 year old girl? If you say yes, I claim bullshit.. I've seen 12 year old girls that looked 20, and 20 year olds that looked 11. Oh, sorry, you like em young.. But that aside, can you PROVE, if the authorities knock on your door that the people in the images on your crackpot website are of legal age? Can you provide custodial information or model releases and ids? No. You would go right to jail.

There are people 8 feet tall too ...

Yes - I would say it is "special that both partners experience orgasm" and that most partner sex couples would like this to occur.

And there is no reason for it not to.

Premature Ejaculation is "cured" with knowledge.
Inhibited female orgasm is "cured" with knowledge.

if the board's were never broughten to this site the whole sexeducation.com would have been eraticated easily but with people on the board ranting raving like children with vendettas surly in some point in time dad @ sexeducation would have been notified . hmm also note this site www.sexed.com notice how this site is undisputable proof as to dad's cause and war on porn and natural sex in todays society

vaginal mutilation

:2 cents:

what!?!?
youve made excuses through this whole thread! you are so fucking full of it.
you were given links to pictures on your website....that should be enough....no one needs to describe shit to you.....unless of course you are fucking blind?

multiple personalities dont help anyones cause. stay in one character 'dad'

I have dealt with THOUSANDS of people which use absolutes ...
"always", "never", "they" ,"them" ...

The answer is no person can be 100% exact all of the time.
(an absolute question - will get an absolute answer.)

Yes - for the ones I think are generating all this commotion.
Yes - DESCRIBE THE PICTURE ...

I have no idea what you are talking about.

just like you have no idea what you are doing wrong.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

So is illegal activity and jailtime. Too bad it's too late for you.

NO - ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA ...
I'VE NEVER SAID ANYTHING CORRECT ... EVER - RIGHT?



(another absolute statement - with another absolute reply)

Time will prove one of us right.
Will the other appologize?

Maybe third time is a charm.

Do you charge for access to your hardcore members section? And are there pictures in your hardcore members section that are not owned or copyrighted by you?

If so, how do you justify this? Do you feel good about yourself making money off of others work?

The one in your tour, with two young looking people having sex? Hundreds saw it that *I* know of. Provide me license information for those images. Provide me with documentation that proves those people are of legal age to engage in those activites on camera. In fact, provide licensing information for everything on your site, or your notices of permission, photographer's releases, etc.. Let's see them.. This is what the cops will want when they show up on your doorstep. Too bad you don't have it.
You are in the hotseat here, pal, not me. And very nice of you to COMPLETELY IGNORE my posts DIRECTLY QUOTING canadian law on copyright infringement which you are clearly commiting. Sweet.

you dont need to apologize to us. just send gfy a postcard from prison.

I doubt Bubba's going to have his dick out of your mouth for long enough for you to stutter sorry, but I can hope, right?

I'm gone for the night.
I will be back as usual.

However, will there be a description of the "proof" or will there be a heavily censcored graphic of this "proof" presented here ...

Not likely ... fluff & fodder. right?

John E. Beacock
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

[PLUG]
Every person that is reproductively capable has a self evident right to an understanding of such.

as usual you completely ignore the proof.

go eat a dick you fucktard.

The only fluff and fodder present here is your not so deft avoidance of questions, direct quotes of the law and more.. Just because you ignore it doesn't mean it doesnt' exist. You might not acknowledge these questions/posts, but everyone else sees that you've avoided them. Any credibility you might think you had is completely abolished.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by malakajoe


Maybe third time is a charm.

Do you charge for access to your hardcore members section? And are there pictures in your hardcore members section that are not owned or copyrighted by you?

If so, how do you justify this? Do you feel good about yourself making money off of others work?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Very enlightening response.

I do NOT have a "hardcore" section.

I do have an "advanced" section, where even more adult discussions take place.

If you ask a question - I will reply.
If you start this "bubba crap" again - without adding value to the discussion - you will be ignored.

I thought I did a good job - of explaining - my points of view without "dodging" and without swearing. (excluding a temporary emotional - flipout ...lol)

DOUBLE POOF
CYA - tomorrow.
HEY - thats 24 hours to figure out how to describe a picture or censor one. ; )

That was a GFY blimp.
Can you see that every sentence - every word - even things beyond my control - are being criticized. That is the definition of a witch hunt ...

Bubba fuckin what? You getting people confused again?

You did a shitty job explaining yourself. Ok..you call it an advanced section. In your "advanced" section, do you charge access for this? In your "advanced" section, do you own or have the copyright to all images?

that's pretty sick.. burn baby burn...

on top again.. hehe


since this guy is scum..

check out our new site that will be announced tomorrow..

http://assgate.com

Idiot

The website is broken. It is broken because I had spent more time with Google.com alogorithms and the homepage then with fixing the code of the "advanced section" and with fixing the code of the "file server/graphic filter".

I have changed and rechanged the website numerous times in an attempt to solidify a constant AVS or CC processor. The "advanced" section and the "file" section have been broken for several months - maybe even - six months.

The advanced section tends to contain the more "controversial" articles like ...
"Die - Faggot - Die" which discusses the ecologoy of AIDS in bathhouses. This article is extremely upsetting to young promiscuous gay men. It was written to be that way.

"Google Gag Gah" contains a censored graphic of a "first page results" link of the search term "bondage". The graphic of the female with her lips sewn shut was captured from the "tour" area of a paid Google.com advertising customer. Because I called this graphic "rape & torture" and NOT "bondage" my advertising campaign with Google.com was terminated. Same graphic - different view of it. It doesn't matter that the website displaying the graphic ALSO used "torture" as a word when describing the event.

"Let Teens Have Sex" contains, what I believe is a very kewl and very unique "lesson/discussion" of all the arguements presented to me over the years for allowing teenagers to have sex. It has a unique ending that "nails" the reader - and promotes abstinence as a mature decision.

the advanced section contains ...

discussion of G-spot stimulation and real female ejaculation discussions.

I have tried NUMEROUS, NUMEROUS marketing methods and was currently in the process of having just the homepage, the tour, "Dad's Desk", a sample Table of Contents and to see the rest you would require AVS access or a paid membership.

I have tried all graphics & video off if you do not have a paid membership.

I have tried showing graphics as thumbnails (really an attempt to comply with AVS site requirements like "30 thumb pictures minimum" ) and requiring an AVS or paid membership to view video.

I have tried not being allowed to save your "viewing preferences" as a manner in which to entice AVS or paid memberships.

I have tried "guaranteed reply" to emails ...

And I have tried combinations of all the above.

I do not "own" Pepsi.com but I do talk about one of their commercials.

I do not "own" Cosmopolitan magazine or "O" Oprahs magazine but I do discuss those magazine and contain samples of the advertising.

I do not "own" Admiral Krags graphics but do present opinions about his graphics (which most have his name on).

I do not "own" Playboy - but will discuss the evolution of Playboy graphics and how Playboy has stayed more "main stream". Usually no close up "vaginal" shots.

I do not "own" Penthouse.com but I have a right to discuss the photograph techniques which seem to be used over and over - like the shining/reflecting of a light on a the females vagina.

I do not "own" Hustler.com but I have a right to discuss the more bizzare graphics like "urination" and "golden showers".

The advanced section contains "The only known cure for premature ejaculation" a link to "http://www.DrMirkin.com"

Currently - I am unsure how I will market SexEducation.com.

Now if you think about it - is there really an "Advanced" section. I don't think so - the whole word "advanced" plays on "I want the one sentence answer to sex. Just give me the good stuff." Is my advanced section really more advanced? Yes - and - no. It's just more discussion - to me. I am not the only online newspaper struggling with how to entice readers to get an online membership.

Do I own the buildings of the photographs I take (for example) of the City of Calgary - no?

Yes. But did you take those pictures on your site?
Fucktard.

Your website is an example of what must be changed.
No aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids on any directly accessed domain name.

A typo/mistake of forgetting to put in the "P" to the URL - "www.Passgate.com - the world's safest online payment technology." immediately presents your website "assgate.com" which immediately shows aroused genitals and reproductive bodily fluids.

This needs to stop and the majority of adults agree.

May I suggest you rate your page with ICRA.org so 90% + of todays browser can block your website if so set.

Huh?
No - I do not own the buildings in the photographs I take of the City of Calgary.

#1) You can not describe or present a heavily censored graphic either - right?

#2) Absolutely. My homepage is not written for Google.com any more. I understand Google alogorithms I was forced to - when they terminated an advertising campaign. I make no appologies for doing my job as a Webmaster - increasing traffic.

It is also HIGHLY recommended that you put your DOMAINS up for sale by searching for "free classifieds", making a list of those services ranked high in Google.com - and then go and make an advertisement with those websites - of any kind - and do not forget to mention your domain name.


QUOTE:" ... why not donate that domain name to a legitmate registered sexual education organization? Maybe something that the world health organization could do with it. In fact, you seem to want to win our respects, change our minds, donate it. I dare ya. "
Why don't you donate all your porn profits to the starving and tortured children by AIDS - in Africa? I dare ya.

Just stepping aside for a moment... GFY threads will never be seen by well behaved SE bots.

http://bbs.gofuckyourself.com/robots.txt

<font face="Courier">User-agent: *
Disallow: /
</font>

Well ...
My primary domain SexEducation.com is still not working.

Although most of my other domains are and I could re-open the website under one of those other domains - in seconds.

I am waiting to find out what the SPECIFIC problem is ... to have it solved and move on.

My [email protected] email address is still not behaving correctly. That email address controls all my domains.

Something was done - by someone - however I have still NOT been contacted in any manner about my website.

Will keep you informed.

John E. Beacock
[email protected]
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

PPS: Usually - at my location - DNS updates happen around 9:00 AM my time. [fingers crossed] ...
Hopefully - everything just fixes itself and I can move on - but I promise some of the issues discussed here - will be addressed in the most expeditious manner. Which with my schedule is like - 90 days. Sorry - I can not fix the issues addressed faster then that. I have job too ... one that is quite relaxing actually ... and is just as fun as SexEducation.com.

It's all good ... bring it on ...bring it on ...life that is.
Pretty kewl stuff ... : )

Sexeducation
LOL - you obivously can't read Google's rules as well as the info in this thread.... fucking clueless.

BTW - You are now saying you have taken images from Playboy and Hustler without permission? LOL... dickhead!

Oh and one point.... IF YOU are not into CP... where did you get the nude minors pictures from that you have already admitted to putting on your site? Seems like you would to be actively browsing for that stuff..... You TRULLY are FUCKED IN THE HEAD!