I do not have ANY hidden secret directories.
The directory structure - the files - even the roughup of graphics, indeed even the "steps of" the roughup of graphics - are an identical mirror of my personal work station.

If the server crashes or my personal work station crashes - I can replicate the site from the other.

I do not do "backups" - the server is my backup (and vice versa).

I used to have a generic 2257 message on my homepage ... but it increased the density of words on my homepage and thereby lowered Google ranking so I removed it.

And I do have the "sources" for the more controversial and more adult type graphics. And can and will present them - if so demanded by a court of law or if requested by the Police.

Posting a generic blurb about 2257 on my homepage - gives a wrong impression on what the site is about. SexEducation.com is not a "porn" site - by any definition of "pornography"

I once had a picture (and link & source credits) to a Canadian Version of Time Magazine which was a Mother & Daughter with AIDS complications. This means YES - I have pictures of minors on my website.

NO ABSOLUTELY NOT - SEXEDUCATION.COM DOES NOT HAVE ANY PICTURE OF ANY MINOR ENGAGED IN ANY SEXUAL ACTIVITY.

"CHILD MOLESTOR" GARBAGE ANSWERED ABOVE ...

SexEducation.com provides alternative forms of intercourse for maturing adults - which PARENTS(ADULTS) can optionally use.

It is a place where adults can discuss (with out the cursing) ... stronger replies to common questions.

It is not a hypothesis that schools begin teaching 10 year olds about the "birds and the bees" - it is factual.

It is also factual that many girls begin having their periods as early as age nine.

Are you asking me to contact you by ICQ?
I thought you were referring to others.

My ICQ is 32315652.
A simple search of the email address [email protected] would provide that.

Any chat at that ICQ may be used on my website after being "anonymised" - however.

2257 exactly ...
This "CHILD MOLESTOR" crap will die - it just a big "rumour mill" ...an unsubstantiated "witch hunt" because I say stuff that some in the adult industry do not like.

If so many people have reported me to the police - where are the police? Time will terminate this "fluff & fodder".

There has never been a formal complaint on SexEducation.com and all the "questionable" content articles have been on the website for several YEARS! Not days - not weeks - but several YEARS ... unaltered. And anyone - ANONYMOUSLY - may make a contribution to that article. No-one has even ANONYMOUSLY.

In fact - then ending of my child pornography article is a challenge to President George W. Bush - which has come true.

That "challenge" being - that it was unreasonable to those who are not yet reproductively capable (children) to be presented sexual graphics IMMEDIATELY when going to WhiteHouse.com.

That has now been changed.
As we all know to WhiteHouseSEX.com.

you want parents to show 10 year olds your site? you are one sick fuck

i love how your browser fails to show pictures when you are directly questioned about them...
:321GFY

I still can not get the graphics to load in Explorer 6.0 ...
However - the iDeepThroat.com graphics did load in Netscape 6.2.

Yes - I see what you are saying now...
That's pretty dany border line... you really have to look.

However, she has rated the page with RASC (I think she should update that with ICRA.org) and therefore as previously discussed on my website ... and in other threads ... would not in my opinion be required to meet ...

No aroused genitals or reproductive bodily fluids on her directly accessed domain.

The issue is - how reasonable would it be for a child to visit the directly accessed domain.

In the case of - WhiteHouse.com VERY HIGH.
In the case of - Sex.com VERY HIGH.
In the case of - SexEducation.com VERY HIGH.

These types of domains (IMO) must take higher precautions when displaying sexual content on their directly accessed domains.

Currently, I feel that if a domain name contains the word "SEX" and the domain name is rated with ICRA.org - which thereby allows over 90% of web browsers to use parental functions contained therein ... then have at it for adult content on your directly accessed domain - IF - IF - there is an adult warning.

iDeepThroat.com - still meets the requirements as discussed.

How likely is it that a child would enter iDeepThroat.com directly into a web browser? VERY VERY LOW - HIGHLY UNLIKELY.
Yet she contains - relatively - obscure graphics.
Ample - filter content options.
"2257 compliant" text for filtering software to check for.
An "ADULT ENTER" ... and kids be gone links.
AND is rated to enable browser controls to work.

Currently - her directly accessed domain name does not violate the rights of the majority of the world (children) to reasonable access to the information age.... and

therefore - is still recommended.

Dad@

I am out of this thread for the day.
If I missed any questions please repost them.
CYA - tomorrow.


John E. Beacock
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

Bullshit.. And NOT having any 2257 warning on your page puts you in DIRECT violation of Title18 laws.. you may be in canada, you idiot, but you HOST in the states... Fuck that i'll just contact your host and see what they think about it. Doesn't matter WHAT impression it gives, if you have sexual material on your site, YOU MUST HAVE 2257 CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS INFORMATION, if you do not, I don't give a flying fuck if it's a website about a tribute to clowns, YOU ARE IN VIOLATION. You have pornography on your site, therefore it's under the jurisdiction of title 18.. AND canadian obscenity laws. Ok smartypants.. show me a license that allows you to display the material you have there? The material that "heather" supposedly told you you could use? You must have SOME kind of license agreement? Who's the custodian? Can you PROVE difinitively that the participants in the sexual intercourse in those images are of legal age? Or do you know the name of the custodian of records so they can?

Fuck off, you wannabe. You'd be smartest to hire yourself a damn good lawyer, because you are going to fucking need one.

Are you a fucking moron? 2257 information is NOT for kids, it's for the AUTHORITIES... To prove that the people depicted in the images are OF LEGAL AGE TO PARTICIPATE IN SUCH IMAGES.. You really want to go to jail, and you're fixated on children.. hmm I wonder why...

Damn, if this idiot posts here one more time, I'm sure GFY will be in top position on Google searches for "fluff and fodder"

1. Why is it ok for minors to see pictures of hardcore sexual intercourse?
2. Why do you use the nickname dad?
3. Are you a member of NAMBLA?
4. Do you support NAMBLA?
5. Do you get aroused looking at naked pictures of minors?

hahahah probably.. how're you doing darlin?

I wonder just HOW many times he's avoided these questions... we should go through all the threads and count them up. :)

THIS IS THE ONLY THREAD I REPLY TO NOW ....

I will keep you informed of the proceedings ... the situation ... and what appears to be an apparent website shut down.

At least currently - my Zone Files - seem to be not working correctly.

I have about 2 hours to solve this otherwise what happens - will happen - and life will go on - AND - I will continue to report the events to the best of my knowledge.

Have at it ...
It's all fun - it's all fun ...
Life that is.

John E. Beacock
[email protected]
1-403-619-2739

Female Genital Mutilation is a global sickness cured simply with knowledge.

[ oopps ... plug]

You are a sicko and I hope you never ever get that piece of shit website up again....

You know what ...

I am ... FUCKING PISSED OFF ...

I need to take a break ... and calm down ...

I'm just livid.

I might take the whole night off.
Well not really - I just worked - friggen - 10 hours ...
wtf ... I need break.

I need a Bud ... lol

FUCKOFF - LADYFUCK...

Start listening to some truth, instead of being mad at me.. be mad at yourself for being the kind of fucking creep you are, a predator of children and someone who refuses to listen to reason.

This is interesting ...

If I had not stopped for gas - I would have beaten the internets DNS caching system.

As it stands now I can not access my email to make modifications to the DNS zone files.

My ... backroom.iserver.com login and password seems to be failing ...

It's not the first time of dozens I have forgot it though ...
And I am still quite "emotional" ... lol

NOTE TO SELF: calm down ...

300!!! FUCK, THIS THREAD IS TOO LONG!!!

But the police have not phoned ...
1-403-619-2739...

anywhere ... at anytime ... EVER!!!
NOT ONCE - NOT EVER ...

I have one picture of a minor on my website that is nude.
It the most disgusting FUCKING DISGUSTING GRAPHIC - I could find.

If you are so smart - and the internet adult webmaster's are so smart - YOU TELL ME WHAT FUCK - HAPPENED TO - HER!!!

Where is she?
WHERE IS SHE ?


[tears ...so many fucking tears ... ]

= = = = LadyMischief = = = = =
This thread is alive and well, you fucking idiot.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Wrong - I only post to this thread.

Or is GFY going to ban me too ?

= = = = QUOTE MULE = = = = = =
Hmmm, showing your true colours now, sicko?
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


My true colours have been showing through for awhile.
I appologize for the swearing.

sexeducation:

Why are you here???

You are not any kind of webmaster but some CHILD MOLESTOR and purveyor of CHILD PORN - both of which are illegal, so where is your credibility and qualification to be here??

FUCK OFF CHILD MOLESTOR!!:321GFY

you guy's took down a respectable web site i stand by the man 100%. you guys always get the facts backwards ...:(

?

Thank you WMD ...
My son says defend yourself.
...
I'm just so much in tears right now - I an not think ...

Please, enlighten us how it is respectable. We are here to debate.

This idiot solicits minors to access his members area, AND he has nude pictures on minors on a sex site.

We have asked him questions, he has answered some but has avoided the tough ones.

So, please...give us your thoughts on why the site is ok.

What in the world are you in tears about ?

You brought this here ... you brought it upon yourself !

Many reputable webmasters here gave you plenty of free advice... you think avs services like taking links out of thier lists? NO they only do it when your breaking the rules or laws.

Then you furthered this by coming here and crying like a little pussy and telling everyone how within the law you were.

Then you pissed off a few more people and your hosting company that took care of your dns was contacted .... let me inform you of this ... I have an inside scoop with a few hosts ... Hosting companies do not like taking down sites .... they love charging for the bandwidth those sites use.... however if a site is breaking the law the hosting company can be held liable if they don't remove the site.

Therefore it leaves me and everyone else with the same conclusion ... GET A FUCKING CLUE HERE ... YOU WERE BREAKING THE LAW !!!!!!!

Have sympathy for you because your shitty child porn site was taken down? FUCK NO sympathy is in the dictionary between shit and syphillis if you want sympathy.

I'll be even more glad when the police lock your sorry ass up. Don't think it's happening ? Well you didn't think your site was coming down either did you? .... Think about it .... this board is not about a bunch of keyboard warriors... We are about legit business and action.

Kudo's to everybody that was involved with yanking his site. I know there was alot more involved than who posted here.


:thumbsup

WMD:

Some facts you may appreciate... this "website" contained child pornography. In addition, it contained images where the owner had no rights to use.

In addition, the background of the owner in conjunction with the above facts, make him the last person on earth to be running a "sex education" site.

Which hole did you just creep out of expressing opinions on this board about stuff you obviously know fuck all about with three posts???

Your name wouldn't happen to be Bloodhound would it? :P

was neither a child porn site or adult xxx site i personally found the site a very educational tool in sex ed of course the site would be taken down if the server is abushed with 100 calls a day

Forget the logic ... and all the "netiquette" ... for once Iwant you to know my feelings ...

and the TRUTH is I am crying ... I really am ... in tears ...

that is the truth ... because it is the truth ..

I am in tears ...

I an't think ... I am really just crying ...that's all.

You've broke me ... I submit.

*LOL*!!!

He is obviously a "friend" (or sexeducation!) attempting to get some support - else a total imbecile worth ignoring!! :glugglug

Plenty of sites get taken down for unlicensed used of copyrighted content. The only reason I can see for you to defend him is if you *are* him.

I admit complete defeat.

Unconditional surrender ...

WMD:

Piss off you stupid asshole!!:1orglaugh

Absolutely 100% correct. You have hit every nail within a 100 mile radius on the head.

Does that mean you are going to stop breaking the law, and/or take your site down?