GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   I am no longer a republican. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=337202)

rambler 08-06-2004 04:29 PM

Wow it totaly fascinates me that approx. 50% of the US population are like BOOBMASTER.

I feel sorry for all the normal people down there:(

Tom_PMs 08-06-2004 04:30 PM

Clinton tried to kill bin laden, and the republicans accused him of trying to distract the american people from their fake impeachment scandal that they wanted the headlines to be about. Check it.

Jimmie 08-06-2004 04:31 PM

what fascinates me, is if the democratic party was as strong as it seems to be on GFY, why is BUSH in office and not GORE. and dont give me the FLORIDA Bullshit, if you Demorcrats were so strong, the race shouldnt have even been close....

Gunni 08-06-2004 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by boobmaster
Mock on, dipshit! I'm a republican. I'd vote for whoever was running on the ticket. Democrats do nothing but fuck the country up by taxing us to death.

:Kissmy

Dude, pick a sports team, any sport you want, this is just stupid...

A man should be judged by his action, not what political party he happens to be a part of. Please tell me do you really thing Bush's positive actions out weight his negative actions?

if so then you must have a very dísturbed view of the world!
Weigh the positives and negatives, and vote for who oever exept Bush, he has done nothing to deserve another term.


And remember, you can change your religion and political party, but you can't change your football team!

Tom_PMs 08-06-2004 04:32 PM

Gore won the popular election. Damn dont you get the news? The electoral votes are what was so fucked up. The choice of the actual people was never contested. Cripes. This is useless, lmao :)

Jimmie 08-06-2004 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom_PM
Clinton tried to kill bin laden, and the republicans accused him of trying to distract the american people from their fake impeachment scandal that they wanted the headlines to be about. Check it.
what did CLINTON do after Al Queda bombed the Towers in 93? Or after they bombed several different US Embassys over seas or the USS Cole (is that right, not 100% positive on the name)

not a damn thing...... like i said before.

DarkBob 08-06-2004 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jimmie
why is BUSH in office and not GORE.
the butteryfly ballot

Jimmie 08-06-2004 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom_PM
Gore won the popular election. Damn dont you get the news? The electoral votes are what was so fucked up. The choice of the actual people was never contested. Cripes. This is useless, lmao :)
like i said, if you democrats were as strong as u appear to be in the GFY community, it wouldnt have mattered!

Tom_PMs 08-06-2004 04:35 PM

Bush: 50,456,002 or 47.87%

Gore: 50,999,897 or 48.38%

So why are people surprised that theres alot of people who want Bush out? Damn.

devilspost 08-06-2004 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Peaches
Heathcare is already available for all :)
http://www.eco-action.org/dod/no9/essex_grim_reaper.jpg

BlueDesignStudios 08-06-2004 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom_PM
Bush: 50,456,002 or 47.87%

Gore: 50,999,897 or 48.38%

So why are people surprised that theres alot of people who want Bush out? Damn.

that's a pretty big margin to lose(win) an election by!

Tom_PMs 08-06-2004 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jimmie
like i said, if you democrats were as strong as u appear to be in the GFY community, it wouldnt have mattered!
Incidently, I'm not a democrat :)

DarkBob 08-06-2004 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jimmie
what did CLINTON do after Al Queda bombed the Towers in 93? Or after they bombed several different US Embassys over seas or the USS Cole (is that right, not 100% positive on the name)

not a damn thing...... like i said before.

weren't the people that bombed the trade centers caught, tried and found guilty?

And the investigation into the uss cole bombing wasn't completed until after Clinton left office. What did Bush do?

Tom_PMs 08-06-2004 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlueDesignStudios
that's a pretty big margin to lose(win) an election by!
Google: 2000 presidential election results

first listing. (imagine that, a perfect google relevance match! LOL)

Drake 08-06-2004 04:49 PM

Bush is not a Republican. He's more akin to a soft dictator. Let's try the alternative.

And about Clinton being weak on terror. Do you have any idea how many attacks his administration thwarted while he was in office? Plenty.

devilspost 08-06-2004 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jimmie
why is BUSH in office and not GORE
http://goddoubleplusblessamerica.org...reme_court.jpg

devilspost 08-06-2004 04:52 PM

http://free.freespeech.org/americans...eBozoCourt.jpg

Joesho 08-06-2004 04:53 PM

I LOVE YOU LORYN!!!!!:thumbsup

boobmaster 08-06-2004 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by crockett

I have come to the conclusion that Hardcore Republicans are the same thing as Jehovah's witness

Ever see one knock on your door and try to convert you?

Quentin 08-06-2004 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jimmie
what did CLINTON do after Al Queda bombed the Towers in 93? Or after they bombed several different US Embassys over seas or the USS Cole (is that right, not 100% positive on the name)

not a damn thing...... like i said before.

Hmmm.

What exactly did Reagan do after Hezbollah bombed the Marine barracks in 1983, which killed 241 Marines? Did he attack and dismantle Hezbollah? No. Did he invade Iran (who is the biggest backer of Hezbollah)? No. What we did was pull the Marines out of Beirut. In fact, no one has ever been held accountable for that attack, or the subsequent kidnapping, torture and eventual murder of a CIA station chief assigned the area, either.

Why not? Well, for one thing, any military action was not likely to be supported by the American people, who really didn't give a damn about Islamic terrorism or what was going on in the Middle East at the time. Clinton faced a similar problem when he was president; realistically, how many voters do you think would have supported a full scale invasion of Afghanistan pre-9/11? For that matter, how many of our allies would have? And I think you could forget about having the cooperation of Pakistan or any of the other nearby "Stans" as staging points for an operation.

If you want to know the REAL reason why all American presidents from FDR forward don't delve too far into the realities of Islamic terrorism, though, and the REAL reason why the Saudis are pretty much free to give as much money as they wish to any terrorist group, without any kind of reprisal at all from the US, read a book called "Sleeping With The Devil" by ex-CIA agent Robert Baer..... that book will make your stomach turn, and it will make you think that it doesn't matter who is president when it comes to the war on terror, 'cause the real problem will never, ever, be addressed.

IMO, the bottom line is this - the war on terror will not end until our dependence on Saudi oil does. As it stands now, we are caught in a horrible Catch 22; on the one hand, we want to fight terror, on the other, the global economy cannot survive without a continued relationship with the world's leading financiers of terror.

There's a lot of history to all this folks... it goes way, way beyond the Clinton years. George W wasn't even born yet when the problem's seeds were sewn.
:2 cents:

- Q.

Gunni 08-06-2004 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joesho
I LOVE YOU LORYN!!!!!:thumbsup
Lesson 6750 on GFY, read the whole thread before posting :1orglaugh

Doctor Dre 08-06-2004 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com
No No No, I DO NOT like Kerry!! No way no how. It was a joke my lovely co-workers decided to play on me, which in turn is being played on you guys. It's pretty funny!!! :1orglaugh
lol ... well don't vote for bush at least cauz he likes elephant cocks

MissWetPanties 08-06-2004 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jimmie
and gay marriages to be legal all over the country... fuck Kerry! :321GFY
So you think what someone else does in their own home directly harms you in any way? Bullshit! They are human beings and they deserve every single right that anyone else has.

I hope you don't DARE call yourself an American because anyone who feels that way has NO FUCKING RIGHT WHATSOEVER to do so. EVERYONE, gay, straight, black, white, it doesn't matter... EVERYONE has the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" and everyone is guaranteed equal rights. Our whole constitution, the basis for what makes our country great, is geared to PRESERVING rights, not denying them. Anyone who says otherwise doesn't deserve citizenship.

If they're not directly harming you, then why not let them be? Would you have people take away YOUR right to view and produce porn just because THEY believe it's morally wrong or digusting? I THOUGHT NOT! If they lose their rights to the moral majority, who's next?

Joesho 08-06-2004 05:03 PM

What....... no democrat? awwww I been juked, hoodwinked, bamboozled...... :(

MissWetPanties 08-06-2004 05:05 PM

By the way, for those of you whining about the deal with Kerry and the boy in Vietnam, the man who signed the affidavit that made the claim that he saw Kerry shoot and unarmed viet cong teen in a loin cloth said ON TELEVISION in the 90s that he was brave and a hero and that he shot an armed enemy. This is CLEARLY republican propoganda because he certainly has changed his story from the one he told a few years ago.

Drake 08-06-2004 05:08 PM

It would be humorous if Bush did win re-election and the adult industry was shut down as a result. Those supporting Bush now would be the first ones crying while waiting in line at the food bank when there is no more Topbucks or Adult.com to pay them.

Invariably unable to find another tech job because all of those are overseas, they would attend demonstrations opposing the party and would be physically beat down by police and then imprisoned for supporting terror. Maybe they would finally understand what we were saying all along. Maybe not. Maybe they'd say it was all worth it. After all, Saddam is gone now.

Webmaster_Logic 08-06-2004 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rambler
Wow it totaly fascinates me that approx. 50% of the US population are like BOOBMASTER.

I feel sorry for all the normal people down there:(

I dont know were they get there numbers from i have not talked to one person from doctors to lawyers to the mail man who likes Bush. Those figures baffle me sometime.

devilspost 08-06-2004 05:11 PM

http://www.falloutshelternews.com/ScotusTreason1a.JPG

bret 08-06-2004 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com
OMG you will so get paid back for this!!! :mad:


THERE IS NOT WAY IS HELL I WOULD EVER EVER....................


GOOD ONE GUYS!!! :1orglaugh


See this is what sucks when you work with the people who control the board. They do shit like this. They can ruin you if they want.

I :bowdown to you all, oh great programmers!!!

THANK GOD.

I was just about to cross you off my list as GFY's #1 Hottie.

bret 08-06-2004 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
Bush is not a Republican. He's more akin to a soft dictator. Let's try the alternative.

And about Clinton being weak on terror. Do you have any idea how many attacks his administration thwarted while he was in office? Plenty.

name one.

Peaches 08-06-2004 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Sharpie
But at what price???? You are 62 years old, your husbands factory closes - leaving you to get insurance on your own. Not everyone can afford $750 a month for a $2,500 deductible policy......
A 62 year old in Ft. Wayne Indiana who doesn't smoke can get an individual health insurance policy through Unicare with a $2K deductible, 30% co-pay, $30 office visit, for $$163 a month through Unicare :)

eheathinsurance.com can give you other quotes if needed.

bret 08-06-2004 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Tom_PM
Bush: 50,456,002 or 47.87%

Gore: 50,999,897 or 48.38%

So why are people surprised that theres alot of people who want Bush out? Damn.

Wow. you guys are still talking about that? What is so hard to understand about the election process.

its ELECTORAL VOTES that count. hell, technically bush could have had 1% of the popular vote and still won. our votes are only a suggestion.

NichePay_Manny 08-06-2004 05:22 PM

Good job welcome aboard:thumbsup

Loryn 08-06-2004 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bret
THANK GOD.

I was just about to cross you off my list as GFY's #1 Hottie.

No need to do that baby, I'm still a strong Republican!! :thumbsup

Drake 08-06-2004 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bret
name one.
Naming one would be too easy. Here's a couple:
http://www.mikehersh.com/Clinton_vs_..._Clinton.shtml

MissWetPanties 08-06-2004 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bret
name one.
http://www.mikehersh.com/printer_Cli...linton.s html

What ya gonna say now?

fr8 08-06-2004 05:25 PM

Congrats on your new sanity. You should of gone Badnarik though. lol

MissWetPanties 08-06-2004 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
Naming one would be too easy. Here's a couple:
http://www.mikehersh.com/Clinton_vs_..._Clinton.shtml

Beat me to it. hehe

fr8 08-06-2004 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by devilspost
http://free.freespeech.org/americans...eBozoCourt.jpg
rofl!:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Thats pretty fucking good. Looks like I see Don King. lol

Tom_PMs 08-06-2004 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by bret
Wow. you guys are still talking about that? What is so hard to understand about the election process.

its ELECTORAL VOTES that count. hell, technically bush could have had 1% of the popular vote and still won. our votes are only a suggestion.

Not sure who "you guys" are.. But you made my point exactly :)
Point is, it's not surprising that alot of *people* want Bush out. Most of the people didnt vote for him.
My post was in response to another post that wondered why, with so many anti-bush people, did bush win. So I pointed out the reson why it shouldnt be a surprise.

I hope I dont need to put, "I'm not a democrat, but I'm against Bush" in my sig space..

Drake 08-06-2004 05:31 PM

Those who worked with Clinton said that (note: previous to 911) one of his major downfalls was his obsession with Osama Bin Laden. In retrospect it seems like it was a good thing, if only more were as 'obsessed' about it as he had been.

Loryn 08-06-2004 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
It would be humorous if Bush did win re-election and the adult industry was shut down as a result. Those supporting Bush now would be the first ones crying while waiting in line at the food bank when there is no more Topbucks or Adult.com to pay them.

Invariably unable to find another tech job because all of those are overseas, they would attend demonstrations opposing the party and would be physically beat down by police and then imprisoned for supporting terror. Maybe they would finally understand what we were saying all along. Maybe not. Maybe they'd say it was all worth it. After all, Saddam is gone now.

You people are way way way too paranoid!!!!! The adult industry is going nowhere. It is impossible for any President to rid the American People of porn. The President doesn't make law, he is an executive he is not a legislator. The way the constitution is written makes it impossible for the President to take away our right to watch consenting adults fuck the shit out of each other. Now congress can if the people make them take it away. But I seriously doubt you could get enough people together in this country who do not like porn. :1orglaugh

boobmaster 08-06-2004 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mike33
It would be humorous if Bush did win re-election and the adult industry was shut down as a result. Those supporting Bush now would be the first ones crying while waiting in line at the food bank when there is no more Topbucks or Adult.com to pay them.

Invariably unable to find another tech job because all of those are overseas, they would attend demonstrations opposing the party and would be physically beat down by police and then imprisoned for supporting terror. Maybe they would finally understand what we were saying all along. Maybe not. Maybe they'd say it was all worth it. After all, Saddam is gone now.

Liberals can be so fucking funny sometimes.

(1) That ain't gonna happen.
(2) Some of us still have day jobs we can go back to if it does.

Do you people REALLY BELIEVE that the democrats SUPPORT this industry? Wake up, assholes! They can fuck us over just as easily as republicans. They might not put us in jail, but they can get us in other ways -- LIKE TAXING THE FUCK OUT OF US to the point where we all just leave the industry because we can't make any money.

Tom_PMs 08-06-2004 05:37 PM

blah blah blah, democrats raise taxes, blah blah blah

keep toeing that line while the president flounders! :thumbsup

MissWetPanties 08-06-2004 05:38 PM

I'll gladly pay more taxes to protect my country from terrorists, outsourcing and the largest defecit in this country's history!!!! I love this country and I'm damned proud to do my part.

Theo 08-06-2004 05:39 PM

Clinton was obsessed with Laden because he probably had early signs of what he is capable to do. Don't you ever forget who trained and supported Laden.

boobmaster 08-06-2004 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MissWetPanties
I'll gladly pay more taxes to protect my country from terrorists, outsourcing and the largest defecit in this country's history!!!! I love this country and I'm damned proud to do my part.
Will you gladly pay more taxes to support reseachers who want to study the flocking habits of pigeons? Cause that's the kind of shit the democrats will spend it on.

Drake 08-06-2004 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Loryn-Adult.com
You people are way way way too paranoid!!!!! The adult industry is going nowhere. It is impossible for any President to rid the American People of porn. The President doesn't make law, he is an executive he is not a legislator. The way the constitution is written makes it impossible for the President to take away our right to watch consenting adults fuck the shit out of each other. Now congress can if the people make them take it away. But I seriously doubt you could get enough people together in this country who do not like porn. :1orglaugh
Loryn, I agree that porn is a mainstay in one form or another. I overstated about it disappearing and getting beat down for effect. But it's one thing for the adult industry to be gone completely (will never happen) and creating a situation where only the major players in adult are the ones left operating (those that can afford to weasel around the laws). I've heard the statement that 'those who simply 'adapt' will be successful but that's not true under all conditions.

The point about the President not writing law, that's true. The Constitution however has been thrown out the window on a variety of other issues, what's to say it won't be on this issue? In order to go to war Congress has to formally declare war. This hasn't happened to date yet we're in Iraq where we've removed their 'leader' and are still 'at war' there. There are ongoing issues about civil liberties under attack by the Patriot Act. Upholding the words written in the Constitution has been given short shrift.

If it turns out that I'm just paranoid (I hope), I will take you out for dinner and tell you how much of a jackass I was and we can laugh about it. If I'm right, you better be beside me trying to remove this administration next election:1orglaugh

dig420 08-06-2004 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Quentin
Hmmm.

What exactly did Reagan do after Hezbollah bombed the Marine barracks in 1983, which killed 241 Marines? Did he attack and dismantle Hezbollah? No. Did he invade Iran (who is the biggest backer of Hezbollah)? No. What we did was pull the Marines out of Beirut. In fact, no one has ever been held accountable for that attack, or the subsequent kidnapping, torture and eventual murder of a CIA station chief assigned the area, either.

Why not? Well, for one thing, any military action was not likely to be supported by the American people, who really didn't give a damn about Islamic terrorism or what was going on in the Middle East at the time. Clinton faced a similar problem when he was president; realistically, how many voters do you think would have supported a full scale invasion of Afghanistan pre-9/11? For that matter, how many of our allies would have? And I think you could forget about having the cooperation of Pakistan or any of the other nearby "Stans" as staging points for an operation.

If you want to know the REAL reason why all American presidents from FDR forward don't delve too far into the realities of Islamic terrorism, though, and the REAL reason why the Saudis are pretty much free to give as much money as they wish to any terrorist group, without any kind of reprisal at all from the US, read a book called "Sleeping With The Devil" by ex-CIA agent Robert Baer..... that book will make your stomach turn, and it will make you think that it doesn't matter who is president when it comes to the war on terror, 'cause the real problem will never, ever, be addressed.

IMO, the bottom line is this - the war on terror will not end until our dependence on Saudi oil does. As it stands now, we are caught in a horrible Catch 22; on the one hand, we want to fight terror, on the other, the global economy cannot survive without a continued relationship with the world's leading financiers of terror.

There's a lot of history to all this folks... it goes way, way beyond the Clinton years. George W wasn't even born yet when the problem's seeds were sewn.
:2 cents:

- Q.

Don't quote facts to conservatives, it just makes them angrier.

Jon 08-06-2004 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buddy
Real republican women don't vote. Or think.
Gotta get me one of those!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123