Semantics really. I expressed my opinion about a Google allowed "bondage" graphic as "rape & torture".

Playboy.com, Hustler.com and PentHouseMag.com have played a historical role is shaping our societies views and morals about sex and are a fair topic for a website about sexual intercourse.

In fact it is from adult magazines like those that personally gave me the impression that a woman could have a vaginal orgasm - where now that I have done research - it appears to be a lie.

They have also fought and defended - for years - free speech, and have had a direct benefit to the protection of an individuals right to such.

What you don't know - is that several "firms/corporations" have requested anonymity on SexEducation.com - and I have honoured each request.

Also - I have previously emailed Playboy.com that I had written about them.

I have ONE PICTURE of a nude minor on my website. She is not engaged in any sexual activity. The child pornography article I wrote several years back - is doing what it is intended to do. Draw attention to the issue. Child pornography has increased 50% year after year - since the inception of the internet. Obviously - ASACP.org is not the final solution now - is it?

The problem with child pornography is that it takes seconds to find it. I get unsolicited emails everyday pushing child porn and beastiality and ... even ... "teen" type sites which fringe on child pornography really.

Yes - I have done research on Child Pornography.
The source of the most controversial graphic on my website was
posted into a "fetish" newsgroup .. and was automatically downloaded by QuadSucker. It is one of 16 graphics - I deleted the other graphics .... and I censored her image.

Many people are accidentally downloading CP when they go into usenet or use P2P software like FileTopia.com or iMesh.com or whatever flavour is most popular today. I wrote that article when it happened to me.

YOu are so full of shit you stink.. You can have women bathing in cum and 50 hard dicks in a "directly accessed domain name". IF YOU HAVE DOCUMENTATION FOR IT. And if it's behind a warning that informed people there is sexual content in the site... You have NO clue on the law to stop talking like you do. We've explained it to you until we're blue in the face, and your'e still hung up on that.. Mister I can't afford a lawyer. Well how about this, I have THREE lawyers, and they all tell me you're full of shit. Stick that in your crack pipe and smoke it, idiotstick.

I still haven't heard how and why it is ok to use others pictures and make money of it? Why you feel it is ok to use other content without there permission?

Why does a CP article need a picture or pictures of CP? Does a newspaper that writes about a CP that is caught or a news channel that talks about a CP ring that is busted show the actual pictures or videos? No. You are attracting people looking for CP if you use CP pictures in any type of CP article, for or against. Again, why do you need pictures of it to write about it?

If you don't own the images you have on your site, you must have a LEGAL LICENSE TO DISPLAY THOSE IMAGES ON YOUR SITE. You do not. You must have PROPER CUSTODIAL INFORMATION FOR ALL SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL. You do not. YOU MUST HAVE PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER OF THE IMAGE FOR USE (or a license). You do not. Your site is not going to get magically "fixed" bub.. You broke the law, it got pulled down. Stop living in denial and deal with it.

My long term goals with GFY are not Google.com algorithm related ...

[PLUG]
Feed the world and you feed peace. How many do you want to feed?

Open it somewhere else, I dare you, watch it get pulled just as fast.. You still think it's some error? THEY DELETED YOUR SITE, YOU IDIOT. It's GONE. You have ILLEGAL MATERIAL and were in breach of SEVERAL LEGAL COPYRIGHTS. It's not coming back.

Gotta go to work.
Have a great day everyone.

Cya - tonight or tomorrow.

John E. Beacock
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

POOF

SO now you ADMIT to having child pornography on your website? So the truth finally comes out.. You have glossed over and downplayed everything else.. tell everyone about the REST of it.. and for your information, even your "censored" crap is ILLEGAL....

I am glad Google took down your advertisement. You were using stolen content, by your own admission since you said you used there pictures on your site. If the pictures you stole were real and not doctored in Photoshop, then that site is sick, too.

Didn't anyone teach you that 2 wrongs don't make a right?

"Dad"-- You still seem to be missing a basic point. For your use of unlicensed images and text to be legal, they need to be used in line with fair use laws for the press. This often means you need to be a registered press agency. It also means that you can only use them when you give appropriate credit, *and* when you are reviewing the image/etc. You have many images that are placed on the tour of your site with no commentary, news, or sourcing. That is copyright infringement.

This by the same guy who thinks you have to pay Google to get yoursitename.com listed on Google. Doesn't realize that it is all a matter of configuration of your site on if it is listed as www.yoursitename.com or yoursitename.com.

Even stated that he hopes everyone has stock in Google since sites are paying to be listed this way. When did Google go public?

Very well stated. But he won't get it.

No - I admit I need to be more diligent with regards to what you are talking about. I will have these issues addressed and fixed as expeditiously as possible.

I was not aware of "fair use" laws - I have followed links to recommended reading of "laws". This issue will be corrected.

However, it must be noted that the constant termination of suppliers is part of the problem of why it has not already fixed. It's a catch 22.

I join an AVS - get permission to use their graphics - then it is revoked and now I have to remove all those graphics too. I have had a problem keeping up.

I am truly trying to adjust the site to fit a more a "global" set of community standards while obeying the laws of various free countires of the world.

I admit to not being perfect - however - to be accepted in this community - perfection is required - and it shall be done.

I will search out links for USA, CANADA and the UNITED KINDOM and read up on "fair use" laws...

And I will post retractions if necessary or requested.

I will continue to do my best.

The first issue is getting my [email protected] email address working which controls all my domains. Otherwise - I would already be working on the things - I learned in this newsgroup.

Dad@

PS: I really got to scoot to work.

Is this guy for real? :1orglaugh

Sexeducation (u need it)

Thought you had me on ignore fuckwad! People like you are easy to read... so full of shit you need to know what people are saying about you and that's why you keep coming back even though you've not grasped what anyone has said over 12 fucking pages. Most people, even people who can't speak English, would understand within a few posts... You, are a thick twat.

Translation:- you can't read the rules or even comprehend between what's right or wrong.
Translation:- You've stolen their pics and put them on your site and think it's ok. Whatever role they have played - YOU have no right to use their pics without prior permission, license and documention. Copyright infringement... GET IT!

Translation:- You are very crap in bed.... If you have never given your wife/ex-wife/gf a 'vaginal' orgasm.... don't think about teaching Sex Education. Your research seems to be your pitiful attempt at boosting your sexual ego back up after you realised that you just can't cut it. You are warped and need help.

Why would they want anonymity? Surely they would love the free advertising - afterall you are still leaving their watermarks on the images? You are full of shit..

And of course they gave you permission to use their images right....

You have broke the law by distributing child pornography which is a serious offence and it should't take 12 pages for you to grasp that. You are a CP peddler.... and that's not what GFY or the ADULT industry is about... RIGHT!

The ASACP have more sense than to put child porn pics on their site in the fight against CP... and they do actively shut CP sites down. You are now distributing it... with dicks like you, it's not surprising it's on the increase.

You are fucking unreal...

It is good to see you admitting your mistakes, and promising to fix them. It is a big step up from blindly denying everything. However, you still don't seem to understand the seriousness of what you are doing. I will believe your promises to come in line with the law when I see it. And remember, the cops won't take "I was going to fix it, honest" as an answer.

I've never blindly denied everything - reread the posts ...lol

I think - because of the community I am currently in - that your perspective of SexEducation.com is one of a "porn" site.

SexEducation.com is not a porn site.

It is a global magazine of sexual intercourse.

Always - has been - always will be.

I still have not found info on this "fair use" stuff though.

And I do have a question ...

Lets say - well actually - it is occuring in a thread here on GFY.
"Anal Sex is it for every girl."

Someone posted a horrific graphic of a females vagina in that thread.
The translation of the french (it's been awhile) contained in the graphic is
"Raped - she has finally received bullets in her vagina."

So here - in this newsgroup a REAL rape graphic as it appears ... has been posted.

Is anyone shutting down GFY - besides Deepsy1?

Now if I want to discuss that graphic ....
How would I according to "fair use" quote it's source?

Do I say I got it from GFY - that would not be fair to GFY?
Do I have a right to discuss that graphic at all?
Or - should no magazine or newspaper be able to discuss that graphic?

Yep - that's me.
What year was that - do you know?

You can write about anything you want. You can link to anything you want.

BUT if you show a picture, you have to have permission to use it, and you have to give credit for who took the picture.

Easy enough?

fluff & fodder ...
all these have been previously answered.
you add nothing of value to this discussion.

Neither do you.

In reading what LadyMischief aske me to ...
from my understanding ...
I can still use the PUBLICLY POSTED picture - but must state it source when it comes publicly known.

Lets assume (I have no intention - but lets assume) ...
I want that picture presented with the discussion of it and the thread it is contained in. The thread is a valid topic.

So you are saying - I can not protect the identity of the person who POSTED IT?
It appears the graphic is one of an unknown source.
Are you saying - I can not use the graphic AT ALL ?

Yes, I am stating you can't use it.

People used to think they could download tons of content from newsgroups and use those pictures to make adult websites. There defense was they got the pictures from a public location.

Well, doesn't hold up...and as I am sure many content providers and webmasters can tell you...they will win in court.

If you don't have direct permission from the person who owns the pictures, you cannot use them even if you got them from a newsgroup, a forum, etc....

Your brain getting this yet?

This is where we have a fundamental difference of opinion.

If the graphic is unknown, and it is potentially "harmful" to t he person - or the subjects - and I ensure that their identities are protected ... I feel in this case - for this graphic - as a magazine I do not have to reveal my sources ... because it could be harmful to those involved.

And the law LADYMISCHIEF sent me to - states the author may request anonymity and be expected to have it.

If you do not know the source, you should not use it. If it is ADULT related material, you require FULL custodial infromation and it's NOT press material under fair use. It is goverened by obscenity laws, not fair use laws. That requires model releases, ids, or at least some form of custodial information.... and if you didn't take the image, it requires that you have a LICENSE from the ORIGINAL PRODUCER or his AGENT OR BROKER to use the image... AND you have to have a proper 2257 disclosure on your site.. You have NONE of this. See that advice I give can actually be USEFUL?

You are not a registered news media source, therefore fair use laws DO NOT APPLY to you, you are in violation of copyright unless you go legit and register, and then you are still answerable to the law.

Someone smart just posted this elsewhere.. I suggest you use it to your advantage (not that that forgives your OTHER crimes, but you're seeing some clarity to let's work with this)
http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html

I will look up this "news media source" ...

However - I can tell you - that in Calgary there is no license requirement for a "magazine". The reason for this is the cost of the license could be used to prohibit free speech. This sounds like something similar - if there is a "registration fee" for where you are saying I should register.

You fuckin idiot...what you said is the author GAVE you permission to use it, but stay anonymous.

If you just a picture from a forum or newsgroup, who gave you permission?

I swear, my girlfriends little sister would understand copyright infringement better than you.

Good link ...
cya - tomorrow.
I'm exhausted.

If you are hosting your website in the united states, you have to obey THEIR laws as well. Start doing your research instead of wasting your time here... This place is doing you no good.. you have NO fucking clue, you don't even know where to start.. I have 5 different friends in Calgary, ALL with their own magazines, mainstream. They ALL contacted LAWYERS before going to print, and I highly suggest you work double time at McDonalds and scrape up the coin to hire one for yourself, because you are floundering worse than ANYONE I've ever seen. You don't even know the laws of your own country, let alone the country where you want to host.

Considering it says 2002 in the url.. my first guess would be.. well 2002

We were telling you the same shit asshole.

You can't really expect a guy with such low intelligence that he cant' even start to grasp copywrite infringement even in the the least bit to be able to figure that out, did you?

I think I know why he is posting on GFY! See #9 on the list below:

Top Ten Sig Cash Referrers Today! Username Impressions
eiht98 2101
masochist 1549
reakwon 1293
profxx 1101
pimpex 1012
maxjohan 962
silvertab 850
ngndcom 820
sexeducation 600
savas72 578

Lets hope Swoit doesn't pay him his $50 a month or whatever % he gets out of the $1000. I believe a few have notified them about what he is like.

1) Don't even try and think that what this asshat (apologies to the deserving asshats I may have offended) has been providing even comes close to "teen".
2) Whoever your are, you either 1. never went to his site before this entire situation started, or 2. you are a mentally retarded assfuck that fingers 8yo girls. In either case you have no opinion of merit here. Go Fuck Yourself.
3) Actually there are many indications, while not publically known turths that he IS in FACT a pedophile and has been procecuted.
4) Try not interpretting the law(s) that you in fact do not understand fully. AVS sites, ALL OF THEM, forbid this kind of content. EVERY image, quote, etc. is copyrighted as soon as it is made by the originator. Shut the Fuck up! (oops, sorry - wrong board...)
5) Never, ever, ever, call anyone a FAG. If they are straight they will kick your ass. If they are a homosexual man, they will kick your ass then dress your bloody corpse in a nice pink gown and hang you from the nearest flagpole with a sign that says "I'm a FAG".

sexeducation:

What "magazine" do you claim to publish??? You don't have any "magazine". You operate an illegal ... (careful with words here because what you have/had, can hardly be called a "website").. website on the basis of:

(a) IMAGES CONTAINING SEXUAL ACTS WITH CHILDREN including sex acts with men and young boys ad nausea. There is NO debate on this - it is clearly "child porn".

(b) FURTHER ILLEGAL IMAGES FOR WHICH YOU HAVE NO PERMISSION TO PUBLISH. ie Time Magazine cover. There are NO discretionary rights to do as you see fit - these are illegal images, pure and simple, as defined by international copyright agreements.

If you doubt any of this.. I will give you a password to a domain where you can see ALL content you "published", - images and html pages, which constituted your supposed "magazine". If you don't understand this, I better explain fully... your "website" has been recorded by me and also by, I understand, more than one law enforcement agency now and is available for review.

So meantime.. fuck off and try to avoid molesting any more children and save up for some legal activity....

:321GFY

I quit reading all the replies to this thread because it all entails nothing but everyone on the mentally clued planet telling SE just how fucked he is and him replying with "fluff and fodder". I merely hope that one day soon this asshat, fucktard, wannabe, dillweed, child molesting, piece of trash, BARBARA STREISAND! (whew) gets his ass handed right back to him.