i do not know

What "story" have you heard?

I'll wait until tomorrow to talk to Chris (iBanker) and see what's his story.

But if what vivalaspam is saying is true, that's fucked up.

Also, I'm sure the mod that banned them will come here and tell his side of the story also.

It sounds like one of those, its my board so na na na na na na things. Not too cool in my opinion.

I think we should wait for the mod who banned them to come in here and tell their side of the story before we jump to conclusions about what happened.

comedic version of nonreality you have there :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

it's a spin

I like IBanker's posts. Sucks if he got banned for AMP's (all to common) melt-downs here. :upsidedow

The "story" that I heard doesn't matter because it's not the whole story. My point was that he was "thinking twice about the adult.com crew" because of one person's actions of banning the entire Jason & Alex crew because of one person's actions. I just found it amusing.

here are a few unsolicited reasons why i personally can accept the banning:

- Amp crossed the line severely for whatever reason.

- His employer's did not take corrective action.

- No option's left for an amicable resolution.


It's not a terminal situation but the initial banning's make sense to me. I also have been victimized by the politics and sig weirdness stuff; but, the board is not a free and publicly controlled entity. You own the board, you make the rules at the end of the day.

50.....,...

i think it was wrong of j&a as a company to for all intensive purposes show blind loyalty to an irate employee who got bent by trey moments before going 911 on lens who is not only an owner but he is also a customer. why should he not be protected by the same rules as all of us.


for that matter- ban kourosh from xxxcash and the whole company for breaking the rules as well. they posted false information claiming xxxcash had not been paid and never retracted after plenty of gentle prodding and proof including cleared check numbers amounts and dates of clearing. board rules baby! (they will never get banned of course, because of my initial point that politics are a part of business. evidence btw:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=469114
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=469132

yeah yeah!!

Here come the sheep with the brown noses.

I stated the facts and made my opinion based on those facts.

Facts are:
-Amp was involved in some drama
-Lensman posted how amp wasnt making his current employers look good
-That night or following morning 3 people that work for jasonandalex.com were banned from their accounts and one person that promotes them had thier sig changed.
-2 of the people banned were away on vacation and knew nothing about the drama, nor did they post in any of the drama threads.

Thats how I drew my opinion.
Now its your turn pumpkin tits. Lets hear what you have to say.

Since you such an intelligent little fella, lets hear what you have to say as long as it consist of more than an incomprehensible sentence followed by smilies.

Has anyone figured out why pimpdog wasnt banned that night either? I am not sure who started the drama that night, but if you're going to have rules for your message board and ban some people for breaking those rules then shouldn't everyone be held accountable? Or do gfy mods and admins ban only when it's beneficial.

You meane VERrrrrrrrrrrrryyyyy Long lol! :pimp

I thought I was the only one fingering Mary Jane Rotten Crotch back in Junior High! I wonder what happened to her? <rubs chin - begin dream sequence>

http://www.moocowrecords.com/Assets/images/smrc.jpg

ADG Webmaster

somewhat justified indignancy but still a spin. what gave amp the right to expect instant turnaround on a banning? he gave the mod's about 3 seconds.

How did JSA show blind loyalty when those that are in decision making powers were not even aware of the situation, and were actually living in reality on vacation? Furthermore, where did you see anywhere that an employee of JSA defended amp or encouraged him? Furthermore, how do you know what was or was not done in regards to this situation within the JSA group.

hey, i ain't in on the matrix. i saw all the threads progress that night and being on vacation is not an acceptable answer in the fast-paced interweb. diffusing is time-sensitive and ya snooze ya loose. ibanker is knowledgable sounding and i have no problem with j&a or the mod's or lens for the banning.

I missed AMP's last melt-down here. Seems like he crossed the line, and I have no clue if AMP's current employers were supporting his posts/threads. If they contributed to the posts/threads, they should have been banned also.

I just like IBanker posts/threads. I really don't know the story :)

According to the GFY Admin DB, Vivalaspam's IP is used by one other user named "undermyspell".

Let's see who's sig is in "undermyspell"....

http://www.gfy.com/members/undermyspell/

Care to revise the statement?

that is quite ironic. she was cool though when we bought a domain from her :thumbsup

i like the chutzpa!

Always three sides to a story.

Sorry, but this isnt "Undermyspell" and who I am is irrelevant, unless you wanna get off topic for some reason. No need to turn this into a different topic now is there?

No i'm sure he doesn't care to revive that Ray. VivaLaSpam is not me. Evan.. I take no exception with you and enjoyed our business transaction.

Now that Ray seems to think that I am the one involved in the exposing of the bannings let's go back and look at a few things that were said. Yes, Amp did fly off the handle and post things that should never have been posted. That's not a good thing whatsoever. However, you have to also step back and look at the fact that nobody within the JSA organization supported, condoned or encouraged any of his posts.

What I can tell you is that on that Thursday night I popped into the boards and saw the commotion. I messaged Amp and asked if he was ok. He was not and it was like a train wreck. There was no stopping his actions. Because i'm not in a position to do anything to Amp because I don't sign the checks I bowed out. Alex and iBanker were many miles away from home on vacation enjoying a well earned break. Neither of them were remotely aware of the situation. When I woke up the following morning I received a message from Matt that he was in fact banned. Although his name did not have banned under it. His account was "disabled" apparently. He checked to see if iBanker was also "banned". He in fact was. Now, when Alex returned the following Monday and tried to log in to GFY. Guess what. Another banning.

Now, this is Joe's board. I've never had a problem with him. However, I really do not understand the need to ban a company that was neither present during nor defended any of the actions that took place. Those that asked the question about iBanker being banned were told by someone who had received the story from me firsthand and chose to post their own opinions.

Ray, are you trying to deflect the fact that the members of JSA were banned for no reason whatsoever by creating a secondary "drama". There is no drama here. Someone asked if they were banned. Yes, they are and it occured when Amp was banned. That leads me to the conclusion they were banned because of Amp.

Now, what do you have to say about why they were banned Ray? Is there a reason other than what i've said and if there is would you please share it with me? I would like to know if any of them did something unfavorable.

He's an asshole. HA I'm glad he's banned. SUCK MY BALLS if you read this IBanker!

Wow... Nice twist....

This thread is getting interesting...

wow.. you got here fast! Posted from the same IP too, but okay.. maybe your rommies... whatever..

Let's put that asside for the moment and ask this.

Are you sure you have all the details? 100%? I am not going to enlighten you to those details. I will stick to my original statement that there is always three sides to a story.

For all INTENSIVE PURPOSES??

AHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Today's english lesson:

For all intensive purposes = For all intents and purposes.

No green card for you until you get better language skills :)

Ray, I have all the details as far as i'm aware. Like I said if anything devious occured I would like to be the first one to know. From what I saw and heard on that night two of the people that were banned were not even in town. So, i'm not sure what they could have done to instigate the banning. However, that i'm sure will never be answered here. The point is that a company was banned and they cannot defend themselves. It's not my place to speak for anyone else in the company and I won't do that.

Ray, I know as little about IP addresses and things like that as you possibly can but still turn a computer on. If we post from the same address i'm sure you have figured out that we are in the same location. However, that does not mean we are the same person. Just as if you were posting from the adult.com offices. You are not Lens.

I'm really still curious though since i've never seen a definitive answer. Were Alex, Chris and Matt banned for Amp's behavior? That's a fair question. If the answer is no fair enough. If the answer is yes.. fair enough too.

Tranza.. there is no twist at all in the plot unless there is something i'm unaware of. My posting now is only in response to Ray saying I was vivaLaspam. If I have something to say I will say it and not hide behind another nickname.

and Ray, I don't know you but if you would grant me the kindness to answer my above question I would appreciate it and be done with the issue as i'm sure everyone else will be.

I don't really remember but i think iBanker was a fag.
As all the J&A crew. Especially that moron Alex.

Fuck them.

Doesn't matter.
AMP was representing the company and got it banned on GFY.


END OF THREAD.

Jedi you're right.. it probably is time for Alex to come out of the closet. After all he shouldn't be ashamed of his sexuality.. it's a new millenium. :1orglaugh

fag was used in a sense of "lameass/moron/idiot"

all i remember from J&A crew is constant spam.

If this is your justification it's not really a valid argument since people get banned here from time to time that are "representing" companies and their entire company does not get banned. But, each person is entitled to their own opinion. I just wanted to hear someone with authority give me an affirmative or a negative is all. That doesn't seem like a huge request.

if that were the case, the media and some other epiccash nicks should have been banned when p1mpdogg was a while back

Like who ?

He's probally still waiting for his french benefits.

oh shit, i just spit my drink out

I think Jace just answered that question directly above your post. I don't have anything against Trey whatsoever. He and I have never had an issue about anything. I love Media. However, none of the epic people were banned when Trey was. I'm sure there are many others but i'm not worried about digging that up. The point was validated with Jace's answer.