GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Is IBanker from Jason and Alex banned? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=476256)

woj 06-03-2005 07:29 PM

50.....,...

XPays 06-03-2005 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Missy
The "story" that I heard doesn't matter because it's not the whole story. My point was that he was "thinking twice about the adult.com crew" because of one person's actions of banning the entire Jason & Alex crew because of one person's actions. I just found it amusing.

i think it was wrong of j&a as a company to for all intensive purposes show blind loyalty to an irate employee who got bent by trey moments before going 911 on lens who is not only an owner but he is also a customer. why should he not be protected by the same rules as all of us.


for that matter- ban kourosh from xxxcash and the whole company for breaking the rules as well. they posted false information claiming xxxcash had not been paid and never retracted after plenty of gentle prodding and proof including cleared check numbers amounts and dates of clearing. board rules baby! (they will never get banned of course, because of my initial point that politics are a part of business. evidence btw:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=469114
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=469132

yeah yeah!!

vivalaspam 06-03-2005 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays
comedic version of nonreality you have there :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Here come the sheep with the brown noses.

I stated the facts and made my opinion based on those facts.

Facts are:
-Amp was involved in some drama
-Lensman posted how amp wasnt making his current employers look good
-That night or following morning 3 people that work for jasonandalex.com were banned from their accounts and one person that promotes them had thier sig changed.
-2 of the people banned were away on vacation and knew nothing about the drama, nor did they post in any of the drama threads.

Thats how I drew my opinion.
Now its your turn pumpkin tits. Lets hear what you have to say.

Since you such an intelligent little fella, lets hear what you have to say as long as it consist of more than an incomprehensible sentence followed by smilies.

Has anyone figured out why pimpdog wasnt banned that night either? I am not sure who started the drama that night, but if you're going to have rules for your message board and ban some people for breaking those rules then shouldn't everyone be held accountable? Or do gfy mods and admins ban only when it's beneficial.

thaifan99 06-03-2005 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by opflix
oooooh.... this one could get long :eek2




..

You meane VERrrrrrrrrrrrryyyyy Long lol! :pimp

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 06-03-2005 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vivalaspam
...I was in the adult business while most of you were fingering mary jane rotten crotch back in junior high and post counts dont mean shit except that you have nothing better to do than troll on gfy every waking hour.

I thought I was the only one fingering Mary Jane Rotten Crotch back in Junior High! I wonder what happened to her? <rubs chin - begin dream sequence>

http://www.moocowrecords.com/Assets/images/smrc.jpg

ADG Webmaster

XPays 06-03-2005 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vivalaspam
Here come the sheep with the brown noses.

I stated the facts and made my opinion based on those facts.

Facts are:
-Amp was involved in some drama
-Lensman posted how amp wasnt making his current employers look good
-That night or following morning 3 people that work for jasonandalex.com were banned from their accounts and one person that promotes them had thier sig changed.
-2 of the people banned were away on vacation and knew nothing about the drama, nor did they post in any of the drama threads.

Thats how I drew my opinion.
Now its your turn pumpkin tits. Lets hear what you have to say.

Since you such an intelligent little fella, lets hear what you have to say as long as it consist of more than an incomprehensible sentence followed by smilies.

Has anyone figured out why pimpdog wasnt banned that night either? I am not sure who started the drama that night, but if you're going to have rules for your message board and ban some people for breaking those rules then shouldn't everyone be held accountable? Or do gfy mods and admins ban only when it's beneficial.

somewhat justified indignancy but still a spin. what gave amp the right to expect instant turnaround on a banning? he gave the mod's about 3 seconds.

vivalaspam 06-03-2005 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays
i think it was wrong of j&a as a company to for all intensive purposes show blind loyalty to an irate employee who got bent by trey moments before going 911 on lens who is not only an owner but he is also a customer. why should he not be protected by the same rules as all of us.

How did JSA show blind loyalty when those that are in decision making powers were not even aware of the situation, and were actually living in reality on vacation? Furthermore, where did you see anywhere that an employee of JSA defended amp or encouraged him? Furthermore, how do you know what was or was not done in regards to this situation within the JSA group.

XPays 06-03-2005 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vivalaspam
How did JSA show blind loyalty when those that are in decision making powers were not even aware of the situation, and were actually living in reality on vacation? Furthermore, where did you see anywhere that an employee of JSA defended amp or encouraged him? Furthermore, how do you know what was or was not done in regards to this situation within the JSA group.

hey, i ain't in on the matrix. i saw all the threads progress that night and being on vacation is not an acceptable answer in the fast-paced interweb. diffusing is time-sensitive and ya snooze ya loose. ibanker is knowledgable sounding and i have no problem with j&a or the mod's or lens for the banning.

SureFire 06-03-2005 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays
here are a few unsolicited reasons why i personally can accept the banning:

- Amp crossed the line severely for whatever reason.

- His employer's did not take corrective action.

- No option's left for an amicable resolution.


It's not a terminal situation but the initial banning's make sense to me. I also have been victimized by the politics and sig weirdness stuff; but, the board is not a free and publicly controlled entity. You own the board, you make the rules at the end of the day.

I missed AMP's last melt-down here. Seems like he crossed the line, and I have no clue if AMP's current employers were supporting his posts/threads. If they contributed to the posts/threads, they should have been banned also.

I just like IBanker posts/threads. I really don't know the story :)

Big Ray 06-03-2005 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vivalaspam
......btw. don\'t expect me to reply, because im sure ill be banned after this, and no I dont work for jasonandalex.com or have any relation to them or their business.....

According to the GFY Admin DB, Vivalaspam's IP is used by one other user named "undermyspell".

Let's see who's sig is in "undermyspell"....

http://www.gfy.com/members/undermyspell/

Care to revise the statement?

XPays 06-03-2005 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Ray
According to the GFY Admin DB, Vivalaspam's IP is used by one other user named "undermyspell".

Let's see who's sig is in "undermyspell"....

http://www.gfy.com/members/undermyspell/

Care to revise the statement?

that is quite ironic. she was cool though when we bought a domain from her :thumbsup

i like the chutzpa!

Big Ray 06-03-2005 09:28 PM

Always three sides to a story.

vivalaspam 06-03-2005 09:38 PM

Sorry, but this isnt "Undermyspell" and who I am is irrelevant, unless you wanna get off topic for some reason. No need to turn this into a different topic now is there?

undermyspell 06-03-2005 09:49 PM

No i'm sure he doesn't care to revive that Ray. VivaLaSpam is not me. Evan.. I take no exception with you and enjoyed our business transaction.

Now that Ray seems to think that I am the one involved in the exposing of the bannings let's go back and look at a few things that were said. Yes, Amp did fly off the handle and post things that should never have been posted. That's not a good thing whatsoever. However, you have to also step back and look at the fact that nobody within the JSA organization supported, condoned or encouraged any of his posts.

What I can tell you is that on that Thursday night I popped into the boards and saw the commotion. I messaged Amp and asked if he was ok. He was not and it was like a train wreck. There was no stopping his actions. Because i'm not in a position to do anything to Amp because I don't sign the checks I bowed out. Alex and iBanker were many miles away from home on vacation enjoying a well earned break. Neither of them were remotely aware of the situation. When I woke up the following morning I received a message from Matt that he was in fact banned. Although his name did not have banned under it. His account was "disabled" apparently. He checked to see if iBanker was also "banned". He in fact was. Now, when Alex returned the following Monday and tried to log in to GFY. Guess what. Another banning.

Now, this is Joe's board. I've never had a problem with him. However, I really do not understand the need to ban a company that was neither present during nor defended any of the actions that took place. Those that asked the question about iBanker being banned were told by someone who had received the story from me firsthand and chose to post their own opinions.

Ray, are you trying to deflect the fact that the members of JSA were banned for no reason whatsoever by creating a secondary "drama". There is no drama here. Someone asked if they were banned. Yes, they are and it occured when Amp was banned. That leads me to the conclusion they were banned because of Amp.

Now, what do you have to say about why they were banned Ray? Is there a reason other than what i've said and if there is would you please share it with me? I would like to know if any of them did something unfavorable.

GatorB 06-03-2005 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SureFire
I like IBanker's posts. Sucks if he got banned for AMP's (all to common) melt-downs here. :upsidedow

He's an asshole. HA I'm glad he's banned. SUCK MY BALLS if you read this IBanker!

tranza 06-03-2005 09:54 PM

Wow... Nice twist....

This thread is getting interesting...

Big Ray 06-03-2005 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by undermyspell
No i'm sure he doesn't care to revive that Ray. VivaLaSpam is not me. Evan.. I take no exception with you and enjoyed our business transaction.

Now that Ray seems to think that I am the one involved in the exposing of the bannings let's go back and look at a few things that were said. Yes, Amp did fly off the handle and post things that should never have been posted. That's not a good thing whatsoever. However, you have to also step back and look at the fact that nobody within the JSA organization supported, condoned or encouraged any of his posts.

What I can tell you is that on that Thursday night I popped into the boards and saw the commotion. I messaged Amp and asked if he was ok. He was not and it was like a train wreck. There was no stopping his actions. Because i'm not in a position to do anything to Amp because I don't sign the checks I bowed out. Alex and iBanker were many miles away from home on vacation enjoying a well earned break. Neither of them were remotely aware of the situation. When I woke up the following morning I received a message from Matt that he was in fact banned. Although his name did not have banned under it. His account was "disabled" apparently. He checked to see if iBanker was also "banned". He in fact was. Now, when Alex returned the following Monday and tried to log in to GFY. Guess what. Another banning.

Now, this is Joe's board. I've never had a problem with him. However, I really do not understand the need to ban a company that was neither present during nor defended any of the actions that took place. Those that asked the question about iBanker being banned were told by someone who had received the story from me firsthand and chose to post their own opinions.

Ray, are you trying to deflect the fact that the members of JSA were banned for no reason whatsoever by creating a secondary "drama". There is no drama here. Someone asked if they were banned. Yes, they are and it occured when Amp was banned. That leads me to the conclusion they were banned because of Amp.

Now, what do you have to say about why they were banned Ray? Is there a reason other than what i've said and if there is would you please share it with me? I would like to know if any of them did something unfavorable.


wow.. you got here fast! Posted from the same IP too, but okay.. maybe your rommies... whatever..

Let's put that asside for the moment and ask this.

Are you sure you have all the details? 100%? I am not going to enlighten you to those details. I will stick to my original statement that there is always three sides to a story.

Thomas N 06-03-2005 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays
i think it was wrong of j&a as a company to for all intensive purposes

For all INTENSIVE PURPOSES??

AHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

DarkJedi 06-03-2005 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays
i think it was wrong of j&a as a company to for all intensive purposes show blind loyalty to an irate employee who got bent by trey moments before going 911 on lens who is not only an owner but he is also a customer.



Today's english lesson:

For all intensive purposes = For all intents and purposes.

No green card for you until you get better language skills :)

undermyspell 06-03-2005 10:44 PM

Ray, I have all the details as far as i'm aware. Like I said if anything devious occured I would like to be the first one to know. From what I saw and heard on that night two of the people that were banned were not even in town. So, i'm not sure what they could have done to instigate the banning. However, that i'm sure will never be answered here. The point is that a company was banned and they cannot defend themselves. It's not my place to speak for anyone else in the company and I won't do that.

Ray, I know as little about IP addresses and things like that as you possibly can but still turn a computer on. If we post from the same address i'm sure you have figured out that we are in the same location. However, that does not mean we are the same person. Just as if you were posting from the adult.com offices. You are not Lens.

I'm really still curious though since i've never seen a definitive answer. Were Alex, Chris and Matt banned for Amp's behavior? That's a fair question. If the answer is no fair enough. If the answer is yes.. fair enough too.

Tranza.. there is no twist at all in the plot unless there is something i'm unaware of. My posting now is only in response to Ray saying I was vivaLaspam. If I have something to say I will say it and not hide behind another nickname.

and Ray, I don't know you but if you would grant me the kindness to answer my above question I would appreciate it and be done with the issue as i'm sure everyone else will be.

DarkJedi 06-03-2005 10:48 PM

I don't really remember but i think iBanker was a fag.
As all the J&A crew. Especially that moron Alex.

Fuck them.

DarkJedi 06-03-2005 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by undermyspell
Ray, I have all the details as far as i'm aware. Like I said if anything devious occured I would like to be the first one to know. From what I saw and heard on that night two of the people that were banned were not even in town.

Doesn't matter.
AMP was representing the company and got it banned on GFY.


END OF THREAD.

undermyspell 06-03-2005 10:55 PM

Jedi you're right.. it probably is time for Alex to come out of the closet. After all he shouldn't be ashamed of his sexuality.. it's a new millenium. :1orglaugh

DarkJedi 06-03-2005 10:58 PM

fag was used in a sense of "lameass/moron/idiot"

all i remember from J&A crew is constant spam.

undermyspell 06-03-2005 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
Doesn't matter.
AMP was representing the company and got it banned on GFY.


END OF THREAD.

If this is your justification it's not really a valid argument since people get banned here from time to time that are "representing" companies and their entire company does not get banned. But, each person is entitled to their own opinion. I just wanted to hear someone with authority give me an affirmative or a negative is all. That doesn't seem like a huge request.

Jace 06-03-2005 11:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
Doesn't matter.
AMP was representing the company and got it banned on GFY.


END OF THREAD.


if that were the case, the media and some other epiccash nicks should have been banned when p1mpdogg was a while back

DarkJedi 06-03-2005 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by undermyspell
If this is your justification it's not really a valid argument since people get banned here from time to time that are "representing" companies and their entire company does not get banned.

Like who ?

GatorB 06-03-2005 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
Today's english lesson:

For all intensive purposes = For all intents and purposes.

No green card for you until you get better language skills :)

He's probally still waiting for his french benefits.

Jace 06-03-2005 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB
He's probally still waiting for his french benefits.

oh shit, i just spit my drink out

undermyspell 06-03-2005 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
Like who ?

I think Jace just answered that question directly above your post. I don't have anything against Trey whatsoever. He and I have never had an issue about anything. I love Media. However, none of the epic people were banned when Trey was. I'm sure there are many others but i'm not worried about digging that up. The point was validated with Jace's answer.

undermyspell 06-03-2005 11:13 PM

oh and wasn't Bradshaw banned for a while here? Yet I don't remember Greg or any of the other AZN's being banned.. but my memory may be failing too

undermyspell 06-03-2005 11:20 PM

on a side note.. does anyone know how to remove wax from a suede bedspread? I'm not going to tell you how it got there though.. :winkwink:

XPays 06-03-2005 11:22 PM

tgif and i have been baddog'd but not even on spelling :upsidedow

this legal jargon low-point moment has been brought to you by:

http://XPays.com


people are laughing at me http://www.gofuckyourself.com/images...sadcrying4.gif


:1orglaugh

Jace 06-03-2005 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by undermyspell
on a side note.. does anyone know how to remove wax from a suede bedspread? I'm not going to tell you how it got there though.. :winkwink:

hair dryer and paper towels, get it SUPER hot with the hair dryer

undermyspell 06-03-2005 11:23 PM

I didn't laugh at you Evan until the French benefits was brought up.. and then I only laughed with you.. :winkwink:

undermyspell 06-03-2005 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaceXXX
hair dryer and paper towels, get it SUPER hot with the hair dryer

fantastic.. I'm going to try that and keep my fingers crossed.. I'm going to be devestated if it doesn't come out and I can't replace it.

pornstar2pac 06-03-2005 11:30 PM

i was in the caribbean the last two weeks. did i miss something?

CDSmith 06-03-2005 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by undermyspell
on a side note.. does anyone know how to remove wax from a suede bedspread? I'm not going to tell you how it got there though.. :winkwink:

Got a deep freezer? Put it in there overnight and then bust the wax up.


Say, how'd it get on there? :D

XPays 06-03-2005 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB
He's probally still waiting for his french benefits.

congrats on 4000 :1orglaugh

undermyspell 06-03-2005 11:37 PM

well CD.. that's a whole nother thread in and of itself.. perhaps I shall enlighten the masses when I have a spare moment. However, my freezer is just part of my fridge and i'm afraid that if my delicate body had to spend an evening without the comfort of my squishy bedspread it would not be happy

GatorB 06-03-2005 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays
congrats on 4000 :1orglaugh

Thanks. I totally forgot about it. For 5000 I'll have to think of something profound to say.

CDSmith 06-03-2005 11:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by undermyspell
well CD.. that's a whole nother thread in and of itself.. perhaps I shall enlighten the masses when I have a spare moment. However, my freezer is just part of my fridge and i'm afraid that if my delicate body had to spend an evening without the comfort of my squishy bedspread it would not be happy

Then I'm out of ideas :D

Whatever you do don't use a propane torch on it, cause that's a whole other thread too.

SmokeyTheBear 06-03-2005 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
Doesn't matter.
AMP was representing the company and got it banned on GFY.


END OF THREAD.

Didn't seem to me he was representing anything but a bad attitude.. :2 cents:

Companies are reflected upon by the things their reps do merely by association if no action takes place,.

undermyspell 06-03-2005 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith
Then I'm out of ideas :D

Whatever you do don't use a propane torch on it, cause that's a whole other thread too.

Now that cracked me up... Thanks for the laugh.. :1orglaugh

Theo 06-04-2005 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays
here are a few unsolicited reasons why i personally can accept the banning:

- Amp crossed the line severely for whatever reason.

- His employer's did not take corrective action.

- No option's left for an amicable resolution.


It's not a terminal situation but the initial banning's make sense to me. I also have been victimized by the politics and sig weirdness stuff; but, the board is not a free and publicly controlled entity. You own the board, you make the rules at the end of the day.

you should patent malakia, you bring it to a new level

DarkJedi 06-04-2005 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
Didn't seem to me he was representing anything but a bad attitude.. :2 cents:

Companies are reflected upon by the things their reps do merely by association if no action takes place,.

Well, this is not a public board. This is Lensmans personal site and he runs it as he sees fit. He could ban every fucking one here for no reason, if he wanted to.

Don't like it ? Write to your senator.


DEAL.
\
http://sexy-celebs.net/hotlink/hammertime.gif

Nathan 06-04-2005 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhesus
Something with NATS and decreasing the credibility of 'other' programs?

Leave NATS out of this please. Also, they never decreased credibility, all they did was tell everyone they used a biller which we explicitly told them not to use in the first place because of security concerns we had.

pimplink 06-04-2005 03:36 PM

bump, free ibanker and the rest of their crew

tranza 06-05-2005 04:33 PM

Any updates??

$5 submissions 06-05-2005 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by XPays
I also have been victimized by the politics and sig weirdness stuff; but, the board is not a free and publicly controlled entity. You own the board, you make the rules at the end of the day.

Exactly. :thumbsup :thumbsup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123