Wrong. I proved that Cybertainment (KinkyCeline) did NOT change the banner.

I prepared a Step-by-Step Guide for you.

1.) Go to
http://web-sniffer.net/?url=http%3A%...%2Fbanner2.jpg

This IP is owned by Cybertainment (aka KinkyCeline) - This was the banner that was displayed on your site.

2.) Look for Last-Modified on the Page
Last-Modified: Mon, 23 May 2005 05:38:47 GMT

This means that the banner was last changed on 23 May 2005 by KinkyCeline.

=> KinkyCeline did NOT change the banner => You lied to GFY ...

Q.E.D.

ummm, actually that makes sense as that ad campaign went into effect june 1 - it's automated and put into the sytem way before that - meaning it would have been approved probally around the 20th or so. it was probally changed on their server on the 23 or whenever you say so that we believe we were linking to the banner we approved and then suddenly when it went live on the 1st (when banners change) the bad banner went in and cybercat or I were none the wiser till this exploded on GFY on the 1st.


think about it - SERIOUSLY - if it was live on my site from the 23rd SOMEONE - like you - would have caught it and brought it to the masses attention.

i'm under a microscope in my daily transactions from you trolls - no way could i have had a beast banner on my site form the 23rd without you guys noticing. you caught it on the 1st - when the banners changed and updated

and i'm really happy you trolls DID catch the banner when you did and i THANK YOU for watching soo close and monitaring my site so.

i really appreaicte it. Helps me to keep a cleaner site.


:thumbsup

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Why is the banner an issue at all ? The SITE was approved wasn't it ? Isn't it the SITE that is in question here also ? Or was the SITE changed after it was approved too ?

i never claimed you had it since 23rd may.

you had it since 1st june ( 8 days after the banner was uploaded to the server). the banner was never changed after it has been uploaded though ...

Yea, of course the site was approved.

But SleazyDream claims that both the site and banner were changed (pure bullshit) ...

When he told us that lie, he didn't think about Last-Modified though ...

This clearly uncovered his lie, proofing that SleazyDream knowingly accepted Bestiality on his site ...

god you're going in circles here. we would not have knowingly approved a beast banner. even in the form sent out to my clients it stats no beast stuff - has for years.

i'm curious- who exactly ARE you? do you have the guts to say?

yeah - obviously sites can NEVER be changed. lol

That's what I was wondering. Thanks for clearing that up.

So then; Sleazydream and Cybercat say they were duped, and the site being advertised was changed after it was approved.

Got it.

Yeah, especially with the fact that archive.org is clearly proving that the landing page has never been changed in two years. Amazing that he's still using the "they changed the landing page" bullshit excuse. :1orglaugh

ummmmm.... i see why you are arguing/fighting this SD... you are KNOWINGLY profiting from a company that produces & distributes bestiality. its that simple. shouldn't the canadian mounties or somethin be up in dat ass for that? :eek7




...

Well it did take well over 24 hours to have it removed. It wasn't exactly a priority for Sleazy to stop pushing the beast. :2 cents: