You are the very definition of a sheep.

Today's conservatives are no better than 1930's era Germans.

Deal!! Dinner, you jackass!!! If anything happens, I will stand by you!!! :thumbsup

:1orglaugh

You conservatives might want to look up Ashhahahahaha's speeches on this administration's social agenda pre 9-11, particularly online pornography, before you talk about there being no difference between the parties.

Oh I forgot... you don't read.

True, Democrats could screw us just the same. I'm going on past experience. When the Democrats were in office, we didn't have ultra conservatice churchgoers influencing decisions about the industry. It seems we do now under the current admin.

:)

Oh boy, you're really grasping at straws now, huh?

Why don't you study Clinton's budget plans in depth and see just where the spending was going and why. Educate yourself before you post random political rhetoric, please.

http://www.jfanow.org/cgi/getli.pl?72

Hehe! I love seeing the desparation of liberals who know that their ship will not be coming in any time soon. You really have to be desparate to compare Republicans with Nazis. If it wasn't so damn funny watching you squirm, I might actually be offended.

The reason I vote republican is because they are usually for smaller government and less taxes, which to me are the most important issues. Feel free to keep using the word 'sheep' if it makes you feel better. It ain't gonna make you look any less stupid and it ain't gonna make your lame ass canduidate any more likely to win in November.

The bitch deserved it.

Little ones to Him belong,
They are weak but He is strong

Spoken like a true Texan. :1orglaugh

:feels-hot

When it comes to pornography, there are churchgoers influencing decisions on both sides. I don't know why you people seem to think that just because someone is a fundamentalist Christian, that AUTOMATICALLY means he/she is a republican. Billy Graham is a life-long die hard democrat and he's about as fundamentalist a Christain as you can be.

We are an EASY TARGET. Why? Because the very people who make us rich are the same ones who will remain completely silent when we are attacked. They are NOT going to stand up for us because they are hypocrites who will do anything to hide their little hobbies from their spouses and loved ones.

Attack a pornographer and you will win votes on both sides.

So you know the words. I'm happy for you.

lol maybe you should turn on the news some time to a channel besides FOx news

Quote:

[i] yea, and democrats like CLINTON are fine and dandy, while they sit on there asses and do nothing when our country or our countries interests are attacked multiple times, and that cock sucker didnt do a damn thing about it... Now you know why BUSH is dealing with the bullshit hes dealing with, cause CLINTON didnt take care of it when he was in OFFICE.

I assume you are talking about taking care of Saddam being Bush seems to have forgotten about Osma...

So if it's Saddam you are talking about you must have a very short memory.. Seems to Me a Republican by the name "Regan" while papa Bush was vice Pres was arming Saddam to the teeth with WMD and all kinds of cool war toys. Then he becomes our whooping boy when Papa Bush become pres 8 years later. Go figure..

So who in fact are you blaming for our troubles again? But I know you will still blame everything on some Democrat somehow.

If this is true then why do you claim to be the "land of the free"?

Your votes are only a suggestion? :helpme

everyone knows them, but few of us believe them

Everything you say gets shot down. Every point you make gets destroyed with fact.

Your defense? I'm a republican and I'll vote for whoever they put in front of me. And bizarre comments about how we're all gonna learn a lesson when Bush wins. The words of a total sheep.

Let me tell you something: If a Democrat did the shit that Bush has done and got caught for, he wouldn't have the support of his party or his constituency. You are a helpless, hopeless sheep and yes, you're little better than a brownshirt. So proud to vote in an administration that so badly wants to be a tyranny.

Odd... I don't hear Kerry using the "war on porn" as a part of his campaign platform, unlike your buddy Bush.

"According to the American Family Association Journal, George W. Bush promised during the 2000 campaign that "his administration would make it a point to enforce obscenity laws." To seal the deal, he even signed a "letter of commitment" after repeated entreaties from the American Family Association. Ashhahahahaha made similar promises in the early days of his tenure, meeting with representatives from more than a dozen anti-pornography groups in May 2001. "We gave him a ton of information and actual evidence as to who the major pornographers were," Phil Burress recalls, "and he seemed determined to do something about it." "

If you want to trust your future and the industry that feeds you and pays your bills to the "moral majority" then that's your own (albiet misguided) business. But before you go spouting your republican garbage, EDUCATE yourself first. Know the facts and stop spewing forth unfounded rhetoric.

Idiot.

"Lieutenant Commander George Elliott said in an interview that he had made a ''terrible mistake" in signing an affidavit that suggests Kerry did not deserve the Silver Star -- one of the main allegations in the book. The affidavit was given to The Boston Globe by the anti-Kerry group to justify assertions in their ad and book.

Elliott is quoted as saying that Kerry ''lied about what occurred in Vietnam . . . for example, in connection with his Silver Star, I was never informed that he had simply shot a wounded, fleeing Viet Cong in the back."

The statement refers to an episode in which Kerry killed a Viet Cong soldier who had been carrying a rocket launcher, part of a chain of events that formed the basis of his Silver Star. Over time, some Kerry critics have questioned whether the soldier posed a danger to Kerry's crew. Crew members have said Kerry's actions saved their lives.

Yesterday, reached at his home, Elliott said he regretted signing the affidavit and said he still thinks Kerry deserved the Silver Star.

''I still don't think he shot the guy in the back," Elliott said. ''It was a terrible mistake probably for me to sign the affidavit with those words. I'm the one in trouble here."

n an interview for a seven-part biographical series that appeared in the Globe last year, Kerry said: ''I don't have a second's question" about killing the Viet Cong. ''He was running away with a live B-40, and, I thought, poised to turn around and fire it."

Asked whether that meant that he had shot the guerrilla in the back, Kerry said, ''No, absolutely not," adding that the enemy had been running to a hut for cover, where he could have destroyed Kerry's boat and killed the crew."


http://www.boston.com/news/nation/ar...cism_of_kerry/

Nice links, dig420:)