just for your information

:warning in canada bestiality is as illegal as CP (max. 10 years in prison) :warning

i would think twice before doing business with sleazydream

what the fuck is up the asshole of you morons?

with in hours of when the client changed the banner it was found on gfy - as soon as i was notified client was severly warned - banner was changed. client changed banner back later that day - cleint was banned from any future dealings.

why would i promote beast stuff - it's a PRE- PAID ad - and there's a waiting list. i make the same either way. THINK ABOUT IT.


clients host their own banners. it's possible for them to change the image and landing page anytime - if they do they get banned. this client got a warning cause they've been a client for many years but even with they they STILL got banned after one warning.


mind telling me what else i can do? I did all due dillangce possible in this case.

Read the fucking thread you clueless fat fuck.

The issue here is not about the banner. It was about the fact that you approved their bestiality site. Or are you telling us that when you reviewed their site, they *also* changed it after being approved. You want us to believe you guys *NEVER* review/check the advertiser's site?

Stop being such a dumbass and admit you knew that advertiser was promoting bestiality.

whenever i reviewed the site it had no beastilaity on it.


why would i post a beast site when my banner space is sold out with a waiting list and it's pre- paid?


does that make sense? think about it?


or are you still mad that you made money on my site and not on your buddy chokers? :1orglaugh

After the banner was discovered you told them to change it, but still agreed to sell traffic to a beast site. What you could have done is stopped advertising any banner that promotes a beast site. But you did not, did you
Beasty Boy ???

stop lying to GFY. the advertiser did NOT change the banner.
(proof in this thread)

- Why do you have a CyberCat banner in your Rotation if you are booked out? Makes no sense ...

- Let me guess ... Beast Sponsors pay 10x more than the normal advertisers. Why shouldn't you turn such a deal down?

Your lies are bigger than you. And that's big, trust me.

When we clicked the banner, it was the link

http://www.kinkyceline.com/indexsd.html

indexsd.html ? Hmmm Index Sleady Dream maybe..

And ohh.. look what I found on archive.org

http://web.archive.org/web/*/kinkyce...m/indexsd.html

That link was created in 2003 and that SITE ALWAYS CONTAINED BESTIALITY.

OWNEEEEEEEED.




I barely made profit with a gallery spot on your site because it was a promotion with dollarmachine.

I never bought anything from Choker but I'm pretty sure it's a 100 times better than your chinese/popup traffic.

after the banner was discovered the client ( who had been a client with clean sites for years )- was told to change that banner and not to link to what it was going to. they changed it - then changed it back. Once it was discovered it was changed back the clients was dumped permently.

i suppose clients are something you're not used to dealing with these days - looking at how you're dropping your rates and all ... don't worry, i'm sure things will pick up sooner or later for you choker. in the mean time, is there anything i can do to help?

whenever i inspected the site it had no beast stuff. i have no idea if they hade it changing or what.

cybercat buys that spot - and they do on all their clients. (ask jjj, the hun or worldsex if you don't believe me) i actually get paid full rate for it.

Idiot.

Stop ignoring my previout post.

Your lies are bigger than you. And that's big, trust me.

When we clicked the banner, it was the link

http://www.kinkyceline.com/indexsd.html

indexsd.html ? Hmmm Index Sleady Dream maybe..

And ohh.. look what I found on archive.org

http://web.archive.org/web/*/kinkyc...om/indexsd.html

That link was created in 2003 and that SITE ALWAYS CONTAINED BESTIALITY.

OWNEEEEEEEED.

umm, no you proved i never changed my site - the banner is a link - they host it - they can change that at any time - you'd know that if you had a clue and it was proven by people who have a clue in other threads again and again but it's hard to get some simple logic though your head so you might as well keep this bullshit up pretending you have something that doesn't exist

this is getting old. have you fun. i'm sold out, and you're broke. :1orglaugh

enjoy your day.

Can't find excuses for your lies anymore?

why bother - i got money to spend. :thumbsup

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :thumbsup

WRONG

i proved that the BANNER was not changed.

the last modified date for the banner is 23 may 2005 (8 days before it appeared on your site)

in other words. the banner was not changed.

stop telling lies to GFY ...

mmmmmm popcorn

umm, no you proved that i never changed the banner. which i didn't

Wrong. I proved that Cybertainment (KinkyCeline) did NOT change the banner.

I prepared a Step-by-Step Guide for you.

1.) Go to
http://web-sniffer.net/?url=http%3A%...%2Fbanner2.jpg

This IP is owned by Cybertainment (aka KinkyCeline) - This was the banner that was displayed on your site.

2.) Look for Last-Modified on the Page
Last-Modified: Mon, 23 May 2005 05:38:47 GMT

This means that the banner was last changed on 23 May 2005 by KinkyCeline.

=> KinkyCeline did NOT change the banner => You lied to GFY ...

Q.E.D.

ummm, actually that makes sense as that ad campaign went into effect june 1 - it's automated and put into the sytem way before that - meaning it would have been approved probally around the 20th or so. it was probally changed on their server on the 23 or whenever you say so that we believe we were linking to the banner we approved and then suddenly when it went live on the 1st (when banners change) the bad banner went in and cybercat or I were none the wiser till this exploded on GFY on the 1st.


think about it - SERIOUSLY - if it was live on my site from the 23rd SOMEONE - like you - would have caught it and brought it to the masses attention.

i'm under a microscope in my daily transactions from you trolls - no way could i have had a beast banner on my site form the 23rd without you guys noticing. you caught it on the 1st - when the banners changed and updated

and i'm really happy you trolls DID catch the banner when you did and i THANK YOU for watching soo close and monitaring my site so.

i really appreaicte it. Helps me to keep a cleaner site.


:thumbsup

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Why is the banner an issue at all ? The SITE was approved wasn't it ? Isn't it the SITE that is in question here also ? Or was the SITE changed after it was approved too ?

i never claimed you had it since 23rd may.

you had it since 1st june ( 8 days after the banner was uploaded to the server). the banner was never changed after it has been uploaded though ...

Yea, of course the site was approved.

But SleazyDream claims that both the site and banner were changed (pure bullshit) ...

When he told us that lie, he didn't think about Last-Modified though ...

This clearly uncovered his lie, proofing that SleazyDream knowingly accepted Bestiality on his site ...

god you're going in circles here. we would not have knowingly approved a beast banner. even in the form sent out to my clients it stats no beast stuff - has for years.

i'm curious- who exactly ARE you? do you have the guts to say?

yeah - obviously sites can NEVER be changed. lol

That's what I was wondering. Thanks for clearing that up.

So then; Sleazydream and Cybercat say they were duped, and the site being advertised was changed after it was approved.

Got it.

Yeah, especially with the fact that archive.org is clearly proving that the landing page has never been changed in two years. Amazing that he's still using the "they changed the landing page" bullshit excuse. :1orglaugh

ummmmm.... i see why you are arguing/fighting this SD... you are KNOWINGLY profiting from a company that produces & distributes bestiality. its that simple. shouldn't the canadian mounties or somethin be up in dat ass for that? :eek7




...

Well it did take well over 24 hours to have it removed. It wasn't exactly a priority for Sleazy to stop pushing the beast. :2 cents: