GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Petition to Impeach Bush (for you Americans) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=559028)

seeric 01-01-2006 09:07 PM

50 impeached gfyers


this is the most ridiculous thread this week. does anyone understand what impeachment is here?

escorpio 01-01-2006 09:19 PM

"Oh no, not an internet petition!" said G.W. Bush as he trembled in the face of such formidable opposition.

Kard63 01-01-2006 09:39 PM

Of all the things my country has done re-electing GWB was the one that most embarrases me.

DaddyHalbucks 01-01-2006 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t
clinton lied about a blowjob of some broad

bush lied about the reasons to start a war that has affected every country in the world ecomically, not talking about all the victims of the war


Clinton abused his power. The so called "friend to women" was really a sociopath who used women, and a sick bastard who abused his political power to defame Paula Jones and deny her a fair trial. He committed real crimes in office including perjury, subornation of perjury, filing a false affidavit, obstruction of justice, etc.. The chief law enforcement officer of our country was a bigger sleazeball than any pimp on this board.

Why do you only single out GWB for "lies?" If the CIA, the US Congress, the US State Department, and Kerry, and Clinton, and foreign intelligence services all believed Saddam had WMD, why would you single out Bush?

I mean, why.. unless you were a hater or a member of the Looney Left?

Nismo 01-01-2006 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks
Clinton abused his power. The so called "friend to women" was really a sociopath who used women, and a sick bastard who abused his political power to defame Paula Jones and deny her a fair trial. He committed real crimes in office including perjury, subornation of perjury, filing a false affidavit, obstruction of justice, etc.. The chief law enforcement officer of our country was a bigger sleazeball than any pimp on this board.

Why do you only single out GWB for "lies?" If the CIA, the US Congress, the US State Department, and Kerry, and Clinton, and foreign intelligence services all believed Saddam had WMD, why would you single out Bush?

I mean, why.. unless you were a hater or a member of the Looney Left?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh Seriously dude, have you thought about being a stand-up comic? This was one of the single handedly funniest posts I've read on here in weeks.

directfiesta 01-01-2006 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nismo
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh Seriously dude, have you thought about being a stand-up comic? This was one of the single handedly funniest posts I've read on here in weeks.

LOL ... I think he is of his meds ....

Redrob 01-01-2006 10:01 PM

Personally, I'm a 70%er. I don't bing with either lunatic fringe.....That is the 70% of the middle-of-the-road moderates in the USA.

But, I don't like what Bush, the Christo-Naziis, and the Republicans have done to this country.....

dig420 01-01-2006 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Its all about being a sayer, or a doer. Reagan, and Bush are both doer's.

Reagan and Bush are both murderous assholes, in case nobody remembers Iran-Contra. He funded a secret war and death squads in Nicaragua against the will of the congress and the american people, took credit for the fall of the USSR when it was just the result of 50 years of containment, and sabotaged Bush the elder's presidency by taking out short term high interest loans timed to come due when his Presidency expired. He was no hero and he wasn't that loved in his time, but there's been a HUGE push to rehab and glorify him by Republicans that apparently is working quite well judging by this thread.

Truth is, if he hadn't claimed not to know what was happening in his administration during Iran Contra, he would have been impeached, so your choices concerning Reagan are that he was 1. Senile and unaware or 2. a criminal who waged a covert war and lied to congress about it. Take your pick.

directfiesta 01-01-2006 10:03 PM

Oups, double post.

Redrob 01-01-2006 10:04 PM

And, his stupid "gun-monkey," Oliver North, doing "neo-patriotic" BS on TV when he should be sitting in prison.

spanky part 2 01-01-2006 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks
Clinton abused his power. The so called "friend to women" was really a sociopath who used women, and a sick bastard who abused his political power to defame Paula Jones and deny her a fair trial. He committed real crimes in office including perjury, subornation of perjury, filing a false affidavit, obstruction of justice, etc.. The chief law enforcement officer of our country was a bigger sleazeball than any pimp on this board.

Why do you only single out GWB for "lies?" If the CIA, the US Congress, the US State Department, and Kerry, and Clinton, and foreign intelligence services all believed Saddam had WMD, why would you single out Bush?

I mean, why.. unless you were a hater or a member of the Looney Left?

Yep, that whole spying thing without oversight and outing a CIA operative,weren't abuses of power. They were just done to "protect us:

spanky part 2 01-01-2006 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Right you dont even understand why Clinton was impeached. He lied UNDEROATH. Bush lied about what exactly? You have been brainwashed by the media. Funny you have to resort to calling him a primate. You are defending an undefendable position.

That's the problem, he won't testify anywhere under oath. Him or Cheney.
For a white house that said it was gonna bring back honor and dignity, they sure seem to hide from telling the truth under oath alot.
9-11 comission, Valerie Plame, but why should they. The repubs wouldn't even put the oil execs under oath when they testified before congress.

Kiddies, companies are now running our country, not the people.

pornstar2pac 01-01-2006 11:08 PM

I'm going to start a Petition to impeach all the bush haters

spanky part 2 01-01-2006 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornstar2pac
I'm going to start a Petition to impeach all the bush haters

You'll only need a post it note.

Webby 01-01-2006 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
He funded a secret war and death squads in Nicaragua against the will of the congress and the american people...

There are plenty people who rememeber that well in Latin America - they lost a fair number of family members.

A casual accquantance who now lives in Costa Rica and who was trained by the "School of Americas" was heavily involved on the borders of Nico and present at meetings there with North.

His thoughts on history are.. well "vicious". He was involved in a substantial amount on behalf of the US govt over his lifetime and did some of their dirty work in the process and also made regular trips to Vietnam to collect people the US govt decided to ignore. He basically does not trust anything he's told and got little more than contempt for his "hirers".

He's actually a very nice guy for a trained "sorter" (read killer) and well-balanced. :winkwink:

reynold 01-02-2006 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornstar2pac
I'm going to start a Petition to impeach all the bush haters

Careful with that or you're gonna be impeached too.

JimBiZzo 01-02-2006 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky part 2
You'll only need a post it note.

:thumbsup

The Demon 01-02-2006 07:09 AM

Boohoo I'm a stupid liberal.. Stay out of the US

stickyfingerz 01-02-2006 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimBiZzo
What he lied about is tapping domestic-domestic phone lines without a warrant. There are specific laws requiring a warrant. The president does not have power under the constitution to make that decision without congress (until now of course) and furthermore, not only is that power not enumerated, it's specifically prohibited. Bush blatantly ignored the checks and balances system laid out by the constitution. You can't tap domestic calls without a warrant; that was never part of the patriot act.

Hi its not illegal. :thumbsup Congress knew he was doing domestic tapping too, might wanna do some research before you open your big flaming liberal trap. :winkwink:

stickyfingerz 01-02-2006 08:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta
Don't quit school...

Well no worries there since I graduated in 91. :1orglaugh

stickyfingerz 01-02-2006 08:53 AM

You realize some of you just come off plain silly in this thread right? Srsly. And I dont mean the ones sticking up for Bush. :winkwink:

spanky part 2 01-02-2006 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
You realize some of you just come off plain silly in this thread right? Srsly. And I dont mean the ones sticking up for Bush. :winkwink:

The funny thing is that conservatives always think they are so superior. That's your problem, small dicks and a big ego. If it wasn't for us loony liberals, blacks would still be segregated, women couldn't vote, and you would be living in the confederate states of america.
:winkwink:

nico-t 01-02-2006 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
You realize some of you just come off plain silly in this thread right? Srsly. And I dont mean the ones sticking up for Bush. :winkwink:

i disagree, i think the ones defending him come off very silly. Its like you cant look objectively anymore to the stuff that is happening in the world, you just can't convince a stubborn bush fanboy of the man's billion dollar mistakes..

ronbotx 01-02-2006 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NickPapageorgio
Reagan was a statesman and a gentleman. Don't ever compare GWB to Reagan please. Reagan was a bit more tactful in dealing with foreign affairs than space cowboy is. :winkwink:

How quickly we forget. Reagan was a portrayed as "cowboy" who was going to get us involved in WWIII by the media and dems. Not to mention all the "Bedtime for Bonzo" references...

ronbotx 01-02-2006 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky part 2
Yep, that whole spying thing without oversight and outing a CIA operative,weren't abuses of power. They were just done to "protect us:


What outing of what CIA agent? Not ONE person has been charged with that... after a several years and millions of dollars spent. You must mean the non-outing , of the non-covert CIA employee who worked in an office in Langley Virginia....

I'm sure you would agree that the person who leaked the information about the "top-secret" NSA surveillance to the NY Times in blatant violation of the law and National Security should be prosecuted though, don't you?

JimBiZzo 01-02-2006 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Hi its not illegal. :thumbsup Congress knew he was doing domestic tapping too, might wanna do some research before you open your big flaming liberal trap. :winkwink:

Quote:

Hi its not illegal.
What part of my post didn't you understand. If you didn't comprehend the post, the language of the constitution might be above your reading level thus your inability to understand plainly that it certainly IS illegal.
Quote:

Congress knew he was doing domestic tapping too
Congress knew? Where do you get your news from the dog with the tinfoil hat?
Quote:

might wanna do some research
Oh, I should listen to Rush/Hannity. I'll get on that right away.

Everyone in this country should be outraged with the way this administration has handled itself. While you're defending Bush, he's waging an illegal war while giving this country away to the Chinese, and filling the pockets of the people who put him in power. Shame on you. If you weren't a complete ignoramous you surely would be treasonous.

JimBiZzo 01-02-2006 09:43 AM

btw sticky, is this your site?
http://www.stickyfingerz.net/webmasters.html

directfiesta 01-02-2006 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Hi its not illegal. :thumbsup


Quote:

The president denied misleading the public during a 2004 appearance in support of the Patriot Act when he said, "Any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, a wiretap requires a court order."
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...w191005S99.DTL

Flippy-dee-flop ... lol

BTW, why did he summons urgently to the oval office the Editor in chief of the Washington Post ?

JimBiZzo 01-02-2006 10:07 AM

Heh, yah.
I am done with this thread. You can only lead a horse to water...

spanky part 2 01-02-2006 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronbotx
What outing of what CIA agent? Not ONE person has been charged with that... after a several years and millions of dollars spent. You must mean the non-outing , of the non-covert CIA employee who worked in an office in Langley Virginia....

I'm sure you would agree that the person who leaked the information about the "top-secret" NSA surveillance to the NY Times in blatant violation of the law and National Security should be prosecuted though, don't you?

Yep Scooter Libby just lied to the grand jury because he likes to lie. You conservatives are a funny bunch. Rove lied and then recanted right before he was gonna be charged.Smart man that Rove guy.

There is a big difference between the 2 leaks. The first one was for political purposes to payback someone who was telling the truth about a Bush lie.
The other person was outing the truth about abuse of power by Bush. Big difference.

Before 2004 I just loved bush of any kind.

Can't wait for the spin once Abramoff starts spilling the beans.

Gnat69 01-02-2006 12:23 PM

If only americans can vote for this why is the option of Province available....???

stickyfingerz 01-02-2006 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky part 2
The funny thing is that conservatives always think they are so superior. That's your problem, small dicks and a big ego. If it wasn't for us loony liberals, blacks would still be segregated, women couldn't vote, and you would be living in the confederate states of america.
:winkwink:

Wow except it was the Republicans that voted to abolish slavery. Abe Lincoln was a Republican. Try again. Pick up a history book much? :thumbsup

stickyfingerz 01-02-2006 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t
i disagree, i think the ones defending him come off very silly. Its like you cant look objectively anymore to the stuff that is happening in the world, you just can't convince a stubborn bush fanboy of the man's billion dollar mistakes..

No its just that we have more sense than to believe what the left leaning media spoon feeds us. :winkwink:

stickyfingerz 01-02-2006 04:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimBiZzo
btw sticky, is this your site?
http://www.stickyfingerz.net/webmasters.html

Ya you have a point?

stickyfingerz 01-02-2006 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JimBiZzo
What part of my post didn't you understand. If you didn't comprehend the post, the language of the constitution might be above your reading level thus your inability to understand plainly that it certainly IS illegal.

Congress knew? Where do you get your news from the dog with the tinfoil hat?

Oh, I should listen to Rush/Hannity. I'll get on that right away.

Everyone in this country should be outraged with the way this administration has handled itself. While you're defending Bush, he's waging an illegal war while giving this country away to the Chinese, and filling the pockets of the people who put him in power. Shame on you. If you weren't a complete ignoramous you surely would be treasonous.

Well go ahead and prove its illegal then. Funny no one else has shown it to be illegal. Guess you will be proved right when Bush is put in prison for it. *rolls eyes* I dont wanna call you retarded, but... you are retarded. Da da daaaaa!

stickyfingerz 01-02-2006 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanky part 2
Yep Scooter Libby just lied to the grand jury because he likes to lie. You conservatives are a funny bunch. Rove lied and then recanted right before he was gonna be charged.Smart man that Rove guy.

There is a big difference between the 2 leaks. The first one was for political purposes to payback someone who was telling the truth about a Bush lie.
The other person was outing the truth about abuse of power by Bush. Big difference.

Before 2004 I just loved bush of any kind.

Can't wait for the spin once Abramoff starts spilling the beans.

He lied, or he mispoke? He knew they had his notes in evidence, yet he would tell a contradiction underoath when he knew something in his notes said differently. This so called lie wouldnt of made a difference either way, what good would it have done to lie about it? You make no sense.

Webby 01-02-2006 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
He lied, or he mispoke? He knew they had his notes in evidence, yet he would tell a contradiction underoath when he knew something in his notes said differently. This so called lie wouldnt of made a difference either way, what good would it have done to lie about it? You make no sense.

Stop wasting good bandwidth with shit. :1orglaugh

Courts/juries will decide on the guilt or innocence - not the usual bullshit "he said, she said" and deviant patriotic base level at GFY. Who gives a fuck whether they are one party or another - they commit offenses, they pay the price. That's called democracy btw.

stickyfingerz 01-02-2006 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby
Stop wasting good bandwidth with shit. :1orglaugh

Courts/juries will decide on the guilt or innocence - not the usual bullshit "he said, she said" and deviant patriotic base level at GFY. Who gives a fuck whether they are one party or another - they commit offenses, they pay the price. That's called democracy btw.

Shame we dont live in an actuall democracy. :winkwink: There wont be a single charge filed over this. Why? There was no crime. If there was guess we will need to put Clinton on trial too. This is standard practice. I aint worried about it thats for sure. Why am I not worried about it? I dont call Afganistan, or Iraq, or Jordan, or Palestine. Thats the ones that get listened to. Not to mention anyone that says certain key words get flagged and recorded. This is done to any potential call made by anyone. This is a worthless, stupid, and very transparent attempt to again bash Bush. :321GFY

Temp1 01-02-2006 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t
ok so everything bush does that is within the rules the same government made is allright.
think outside the box please.. i dont understand you man.


It's like Bill Mahr said; Bush could have been holding the leash in those prison torture pictures and his supporters would still find a way to explain it away.

It's bizarre.

directfiesta 01-02-2006 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Shame we dont live in an actuall democracy. :winkwink: There wont be a single charge filed over this. Why? There was no crime. If there was guess we will need to put Clinton on trial too. This is standard practice. I aint worried about it thats for sure. Why am I not worried about it? I dont call Afganistan, or Iraq, or Jordan, or Palestine. Thats the ones that get listened to. Not to mention anyone that says certain key words get flagged and recorded. This is done to any potential call made by anyone. This is a worthless, stupid, and very transparent attempt to again bash Bush. :321GFY

read before you continue to make a fool out of your self:

http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fisa/

Is it also legal to transmit and share the collected data with all levels of law enforcements and para-public orgs ????

I hope it is, because this is what they did.

Meanwhile, I am happy that you are happy about that... The day they make a typo mistake and pick you up to ship to Egypt, I will be rolling in laughter till my bladder exploses .... :1orglaugh

directfiesta 01-02-2006 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Temp1
It's like Bill Mahr said; Bush could have been holding the leash in those prison torture pictures and his supporters would still find a way to explain it away.

It's bizarre.

Indeed :thumbsup

He is the " TEFLON 2 " president.

stickyfingerz 01-02-2006 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Temp1
It's like Bill Mahr said; Bush could have been holding the leash in those prison torture pictures and his supporters would still find a way to explain it away.

It's bizarre.

Yes cause I do feel so bad that a few prisoners were caused to be treated like Frat pledges. Waaaa!!! A dog leash.... Waaaa!! panties on my head. How will I live. Of course it was ok that Saddam performed castrations, and beheadings, and cut of limbs, and threw people off roofs dressed like superman. Those silly little insurgents are lucky we dont do things like bamboo splints under the fingernails, and water torture. Bunch of friggin pansies in this country.

dig420 01-02-2006 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Ya you have a point?

yeah. if you're not a webmaster get the fuck outta here. Funny how it's always non-webmasters like you and theking in here defending Bush, who wants to put us all in prison. We don't need your input. Leave.

dig420 01-02-2006 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Yes cause I do feel so bad that a few prisoners were caused to be treated like Frat pledges. Waaaa!!! A dog leash.... Waaaa!! panties on my head. How will I live. Of course it was ok that Saddam performed castrations, and beheadings, and cut of limbs, and threw people off roofs dressed like superman. Those silly little insurgents are lucky we dont do things like bamboo splints under the fingernails, and water torture. Bunch of friggin pansies in this country.

you're all for torture, permanent imprisonment without ever going to trial or being charged, letting the govt wiretap anyone they want without a warrant.

I think China might be a more appropriate fit for you. Get the fuck out of my country.

stickyfingerz 01-02-2006 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta
read before you continue to make a fool out of your self:

http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fisa/

Is it also legal to transmit and share the collected data with all levels of law enforcements and para-public orgs ????

I hope it is, because this is what they did.

Meanwhile, I am happy that you are happy about that... The day they make a typo mistake and pick you up to ship to Egypt, I will be rolling in laughter till my bladder exploses .... :1orglaugh

Explain what you are trying to say better and I will respond. Not sure what the Federation of American scientists has to do with anything here. The patriot act was made to ensure that all levels of law enforcement could easily share information.

Temp1 01-02-2006 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Yes cause I do feel so bad that a few prisoners were caused to be treated like Frat pledges. Waaaa!!! A dog leash.... Waaaa!! panties on my head. How will I live. Of course it was ok that Saddam performed castrations, and beheadings, and cut of limbs, and threw people off roofs dressed like superman. Those silly little insurgents are lucky we dont do things like bamboo splints under the fingernails, and water torture. Bunch of friggin pansies in this country.

Excuse me but why are you here, turbo? Isn't Ann Coulter on now you should be tuning into?

stickyfingerz 01-02-2006 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
yeah. if you're not a webmaster get the fuck outta here. Funny how it's always non-webmasters like you and theking in here defending Bush, who wants to put us all in prison. We don't need your input. Leave.

Duh its my website moron. One of quite a few. Im also a webhost. I also shoot content. Just starting out in this stuff, and Im here to learn. Im not a surfer.

stickyfingerz 01-02-2006 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Temp1
Excuse me but why are you here, turbo? Isn't Ann Coulter on now you should be tuning into?

Wtf are you talking about?

dig420 01-02-2006 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
Explain what you are trying to say better and I will respond. Not sure what the Federation of American scientists has to do with anything here. The patriot act was made to ensure that all levels of law enforcement could easily share information.

How about NO wiretapping of american citizens without going to at least a secret FISA court? Is the President allowed to make his own rules? Is he a King or an elected official?

Torture, domestic spying, secret wars, spending 200 billion of OUR dollars capturing the wrong guy is all ok with you but lying about getting a blowjob isn't?

You weird fucker.

stickyfingerz 01-02-2006 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dig420
you're all for torture, permanent imprisonment without ever going to trial or being charged, letting the govt wiretap anyone they want without a warrant.

I think China might be a more appropriate fit for you. Get the fuck out of my country.

Pillows and feathers dont win wars pal. War isnt a fun little game.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123