eat shit and die :winkwink:

i love gfy:thumbsup

Honest Question:

Do you ever get any business done here?



See Title

without gfy mary would never have met juicy's dick.

Yes it is.

Why do you say that?

schizophrenia

reply is all wrong too :)

How's that?

He has different posting styles indeed. But he said he drinks a lot.

:1orglaugh

GFY is a privately owned space, much like someone's home; it is not a public entitlement. Any rules or arbitrary enforcement don't have to follow any guidelines as to continued membership.

The different posting styles are dependent on the mood of the room - whether I am chatting like now - on whether sig whores are posting their smilie, or 50,100,150 or "p" crap...

I can turn on the Fucking MasterBlogger and fucking own your asses anytime I fucking feel bored. OR not; )

The styles are a result of a decade of email/chat interpretations.

PS: And yes sometimes beer.
I am not perfect - I smoke too.
Canadian smokes not that US crap! lol

actually yes i have more than tripled my online income since posting here and i've been in the biz since 1999.

bullshit. this is by far the most lucid couple of posts you've ever made here. ever. Sexed.

:glugglug

I am glad for you.

Wouldnt you want that increase to continue?

Different styles...
It's not flip-flopping, it's pandering:thumbsup

I think part of the reason sexed's posts sounded so wacked (besides the fact that he's insane), is that he also doesn't speak very good English. I think his english is getting better. That's my pointless theory of the day.

That's only because slowly this boards perception of me is changing.

I never ran ...
I never backed down ...

I felt it was important to desensitize my primary suppliers to the lies of just a few.

It was just the other day someone posted the link "How to take down a website with one email"

I've had that happen hundreds of times because a handfull of adult webmasters do not like my campaign to clean up homepages.

cat is out of the bag :glugglug

Yes I failed grade 12 English twice.

And when I am tired - I can be more dislexic then normal.

Campaigns to clean up anything on the internet always turn out to be spitefests. If I were to take an activist stance I would approach it from the angle of encouraging (or making it required for) parents to take strict control over kids' use of the internet. If your kid is too young for unsupervised internet don't push off the babysitting to filters or laws. The only software you should trust with your kids is maybe software that only lets them see pages you approve but that is still no license to leave them unattended with it.

Adults should be able to see what ever aroused or fluidy thing they want. If people want a government enforced solution they should pass the .kids domain and tie it into a kids' browser and let your approved government entity of choice decide what goes into it. That would give lazy parents an easy way out by letting the status quo babysit while adults who give a shit could take an active role in their child's time.

Kind of funny, because He's a "ad rep" but completely relies on GFY to make money, yet hates on it... I guess he will need to find new employment soon.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh
You have NO idea what you're talking about.

We will see now wont we?

Not we, you will see. You live in a weird world.

Don't be silly. I suspect you're a pedohpile. I'm not the only one.

:thumbsup :1orglaugh

I believe in BOTH reasonable access for children and reasonable access for adults.

When I began the campaign WhiteHouse.com & Queen.com were porn sites.

In the case of adults - the complete shut down of AVS IS PLAINLY WRONG and an over reaction by the current administration. There MUST be a way to prove online that you are an adult. Currently, that does not exist! So we are all in "jeoprody" unless we take due dillegence to stop children from entering out sites. In my case in 2000 I acquired the highest rating with ICRA.org.

It's a given the porn industry will evolve - one of the things that must be done is to have REAL AVS !!!!

who would pay him ?

Time for you to reevaluate your el33t english skills.

You have no idea what you are talking about.

I agree 100% and myself hate scrolling Thru the huge letters. I have him on ignore and don't click on any threads he starts.

why that's Fake Nick :Graucho

The United Nations .... through secret messages post by SmokeyTheBear and "The Society*" ...

you must destroy your moniter now ...

Brad was way out of line.

I don't know where the nic sexeducation has broken any rules, and no one has been able to point any out. They all point to the time I banned masterblogger.

Let me know how sexed has broken GFY rules, and he's gone. But I'm not gonna ban someone just because a lot of people don't like him.

Screw the search feature ...
Get Lensman to disallow people you have banned from posting in threads you start !!!

MasterBlogger for GFY Moderator ...
It's your duty to vote.
Go vote now!!!

good point . . . .sometimes one needs to know when to shut up

The boss has spoken ...
I better behaive.

<pornstar2pac style suck up>

I completely agree big L :thumbsup

</pornstar2pac style suck up>


:glugglug

Lensman,

masterblogger = sexeducation same person

If you banned masterblogger, why wouldn't you ban him for breaking the rules and posting under another nick.

Yeah, baffled me, if you were paying a nice chunk of cash to advertise somewhere, the last thing you'd want to do would be to mock your venue and drive webmasters away.

SexEd also threatened violence to Mary34D. If I could search, I would point it out.

The reason sexeds posts can vary is because he suffers from MPD (multiple personality disorder), so you never quite know what your going to get with him.

Because I appolized for a typo mistake when a entering CP url called "illegal.??" (use your imagination for the two question marks) that I wanted shut down.

It was a grevious error that I apologized to the GFY community for, and had apologized on other boards for, and which continue to apologize for. I would never knowingly post a working link to CP. It was a mistake in my anger of the brazen flaunting of that site to emails sent to coworkers of mine.

I forgot to put the question marks in.
I appolgize.


However, if I ever find out that FUCKING site is operational again - once again - I will have it shut down in 15 minutes !!!! As well as any supplier to that terminated site.

crystal?

murray_dawg is BradM and whatever the other name is that was banned last night, so I guess not, or else murray_dawg would be banned too

Well isn't there a rule about multiple nicks?

5. Multiple personalities are not allowed. If you have multiple personalities we will find out about you and we will shut down all your accounts. Also if you post under someone else's account and do it to break the rules, or they break the rules and we tie you to them. We will ban you and them. This is just like carrying someone else's bags at the airport. Don't do it.

You already had been breaking rule #5 by posting for months under two different nicks masterblogger and sexeducation

Lensman, please ban sexeducation as he clearly has been breaking this rule for months:

5. Multiple personalities are not allowed. If you have multiple personalities we will find out about you and we will shut down all your accounts. Also if you post under someone else's account and do it to break the rules, or they break the rules and we tie you to them. We will ban you and them. This is just like carrying someone else's bags at the airport. Don't do it.

He has openly admitted to posting under multiple personalities, why has he not been banned?

Lensman is not unreasonable.
Contact him or Loryn.
Explain the situation and perhaps you will be unbanned.

We all make mistakes.
But don't do the same ones over and over and over.

And heed the warnings.

If Lensman says - "be careful" or "watch what you say" or something like that ...

don't push the issue ...
It's not a democracy here.
It's his board. : )

He is the sole "Moderator" - so to speak.

Wrong.
SexEducation.com was temporarily disabled by a DDOS attack.

I created MasterBlogger while that issue was being resolved.

The first post I made was that I was really "sexeducation" and explained why I had created a new nick.

Further - I have only ever used one or the other - not both simultaneously.

You're still on a witch hunt - but there are no witches.
When are you going to realize that?

Stop listening to the GFY Big Mouths and start looking at the facts.
I am prepared to answer any and all questions.

And personally I prefer MasterBlogger ...
but wth ...sexeducation will do.

; )