Hee hee....my turn.

(Avoid use of contemporary slang if possible-e.g. "..make significant returns on your investment" ).

(Should be Sonofsam- proper name)

Wait let me get this right...
We got Lenny2 and Lenny's wife...

Great.
So we got a husband and wife double teaming on this guy...

Wish he had openned a DP site.

So, you do not want to send traffic to a program you agree converts? :Oh crap

We realize you have a personal interest in seeing this program survive.

Don't count on it.

Unless MetaformX seriously changes his MO, his program won't survive a year.

Dude STFU already......how does MetaformX's ass taste?

yayyyyyyyy english class

all the ladies please get out your slutty teacher outfits :thumbsup

Personnal interest now?
Your right...

I invested in StudioCash.
Its my money.

I guess we won't hear from MetaformX until late tomorrow night.

That's about how long it took for him to come up with his bullshit reply to the last thread that called him out.

This is my husband's beef. You don't see me posting crap about this guy. Now, crawl back up his ass and shut the hell up.

How about ya have yur husband crawl up your ass and we can call it a day?

It's getting obvious that you either designed this site, or you're going to be designing sites for him in the future. You usually go out of your way to insult other designers, but all of a sudden you feel the need to repeatedly state how great of a site this is, when it looks to most people like a mediocre deluxepass front at best.

Yeah, kinda similar to you and MetaformX.

Ok this drama has been real fun, but I gotta say ...

Lenny...

Who cares if Meta thinks he's better than you? Who cares if he was a dick? That's what you're really pissed about and it keeps shining through.

It's nice to think that you're trying to protect GFY from a scammer here, but I think what's really going on is nothing but a case of bruised ego.

Sorry dude but at this point that's my opinion.

I started out supporting Meta, then you had me convinced ... and now I think this whole thing is just stupid and I don't care.

Starting to remind me of American Politics.

:disgust

-P

I don't agree it converts, I said that's not what we're questioning. Try to keep up with the rest of the class.

BTW, even if it converted at 1:50, I wouldn't send a single join to a lying clown like MetaformX. Programs who are run by over-eager kids who think they know everything and try to act like bigshots always end one way. I'll let you figure out what that way is.

You're entitled to your opinion. However, if you just don't care anymore, stop reading the thread and posting on it. Enough said.

LOL see I'm full of shit when I say I don't care. I don't WANT to care, but I do lol ... Ya sucked me in!

<-----This guy is full of shit. He loves drama.

Calling someone a scammer within a thread title is a real piece of shit thing to do to smeone when the reality is...

Metaformx has not stlen a dime from no one in this biz...
He prolly just trying to promote his program like anyone else around here. I can appreciate his stuntmanship posts.

Kinda almost like PimpDawg but a little more subtle and vaguely more clever and definatly more controversial in his choice of words.

WORDS guys...

And until ya can prove he stole money from ya he aint no scammer.

hes gonne get busy :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

hahahhaa

And ya have just proven what a stupid businessman you are...

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

100 scammers.....

Are you worth filing on?
If ya are, I will think something :1orglaugh

Alien didn't you start a thread just a month ago calling somebody out? I think it was webgurl. Now you're all into this "drama" for absolutely "no reason"?

Interesting...

I never said "thief", I said "scammer"

As I said before, he logged into GFY with a fake nick and said he was going to do a "traffic test" on studio cash.
Then he got caught photoshopping the stats.

That's a scam, pure and simple.

Also, I group liars and thieves together. If I can't trust you to tell me the truth then I can't trust you not to steal from me, its pretty simple.

That's your definition of scammer and it's been noted. Others, myself included, would consider someone who lies and fakes stats shots to try to trick people into sending him traffic a scammer. If he had stolen money we'd be calling him a thief, which non of us have.

My guess.......sig spots......nothing more. :2 cents:

Thats right...
I am unpredictable.

A loose canon.
Not even the best guys in this biz that I talk to, have lunch with or visit can figure out exactly where I stand on things or why I do what I do...

I can not even tell ya what I will do next.

Webgurl...
Yeah I hit her.

Regarding her not being able to mind her own business and attacking my design work. I put my foot in her ass for it.

Hey Rich it could be worse.
The last time you called someone a scammer you were informed that you were Russian.

I bet that came as a shock.

HiHi

http://www.itee.uq.edu.au/~pja/_jpg/monkey.jpg

I also called out Headless...
Also Juicy and even Lensman.

And many many others.

But wait...
There is more than meets the eye.

Headless is a client and Juicy is well...
Juicy.

Ya people really crack me up.
So clueless or err... rather...

Presumptious and gullible.

If I knew people were this gullible in my early day I would have my own gameshow already.

Hey Rich...

Umm...

Your sig reads...

Our "Busty Amateurs".
Are you evoking that term because BustyAmateurs was a wild success and your choosing to use the term's notoriety for your own gain in hoping to fool people?

Thats kinda scammish to me...

Lenny you claim "Hi converting sites" in your sig and on the webmaster program site.

Where is your proof?
Wait, ya only got one site.
So shouldnt it read "Our Hi converting site"?

Or maybe it should read "Our supposedly Hi Converting Site" because we are just gonna tell ya it's hi converting but show no real proof?

Dude, you're reaching.

First of all, Rich doesn't have anything in his sig, it's my sig you're referring to.

Second of all I use the term "busty amateurs" because it is a term commonly used to describe amateur girls with large breasts.
However "Busty Amateurs" is only 2 words and "amateur girls with large breasts" is 5 words so I figured "Busty Amateurs" was the easiest way to describe the content that we're producing.

Since bangbus was the first "reality site" does that mean everyone who uses the term "reality site" is trying to fool people for their own gain?
Perhaps if we did things your way we could describe our sites as "sites where we show how we pick up the girls and get them to fuck on film for money thus adding more realism to the surfer experience"?

Time to renew your lithium prescription : Cheap Prices

Man if that's all you got you need to troll elsewhere. You're really reaching.

omfg, you're such a donkey :1orglaugh

I'm sure MetaformX is happy to have you defending him

Well read my words...

On Metaformx's Studio Cash he is not making such outragious claims in a feeble attempt to hype.

Only ne phrase in small text...
"The above sites convert amazingly and we would put up our conversion ratios against any other program!"

2nd of all "Busty Amateurs" is in the UPTO as a trademark thats dead.
It has been known as a Branded term and particularly this term was quite the rage in early 2000.

A Branded term you are using to promote your program now.


So anyways let's turn it into a game.
I am willing to bet his anal site does better than your Boob site.
Infact Xgape will outperform your boob site by prolly 20%.

Are ya rdy to put your dick where your mouth is?

I don't know Lenny, but I started promoting Real Big Racks a couple of days ago.

Here are my stats from his program:

Summary Stats (Period)-- prev1092
Site Unique Raw Sales Ratio Payout
realbigracks 129 154 2 1/64 $0
TOTALS 129 154 2 1/64 $0


Summary Stats (Today)-- prev1092
Site Unique Raw Sales Ratio Payout
realbigracks 62 76 1 1/62 $0
TOTALS 62 76 1 1/62 $0

so, 129 hits, 2 sales.

it was funny. 10 years ago :(

I see nothing on the United States Patent and Trademark Office site that indicates that Busty Amateurs is patented or trademarked.

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...FIELD2=&d=ptxt

http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...FIELD2=&d=PG01