![]() |
Wow it totaly fascinates me that approx. 50% of the US population are like BOOBMASTER.
I feel sorry for all the normal people down there:( |
Clinton tried to kill bin laden, and the republicans accused him of trying to distract the american people from their fake impeachment scandal that they wanted the headlines to be about. Check it.
|
what fascinates me, is if the democratic party was as strong as it seems to be on GFY, why is BUSH in office and not GORE. and dont give me the FLORIDA Bullshit, if you Demorcrats were so strong, the race shouldnt have even been close....
|
Quote:
A man should be judged by his action, not what political party he happens to be a part of. Please tell me do you really thing Bush's positive actions out weight his negative actions? if so then you must have a very dísturbed view of the world! Weigh the positives and negatives, and vote for who oever exept Bush, he has done nothing to deserve another term. And remember, you can change your religion and political party, but you can't change your football team! |
Gore won the popular election. Damn dont you get the news? The electoral votes are what was so fucked up. The choice of the actual people was never contested. Cripes. This is useless, lmao :)
|
Quote:
not a damn thing...... like i said before. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Bush: 50,456,002 or 47.87%
Gore: 50,999,897 or 48.38% So why are people surprised that theres alot of people who want Bush out? Damn. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And the investigation into the uss cole bombing wasn't completed until after Clinton left office. What did Bush do? |
Quote:
first listing. (imagine that, a perfect google relevance match! LOL) |
Bush is not a Republican. He's more akin to a soft dictator. Let's try the alternative.
And about Clinton being weak on terror. Do you have any idea how many attacks his administration thwarted while he was in office? Plenty. |
Quote:
|
|
I LOVE YOU LORYN!!!!!:thumbsup
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
What exactly did Reagan do after Hezbollah bombed the Marine barracks in 1983, which killed 241 Marines? Did he attack and dismantle Hezbollah? No. Did he invade Iran (who is the biggest backer of Hezbollah)? No. What we did was pull the Marines out of Beirut. In fact, no one has ever been held accountable for that attack, or the subsequent kidnapping, torture and eventual murder of a CIA station chief assigned the area, either. Why not? Well, for one thing, any military action was not likely to be supported by the American people, who really didn't give a damn about Islamic terrorism or what was going on in the Middle East at the time. Clinton faced a similar problem when he was president; realistically, how many voters do you think would have supported a full scale invasion of Afghanistan pre-9/11? For that matter, how many of our allies would have? And I think you could forget about having the cooperation of Pakistan or any of the other nearby "Stans" as staging points for an operation. If you want to know the REAL reason why all American presidents from FDR forward don't delve too far into the realities of Islamic terrorism, though, and the REAL reason why the Saudis are pretty much free to give as much money as they wish to any terrorist group, without any kind of reprisal at all from the US, read a book called "Sleeping With The Devil" by ex-CIA agent Robert Baer..... that book will make your stomach turn, and it will make you think that it doesn't matter who is president when it comes to the war on terror, 'cause the real problem will never, ever, be addressed. IMO, the bottom line is this - the war on terror will not end until our dependence on Saudi oil does. As it stands now, we are caught in a horrible Catch 22; on the one hand, we want to fight terror, on the other, the global economy cannot survive without a continued relationship with the world's leading financiers of terror. There's a lot of history to all this folks... it goes way, way beyond the Clinton years. George W wasn't even born yet when the problem's seeds were sewn. :2 cents: - Q. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I hope you don't DARE call yourself an American because anyone who feels that way has NO FUCKING RIGHT WHATSOEVER to do so. EVERYONE, gay, straight, black, white, it doesn't matter... EVERYONE has the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" and everyone is guaranteed equal rights. Our whole constitution, the basis for what makes our country great, is geared to PRESERVING rights, not denying them. Anyone who says otherwise doesn't deserve citizenship. If they're not directly harming you, then why not let them be? Would you have people take away YOUR right to view and produce porn just because THEY believe it's morally wrong or digusting? I THOUGHT NOT! If they lose their rights to the moral majority, who's next? |
What....... no democrat? awwww I been juked, hoodwinked, bamboozled...... :(
|
By the way, for those of you whining about the deal with Kerry and the boy in Vietnam, the man who signed the affidavit that made the claim that he saw Kerry shoot and unarmed viet cong teen in a loin cloth said ON TELEVISION in the 90s that he was brave and a hero and that he shot an armed enemy. This is CLEARLY republican propoganda because he certainly has changed his story from the one he told a few years ago.
|
It would be humorous if Bush did win re-election and the adult industry was shut down as a result. Those supporting Bush now would be the first ones crying while waiting in line at the food bank when there is no more Topbucks or Adult.com to pay them.
Invariably unable to find another tech job because all of those are overseas, they would attend demonstrations opposing the party and would be physically beat down by police and then imprisoned for supporting terror. Maybe they would finally understand what we were saying all along. Maybe not. Maybe they'd say it was all worth it. After all, Saddam is gone now. |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
I was just about to cross you off my list as GFY's #1 Hottie. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
eheathinsurance.com can give you other quotes if needed. |
Quote:
its ELECTORAL VOTES that count. hell, technically bush could have had 1% of the popular vote and still won. our votes are only a suggestion. |
Good job welcome aboard:thumbsup
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://www.mikehersh.com/Clinton_vs_..._Clinton.shtml |
Quote:
What ya gonna say now? |
Congrats on your new sanity. You should of gone Badnarik though. lol
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thats pretty fucking good. Looks like I see Don King. lol |
Quote:
Point is, it's not surprising that alot of *people* want Bush out. Most of the people didnt vote for him. My post was in response to another post that wondered why, with so many anti-bush people, did bush win. So I pointed out the reson why it shouldnt be a surprise. I hope I dont need to put, "I'm not a democrat, but I'm against Bush" in my sig space.. |
Those who worked with Clinton said that (note: previous to 911) one of his major downfalls was his obsession with Osama Bin Laden. In retrospect it seems like it was a good thing, if only more were as 'obsessed' about it as he had been.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
(1) That ain't gonna happen. (2) Some of us still have day jobs we can go back to if it does. Do you people REALLY BELIEVE that the democrats SUPPORT this industry? Wake up, assholes! They can fuck us over just as easily as republicans. They might not put us in jail, but they can get us in other ways -- LIKE TAXING THE FUCK OUT OF US to the point where we all just leave the industry because we can't make any money. |
blah blah blah, democrats raise taxes, blah blah blah
keep toeing that line while the president flounders! :thumbsup |
I'll gladly pay more taxes to protect my country from terrorists, outsourcing and the largest defecit in this country's history!!!! I love this country and I'm damned proud to do my part.
|
Clinton was obsessed with Laden because he probably had early signs of what he is capable to do. Don't you ever forget who trained and supported Laden.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The point about the President not writing law, that's true. The Constitution however has been thrown out the window on a variety of other issues, what's to say it won't be on this issue? In order to go to war Congress has to formally declare war. This hasn't happened to date yet we're in Iraq where we've removed their 'leader' and are still 'at war' there. There are ongoing issues about civil liberties under attack by the Patriot Act. Upholding the words written in the Constitution has been given short shrift. If it turns out that I'm just paranoid (I hope), I will take you out for dinner and tell you how much of a jackass I was and we can laugh about it. If I'm right, you better be beside me trying to remove this administration next election:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123