![]() |
Quote:
|
What gets me is this stupid fucking bush is talking about exploitation of kids, how they are going to protect them, meanwhile Bush and his band of merry dirtbag politicians are using Adam Walshes death as the platform to sneak in a law they couldn't get passed prior, along with other laws that are totally obsurd. I call this a form of exploitation.
This law is not going to protect children...it will only protect them after it is too late. Fucking parents need to keep an eye on their kids and maybe this crap wouldn't happen, and shame on Mr. Walsh for letting Bush and his band of merry dirtbags exploit his childs name to pass a bogus law and shame on Walsh for not watching his kid at K-Mart. Just my :2 cents: Maybe we should have laws that throw these fucking parents in jail for 10 years for not suprivising their fucking little rugrats. It's time for some of the responsibility to be put on the parents. If you were a parent wouldn't you put your smut magazines away so your kid wouldn't find them? Would you put your weapons in a safe place so your kid did not get to it? If your wife loves dildo's wouldn't you put it away so your kid couldn't see it? So why can't fucking parent's take responsibility and watch their fucking kid while they are on the computer? Everyone else is to blame execpt the fucking parent's and their special little offspring's. |
Quote:
|
" Whoever knowingly uses a misleading domain name on the Internet with the intent to deceive a person into viewing material constituting obscenity shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both."
2 years in prison... are they fucking insane. It's laughable, pathetic and totally crazy. Concentrate on something more important you fucking idiots. http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pitt.../s_463726.html |
Quote:
How would someone PROVE "intent to deceive"? I'd think it would have to be very blatant. Like 1800flowerz.com or something, then wham a bunch of porn. Those sort of things SHOULD be stopped, so I'm not really sure that this is a bad thing in any way honestly.. It seems the main core of 2257 is unchanged except for the part about what constitutes "sexually explicit". |
The main core is that all these laws being implemented in effect are similar to tyrant rule where they can arrest anyone for anything. The same thing his Government are crusading worldwide againt. It's so fucking weak and hypocritical.
It's absolutely insane, and I for one will never ever visit again. Can't risk it. |
Well yeah true. It doesnt make sense from the get-go to me either. I can understand internal record keeping, or even a requirement for the actual content shooters to maintain copies of the relevant records. But asking 100% of legit adult businesses to keep records when they didnt even produce the content is insane.
It'd be like requiring all car dealers to maintain the same records as a car manufacturer because there is an illegal chop-shop ring operating. Retarded. |
Check out my sig while I read this thread
|
Quote:
kids-enter-here-square-pants-porn.com mydisneytripsex.com fun-mp3-beanie-baby-porn.com mybabysittersexstories.com mommy-dickcheneytouchedmeinaprivatearea-sex.com |
Quote:
kids-enter-here-square-pants-porn.com fun-mp3-beanie-baby-porn.com "kids enter here porn "? are you insaine ? |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123