I have never abused children - you are a fucking liar.

Be careful of who I know.

And return favours I can call upon. : )

801

I am Father that has reseached sex for almost ten years.
I make my point of view - I thought - blatently obvious - from my handle and my historical record of answering emails.

I came here do discuss ..
"No aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids on any directly accessed domain" but there appears to be no answer ... no discussion ... and no willingness to even to discuss ... regardless of the number of "adult" boards I have been booted from.

sexeducation:

YOU KNOW FUCK ALL - For my part, I have already collected the "favours" for you - and I ain't smiling.

PISS OFF OUT OF HERE "BEACOCK" AND TRY TO AVOID PUBLIHSING CHILD PORN AND BEING A THIEF - AND LINE UP A LAWYER COS YOU WILL NEED ONE.

:321GFY

sexeducation:

I ASK FOR THE FACTS.. What qualifications do you hold which "entitle" you to provide sex education to children??

Bring it on ... bring it on ...
It's all fun ...LIFE - that is as it goes by.

You can only do the best you can do.
Those who do not - are cowards.

John E. Beacock
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

[PLUG]
Feed the world and you feed peace. How many do you want to feed?

sexeducation:

WAS THAT A REPLY?? I assume you are NOT QUALIFIED to provide sex education to childen.

That is no surprise somehow since your are a CHILD PORNOGRAPHER, A THIEF and KNOW NOTHING.


:321GFY

What do you feel about ...

"No aroused genitals or reproductive fluids on any directly accessed domain?"

sexeducation:

WAS THAT A REPLY?? I assume you are NOT QUALIFIED to provide sex education to childen.

That is no surprise somehow since your are a CHILD PORNOGRAPHER, A THIEF and KNOW NOTHING.

:321GFY

I do not educate children.
It has content for ADULTS (Parents) which is an alternative to your stupidity.

My website has the highest levels of mature content as rated by ICRA.org.

It has many warnings of adult content ... 5 that they must agree to the "Access Policy" before continuing ..

The graphics of the tour continue to become more adult ...

It uses Aestiva.com self expiring URLS to not allow people to bookmark interiour pages ...

It uses cookies to better filter content ..

It has the ability to shut off all background images.

It has the ability to shut off all webpage graphics.

What exactly else do you want me to do?
Be specific?

Sorry I forgot some of the Parental controls I coded ,,,

you can block specific articles ...
you can block specific videos ...

you can be warned if the cookies were changed without your authority ...


I have the highest levels of content control that exist on the planet ...


Name any website - ANYWHERE - that has done ALL of these things that this hamburger flipping father has ...

forget that ...

Why not just answer the question about ...

"No aroused genitals or reproductive fluids on any directly accessed domain name?" ...


Just answer that one question with a reason why or why not?

sexeducation:

FUCK OFF CHILD PORNOGRAPHER, THIEF (AND YOUR OTHER QUALITIES) - YOU HAVE ZERO TO OFFER ANYONE

Still no answer .. right ?

That is what you called NAILED ... PINNED ...

No answer .. still ANYWHERE ...

Holy fuckin shit zipotage man. Are you fuckin serious?

Are you saying you are far more advanced than anyone else out there? You can't even understand law or how Google works...yet you claim you are the most advanced. I don't know if I should laugh all night or just sit here stunned.

How about if I turn off cookies or hahahahahahahahahaha? Then what? Kids are far more technical than there parents and will know how to get around things.

You make yourself a bigger joke each and every fuckin day.

sexeducation:

You answered my question.

Next questions is what qualifications do you have to provide *ANY* from of sex education?

Just answer the question that started all of this several webmaster boards ago ...

stay focussed ... it's a difficult question ..

Should aroused genitals and reproductive bodily fluids be shown on any directly accessed domain name - and if so why?

One simple question still not answered ANYWHERE ..
answer it ...

1. Don't use anyones content without there permission.

2. Don't solicits minors to view your site. You honestly think a teenager will sit there with there parent and look at porn?

3. Make your stupid access policy much easier to read and understand. It is filled with a bunch of garbage and not easy to follow. And why make them click it? Why not show all that info, and then an enter at the bottom of it? I think I know why...because you are just doing it to be "legit", not to truely have people follow it.

4. Have a site of just education without pictures or videos. Then have a site for porn. Seperate. Easy enough for you?

I answered it on another board. Don't say no one ever has.

P.S. - Why are you avoiding my response? I told you your post was garbage. My response was on topic because you wrote and asked what else was needed. I told you how wrong you are.

How the fuck is that off topic?

Lol ... what is your supposed "answer" a secret ... repost it. then.

Con....

How about a guy with 9 inches soft? In your mind, that would be ok to show, huh?

How about a women shoving a grapefruit up her ass? I am sure she wouldn't be aroused, so that would ok?

It is obvious you hide behind this line simply to try and make your site look legit. Your front page gives permission to minors to view your site, that you claim has sexual techniques and videos. Do you know it is illegal in most areas to show minors sex videos?

Answer the question ... the fluff and fodder - no longer cuts it in this thread - we've both been through it ... answer the question ...

sexeducation:

I'll repeat this question since you may have missed it as well.

What qualifications do you have to provide *ANY* from of sex education?

Also... What does the education of parents have to do with, for example, images of adults involved in anal sex with children ?

I did answer your fuckin question. That line is not going to work. Simple as that.

I will expand on my thoughts if you answer my response to your earlier post about cookies and such.

This is not a onesided conversation on your end. You ask, we ask. You answer stupid, we answer intelligently.

Answer mine..and I will go further on yours.

sexeducation:

PEDO... I'll repeat this question yet again since you may have missed it as well.

What qualifications do you have to provide *ANY* from of sex education?

Also... What does the education of parents have to do with, for example, images of adults involved in anal sex with children ?

Cya tomorrow ...
This thread will end on that question ...
do you get the point !
no matter how many times you change this into a personal attack on me or my website ... this thread will die only when the question gets answered.... or noone replies to it any longer ...
I will ask the same thing tomorrow ...
good nite ...

John E.Beacock
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

And again, I answered your question..and you avoided my response to your other post.

I am sorry if you do not have the intelligence to read into what I said to answer your question. If you respond my post, I will further expand on why your one stupid line is dumb and way off base.

sexeducation:

Another "avoidance" by the typical PEDO!

Fuck off you sick sorry specimen! :321GFY

It's truley amazing how much notoriety (albeit negative) that this schmuck and his website have recieved on this board.

Lucky he's not running a legitimate affiliate program for good looking paysites or I'm sure he still would have had a few sign ups - even with the bad publicity. :(

SE - you're dismissed.

sexeducation:

PEDO... I'll repeat this question yet again since you may have missed it as well.

What qualifications do you have to provide *ANY* from of sex education?

Also... What does the education of parents have to do with, for example, images of adults involved in anal sex with children ?

Take your time with an answer to these questions you elected to opt out on with :

"Cya tomorrow ... T
his thread will end on that question ...
do you get the point !...."

And no, since you have not made any points, I can't "get the point".

By the way, I have just made another copy of your "websites" for the record and you claim to have disposed of the DAD email address. This still appears on adultsextechiques.com for which you are responsible.


:321GFY

Kel:

Just wondering what we can do with his domains.. sexeducation.com blah.

But doubt he has the funds to pay anyone to take them on - I'd want $100K and an indemnity from him on legal action/costs! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I have time for a few quick posts ...
This morning ...

No Webby I am NOT avoiding your questions.
I will answer any question posted.
If I do not it is not on purpose.
Sometimes I am in the process of answering one post when you are posting like above.

I have the same qualifications that ALL Mothers & ALL Fathers have. The right to discuss sex with their children to the best of their ability. SexEducation.com is a global magazine of alternative adult sexual intercourse. That Parents can read and if they choose print and give to their child.

Mothers will have a different perspective of things - as would brothers. My perspective is that of a Father.

For example; one of the things I recommend Parents to do when they are watching a "television sexual scene" with their teens - and where - as usual the couple does not reach for a condom or any other form of contraception - is to say outloud to themselves - so the teen can hear "that is so unrealistic - they never reach for a condom" AND/OR just change the channel while saying "sex, sex, sex - boring - it's not the most important thing in life."

ALSO - I know that some of your previous questions were not answered on multiple pages back ...
I am aware of that - but I do not want to be accused of "bumping" this thread.

There are NO images of children having sex on my websites!
Except for some banners (which the current is being replaced) and swoit.com graphics and some clipart - there are no graphics on my website - at all.

With regards to "adult education" and discussion.
Yes - many many - adults enjoy pornography. But a better job of explaining that pornograpy is just masturbation material and not necessarily reflective of true partner sex - needs to be done. My website discusses that - in an adult manner. For example; you wouldn't believe how many young men from India have asked me what hole to put it in.

I don't believe I used the past tense when updating this thread.
I don't see my post regarding that on this page. However, I am certain it went something like - "as the new restructuring of SexEducation.com occurs - I will remove all Dad@ and replace that with JB@" ... actually - I am changing my mind ... I think "John@" would be better because it indicates I am male.

The banners IS GOING to be replaced.
The handle "Dad@" IS GOING to be replaced.

There is one thing that should be noted. Anyone - ANYONE - can post an anonymous on topic reply to any of the articles on SexEducation.com. My responses are completely open for critique. So if for example - you - or a Doctor - or a University Professor ...

(which by the way - several have emailed me saying " ...nice response ...it's great to see a website that answers questions so concisely and refreshingly modern...)

... or ... anyone ... can reply to a post on my magazine. Pro - or - con. If I am answering the questions so far off base - then - you would expect to see more "are you out of your mind type replies" but you do not. I am usually pretty close to the issues in my posts.


Webby - would SexEducation.com as a UBB board be more acceptable to you? And would you considering hosting it on your server? I would consider that - and - you could be a moderator...
Just a thought because I am truly trying to work this out.

Frig ...
I got to go work.
Have a good day everyone.
John

If anyone wants to host a UBB board for SexEducation.ORG I will do that. And we could put ...OVER 18+ Enter SexEducation.com ...
UNDER 18 Enter FamilySexEducation.com another domain I own.
I am trying to solve these issues.

I have to go ...
sorry ... I must get to work.

The SexEducation.ORG offer stands ...
I am willing to test this out.

You do not have the right to talk to OTHER PEOPLE'S CHILDREN about sex education. THAT IS NOT WITHIN YOUR RIGHTS. The vast majority of the "discussion material" on your website should NOT be discussed with children whatsoever!!! Ok little Johnny.. sit down and let me tell you about genital mutliation. It's imparitive that you understand there are people who hideously butcher girls..

Yeah, that sounds like something they need to hear while they're at an impressionable age.. You have NO RIGHT TO CHOOSE what content someone else's children/teenagers should learn about. you are NOT QUALIIFIED TO TEACH. Even the stupid things you've suggested to do with a teenagers... "sex sex boring?" Change the channel? Yeah, avoidance is SUCH a good way to teach a child. "Oh, they should be using a condom!". You HONESTLY think that this is a good way to approach the subject? Honestly, if you have to let television be your guide, you need some serious fucking help. Yet another reason you are NOT qualified to teach.

As for the rest of the bullshit, I'm not even going to get into that.

Here is my ultimatum. If you are RESPONSIBLE. If you are MORAL. If you are ALL the things you claim to be, you will take all the domains you have that pertain to sex education in any way and give them to an organization such as this one:
http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/b...s?OpenDocument
If you don't do this, I can never believe that you have ANY morals, and I will know you are ONLY in it for personal gain. If you want a sexual discussion group get a fuckign domain that isn't going to be misleading children and teenagers into thinking what you speak is truth. Because frankly, you don't have a fucking CLUE. Don't put an over18 thing on it.. just FUCKING GIVE IT TO SOMEONE WHO WILL USE IT PROPERLY.

I just figured out how others were "quick" quoting ...
lol



No that is correct.
However, Parents have a right to allow their child to send me an email to see what I think as a Father. The access policy is VERY CLEAR and not mumble jumble legal jargon. MINORS MUST HAVE DIRECT SUPERVISION WHILE ON MY WEBSITE.

Quote:

The vast majority of the "discussion material" on your website should NOT be discussed with children whatsoever!!!

I absolutely agree there is ABSOLUTELY NO CONTENT on my website that "children" (those not yet reproductively capable) should see. Absolutely NOTHING! ZERO ...NOTTA THING - NOTHING.

AND - I absolutely agree that there is content that "teens" should not see. The website is for PARENTS - not children AND not teens. It is for PARENTS. If a Parent allows their teen to email me - BOTH the teen & the Parent know the questions will be anonymised AND I will answer from a Fathers persective.

Quote:

Ok little Johnny.. sit down and let me tell you about genital mutliation. It's imparitive that you understand there are people who hideously butcher girls..

I told my son (16) about how screwed up this world is with regards to sex. And I told him that the United Nations has failed miserablely to end FGM for over 20 years now. That FGM was the identical of having his penis cut off AND 114 Million women have had this done to them. "Son women are not treated equally in this world." ... Thats what I told him - most Parents are not aware of this - "heard something" yes - but not really aware. The verbatim accounts are for a PARENTS knowledge - not a minors.

Quote:

Yeah, that sounds like something they need to hear while they're at an impressionable age.. You have NO RIGHT TO CHOOSE what content someone else's children/teenagers should learn about. you are NOT QUALIIFIED TO TEACH.

NO - but the Parents do - its there choice I have been coding the most advanced content controls on the planet.

Quote:

Even the stupid things you've suggested to do with a teenagers... "sex sex boring?" Change the channel? Yeah, avoidance is SUCH a good way to teach a child. "Oh, they should be using a condom!". You HONESTLY think that this is a good way to approach the subject? Honestly, if you have to let television be your guide, you need some serious fucking help. Yet another reason you are NOT qualified to teach.

Desentization of "television's" and "pornography's" unrealistic portrayal of sex - is highly recommended.

Quote:

As for the rest of the bullshit, I'm not even going to get into that.

okie dokie

Quote:

Here is my ultimatum. If you are RESPONSIBLE. If you are MORAL. If you are ALL the things you claim to be, you will take all the domains you have that pertain to sex education in any way and give them to an organization such as this one: http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/b...s?OpenDocument

When you donate all your porn profits to the torture and starving children from AIDS complications in Africa ... I will do the same.

Quote:

If you don't do this, I can never believe that you have ANY morals, and I will know you are ONLY in it for personal gain.

I could have turned SexEducation.com into a "WhiteHouse.com" sex site years ago ... instead I flip burgers ... my morals and motives for the domain - remain unchallenged - regardless of some of the mistakes you made me aware of.

Quote:

If you want a sexual discussion group get a fuckign domain that isn't going to be misleading children and teenagers into thinking what you speak is truth. Because frankly, you don't have a fucking CLUE. Don't put an over18 thing on it.. just FUCKING GIVE IT TO SOMEONE WHO WILL USE IT PROPERLY.

Why don't you donate all your profits to the sites you mention.

SexEducation.com has presented to the world a "gender neutral manner" in which to have sex ...
Those five pages - are the accumulation of years of work.
I have done the right thing - advancement of sexual knowledge.

Go away

Should aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids be allowed on any directly accessed domain?

I am not the one pretending that I am qualified to give advice or instruction to other people's children and teenagers about sex education. I think you need to shut the fuck up, because you're immoral, greedy, and fully taking advantage of innocence. You aren't advancing any knowledge at all, because you have none that's relevant. I wish you were in the states so you would be covered by that new law about misleading domains. You deserve to go to jail.

You can repeat that stupid question as often as you want. The fact that you have no idea what the answer is, speaks for itself.

YA - WAY TO GO PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH ...
Any links to this new law handy?
BINGO - ....
NEXT STEP ....

"NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE BODILY FLUIDS ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN NAME"

YEHAAA .... mega ... I did not know about this new law.
MEGA KEWL ...

Answer it then ...
yes or no? with a reason...

You are a psychopath who has no place "teaching" children. You're immoral and conniving. You are now also benieth my notice. I hope you go to jail soon, or get hit by a bus, or mauled by wild animals or something. Nobody in the world has earned it more.

Oh -- you are wrong ...
I never ask a question that I don't already have the answer to.
I have an answer - and the proof - to it.
But no-one else has answered it.

I have to scoot for 30 minutes ...maybe 45 ...but I will be back...

CHEERS - PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH ..
yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

Well if you never ask a question you don't already have the answer to, then that makes you a moron. I normally want to better myself by asking questions I don't know the anwsers to otherwise you just go round in circles.... kinda like this thread...

BTW - It depends on the laws of your country dipshit..... You still think you know it all don't you ?

PLEASE BAN THE SexED ASSWIT!

sexeducation:

OK.. why don't you simply say that you have NO QUALIFICATION?


True.. there are "no images of children having sex on my websites" - NOW!

BUT THERE *WERE* IMAGES OF ADULTS INVOLVED IN ANAL SEX WITH CHILDREN and related sick imaging on your "website".

How do I know? Because I have copies of your complete website before it was pulled. It may come as a surprise to you that others have been looking at your website for many months and already have copies of your "content" plus a considerable amount of further related information. There is NO QUESTION that this is CHILD PORN.

You have SERIOUSLY GOT TO BE JOKING!!!
OR, you just don't get any of the threads that have been posted here. Try reading the follow twice:

What is "acceptable" to me is totally irrelevant, - I have nothing to do with your "website" and have no qualification - the same as you, - to engage in giving "opinions" in this area.

SexEducation.com is a totally messed up domain currently the subject of several avenues of inquiry by several law enforcement agencies. These people are in no hurry to speak to you - it's called "research" - there are avenues still partially investigated, and, to use a quote, "Mr 'Beacock' is not going anywhere...".

Under these circumstances there is little doubt that you would need to raise considerable amounts of cash to pay *anyone* to take control of your "websites". They are not even worth the $10 registration fee. They are totally contaminated.

Why do you repeat this question parrot fashion? This is not any legal term and is not any guideline for any websites. "Opinions" don't matter since juries and judges will determine guidelines, together with exisiting laws and precedents. YOU NEED LEGAL ADVICE and you admit you have not been provided with this.

Therefore, your "opinion" on this phrase above and the opinions of others is not relevant. This is not a "legal discussion board" - that's what lawyers are for.

FINALLY, - YOU HAVE NO QUALIFICATION TO OFFER ANY "OPINONS" EITHER WITHIN THE ADULT INDUSTRY OR RELATED TO SEX EDUCATION. YOU HAVE ALREADY MESSED UP TIME AND TIME AGAIN - IN FACT YOU ARE A LIABILITY.

Now... :321GFY

Webby is my goddess.

LadyMischief:

Well... maybe a "God" by some unsuspecting person! :1orglaugh

But mainly "idiot", "halfwit", "communist", "liberal" and a string of other terms which were pulled to suit the situation! :winkwink:

Because no adult webmaster has ever provided a reason to why - "NO AROUSED GENITALS OR REPRODUCTIVE FLUIDS SHOULD BE SHOWN ON ANY DIRECTLY ACCESSED DOMAIN NAME" ... including yourself ...

EVER!

That would be interesting news ...
Take this "hamburger flipping" Father to court ...
after I admitted I had made mistakes ...that would be the best "news media" event I could imagine ...
bring it on ...bring it on ...

So GFY now all of a sudden limits what can be discussed here ?


That's not what common sense says.
I defend the rights of women and children - tell that to the judge.

"No aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids on any directly accessed domain name."

John E. Beacock
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739