GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   DRAMA: Time to Litigate !!! Ifriends better get this turned off ASAP ! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=511329)

SmokeyTheBear 09-03-2005 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steen2
Smokey, my man.

Slander and defamation are both libellous acts.

Slander is spoken.
Defamation is written.

Libel is causing harm to an entity's reputation.

Now that that's cool- let's continue :)

I have read the legal def's in both canada and the united states , AND consulted with lawyers for both, and i'm still uncertain as to the real answer to that.

Heres what dictionary.com says..
----------
slan·der ( P ) Pronunciation Key (slndr)
n.
Law. Oral communication of false statements injurious to a person's reputation

---------

li·bel ( P ) Pronunciation Key (lbl)
n.

A false publication, as in writing, print, signs, or pictures, that damages a person's reputation

-----------

Cliff notes slander is spoken , libel is written ( from what they say, i have heard conflicting answers from both )

OzMan 09-04-2005 12:06 PM

lol this guy is a couple kangaroos short in the top paddock... :upsidedow

After letting all his traffic go to an Ifriends TOS violation page for a few days he is now sending it to Wegcash, still with all Lars content etc. I guess he doesn't read GFY. :error

jawanda 09-04-2005 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan
lol this guy is a couple kangaroos short in the top paddock... :upsidedow

After letting all his traffic go to an Ifriends TOS violation page for a few days he is now sending it to Wegcash, still with all Lars content etc. I guess he doesn't read GFY. :error


Lars, looks like it's time to make another phone call. :)

-Phil

Crypt 09-04-2005 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OzMan
lol this guy is a couple kangaroos short in the top paddock... :upsidedow

After letting all his traffic go to an Ifriends TOS violation page for a few days he is now sending it to Wegcash, still with all Lars content etc. I guess he doesn't read GFY. :error

This thread is funny ;)

Probably the guy sent traffic to cams.com first for real , ratio sucked , so he modified links and redirected to ifriends, got canned, so moved to the next one.. lol

Edit:

And probably dont read GFY :)

Realpascal 09-04-2005 12:27 PM

Let me grab the popcorn again..

Scootermuze 09-04-2005 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeVega
I'm not going to take the time to look it up .... but i believe that walmart was sued by a few people for selling guns that killed family members .... don't recall if any of them won there case ...

Walmart has a slew of lawyers that do nothing but deal with lawsuits brought against them.. They have suits everyday for one thing or another..

Out Of Order 09-04-2005 01:20 PM

Courts have found Affiliated/Sales and Sales Reps are ultimatly responsible.

For the most part it would be Ifriends responsibility to over see there affiliates. To lazy to over see affiliates activities is Ifriends fault and they would lose in court.

baddog 09-04-2005 01:32 PM

can't believe the site is still up

DebsDeep 09-05-2005 04:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chimmy
Nope...disagree. This is not an iFriends issue. This is an iFriends affiliate issue. Same as if a teenager broke a car window with a hammer he bought at Walmart. It's the teenager that is at fault. Walmart has nothing to do with it. So, for a competitor of Walmart to try and muddy up the name of Walmart by blaming them would be irresponsible and foolish. (ie. Lars vs ifriends)

Have a nice day.

I think was Lars was saying is that ifriends needs to help get rid of this guy, I dont think he was slamming or trying to muddy up their name. Everyone knows your not suppose to do things like that to promote its plain and simply in the rules book. Lars has every right to say this, this person is stealing from him and Ifriends had better shut him down..he is right, they better.

I hope something gets done, Its not right when a webmaster works and builds something and then some loser leeches off it.

ClamSmacker 09-05-2005 04:39 AM

Meow, I smell pussy! :winkwink:

Cassie 09-05-2005 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeVega
I'm not going to take the time to look it up .... but i believe that walmart was sued by a few people for selling guns that killed family members .... don't recall if any of them won there case ...


kmart was and the plaintiffs won. kmart no longer sold guns or ammo after the columbine killings.

evildick 09-05-2005 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassie
kmart was and the plaintiffs won. kmart no longer sold guns or ammo after the columbine killings.

Were they actually sued? I thought the pulling of the guns and ammo was just a voluntary PR move after Moore showed up at corporate headquarters raising a stink with those kids that were shot.

Juicy D. Links 09-05-2005 06:53 AM

Lars I can go and bang there wives and such and bukkake them. lmk

Nicky 09-05-2005 07:07 AM

bah, you need to call wegcash now Lars :disgust

mardigras 11-12-2006 09:31 PM

Link is parked at Sedo now...

HighSociety 11-12-2006 09:46 PM

this thread is older then me

babymaker 11-12-2006 09:55 PM

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr who keeps bumping these old threads :) fuckers!

will76 11-12-2006 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LegendaryLars (Post 8129940)
These people are soooo bummmed , Slam dunk case and I will take all their ifriends earnings and their lame ass domain.

You sueing Zango is a slam dunk case but you think sueing people over copyrights is a waste of time remember.

See Gator cases. Gator was sued for the same thing and lost. But you know that I told you that weeks ago. You said you lawsuits are a waste of time and too expensive.

CaptainHowdy 11-12-2006 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 11301209)
You sueing Zango is a slam dunk case but you think sueing people over copyrights is a waste of time remember.

See Gator cases. Gator was sued for the same thing and lost. But you know that I told you that weeks ago. You said you lawsuits are a waste of time and too expensive.

I knew it :)!

Amnesic 11-12-2006 10:01 PM

All I see is a sedo parking page..?

BusterBunny 11-12-2006 10:02 PM

1 hundo..........

will76 11-12-2006 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LegendaryLars (Post 8130005)
dont fuck with my content or my copyrighted material you will get owned !

LOL you are all bark, no bite.

I guess this doesn't apply to zango.

Think about it. You get pissed off because someone registeres/uses a domain name that is close to yours, and you want to sue. I assume for losing traffic/income ? Why else would you sue.

Now here we have Zango that isn't using a domain close to yours, they are targeting YOUR domain, and you are losing a lot of traffic/income because of them. But in this case you say it is a waste of time to sue them. What happened to the lars that says " dont fuck with my content or my copyrighted material you will get owned !"

seeric 11-12-2006 10:04 PM

madawgz why did you bump this

Pete-KT 11-12-2006 10:18 PM

Kill them lars

Lazonby 11-12-2006 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete-KT (Post 11301325)
Kill them lars

Your bot always seems to have it's 'suck program owner's cock' setting on auto.

lazycash 11-12-2006 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by A1R3K (Post 11301243)
madawgz why did you bump this

Looks like mardigras bumped it, not madawgz. Interesting bump considering the circumstances a year later.

CDSmith 11-12-2006 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lazonby (Post 11301384)
Your bot always seems to have it's 'suck program owner's cock' setting on auto.

:1orglaugh okay that was good.

germ 11-12-2006 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chimmy (Post 8135730)
Copyright infringement aside, this thread is tacky and totally unprofessional.

Lars, your thread title would imply that iFriends is directly stealing your material, your branding, and so on. A closer look shows that one of iFriends affiliates has taken liberties with your materials...and not iFriends themselves.

So, your attempt at drama to discredit iFriends has worked, but at the same time, iFriends could be equally justified at screaming back at you for this blatant slander.

I'm always amazed at how the industry leaders in this industry don't seem to have 2 bits of business sense to rub together.

ding ding ding. we have a winner.

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 11-12-2006 11:09 PM

nice drama, pass the popcorn.....

SmokeyTheBear 11-12-2006 11:21 PM

heh rather ironic looking back at this thread that lars is trying to protect his copyrights yet nowadays every copyright thief around is promoting aff..

Lazonby 11-12-2006 11:25 PM

About time the new 'adult leadership' emerged, huh?

Having no ethical standards is so yesterday. How about some new guys step up and provide decent products.

Xplicit 11-12-2006 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 11301591)
heh rather ironic looking back at this thread that lars is trying to protect his copyrights yet nowadays every copyright thief around is promoting aff..

Looks like the Legend of Lars has changed quite a bit over the past few months. :disgust

Paul Markham 11-13-2006 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chimmy (Post 8135730)
Copyright infringement aside, this thread is tacky and totally unprofessional.

Lars, your thread title would imply that iFriends is directly stealing your material, your branding, and so on. A closer look shows that one of iFriends affiliates has taken liberties with your materials...and not iFriends themselves.

So, your attempt at drama to discredit iFriends has worked, but at the same time, iFriends could be equally justified at screaming back at you for this blatant slander.

I'm always amazed at how the industry leaders in this industry don't seem to have 2 bits of business sense to rub together.

Not fair as we all know how strict and observant AFF are when dealing with affiliates who steal other peoples content to use it to drive traffic to AFF.

In fact I know for a fact that AFF employ 1,000 people doing nothing but checking all their affiliates and the ownership of the content they use to send traffic to AFF.

They are not one of these companies who might do something when it's it's reported to them. Depending on how much the affiliate is worth and who the guy is reporting it.

Last week AFF were everyones enemy, this week they are everyones friend. A week is a long time on GFY.

Paul Markham 11-13-2006 12:12 AM

Seems I missed the original post date.

09-02-2005, 01:44 AM

A year is an eternity on GFY.

lazycash 11-13-2006 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xplicit (Post 11301727)
Looks like the Legend of Lars has changed quite a bit over the past few months. :disgust

Yep, he's been one of the most likable and popular people in here over the last couple of years. I'm sure he's still a nice guy, unfortunately he put his ethics aside to make a few bucks and everyone happened to notice it because of all the zango hype.

I still think there's more to the story than has been posted. If the traffic from Zango only represented a very small portion as Lars initially claimed, then I don't see why he wouldn't have made the ethical decision and quit advertising via Zango. He and his program would have retained their popularity amongst webmasters and he wouldn't have lost webmasters who have chosen not to support them because of his decision. Either Zango represents a much larger portion of their traffic than he has let on, or he made a sizable traffic deposit with Zango and isn't ready to abandon it and his money at this point.

will76 11-13-2006 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazycash (Post 11301841)
Yep, he's been one of the most likable and popular people in here over the last couple of years. I'm sure he's still a nice guy, unfortunately he put his ethics aside to make a few bucks and everyone happened to notice it because of all the zango hype.

I still think there's more to the story than has been posted. If the traffic from Zango only represented a very small portion as Lars initially claimed, then I don't see why he wouldn't have made the ethical decision and quit advertising via Zango. He and his program would have retained their popularity amongst webmasters and he wouldn't have lost webmasters who have chosen not to support them because of his decision. Either Zango represents a much larger portion of their traffic than he has let on, or he made a sizable traffic deposit with Zango and isn't ready to abandon it and his money at this point.

One does make you wonder what makes AFF/Cams do the things they do. What about the fact they are still listed on ibill.com ??? I am sure that does not make them a lot of money but didn't Lars himself lose a ton of money to ibill, but now he either buys ads from them or has them as an affiliate.

They Seriously need to hire a PR guy. Their official statement from their attorney and Lars several post since then have been terrible. Besides the fact they shouldn't be doing it in the first place, they have handled the situation about as good as a 10 year old.

will76 11-13-2006 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lazonby (Post 11301613)
About time the new 'adult leadership' emerged, huh?

Having no ethical standards is so yesterday. How about some new guys step up and provide decent products.


Amen to that. I pride myself on the fact that not one person here can say I have screwed them and I have done hundreds of thousands of dollars of transactions with people who post on GFY alone. I still do really well too, I don't have to cheat or screw anyone to get ahead. I could go create a spybot, err i mean "adware program" like zango and do the same thing they are doing but I wouldn't be able to sleep at night. I believe in karma and when you fuck people you will eventually get what is coming to you. It is one thing to market aggressivly, it is another to steal from the hardworking efforts of others. I know I wouldn't want someone to do it to me so I wouldn't do it to anyone else.

However it seems pretty popular here by some who do well that it is ok to do whatever it takes as long as it is technically "legal".

And then you have a 100+ million dollar a year company like AFF who could give a shit who they steal traffic/sales from and they will deal with shady sites/companies. :Oh crap Very Fucking sad.

pocketkangaroo 11-13-2006 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lazonby (Post 11301384)
Your bot always seems to have it's 'suck program owner's cock' setting on auto.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

gooddomains 11-13-2006 01:54 AM

drama alert

gooddomains 11-13-2006 01:55 AM

got zango ?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123