Fake drama and ownage... Good place for a Sigspot

What a backfire thread. Until some proof of how shitty this supposed design was, the only one scamming is B-Eazy. The designer did the work, probably to your specifications, and that is what you get. It's like ordering a cheeseburger at a restaurant. Some designers will go back and fix their work till you are completely happy.

IMPORTANT ISSUE - PLEASE Read.

Hey there Tranza, how are you? I want to make it clear that "Jack" worked here for three months (a test period that defines if the employee has what it takes to stay) and never really did anything major here. He never worked in our design dept. He was going to work in our client care dept but wasn't a right fit for us.

I dislike to see this type of post, Tranza, saying that "jack used to work at Bruno Dickman" because it relates the DICKMANS Quality standards in design, business proccesses and client care to NastyGraphix's.

This just doesnt make sense since 1) I am the one who takes care of the company strategies, marketing and new business development around here; 2) Milena does a HUGE job in Client care management and board posting; 3) Thiago is a Giant in Operations, Planning and technology implementation; and at last but very VERY importantly, about 90% of our design concepts are done by my partner Mike Dickman - a genius if you ask me. We also have a killer flash developer, awesome senior and junior designers, trainees that are better than "pros", and to put it all together, a custom management system that I have never seen anything like, in any advertising or design company of any size.

There´s NO RELATION between DICKMANS DESIGN WORK and NASTY GRAPHIX WORK. So, What are the relationships between Dickmans Design and Nasty Graphix? 1) Marco (the CEO of NG) worked here as a client care assistant for 3 months and wasn´t good enough to stay. 2) Regis, one of NG´s designers, probably a partner of marco, i dont know, worked here as well. Good for design production, never did anything related to concept design around here, meaning, there´s no relation between NG´s ability to design sites that convert to Dickman´s ability to design sites that convert. 3) Jon, a good flash animator, illustrator and production guy, worked here and freelances for NG. Again, No relations with concept design, planning, and making sure the site converts. The core of Dickmans Design was, and still IS here, shaping the edge of the industry with fresh ideas and quality work.

Dickmans Design´s mission is to provide our client´s with design and branding solutions that boost the online performance of our clients. Our work goes way beyond photoshop and flash. Our success is related to the way we think about the needs of our clients, to the way we interface with them, to the way we work and create. We deliver SOLUTIONS, not graphics. Thats probably why we call our bussiness DESIGN (art meets science - beauty and functionality) and some people call their business Graphics (well... graphics.)

My intention with the post I have just made is to once and for all disconnect any relationship there might be between Dickmans Design and NastyGraphix. Nothing more, nothing less.

Thank you very much for reading.

Cheers!

Bruno Dickman :thumbsup

LOL... there you goo.. LOL :thumbsup

Now let's see if all the people who were defending him are still willing to.

Fine... I will step up to the plate.

If you read bruno's post.. it just stated that jack wasn't up to what he believes to be quality.. nothing more .. nothing less. good vs bad is purely subjective. B-easy thought his work sucked.. so what. Others here, including a couple of big players use jack .. they felt he delivered something they believed to be good... so what. design work or graphics .. is subjective.. there are people out there that feel that asians are the graphic kings because they are cheap and produce good stuff.. others here feel the opposite. again.. boils down to beauty is in the eye of the beholder. yes?

The sad thing is.. the much debated site.. is not available for all of us to be the judge, jury and excutioner of the problem.. since this transaction took place a year ago... its redundant... if jack did in fact deliver a subpar site.. so what.. people's skills cannot improve with time?
and if b-easy had dodgy biz dealings in the past.. who is to say that.. he too has turned a new leaf as well.. this whole thing is way out of line for something that happened a year ago.