GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   lemme get this right, you keep sexped around, who has 0 use, and you ban BradM? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=373279)

woj 10-17-2004 01:37 PM

100 banned

Juicy D. Links 10-17-2004 01:37 PM

i have 78 nicks here

sexeducation 10-17-2004 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
And personally I prefer MasterBlogger ...
but wth ...sexeducation will do.

; )

49th post

sexeducation 10-17-2004 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by lazycash
You already had been breaking rule #5 by posting for months under two different nicks masterblogger and sexeducation

Lensman, please ban sexeducation as he clearly has been breaking this rule for months:

5. Multiple personalities are not allowed. If you have multiple personalities we will find out about you and we will shut down all your accounts. Also if you post under someone else's account and do it to break the rules, or they break the rules and we tie you to them. We will ban you and them. This is just like carrying someone else's bags at the airport. Don't do it.

He has openly admitted to posting under multiple personalities, why has he not been banned?

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Wrong.
SexEducation.com was temporarily disabled by a DDOS attack.

I created MasterBlogger while that issue was being resolved.

The first post I made was that I was really "sexeducation" and explained why I had created a new nick.

Further - I have only ever used one or the other - not both simultaneously.

You're still on a witch hunt - but there are no witches.
When are you going to realize that?

Stop listening to the GFY Big Mouths and start looking at the facts.
I am prepared to answer any and all questions.

48th & 47th post

lazycash 10-17-2004 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Wrong.
SexEducation.com was temporarily disabled by a DDOS attack.

I created MasterBlogger while that issue was being resolved.

The first post I made was that I was really "sexeducation" and explained why I had created a new nick.

Further - I have only ever used one or the other - not both simultaneously.

You're still on a witch hunt - but there are no witches.
When are you going to realize that?

Stop listening to the GFY Big Mouths and start looking at the facts.
I am prepared to answer any and all questions.

Who cares if your site was down, that has nothing to do with you creating a new nick. Rules are rules and you clearly broke them. Also, you have created far more profiles than just these two.

sexeducation 10-17-2004 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by lazycash
Who cares if your site was down, that has nothing to do with you creating a new nick. Rules are rules and you clearly broke them. Also, you have created far more profiles than just these two.
Nope that is a lie.
PROVE YOUR "far more profiles than just these two" statement.

I only have ONE nick and that's this one.

MasterBlogger has and is currently disabled.

mary34d 10-17-2004 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by juicylinks
i have 78 nicks here
i want a fake nick

lazycash 10-17-2004 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Nope that is a lie.
PROVE YOUR "far more profiles than just these two" statement.

I only have ONE nick and that's this one.

MasterBlogger has and is currently disabled.

The point is, you were banned, nothing else needs to be said. You were banned and therefore are not allowed to post in here, under any nick. Doesn't matter what the reason is or what your excuse is for being banned, you are banned and not allowed to post in here under any nick. Please observe your banishment and do not post in here anymore.

sexeducation 10-17-2004 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by lazycash
The point is, you were banned, nothing else needs to be said. You were banned and therefore are not allowed to post in here, under any nick. Doesn't matter what the reason is or what your excuse is for being banned, you are banned and not allowed to post in here under any nick. Please observe your banishment and do not post in here anymore.
Lensman previously in this thread ...
Quote:

"Brad was way out of line.

I don't know where the nic sexeducation has broken any rules, and no one has been able to point any out. They all point to the time I banned masterblogger.

Let me know how sexed has broken GFY rules, and he's gone. But I'm not gonna ban someone just because a lot of people don't like him."
Let me point out he banned MasterBlogger.
I apologized for my mistake.

BradM could probably do the same.
Lensman is not unreasonable we all make mistakes.

Lord knows - I have. ; )

sexeducation 10-17-2004 01:53 PM

He may not get the handle he prefers and is known by back...
I don't know ...
It's not my board ...

It used to belong to the MasterBlogger...[smirk]
but now I am just a regular chatter ... [shucks]

lazycash 10-17-2004 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Lensman previously in this thread ...


Let me point out he banned MasterBlogger.
I apologized for my mistake.

BradM could probably do the same.
Lensman is not unreasonable we all make mistakes.

Lord knows - I have. ; )

Why would Lensman go through the process of banning if everyone simply created a new nick and continued posting. He banned you, not your nicks, please observe the banishment and discontinue posting under any nick.

sexeducation 10-17-2004 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by lazycash
Why would Lensman go through the process of banning if everyone simply created a new nick and continued posting. He banned you, not your nicks, please observe the banishment and discontinue posting under any nick.
Both were banned.
I apologized and got SexEducation unbanned.

BradM can apologize - I don't care.
It seems to me he was in a pissing contest and lost.
(don't know all the facts )

He tried to get in a pissing contest with me once too.
"Let's see how long you last John Beacock when I pull my accounts!!! I'm never posting here again" - remember?

GonZo 10-17-2004 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by lazycash
Why would Lensman go through the process of banning if everyone simply created a new nick and continued posting. He banned you, not your nicks, please observe the banishment and discontinue posting under any nick.
He will now have to run off and do something else or go to bed. Thats what a good censor does when hes caught!

Maybe he will start a thread with your name in it so he can go to bed too.

Bow to the Power of a Master

sexeducation 10-17-2004 02:01 PM

If an employee or supplier gave me an ultimatum ...cya
BYE BYE

sexeducation 10-17-2004 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by GonZo
He will now have to run off and do something else or go to bed. Thats what a good censor does when hes caught!

Maybe he will start a thread with your name in it so he can go to bed too.

Bow to the Power of a Master

Both were banned.
I apologized and got SexEducation unbanned.

BradM can apologize - I don't care.
It seems to me he was in a pissing contest and lost.
(don't know all the facts )

He tried to get in a pissing contest with me once too.
"Let's see how long you last John Beacock when I pull my accounts!!! I'm never posting here again" - remember?


PS: Imitation is the best form of flattery.
"Bow to the ..." ... cute

sexeducation 10-17-2004 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by GonZo
He will now have to run off and do something else or go to bed. Thats what a good censor does when hes caught!

Maybe he will start a thread with your name in it so he can go to bed too.

Bow to the Power of a Master

On your fave bored [pun intended] - posts just made seem to IMMEDIATELY be altered. I watched this personally happen to my posts.

psyko514 10-17-2004 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lensman
Brad was way out of line.

I don't know where the nic sexeducation has broken any rules, and no one has been able to point any out. They all point to the time I banned masterblogger.

Let me know how sexed has broken GFY rules, and he's gone. But I'm not gonna ban someone just because a lot of people don't like him.

Lens, you say you care about GFY, and I don't doubt it. But I assume you care for the quality of the board as well, right?

More than "a lot of people" don't like sexeducation. In fact, I'd say 99.9% don't want him here. This isn't high school where all the cool kids are ganging up on the dorky kid with a runny nose and big ears. There is clearly something wrong with the man, even with pedophilic accusations aside.

He significantly lowers the quality of the board. He has no business here, and any potential for business he may have had has been wrecked by his idiotic rants.

If you have no other reason to ban him, ban him for using multiple nicknames. Sexeducation is MasterBlogger. You've banned MasterBlogger. You once banned SexEducation as well, as far as I can remember. You banned him, and yet he's still posting.

Don't get me wrong. I love GFY. I've had fun here, I've learned a lot and I've done a lot of business here. But idiots like sexeducation make this place less and less attractive to visit on a daily basis.

M_M 10-17-2004 02:08 PM

I would worry about goverment people watching and seeing how GFY allows pedophiles here. Doesn't look good for us at all.

Doctor Dre 10-17-2004 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lensman
Brad was way out of line.

I don't know where the nic sexeducation has broken any rules, and no one has been able to point any out. They all point to the time I banned masterblogger.

Let me know how sexed has broken GFY rules, and he's gone. But I'm not gonna ban someone just because a lot of people don't like him.

You are just shooting yourself in the foot Lens ... this board isn't nearly as good as it used to be couple months ago ... and I see less and less known industry names posting arround ... that sucks :(

sexeducation 10-17-2004 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by M_M
I would worry about goverment people watching and seeing how GFY allows pedophiles here. Doesn't look good for us at all.
I hereby as if sworn in an international court , allow any law enforcement agency any where in the world to post a PERSONAL correspondence with me regarding the suspicion of, or conviction of child pornography distribution, child molestation or rape.

John E. Beacock
Suite 353, Unit 204
1440 - 52 Street NE
Calgary, AB
Canada
T2A 4E8

1-403-619-2739 (phone beside me right now)
ICQ 32315652 (online right now)


The real reason we have big mouths stating things about me is that I advocate that no homepage anywhere on the internet should contain aroused genitals or reproductive fluids.

Now most of the people which post crap about me have done or are continuing to do just that.

So - rather then insulting me with your lies - why don't you just clean up your homepages !!!


You continue to attack the messenger and not the message - and anyone with a brain - on this board knows that!!!

Grow up.
I don't have to live with your guilt - you do!!

Webmaster_Logic 10-17-2004 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
I hereby as if sworn in an international court , allow any law enforcement agency any where in the world to post a PERSONAL correspondence with me regarding the suspicion of, or conviction of child pornography distribution, child molestation or rape.

John E. Beacock
Suite 353, Unit 204
1440 - 52 Street NE
Calgary, AB
Canada
T2A 4E8

1-403-619-2739 (phone beside me right now)
ICQ 32315652 (online right now)


The real reason we have big mouths stating things about me is that I advocate that no homepage anywhere on the internet should contain aroused genitals or reproductive fluids.

Now most of the people which post crap about me have done or are continuing to do just that.

So - rather then insulting me with your lies - why don't you just clean up your homepages !!!


You continue to attack the messenger and not the message - and anyone with a brain - on this board knows that!!!

Grow up.
I don't have to live with your guilt - you do!!

Freak

sexeducation 10-17-2004 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Doctor Dre
You are just shooting yourself in the foot Lens ... this board isn't nearly as good as it used to be couple months ago ... and I see less and less known industry names posting arround ... that sucks :(
The reason (if true) is that there is less real discussion and simply just more insults and name calling.

Discuss the facts - post your proof - that's how good boards go.
There is only so many times fake drama works until all lose interest.

Not inspite of people like me - because of people like me.
We came to discuss things not just insult when your feelings get hurt for being pinned on an issue.

69pornlinks 10-17-2004 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by KRL
What did Brad do to get banned?
Quote:

Originally posted by Fake Nick

READ A FUCKIN THREAD BEFORE REPLYING DUMB SOB

THE ACTUAL THREAD WAS LINKED IN THIS THREAD BEFORE YOUR IGNORANT REPLY :glugglug


i think you meant to say this

sexeducation 10-17-2004 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Webmaster_Logic
Freak
That's how they respond once pinned.

But he runs two public companies and a private one and can force me off the board?
ya right ...

Well if you own that and think you can do a better job then I have as the Webmaster AT SexEducation.com then buy me out.
$250 K get all, a silencer clause and a non-competition agreement.

https://www.afternic.com/name.php?id=963812


BLATENT PLUG
SexTherapy.com has an active bid and will soon sell ...
possibly for just $1490 USD
https://www.afternic.com/name.php?id=963813

Webmaster_Logic 10-17-2004 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
That's how they respond once pinned.

But he runs two public companies and a private one and can force me off the board?
ya right ...

Well if you own that and think you can do a better job then I have as the Webmaster AT SexEducation.com then buy me out.
$250 K get all, a silencer clause and a non-competition agreement.

https://www.afternic.com/name.php?id=963812




BLATENT PLUG
SexTherapy.com has an active bid and will soon sell ...
possibly for just $1490 USD
https://www.afternic.com/name.php?id=963813



why pay when i can own you for free freak!

sexeducation 10-17-2004 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Webmaster_Logic
why pay when i can own you for free freak!
Go for it ...
nothing is free ...
and you can NEVER pinn the MasterBlogger ...ever...
it's never happened and never will ...

Bow to the power of the MasterBlogger.

Cassie 10-17-2004 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Webmaster_Logic
why pay when i can own you for free freak!
why even be associated with that for free when you can blackhole it forever.

Webmaster_Logic 10-17-2004 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cassie
why even be associated with that for free when you can blackhole it forever.
Thats a good point. But this little stunt he pulled last week ticked me off and made me take intrest in him. Ask him about the papers he got served this week. Those papers will provide for some great laughs in the near future.

sexeducation 10-17-2004 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cassie
why even be associated with that for free when you can blackhole it forever.
SexEducation.com can NOT be blackholed ...
It's too generic of a domain that has a history of actually discussing what it purports to be.

It's too political and has made some interesting scientific discoveries.

Did I mention "Vaginal orgasm is a lie!"

hey ...kewl
I own that.
Vaginal-orgasm-is-a-lie.com
Like I own all the sheep on this board for lying about me.

sexeducation 10-17-2004 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Webmaster_Logic
Thats a good point. But this little stunt he pulled last week ticked me off and made me take intrest in him. Ask him about the papers he got served this week. Those papers will provide for some great laughs in the near future.
I've been served no papers.

sexeducation 10-17-2004 02:37 PM

And if I do they will be made public.

Cassie 10-17-2004 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
SexEducation.com can NOT be blackholed ...

oh boy you have no clue do you?

don't test those who dislike you to find out how wrong you truly are.

and if you really think you would find out who did such a thing, you are more mistaken then you can ever imagine.

this shows your experience on the web.

sexeducation 10-17-2004 02:38 PM

SexEducation.com has never received a formal complaint EVER!!!!
NOT EVER !!!
NOT EVEN ONCE IN 10 YEARS.

And I don't stay below the radar!!!
I set the fucking thing off.

sexeducation 10-17-2004 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cassie
oh boy you have no clue do you?

don't test those who dislike you to find out how wrong you truly are.

GO FOR IT !!!!!
Don't let fear and common sence stop you from wasting your time and money.

Do you not realize how many years I have heard the sky is falling?

You're not dealing with a kid out of highschool here.

GO FOR IT !!!

Or bow to the power of a MasterBlogger!
kewl ...MasterBlogger.com ..I own that too!

Webmaster_Logic 10-17-2004 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
And if I do they will be made public.
This is my fith post to you about the papers now and your first reply. Did you finally read them and it sunk in? Maybe tonight i will hook up the scanner and scan them for all to see. You sayed you wanted to play so lets play. Is that crystal Jonathan ?

sexeducation 10-17-2004 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Webmaster_Logic
This is my fith post to you about the papers now and your first reply. Did you finally read them and it sunk in? Maybe tonight i will hook up the scanner and scan them for all to see. You sayed you wanted to play so lets play. Is that crystal Jonathan ?
I have NOT received any papers.
I will go pick up my mail tomorrow.

I have no problem with you posting them on GFY.
Post them NOW !!!

WarChild 10-17-2004 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Webmaster_Logic
This is my fith post to you about the papers now and your first reply. Did you finally read them and it sunk in? Maybe tonight i will hook up the scanner and scan them for all to see. You sayed you wanted to play so lets play. Is that crystal Jonathan ?
I'll laugh my ass off if you served the little pedo. He can't afford a lawyer, he'll be fucked.

Cassie 10-17-2004 02:44 PM

one, i do not know how to do something like that but i have seen it done. poof, gone.

secondly, for me to want to learn how to do something like that to you, that would mean i would have to hate you which means i would have to think enough about you to have any sort of feeling towards you.

i dont care about you, i dont think about you and i certainly wouldnt waste my learning time on someone like you.

you are making your own bed. i am just sitting in the stands watching you self destruct.

you have created yourself a lot of enemies. i not being one of them but enough from this board to cause yourself some grief.

sexeducation 10-17-2004 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Webmaster_Logic
This is my fith post to you about the papers now and your first reply. Did you finally read them and it sunk in? Maybe tonight i will hook up the scanner and scan them for all to see. You sayed you wanted to play so lets play. Is that crystal Jonathan ?
My name isn't "Jonathan"?

I have never seen any of your previous posts regarding "the papers*" ...lol

I do however, have a history in this community of answering every single question - every single time.

If I miss your question - just post it again the next time I am online.

Post the papers ...ooooh aaaaah ....
oooooooh aaaa ...
the papers ...the papers ...roflmao

sexeducation 10-17-2004 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cassie
one, i do not know how to do something like that but i have seen it done. poof, gone.

secondly, for me to want to learn how to do something like that to you, that would mean i would have to hate you which means i would have to think enough about you to have any sort of feeling towards you.

i dont care about you, i dont think about you and i certainly wouldnt waste my learning time on someone like you.

you are making your own bed. i am just sitting in the stands watching you self destruct.

you have created yourself a lot of enemies. i not being one of them but enough from this board to cause yourself some grief.

If you lie about me.
You made yourself an enemy of mine.

I will defend my personal name's reputation.
So would you.

I will NOT back down.
I am not a suspected, known or convicted - pedophile, child pornography distributor nor a murderer.

If you were in my shoes ...
you would probably do the same AND NEVER BACK DOWN !!

Cassie 10-17-2004 02:53 PM

sweetness i would never be in your shoes or put myself in a situation even similar.

i have never lied about you, spoke about you, thought about you and anything that relates to you.

everyone has the right to free speech. that is the only thing you have protecting you on this board.

Fake Nick 10-17-2004 02:53 PM

did someone hide the ignore button from you guys ? :Graucho

WarChild 10-17-2004 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
If you lie about me.
You made yourself an enemy of mine.

I will defend my personal name's reputation.
So would you.

I will NOT back down.
I am not a suspected, known or convicted - pedophile, child pornography distributor nor a murderer.

If you were in my shoes ...
you would probably do the same AND NEVER BACK DOWN !!

Yes lots of people suspect you're a pedophile. I personally saw you post a link to child pornography.

1) This is in violation of Canadian Internet laws designed to protect children. You're not allowed to be viewing that site period, doing "research" is not a valid reason to break the law.

2) When you posted the link to GFY, you were agian in violation of Canadian law. You're not only not supposed to be "researching" these pages, you're not supposed to post a url or link anywhere. Not in anger, not as a typo, not at all.

Being as I know for a fact you've broken Canadian laws designed to protect Children, I've classified you as a Pedophile. Those ARE the facts.

Webmaster_Logic 10-17-2004 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
My name isn't "Jonathan"?

I have never seen any of your previous posts regarding "the papers*" ...lol

I do however, have a history in this community of answering every single question - every single time.

If I miss your question - just post it again the next time I am online.

Post the papers ...ooooh aaaaah ....
oooooooh aaaa ...
the papers ...the papers ...roflmao

So let me get this straight then ? you are not jonathan? You did not study General Medical Education at the univeristy of washington ? You did not lose your divorce case back in 98" You dont own sexeducation.com? You are not the son of alfred and amelia Beacock? What other info did i leave out?

sexeducation 10-17-2004 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WarChild
Yes lots of people suspect you're a pedophile. I personally saw you post a link to child pornography.

1) This is in violation of Canadian Internet laws designed to protect children. You're not allowed to be viewing that site period, doing "research" is not a valid reason to break the law.

2) When you posted the link to GFY, you were agian in violation of Canadian law. You're not only not supposed to be "researching" these pages, you're not supposed to post a url or link anywhere. Not in anger, not as a typo, not at all.

Being as I know for a fact you've broken Canadian laws designed to protect Children, I've classified you as a Pedophile. Those ARE the facts.


Quickly try to weasel your way out of a very bad legal liability problem.

Explain to me how a blog and typo of trying to shut down a CP site makes me a "pedophile"?

You did read the rest of the post in that thread or did you go directly to the typo'd url?

Webmaster_Logic 10-17-2004 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WarChild
Yes lots of people suspect you're a pedophile. I personally saw you post a link to child pornography.

1) This is in violation of Canadian Internet laws designed to protect children. You're not allowed to be viewing that site period, doing "research" is not a valid reason to break the law.

2) When you posted the link to GFY, you were agian in violation of Canadian law. You're not only not supposed to be "researching" these pages, you're not supposed to post a url or link anywhere. Not in anger, not as a typo, not at all.

Being as I know for a fact you've broken Canadian laws designed to protect Children, I've classified you as a Pedophile. Those ARE the facts.

Not to side with this freak. But there is no public record showing anything with him being a convicted pedo or ever being accused of one. If someone has some proof foward it to me please and i
will foward this info to my lawyer. You do not need to give me any of your info. Just proof thats all i need. 247-742-205

WarChild 10-17-2004 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
Quickly try to weasel your way out of a very bad legal liability problem.

Explain to me how a blog and typo of trying to shut down a CP site makes me a "pedophile"?

You did read the rest of the post in that thread or did you go directly to the typo'd url?

I'm not going to try to weasel out of anything. Go ahead sue me. I'm waiting for the libel papers. I'm absolutely terrorified John.

You're not allowed to be surfing CP sites period under Canadian law. You're not allowed to do it for reasearch, you're not allowed to do it to try and have it shut down, it's not your responsibility.

If you really are Canadian, like you claim, then I'm sure you've violated Canadian laws designed to protect children. As that's the case, and i know it to be true, I'll call you pedo all day long and never be afraid you'll be able to make me stop.

WarChild 10-17-2004 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Webmaster_Logic
Not to side with this freak. But there is no public record showing anything with him being a convicted pedo or ever being accused of one. If someone has some proof foward it to me please and i
will foward this info to my lawyer. You do not need to give me any of your info. Just proof thats all i need. 247-742-205

I can prove that if he's Canadian he's violated Canadian laws designed to protect children. He even admited to doing it here.

I don't really care if the law has caught up with him or not. If I see someone break in to a car, they're a thief in my book. Regardless of if the police caught them. :2 cents:

sexeducation 10-17-2004 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Webmaster_Logic
Not to side with this freak. But there is no public record showing anything with him being a convicted pedo or ever being accused of one. If someone has some proof foward it to me please and i
will foward this info to my lawyer. You do not need to give me any of your info. Just proof thats all i need. 247-742-205

BUMP

please do - there isn't any.
and that's a fact.

Webmaster_Logic 10-17-2004 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by WarChild
I can prove that if he's Canadian he's violated Canadian laws designed to protect children. He even admited to doing it here.

I don't really care if the law has caught up with him or not. If I see someone break in to a car, they're a thief in my book. Regardless of if the police caught them. :2 cents:

Well i did see the links he has posted along with some other stuff. I was just clarifying there was nothing on public record about him. Do you have some #'s of organization's i can contact up in canada?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123