all those other nations are poor, they will give what they can give

K the Oil rich nations of the middle east are poor?

MMMkkk...
We already went threw that.

Read the whole thread, start from the beginning.

Yes. Basically...

Geography lessons are over...

You missed that part.
While Asia may encompass over 1/4 of the world does not mean its minor sections are not to be classified as other regions.

Be sure to consult with your local library on Nations affiliated with the middle East in the Geography section and those within the whole of Asia. But since your so desperate to get an edge in this discussion I never said Jordan was NOT in "Asia". Not to mention off subject in a desperate move to twist the facts I have put before you.
Jordan is a Middle Eastern Nation within Asia as a whole. Though my educated mind believes that Jordan and China really have nothing in common along with Vietnam, Malasia, Singapore, India and Japan.

lol

just for your reference: Middle East is a part of Asia. There are 6 major regions of the world: Europe, Asia, America, Africa, Antarctida and Australia&Oceania.

They have one thing in common. THEY ARE ALL ASIAN COUNTRIES!!

Look at you cheap ass terrorist nation supportaing retards trying to debate Jordan is NOT in the middle East but its ASIA!
OMG piss poor dumb fukcers go suck Osama's cock!!! Alah Ackbar!

God is great because Newbies keep getting dumber and dumber. I swear its true. I mean I used to slam newbs that were a challange a cuople years ago. But this new wave of newbs is the biggest bunch of retards I have ever encountered to date.

Ya wanna talk about Jordan as not being a Middle Eastern Nation and say that its an Asian Nation thats fine, call it what ever you want but the truth is Jordan is one of those dumb ass Nations that have no fucking care for the world and would rather blow things up than actually help.

YOU calling ME newb??? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Yup...
Straight up...
If you were sombody ya wouldnt be dumb enough to hide like a little bitch with no sig, no WEB ID and a lousy 750 posts.

Your a newb dude.
Sorry...

But consider yourself lucky cuz school is in session for you little whinners.

Could be, but you are one of those dumb ass idiots who thinks Middle East is a continent.

lol, you are funny guy. so, if I tell that Jordan is a part of Asia it means I support terrorists. wow. :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh

Nah it means you just dont got a clue really.
This is a debate primer, so far you kinda suck.

Lets have fun for a sec...

"<-Freesite designs. $10 each. Coming soon.->"

10 Dollar galleries. Can I rape you?

I got over 5 gigs of content to be made for galleries, at 10 bucks each 20 pics per...

Think you can handle it?

hmm. free site is not a gallery. :Graucho

I've heard that some people work while others are making thousands of posts on gfy talking that all arabs must die except those ones who live in USA.

This raises a valid point. The US got bashed because it didn't give enough (although I wonder how much it costs the US to have an Aircraft Carrier Batter Group on station on a daily basis)......

Why hasn't other countries in the Middle East given money? While I'm bluring the lines here a bit, why hasn't Egypt, Syria, Pakastan, Jordan, and India coughed up some money?

Isn't Indonesia one of the biggest Muslim areas in the world?

Thats the Irony I am trying to point out. Some of these delusional dimwits would rather talk about Jordan being a part of Asia. Let me know if any people on Jordan land saw the tsunami when it happened.

you bad boy

Question: Just how far up your ass do you have your head, anyway?

Pardon me, I just am kickin up shit with the newbies to sharpen there skills.

Its for there own good.

the common problem for most americans is that you don't know anything about the world outside US, but you think you do.

India is one of the countries suffered from tsunami. Syria, Pakistan, Egypt - they don't have millions dollars to share. but it doesn't mean they do not help though. maybe your tv just forgot to tell you about that.

Indonesia has more Muslim's than any other country

from what I've seen on this board, don't think you could find it. :upsidedow

So your saying the people of those countries are all broke and cant afford it?
I call bullshit.

If elements of those countries can fund terrorists to mobilise against The United States and the nations that benefit the world then they can actually help.

However throughout history Islamic nations have held steadfast to the principal of there laws and won't ever help people in need. It is a creed of Strict Islamic Law not to help those in need but to help those in need under salvation with the promis to place faith in Allah.

I do hope a realisation occurs in people that read this.
The realisation is the fact that the "Co-exhistance" in Islamic law does not exhist, and that is why Arabic/Muslim nations have no future.

[QUOTE=AlienQ]
However throughout history Islamic nations have held steadfast to the principal of there laws and won't ever help people in need. It is a creed of Strict Islamic Law not to help those in need but to help those in need under salvation with the promis to place faith in Allah.
QUOTE]

Wow. You belive Middle East is a continent and YOU are giving us a history lesson...

arabs are cheap (unless they sell drugs), what else are we trying to find out?

Poor Donnie you dumb bitch...

I referred to Jordan as being a middle eastern region. Get with the program.
I tell ya what I will give 100.00 PayPal if you just read the thread and comprehend what I am saying.

Looks like the 100 is mine...

You cant read.

no. I said they can't afford spending such a big sum like US or EU.

"Element of the country" is not the country in the whole. and btw, Saudi Arabia supports terrorists too. but as officially they're friends of US you consider them to be very good guys, right?

Arabs :thumbsup

America does it for gain, business and the benefit of all. The hand is there, the modern world puts its hands out to everyone that would look to see it.

Same arguement as above. The elements of rogue nations are in control, A Countries failure to control there own people is simply an excuse in the eyes of all humanity. The laws of those countries do not permit compassion for the suffering.

Arab "Nations" are for the most part arbitrarily delineated entities. The British had a lot to do with this during the waning years of their colonial period. In addition, some of these borders were also altered arbitrarily by the most powerful world leaders after the close of WWI. Culturally and politically (from and Arab point of view that is) the borders make almost no sense. Moreover, it has been in almost every other nation's perceived self interest to deter the creation of Muslim states.

Given these circumstances, I fail to see how "Arab Nations" can be held accountable through the paradigm of Islamic unity in the relief effort. It's a sexy argument, but ultimately a specious one.

Maybe it would be better to examine the actions of Iran in this relief effort than to throw all Arab governments into one pile and light it on fire.

Woa!
Intelligence! I am impressed:)

Now read above.

Why dispite these "Colonial" lines is it that these "Islamic countries" have no compassion for the suffering without bowing to Allah first?

Its a flaw in the very core of the belief.

IN America it's OK if you worship Allah, its OK if your a catholic, its OK if your Jewish, its OK if your a Satanist.

There is an element of co-exhistance in the freedom based system that the modern world embraces while a segment wishes to destroy any that oppose the balance of co-exhistant thought.

Allah is only merciful to those who bow in allegiance.

http://www.submission.org/images/mir4.jpg

Can you read this?

Many of these countries, most of them in fact, are secular. Aside from Iran (correct me if I'm wrong) there are no "Islamic countries" in the Middle East, at least not Islamic governments. Maybe you should check to see what the Red Crescent has done. I haven't checked, and maybe they've done nothing. Maybe they've done alot. My point is simply that you need to think of these countries as secular countries, not religious ones. And given that fact, it is not possible to make a valid connection regarding moral obligation to help other muslims, at least not at the government level.

That being said, the United States government does something that I think is even greater than giving aid -- which is to keep as low a profile as it is possible to keep about giving that aid. In other words, the US government doesn't appear to be into the whole kudos thing when it comes to this. They see a chance to help people in need and they do it without bragging all over the place. That's the real contribution, IMHO.

By the way, Islam is actually a very peaceful religion as practiced by the VAST majority of it's adherents. Comparing the actions of a few idiotic hotheads with guns to Islam as a whole is exactly like pointing at the KKK and saying it represents Christianity.

every thing America does is for benefit of America. not sure what you meant talking "all" though.

sorry, can't disput with you about the history of Islam and muslim countries as my English isn't good enough to teach you the history and geografy. I can't say thal I like muslims, but I can understand why they don't like you.

have a nice day. gonna go to sleep now.

exactly! :thumbsup
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

For all of you too lazy to read the whole thread I'll sum it up:




AlienQ, you're an idiot!

Arab nations do not want anything to do with the US.... As a matter of fact most Europeans also HATE americans.... :helpme


But they still eat our Big Macs and French Fries :1orglaugh

:thumbsup

what does being able to read that have to do with what you are talking about?

yeap, that about sums up this whole thread :thumbsup

You mean freedom fries ;)

I could not agree more. I get sick of hearing "Islamic Suicide Bombers". That is a oxymoron, Muslims do not commit suicide and suicide is condemned in the Quran. People in every religion have a person or a group of people who use religion to form their own social norms for their personal benefit.

- Darklord forgot to include the entire thing. He left out: "That being said, the United States government does something that I think is even greater than giving aid -- which is to keep as low a profile as it is possible to keep about giving that aid. In other words, the US government doesn't appear to be into the whole kudos thing when it comes to this. They see a chance to help people in need and they do it without bragging all over the place. That's the real contribution, IMHO."

It seems, like most America-bashers, that Darklord has a selective conscience.

I just noted the things I agree with and deleted the things I don't agree with. is it better now?