GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Time Travel is Possible....scientific proof!!! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=454647)

ATKTrevor 04-12-2005 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x
http://www.recongames.com/images/Mentok.jpg
..wait.. wait.. I'm getting something..
Oh yeah, no maths or physics in your theories.

false alarm.

It just works Napoleon, you don't even know.

HitMePlse 04-12-2005 04:58 PM

Don't most people call this Deja Vu?

Pleasurepays 04-12-2005 05:37 PM

http://www.hollywoodjesus.com/movie/...ynamite/03.jpg

bobvegas 04-12-2005 06:04 PM

Say hi to Captain Kirk for me........

quantum-x 04-14-2005 06:04 AM

You give no theory.
I will listen to you when you publish your studies, with accompanying pages of equations and mathematical functions.

Until then you can string things together and call them 'proof' as much as you want.

ADL Colin 04-14-2005 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by quantum-x
Until then you can string things together and call them 'proof' as much as you want.

Pun intended?

Froey Twe 04-14-2005 06:51 AM

again this guy is smoking crack! lol

EROTEEK 04-14-2005 07:26 AM

STP, STOP, I just figured something, it's all wrong, OMG, it's all WRONG !!!

Demonstration:
The coefficients of the power series solutions of certain non-linear
differential equations are generated by convolutions of the preceeding
coefficients. One example is the differential equation

x x'' + a (x')^2 = b (1)

Among the solutions of this equation (with appropriate choices of a,b)
are exp(t), sin(t), cos(t), (A+Bt)^n, A+Bt+Ct^2, and sqrt(A+Bt+Ct^2).
This last function represents the separation between any two objects
in unaccelerated motion. Other solutions include the cycloid relation
for (non-rotating) gravitational free-fall, and the radial distance
of a mass from a central point about which it revolves with constant
angular velocity and radial freedom.

The power series solution of equation (1) can be written

x(t) = c[0] + c[1] t + c[2] t^2 + c[3] t^3 + ...

where the coefficients c[i] satisfy the convolutions

n / b if n = 2
SUM A(k,n-k) c[k] c[n-k] = (
k=0 \ 0 if n > 2

with
A(k,j) = (a-1) j (k-j) + k(k-1)/2

Any choice of c[0], c[1], c[2], and c[3], with c[1]c[2] not zero,
determines the values of a,b and therefore all the remaining
coefficients. There are many interesting things about these sequences
of c[k] values. Focusing on just the sequences with |c[k]| = 1,
k=0,1,2,3, there are obviously 16 possible choices, but only 8 up to
a simple sign change. These 8 can be arranged as four groups of 2:

k I II III IV
--- -------- ---------- --------- ---------
0 1 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 1 -1
2 1 1 1 -1 -1 -1 1 1
3 -1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 -1
4 1/2 1/2 3/2 -3/2 0 0 1 1
5 1/2 -1/2 5/2 5/2 4/5 -4/5 1 -1
6 -3/2 -3/2 9/2 -9/2 2/5 2/5 1 1
7 3/2 -3/2 19/2 19/2 -2/5 2/5 1 -1
8 3/8 3/8 133/8 -133/8 -1/2 -1/2 1 1
9 -29/8 29/8 267/8 267/8 1/30 -1/30 1 -1
etc

Yhe coefficients in each group differ only in sign. The coefficients
in groups I and II diverge, and those in group IV are all units. Only
the group III sequences converge. Interestingly, these coefficients
are given very closely by

c[k-1] = 2 exp(ku) sin(kw)

for k>2, where
u = -0.145370157...

/ 1.877672951... for III(a)
w = (
\ 1.263919649... for III(b)

Notice that the two possible values of w sum to 3.1415926...

The integer numerators and denominators of these c[k] sequences also
have many interesting properties. For example, primes p congruent to
+1 (mod 4) first appear in the denominator at c[p], whereas primes
congruent to -1 (mod 4) first appear at c[p^2]. The sequence of
numerators is much less regular

1 -1 -1 1 0 -4 2 2 -1 -1 59 -9 -1 233 8 -934 49 .. etc

Incidentally, the value of b in the ubiquitous equation (1) is
essentially just a constant of integration, and the underlying
relation is the derivitive

x x'' + q x' x'' = 0

where q=3 for unaccelerated separations and q=2 for (non-rotating)
gravitational separations. Isolating q and differentiating again
leads to the basic relation, free of arbitrary constants,

x x' x'' x'''' - x x' (x'')^2 - x (x'')^2 x''' + (x')^2 x'' x''' = 0

Dividing by x x' x'' x''' gives the nice form

x'''' x''' x'' x'
------ - ----- - ---- + ----- = 0
x''' x'' x' x

see what i mean???

quantum-x 04-14-2005 07:38 AM

I just plugged that into my Transmeta Hyper Accelerator, and wow! I'm posting from the future.

:D

Head 04-14-2005 07:46 AM

Fassinating Captain!

Platinumpimp 04-14-2005 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blackmonsters
Dude; you are hoping for the TV version of time travel.
TV is produced to entertain the masses of ignorant fucks in this world.
I don't own a fucking TV!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Get more sophisticated about what time travel would be.
Nobody will ever go back in time and physically kick Hitler in his ass.
Stuff like that is for entertainment only.


My time travel feels just as real as being for real.
Viewing into the future and the past is time travel, and wanting to physically interact with the future/past is fantasy.


See, if you could really go back into the past and interact and this could affect the future then chances are that in the future you would not exist any more since any change in history will alter it's entire paradigm.

So going back into the past would be a bad idea.
So just view into the future and see the armored car drop the bag with 3 billion dollars(inflation, ya know) at the the street corner and then go to that corner and just wait for the future and interact when they drop that money.

Then I ask to myself, but why can't you interact with the past or future if someone creates a device that can process sound at the speed of light?

Serge Litehead 04-14-2005 08:03 AM

if time exists then you must be already traveling from one point of time to another.
if you say time doesn't exists and that you're always in state of "now" then time traveling isn't an option because "now" expands through the life span.
take for instance one of the oldest human languages, sanskrit, it doesnt have past nor future tense. pleople speaking sanskrit believed there is only one continues tense which is "now".

keyboard warrior 04-14-2005 08:38 AM

I have been to the future.

My Name is John Tittor!

Monk 04-14-2005 08:55 AM

I dream.... therefore I am!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123