GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   CIRCUMCISION - Yes or No? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=336754)

rambler 08-05-2004 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
I think you are wrong. There is overwhelming medical evidence which strongly suggests that circumcision reduces the risk of various types of disease, including AIDS and cancer.
Fuck Boobmaster you are such a fucking idiot!!

Is this the same type of evidence that proves that your fucking god exists. You fucking MORON:321GFY

PrivateIvy 08-05-2004 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog
It's not a never ending debate. The fact that circumcision rates are declining proves that the tide is changing. Okay, personal preference. I have no problem with that. But say one day you had a son, would you take away all those things from the post i quoted just because your persoal preference for a sexual partner was cut?
It is a neverending debate on this board..in my time here I bet there have been at least 50 threads like this one:1orglaugh

And I have 3 children...2 of which are boys, and yes, they are both circumsized , not just because of my own sexual preference either. My husband and I both made that decision for our own personal reasons . :2 cents:

Ivy

NoCarrier 08-05-2004 07:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
Prove it! :1orglaugh
Hahahah! Right.. The funny thing is that I was a pro-circumcision person about 6 months ago.. And I started reading studies, facts and articles.. My girlfriend was against it. She was pregnant and we were expecting a son..

Well, I was finally convinced.. This is mutilation. It's there for a reason.. Exactly like every other parts on the human body. And religion is still not a valid reason to mutilate a human being.

My son is not circumcised and we will never take that decision for him..

I asked a doctor about it, and he told me that less than 10% of parents request it now..

aSStig 08-05-2004 07:57 PM

yes i agree on it, every man should be circumcised.......


having that is having a proper hygiene . . . . ..

and penis really looks good once circumcised . . . ..

boobmaster 08-05-2004 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier
You are so fucking pathetic. Religion should never be a good reason to mutilate a human being. Parents who accept to mutilate their kids because they think it's for their own good, for God or whatever stupid reason are as pathetic as you.
I love the way you describe it as mutilation. This procedure does not disfigure an infant and is better for their health.

Doing something for God is probably the best reason of all. Let me ask you, if God himself came down from the heavens, appeared to you in person, and told you to circumcise your infant child, would you disobey him? If you would, you are a fool.

buzzard 08-05-2004 07:59 PM

Genital mutilation is not an option.

NoCarrier 08-05-2004 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
Doing something for God is probably the best reason of all. Let me ask you, if God himself came down from the heavens, appeared to you in person, and told you to circumcise your infant child, would you disobey him? If you would, you are a fool.
Well, God did not come down from the heavens and tell me to circumsize my son, so your theory is invalid. Sorry. :glugglug

rambler 08-05-2004 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
I love the way you describe it as mutilation. This procedure does not disfigure an infant and is better for their health.

Doing something for God is probably the best reason of all. Let me ask you, if God himself came down from the heavens, appeared to you in person, and told you to circumcise your infant child, would you disobey him? If you would, you are a fool.

You're a fucking wingnut!
:Hollering

NoCarrier 08-05-2004 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rambler
You're a fucking wingnut!
:Hollering

Well, he's from Texas, that can give you some clues about that guy.. :1orglaugh

boobmaster 08-05-2004 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier

I asked a doctor about it, and he told me that less than 10% of parents request it now..

Don't take this the wrong way, but you need to get another doctor. If he told you that, HE'S COMPLETELY FULL OF SHIT. A SIGNIFICANT number of people in the country are fundamentalist Christians who follow the teachings of the bible. The bible says CUT. You can be DAMN SURE that these parents are asking for the procedure.

boobmaster 08-05-2004 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier
Well, he's from Texas, that can give you some clues about that guy.. :1orglaugh
Transplanted from a northern city and NOT rasised in a fundamentalist Christian home.

boobmaster 08-05-2004 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier
Well, God did not come down from the heavens and tell me to circumsize my son, so your theory is invalid. Sorry. :glugglug
Not yet, at least.

NoCarrier 08-05-2004 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
I love the way you describe it as mutilation. This procedure does not disfigure an infant and is better for their health.

Better for their health?

Oh yeah.. the better "STD" protection bullshit fact.. Well.. If you are such a "RELIGIOUS" person you should be against having sex before marriage.

And if you only do it with your wife once you are married, you don't need protection against STD's.

So basically, you wouldn't need to be mutilated.

Better for their health? Yeah.. They are going to live longer with a circumsized penis..

Come on.. Try harder..

:1orglaugh

boobmaster 08-05-2004 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rambler
You're a fucking wingnut!
:Hollering

G E T T H E F U C K O U T ! You are NOT and adult webmaster.

chodadog 08-05-2004 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
I love the way you describe it as mutilation. This procedure does not disfigure an infant and is better for their health.

Doing something for God is probably the best reason of all. Let me ask you, if God himself came down from the heavens, appeared to you in person, and told you to circumcise your infant child, would you disobey him? If you would, you are a fool.

A part of their body is missing. You don't call that disfigurement? Like someone else already mentioned, should we have our ears removed to eliminate the risk of ear infection?

And don't tell me that it's a stupid comment because ears serve a purpose because so does the foreskin.

boobmaster 08-05-2004 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier
Better for their health?

Oh yeah.. the better "STD" protection bullshit fact.. Well.. If you are such a "RELIGIOUS" person you should be against having sex before marriage.

And if you only do it with your wife once you are married, you don't need protection against STD's.

So basically, you wouldn't need to be mutilated.

Better for their health? Yeah.. They are going to live longer with a circumsized penis..

Come on.. Try harder..

:1orglaugh

What's the point? You are pretty set in your ways.

Wiggles 08-05-2004 08:11 PM

i say no, more feeling with it as per the comments from thousands of men from before and after they had it done

rambler 08-05-2004 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
G E T T H E F U C K O U T ! You are NOT and adult webmaster.
Sorry to be so rude but I was just stating the obvious:2 cents:

You really need to see a shrink man... I'm concerned:1orglaugh

NoCarrier 08-05-2004 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
What's the point? You are pretty set in your ways.
What's the point? Well, your only argument is religion. And that is such bullshit. That's not a valid reason. Parents who mutilate their babies because of religion are morons.

chodadog 08-05-2004 08:15 PM

The American Academy of Pediatrics stopped recommending routine circumcisions back in 1971. You're living in the past.

Surely if God didn't want you to have a foreskin, then uhh... he wouldn't have given you one? Isn't the belief that Adam circumcised himself with a sharp rock as punishment for being temptedy by sin?

So even if you believe that it's what God wants, then you'd still have to concede that you're punishing your child for Adam's sin.

Correct me if i'm wrong, though. Just something i remembered reading about the origin of circumcision a while back.

boobmaster 08-05-2004 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog
A part of their body is missing. You don't call that disfigurement? Like someone else already mentioned, should we have our ears removed to eliminate the risk of ear infection?

And don't tell me that it's a stupid comment because ears serve a purpose because so does the foreskin.

That analogy is too stupid for me to comment on. But to answer your question, no, I don't consider it disfigurement. Disfigurement implies deformity. A circumcised penis is not a deformity.

DaLord 08-05-2004 08:17 PM

I'm circumcised. The doctors actually did it by mistake when I should have another operation in the stomach. 12 years ago now and I must admit I like this a lot better than the "normal" way.


But such a thing calls for both to agree about it and if you think it's a bad idea your wife should at least give it a rest for a while. There is no idea in being circumcised unless you really got a problem down there. I didn't have a problem but they fucked up and today it really doesn't matter to me.

Well the sex got 10 times better :)

Veterans Day 08-05-2004 08:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier
What's the point? Well, your only argument is religion. And that is such bullshit. That's not a valid reason. Parents who mutilate their babies because of religion are morons.
why are they morons because of religious reasons?

chodadog 08-05-2004 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
That analogy is too stupid for me to comment on. But to answer your question, no, I don't consider it disfigurement. Disfigurement implies deformity. A circumcised penis is not a deformity.
How is it a stupid analogy?

Both are part of the body. Both serve a purpose.

Please explain.

boobmaster 08-05-2004 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier
What's the point? Well, your only argument is religion. And that is such bullshit. That's not a valid reason. Parents who mutilate their babies because of religion are morons.
It is a perfectly valid reason. But it's only valid if there is a God and that God has ordained circumcision. Many people believe that this is the case. What you are really saying is that people who believe in God are morons. They would say that people like you who don't are fools.

NoCarrier 08-05-2004 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Veterans Day
why are they morons because of religious reasons?
Because they won't find other reasons to explain why they did it. Someone who isn't open minded or someone who isn't respectful of the human body is a complete moron. Religion should never be a blind excuse to harm someone. Especially innocent babies that can't decide for themselves.

Easton 08-05-2004 08:22 PM

i say circumcise the little guy... uncut is gross :2 cents:

Betray 08-05-2004 08:23 PM

Question: Why do women not like Un-cut penis?

Answer: Who fucking cares? since when did they ever want us having pleasure?

Honestly if it wasnt such a Look thing.. more males would be uncut.. it feels so much better.

When you send a solidor into unknown territory, they ALWAYS wear helmets.

Veterans Day 08-05-2004 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by NoCarrier
Because they won't find other reasons to explain why they did it. Someone who isn't open minded or someone who isn't respectful of the human body is a complete moron. Religion should never be a blind excuse to harm someone.
how are they harming him? He is residing in the US and the girls I know and have asked this question much rather have a circumsized guy. I guess its a never ending battle, carry on with flaming each other, this debate will go nowhere:2 cents:

patrack 08-05-2004 08:24 PM

The level of Jewish societal conditioning in any society is positively correlated to the % of males in a population subset 'X" that have their foreskin removed.

level of Jewish throught control in US = 65%

level of Jewish thought control in Europe = 5%

think about it....and you'll understand

for the stupid folks.....(99% of you)....just carry on living your pathetic meaningless lives.

extreme 08-05-2004 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PrivateIvy
Lots to be gained..and only the anticurcumcision folks can claim the "pros" of it.

Never heard a circumsized guy complain about it. They have lost nothing.

Here's a pro: sexuality The majority of females in the US find a circumsized penis much more appealing. Females also feel more with a circumsized penis because it gets much harder .

:2 cents:

Ivy

.. and why would it get "much harder"?

Betray 08-05-2004 08:27 PM

i think the jews cut there own skin because its like a sacrifice saying we are sorry jesus we really do believe you.. yet they still deny it!

boobmaster 08-05-2004 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by chodadog
How is it a stupid analogy?

Both are part of the body. Both serve a purpose.

Please explain.

If you can't figure it out by yourself, ......

Removing the ears damages our ability to process auditory stimuli, and thus would significantly impair our ability to function in the environment. It would also impair our ability to communicate since we process incoming language data via the auditory system.

boobmaster 08-05-2004 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Betray
i think the jews cut there own skin because its like a sacrifice saying we are sorry jesus we really do believe you.. yet they still deny it!
Circumcision was a jewish ritual long before the time of Christ.

Elli 08-05-2004 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
A SIGNIFICANT number of people in the country are fundamentalist Christians who follow the teachings of the bible. The bible says CUT.
Let's look a little further, shall we?

Genesis 17
[9] And God said unto Abraham, Thou shalt keep my covenant therefore, thou, and thy seed after thee in their generations.
[10] This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised.
[11] And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.
[12] And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed.
[13] He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant.
[14] And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.


Deuteronomy
[27] And thou shalt offer thy burnt offerings, the flesh and the blood, upon the altar of the LORD thy God: and the blood of thy sacrifices shall be poured out upon the altar of the LORD thy God, and thou shalt eat the flesh.
[28] Observe and hear all these words which I command thee, that it may go well with thee, and with thy children after thee for ever, when thou doest that which is good and right in the sight of the LORD thy God.

So.. am I to assume you have your sacrificial altar at home fully stocked with offerings? Remember, you're not allowed to eat the blood, only the flesh!

PrivateIvy 08-05-2004 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DaLord
I'm circumcised. The doctors actually did it by mistake when I should have another operation in the stomach. 12 years ago now and I must admit I like this a lot better than the "normal" way.


But such a thing calls for both to agree about it and if you think it's a bad idea your wife should at least give it a rest for a while. There is no idea in being circumcised unless you really got a problem down there. I didn't have a problem but they fucked up and today it really doesn't matter to me.

Well the sex got 10 times better :)

:thumbsup

boobmaster 08-05-2004 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by patrack
The level of Jewish societal conditioning in any society is positively correlated to the % of males in a population subset 'X" that have their foreskin removed.

level of Jewish throught control in US = 65%

level of Jewish thought control in Europe = 5%

think about it....and you'll understand

for the stupid folks.....(99% of you)....just carry on living your pathetic meaningless lives.

FUCK OFF, NEWB! FUCKING BIGGOT!

chodadog 08-05-2004 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Elli
Let's look a little further, shall we?

Genesis 17
[9] And God said unto Abraham, Thou shalt keep my covenant therefore, thou, and thy seed after thee in their generations.
[10] This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised.
[11] And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.
[12] And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed.
[13] He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant.
[14] And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.


Deuteronomy
[27] And thou shalt offer thy burnt offerings, the flesh and the blood, upon the altar of the LORD thy God: and the blood of thy sacrifices shall be poured out upon the altar of the LORD thy God, and thou shalt eat the flesh.
[28] Observe and hear all these words which I command thee, that it may go well with thee, and with thy children after thee for ever, when thou doest that which is good and right in the sight of the LORD thy God.

So.. am I to assume you have your sacrificial altar at home fully stocked with offerings? Remember, you're not allowed to eat the blood, only the flesh!

Boobmaster is what i like to call a selective christian. He can agree with certain parts of the bible, and disagree with other parts, and that's fine. But if somenoe happens to disagree with what he believes, then they are a filthy heathen. I don't thinkhe even realises the irony.

rambler 08-05-2004 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Elli
Let's look a little further, shall we?

Genesis 17
[9] And God said unto Abraham, Thou shalt keep my covenant therefore, thou, and thy seed after thee in their generations.
[10] This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised.
[11] And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.
[12] And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed.
[13] He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant.
[14] And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.


Deuteronomy
[27] And thou shalt offer thy burnt offerings, the flesh and the blood, upon the altar of the LORD thy God: and the blood of thy sacrifices shall be poured out upon the altar of the LORD thy God, and thou shalt eat the flesh.
[28] Observe and hear all these words which I command thee, that it may go well with thee, and with thy children after thee for ever, when thou doest that which is good and right in the sight of the LORD thy God.

So.. am I to assume you have your sacrificial altar at home fully stocked with offerings? Remember, you're not allowed to eat the blood, only the flesh!


Yah it's funny how religous people pick and chose (and modify) stuff from the bible

Betray 08-05-2004 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
Circumcision was a jewish ritual long before the time of Christ.
whatever, they always want to be differant... who was the idiot who thought about this one.. "hmm i wonder what happens if i cut a peice of my dick off, oh look moses, i got more chicks then you now!"


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123