Originally Posted by rewn (Post 15359092)

> 3 years later, Default defendants dismissed

https://ecf.wvnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bi...2005cv0051-361

Originally Posted by SwordFish (Post 7401093)

If it breaks your heart, then back that up with some assistance for them. You can certainly afford it. Or is that just lip service?

Originally Posted by XPays (Post 7400568)

her lawyer has rejected some fair settlement offers per a friend of ours that made an offer recently. the webmaster had one link to juicybucks and some decent se placement.

countersuing and all the huffery will not sit well imho and this example is a good example of what happens when illegitimate affiliate ads get promoted by legitimate affiliates. the legit get sued while the illegit hideaway in distant locations :2 cents:

there were no releases on the allison williams video and it harmed her reputation. a lot of you cry about my legal rantings about content and the misnomer "public domain" and now you see reality. i am looking out for your best interests.

this case is not a joke for those caught in the cross-hairs and one should not assume that because a sponsor publishes pics or vid's that the sponsor is setup legit. greed gets you a couple quick dollars- then reality comes to take it all back and then some.

</rant>

Originally Posted by wahooter (Post 7400189)

Ex Beauty pagent queen is suing 59 sites.

I got court papers saying I'm one of them..??

They say my search engine linked to celebflix.com who was selling her fake sex video. WTF?!? Why is that my bad?

CLICK LINK...
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/31/williams/


n00bs!!

any advice? what to do?

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 15361873)

This is why I don't use my real info in the whois.

Originally Posted by sortie (Post 15362774)

You'd just get arrested, sued and prosecuted as "John Doe".
Fake whois will not protect you, it just makes it take longer to find
you and adds to your guilt when the jury hears you used fake names and
addresses because you knew you were operating outside the law.

Originally Posted by Nicky (Post 15362875)

That is not entirely correct.

Originally Posted by LatinCams (Post 15363152)

This kind of Shit gives me the Chills....

We really work on thin Ice and thats Scarry :(

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX (Post 15363155)

or those dealing with celeb sites?

Not everyeone is on that ice.

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 15363468)

Hey guys...did you miss that the thing was dismissed? You're dramatizing over something that doesn't matter. :) No affiliates were sent to jail. No affiliates were harmed at all. And no program sitting off in some "hideaway" has been sent to jail either. It's okay. No need to be scared anymore. lol

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 15363625)

There is plenty of worthy information about what people need to be watching out for. Wasn't the first and won't be the last of this kind of lawsuit.

Originally Posted by rewn (Post 15729521)

Won 7 Million from 9 of the 57 defendents

http://www.smh.com.au/news/technolog...223029865.html

Originally Posted by rewn (Post 15729521)

Won 7 Million from 9 of the 57 defendents

http://www.smh.com.au/news/technolog...223029865.html

Originally Posted by Shap (Post 15729999)

"They all chose not to participate in the trial nor have attorneys represent them."

What a bunch of tools

Originally Posted by sortie (Post 15362774)

You'd just get arrested, sued and prosecuted as "John Doe".
Fake whois will not protect you, it just makes it take longer to find
you and adds to your guilt when the jury hears you used fake names and
addresses because you knew you were operating outside the law.

Originally Posted by Nicky (Post 15362875)

That is not entirely correct.