Exactly, gotta think outside the box.
WG

you must be getting tired from all this dancing

most of these "men" who joined of their own free will come from poor areas and that's their way out....these are fucking kids...
they died in combat over a war that wasn't necessary...

You seem to know so much about me.

I would have no choice but to shoot someone who was pointing a gun at me. But that kid didn't have a gun. He was running away and kerry shot him. I wouldn't have done that.

what about the oath of the manson family?

he could have given a repreive, but chose not to...he allowed the executions to continue

but at least we're both in agreement about the death penalty ;-)

I can honestly say, if I were in that sitation, i probably would have done the same thing as he did...

I remmeber a story my dad used to tell about a kid who was friendly with the troops and would often bring them food, etc. and seemed eager to help out, then one night walked into a hut were some soldiers were with explosives strapped to his chest and took a bunch out with him...this is the type of war they fought...

so, in Kerry's shoes, I might have very well done the same thing

and gay marriages to be legal all over the country... fuck Kerry! :321GFY

But at what price???? You are 62 years old, your husbands factory closes - leaving you to get insurance on your own. Not everyone can afford $750 a month for a $2,500 deductible policy......

and that matters why?

I am not defending Bush's decision to go to war. On the other hand, should we just sit on our asses and wait until some country has the ability and means to threaten our safety? Can you say that we are not safer with Saddam out of power?

Like any other liberal democrat asshole, you are using EVERYTHING at your disposal, including the war, to paint a republican candidate in the worst light possible so that YOUR candidate will win the election. If it wasn't the war, it would be something else.

Some people feel that gay marriages are morally wrong.

BTW, I do not necessarily take this position.

some people have way too much time on their hands

..... and what does that have to do with the price of eggs?

if gay marriage is legalized, that doesn't make it mandatory.

what you can't be serious can you? you do realize how many more people hate us because of what we did in Iraq?


This part just cracks me up I just don't know what to say :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh


I have come to the conclusion that Hardcore Republicans are the same thing as Jehovah's witness

Sounds like some people can't find something good about their own candidate to talk about :)

my candidate has 3 purple hearts :thumbsup

Yeah I prefer that guy too, lol.

Bush has 2 yellow moons, 3 orange stars and a green clover.

No thank you!! I will pass on fucking him. I can't stand the guy. :throwup

Congratulations, now if you can just convert a few million more people. :)

No I dont, go ahead and let me know, since u seem to know.

Quote:

I have come to the conclusion that Hardcore Republicans are the same thing as Jehovah's witness

yea, and democrats like CLINTON are fine and dandy, while they sit on there asses and do nothing when our country or our countries interests are attacked multiple times, and that cock sucker didnt do a damn thing about it... Now you know why BUSH is dealing with the bullshit hes dealing with, cause CLINTON didnt take care of it when he was in OFFICE.

Wow it totaly fascinates me that approx. 50% of the US population are like BOOBMASTER.

I feel sorry for all the normal people down there:(

Clinton tried to kill bin laden, and the republicans accused him of trying to distract the american people from their fake impeachment scandal that they wanted the headlines to be about. Check it.

what fascinates me, is if the democratic party was as strong as it seems to be on GFY, why is BUSH in office and not GORE. and dont give me the FLORIDA Bullshit, if you Demorcrats were so strong, the race shouldnt have even been close....

Dude, pick a sports team, any sport you want, this is just stupid...

A man should be judged by his action, not what political party he happens to be a part of. Please tell me do you really thing Bush's positive actions out weight his negative actions?

if so then you must have a very dísturbed view of the world!
Weigh the positives and negatives, and vote for who oever exept Bush, he has done nothing to deserve another term.


And remember, you can change your religion and political party, but you can't change your football team!

Gore won the popular election. Damn dont you get the news? The electoral votes are what was so fucked up. The choice of the actual people was never contested. Cripes. This is useless, lmao :)

what did CLINTON do after Al Queda bombed the Towers in 93? Or after they bombed several different US Embassys over seas or the USS Cole (is that right, not 100% positive on the name)

not a damn thing...... like i said before.

the butteryfly ballot

like i said, if you democrats were as strong as u appear to be in the GFY community, it wouldnt have mattered!

Bush: 50,456,002 or 47.87%

Gore: 50,999,897 or 48.38%

So why are people surprised that theres alot of people who want Bush out? Damn.

http://www.eco-action.org/dod/no9/essex_grim_reaper.jpg

that's a pretty big margin to lose(win) an election by!

Incidently, I'm not a democrat :)

weren't the people that bombed the trade centers caught, tried and found guilty?

And the investigation into the uss cole bombing wasn't completed until after Clinton left office. What did Bush do?

Google: 2000 presidential election results

first listing. (imagine that, a perfect google relevance match! LOL)

Bush is not a Republican. He's more akin to a soft dictator. Let's try the alternative.

And about Clinton being weak on terror. Do you have any idea how many attacks his administration thwarted while he was in office? Plenty.

I LOVE YOU LORYN!!!!!:thumbsup

Ever see one knock on your door and try to convert you?

Hmmm.

What exactly did Reagan do after Hezbollah bombed the Marine barracks in 1983, which killed 241 Marines? Did he attack and dismantle Hezbollah? No. Did he invade Iran (who is the biggest backer of Hezbollah)? No. What we did was pull the Marines out of Beirut. In fact, no one has ever been held accountable for that attack, or the subsequent kidnapping, torture and eventual murder of a CIA station chief assigned the area, either.

Why not? Well, for one thing, any military action was not likely to be supported by the American people, who really didn't give a damn about Islamic terrorism or what was going on in the Middle East at the time. Clinton faced a similar problem when he was president; realistically, how many voters do you think would have supported a full scale invasion of Afghanistan pre-9/11? For that matter, how many of our allies would have? And I think you could forget about having the cooperation of Pakistan or any of the other nearby "Stans" as staging points for an operation.

If you want to know the REAL reason why all American presidents from FDR forward don't delve too far into the realities of Islamic terrorism, though, and the REAL reason why the Saudis are pretty much free to give as much money as they wish to any terrorist group, without any kind of reprisal at all from the US, read a book called "Sleeping With The Devil" by ex-CIA agent Robert Baer..... that book will make your stomach turn, and it will make you think that it doesn't matter who is president when it comes to the war on terror, 'cause the real problem will never, ever, be addressed.

IMO, the bottom line is this - the war on terror will not end until our dependence on Saudi oil does. As it stands now, we are caught in a horrible Catch 22; on the one hand, we want to fight terror, on the other, the global economy cannot survive without a continued relationship with the world's leading financiers of terror.

There's a lot of history to all this folks... it goes way, way beyond the Clinton years. George W wasn't even born yet when the problem's seeds were sewn.
:2 cents:

- Q.