Hmm..has he really gotten things done that well?

Tell me..has he found Bin Laden in Iraq yet?

You bring up 9/11 and wear it like a badge of honor and then go jumping down the lane to the "just war" in Iraq, as if the two are connected.

Just let me know when you/they/ANYONE finds Bin Laden & co. in Iraq along with the wmds.

Did you forget most of that was caused by the 9/11 tragedy? It had not one thing to do with Bush :1orglaugh

Even if Bush was guilty of ALL (which is not so), Kerry can't do a better job with his policies.

Bush's Tax cuts are working and I'm very happy with my income.

:Graucho

Finally, let me know WHEN George Bush finds those 1.8 million manufacturing jobs in the U.S. that have been lost since he took office.

Another example of great decisive leadership under Bush.

Cause Bush will keep those commie bastards out of America.First step Iran..next North Korea...

they are not gonna survive north korea

"There's no one as blind as those that can't even see the road before them."

You think it's retarded to talk about how we can better take care of ourselves, our loved ones and the rest of our country?

How sad.

Compassionate conservatism at work.

For every con there is a pro-.

Because Al Qaeda didn't EXIST in Iraq since Saddam hated Bin Laden and vice versa and Saddam made damn sure they couldn't even step into Iraq!

Now, we've provided them not only with a recruiting area, but a fucking planning and training area as well!

i thought this thread was supposed to be for Bush lovers, but i scroll down and all I see is Michael Moore sheep :BangBang:

HUH? Democracy has "spread" in the Middle East in the past?
Name ONE Democratic Arab nation in the middle east (and no, Iraq STILL isn't a democracy).

Some fun facts for you!

* Abdul Rahman Yasin was the only member of the al Qaeda cell that detonated the 1993 World Trade Center bomb to remain at large in the Clinton years. He fled to Iraq. U.S. forces recently discovered a cache of documents in Tikrit, Saddam's hometown, that show that Iraq gave Mr. Yasin both a house and monthly salary.

* Bin Laden met at least eight times with officers of Iraq's Special Security Organization, a secret police agency run by Saddam's son Qusay, and met with officials from Saddam's mukhabarat, its external intelligence service, according to intelligence made public by Secretary of State Colin Powell, who was speaking before the United Nations Security Council on February 6, 2003.

* Sudanese intelligence officials told me that their agents had observed meetings between Iraqi intelligence agents and bin Laden starting in 1994, when bin Laden lived in Khartoum.

* Bin Laden met the director of the Iraqi mukhabarat in 1996 in Khartoum, according to Mr. Powell.

* An al Qaeda operative now held by the U.S. confessed that in the mid-1990s, bin Laden had forged an agreement with Saddam's men to cease all terrorist activities against the Iraqi dictator, Mr. Powell told the United Nations.

* In 1999 the Guardian, a British newspaper, reported that Farouk Hijazi, a senior officer in Iraq's mukhabarat, had journeyed deep into the icy mountains near Kandahar, Afghanistan, in December 1998 to meet with al Qaeda men. Mr. Hijazi is "thought to have offered bin Laden asylum in Iraq," the Guardian reported.

* In October 2000, another Iraqi intelligence operative, Salah Suleiman, was arrested near the Afghan border by Pakistani authorities, according to Jane's Foreign Report, a respected international newsletter. Jane's reported that Suleiman was shuttling between Iraqi intelligence and Ayman al Zawahiri, now al Qaeda's No. 2 man.

BUZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ...WRONG!

Even Georgie boy has been forced to admit there was NO Al Qayeda connection.

It's amazing how people will continue to repeat lies even when the men they WORSHIP admit they were wrong.

WTF, AL QAEDA AKA "BIN LADEN'S TERRORIST GROUP" IS STATIONED IN IRAQ AT THIS TIME DUMBASS -

Here learn some shit -

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Conten...3/527uwabl.asp

http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=260

WTF, AL QAEDA AKA "BIN LADEN'S TERRORIST GROUP" IS STATIONED IN IRAQ AT THIS TIME DUMBASS -

Here learn some shit -

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Conte...03/527uwabl.asp

http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=260

yeah..Bush is the CONman..and Kerry is the PRO to fix the mess!

that was weak man..

Finally some sense in this thread.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Thank you thank you thank you for the comic relief!

Out of WHAT Fox News wet dream did you pull out that bs?

That was fucking lame :(

http://pages.infinit.net/pseudop/lame.jpg

proves my theory again, liberals ignore facts when you slam them with them..look them up son, try this magic called google..if you want to believe they are from fox news and false than believe that

Hey Mr. "Fact Man"...put your money where your hallucinations are. Give links to the info you just posted so EVERYONE can see WHO is saying these things that you just posted.

Because you TYPED something on a message board doesn't make it TRUE!

If that was the case, Juicy would have every woman in the Tri-State area! (well, he has most of them I have to admit).

You know what's really funny. You'll believe stuff like this and yet when others make the same sorts of connections between Bush, Cheney, Haliburton, the Saudis etc. you call them morons. :1orglaugh

This is a great line in one of them "While it's hard to know what significance, if any, to ascribe to this information, it fits a pattern.....".

I didn't see any proof in those articles.

haha

No proof. Just as I thought.

You're not going to waste my time you liberal scum :321GFY

http://www.google.com/images/logo.gif

READ.

http://www.hop.com/media_external/im...ome_$50_01.jpg

There are dozens and dozens, why the fuck would anyone waste their time going through each one

you do it and tell us what you find or STFU

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

So you think it is the right of the US to arbitrarily attack other countries for no reason other than becoming an empire?

Saddam Hussein killed the Kurds when they attempted to revolt after the US promised the Kurds their assistance, because they are seperatist. The US left them out to dry, and they got owned. Saddam was particularily brutal in preventing those in his country who wanted a theocracy. He didn't want to be another "shah". That means he was suppressing THE VERY PEOPLE IN IRAQ RIGHT NOW WHO ARE SHOOTING AT US SOLDIERS. Learn some history. For the most part, the only Iraqis that Saddam treated poorly are the exact same Iraqis that US forces are shooting and killing. That is, inbetween the constant "thank you America" parades. You think Iraq is better off? Based on what? Maybe ask an Iraqi first.

Tell that to the Canadian Soldiers I'm paying for to clean up the mess you left in Afghanistan. You can thank me after you dismount from your stars and stripes high horse.


Colin Powell in Cairo February 24, 2001:
"He (Saddam Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbours."

Condoleeza Rice, July 2001:
"We are able to keep his arms from him. His military forces have not been rebuilt."

WRONG.

I see that what the millions of Iraqis want doesn't mean shit to you. I guess they are just second class human beings.

Hugs and kisses.


WRONG.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washing...05-tenet_x.htm


Western Iraq is in the control of roving gangs of armed militants. The infrastructure is having the very wires that run things like telephone, TV and power ripped out of the ground, picked up by fleets of flatbed trucks and shipped to Jordan.

All these maybes your asking? The facts are out there, none of this shit is a mystery to solve.

Google is your friend.

You mean like you wasted mine by posting links that didn't contain any proof?

Why is the best that you conservative/republican/Bush lovers can do is resort to name calling. I'd say 80% of the Bush lovers resort to name calling whereas 20% of the Bush haters do.. Why is that?

Because we get so mad when people ignore facts clearly available to the public anywhere.

ok i agree with your points,on some levels but
how would YOU have handled it if you were President ?

The argument is that there are pillars that support terrorism, and Iraq and Saddam were one of those pillars.
With them taken out there are less places for terrorists to go and less money to support them.
You can't get rid of terrorism without getting rid of Iraq and Saddam.

Goodnight.

http://www.stud.fim.ntnu.no/~vaksdal/pics/stfu.jpg

how would YOU have handled it if you were President ?
Doing nothing is not a solution. Saadam was a threat if you don't know that you are ignorant to the facts. Who is a bigger threat to us ?

Colin Powell in Cairo February 24, 2001:
"He (Saddam Hussein) has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbours."

Condoleeza Rice, July 2001:
"We are able to keep his arms from him. His military forces have not been rebuilt."

"
In his first public defense of prewar intelligence, CIA Director George Tenet said Thursday U.S. analysts never claimed before the war that Iraq posed an imminent threat.
"



I guess you know something they don't, huh.

is this Michael Moore ? He was actively working on it. You don't think it's better that he's gone ? The man was bad news

I dunno, does Michael Moore run state.gov?

http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2001/933.htm


Jeezus.

A threat in what way? He has no long range missiles, nor did the US claim he had any. The CIA didn't classify him as a threat. When the Bush administration was pushed on it, they backpedaled.

He has no navy.

He has no planes.

YOU THINK SADDAM WAS PERSONALLY GONNA TAKE A TAXI FULL OF BOMBS AND DRIVE IT TO DOWNTOWN USA?




Yeah, he was a real threat alright. Couldn't keep consistent power or water running in Baghdad, but you know he was poised to take over the US.


Pfft. Do you really believe this even though there is zero credible evidence in existence anywhere?

Do you hear voices in your head?

1. Bush stole the election.
2. Bush using the electronic machines will steal the election.
3. Republican's run the news.. therefore all these polls showing bush leading are just ways to validate the bullshit election results from these paperless machines.

4. US has so much fucking debt now, taxes are going up. Whether you pay today or tomorrow.. think about it :)

5. More and more of the world is starting to hate the US, I'm talking about allies.

6. Iraq was an invasion. I doubt there will be much grief shown when a few iraqies attack the US. (it's coming)...

7. Bush hurts the middle and lower classes, all these tax cuts for "those who make it". Well, those who make it haven't been paying taxes for a long ass time. Ask Warren Buffet if he thinks the tax cut was worth it.

8. Kids are dying needlessly.. there's a backdoor draft.. Oh i think it's called something like "Stop Loss". That's a real issue, not talked about before the election. Next year, you watch some poor ass kids will be flown over to fight this bullshit war, in the meantime Bush will be doing coke on the first ladies titties.

9. It doesn't take a genious to see why the US invaded Iraq. Halliburton has billions in no-bid contracts.. duhh. Cheney ran that company, it's not hard to see.

10. It's pretty sad when the US takes a few steps back. Country is more divided than ever before.... I'm thinking that that John Tittor (timetraveler) was right.. civil war is coming.

11. Most of the high paying jobs are being replaced with low paying jobs...

All these facts are offset with :

Kerry got a scratch and didn't deserve a purple heart.
Kerry voted against US body armor
Kerry is a blah blah blah.

It's the uneducated folks that are gonna bring the US down. Way to go, I can't wait to see the shit hit the fan.. makes good TV... and I wanna see how the republicans spin it this time.

Sad state of affairs :glugglug

he won't tell you the source because not only is he just some ignorant kid trolling, but the source is a crazy right wing nutjob site.. that lists howard dean and the guardian in the "axis of evil" the kind of site a loony liberal would be mercilessly written of for linking to like prisonplanet or something and the guy that wrote it has been on o'reilly and hannity etc and blames clinton for unleashing Bin Laden on the world.. so basically he's too scared to link to it and instead rants like a child about using google, when the only reason people don't post links is to hide the biases of their information .. one day he might grow up.

this is the site that turns up the most.

http://www.travelbrochuregraphics.co...victorious.htm