GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Bush Signs Adam Walsh Bill, Amends 2257 (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=638282)

Jack_Daniels 07-28-2006 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions
It's not settled yet.... it still has to be tested in and interpreted by the courts. Go get em, FSC!

:thumbsup

Nikki_Licks 07-28-2006 07:12 AM

What gets me is this stupid fucking bush is talking about exploitation of kids, how they are going to protect them, meanwhile Bush and his band of merry dirtbag politicians are using Adam Walshes death as the platform to sneak in a law they couldn't get passed prior, along with other laws that are totally obsurd. I call this a form of exploitation.
This law is not going to protect children...it will only protect them after it is too late. Fucking parents need to keep an eye on their kids and maybe this crap wouldn't happen, and shame on Mr. Walsh for letting Bush and his band of merry dirtbags exploit his childs name to pass a bogus law and shame on Walsh for not watching his kid at K-Mart.
Just my :2 cents:

Maybe we should have laws that throw these fucking parents in jail for 10 years for not suprivising their fucking little rugrats. It's time for some of the responsibility to be put on the parents.

If you were a parent wouldn't you put your smut magazines away so your kid wouldn't find them? Would you put your weapons in a safe place so your kid did not get to it? If your wife loves dildo's wouldn't you put it away so your kid couldn't see it?
So why can't fucking parent's take responsibility and watch their fucking kid while they are on the computer? Everyone else is to blame execpt the fucking parent's and their special little offspring's.

Nikki_Licks 07-28-2006 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimmy The Juggernaut
does anyone else think that since Bush and his time in office and power is running out fast that he is just trying to fuck up as much stuff as possible ?

He can't fuck anything else up, he has ruined the country, drove the deficit through the roof. He needs to go back to being a wanna be cowboy. I can't wait to see this dirtbag out of office...:321GFY :321GFY :321GFY

Troels 07-28-2006 07:28 AM

" Whoever knowingly uses a misleading domain name on the Internet with the intent to deceive a person into viewing material constituting obscenity shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both."

2 years in prison... are they fucking insane. It's laughable, pathetic and totally crazy.

Concentrate on something more important you fucking idiots.
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pitt.../s_463726.html

Tom_PM 07-28-2006 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Troels
" Whoever knowingly uses a misleading domain name on the Internet with the intent to deceive a person into viewing material constituting obscenity shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both."

Thats the section that I've been looking at a bit more too. But the words "with the intent to deceive" is really key. I have a domain without "sex" or "porn" in it. It's all text, and has a clear warning page as it's root index. It's clearly not deceptive, so I'm not worried.

How would someone PROVE "intent to deceive"? I'd think it would have to be very blatant. Like 1800flowerz.com or something, then wham a bunch of porn. Those sort of things SHOULD be stopped, so I'm not really sure that this is a bad thing in any way honestly..

It seems the main core of 2257 is unchanged except for the part about what constitutes "sexually explicit".

Troels 07-28-2006 07:48 AM

The main core is that all these laws being implemented in effect are similar to tyrant rule where they can arrest anyone for anything. The same thing his Government are crusading worldwide againt. It's so fucking weak and hypocritical.

It's absolutely insane, and I for one will never ever visit again.
Can't risk it.

Tom_PM 07-28-2006 07:55 AM

Well yeah true. It doesnt make sense from the get-go to me either. I can understand internal record keeping, or even a requirement for the actual content shooters to maintain copies of the relevant records. But asking 100% of legit adult businesses to keep records when they didnt even produce the content is insane.
It'd be like requiring all car dealers to maintain the same records as a car manufacturer because there is an illegal chop-shop ring operating. Retarded.

MikeVega 07-31-2006 06:50 AM

Check out my sig while I read this thread

DaddyHalbucks 07-31-2006 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KRL
§ 2252B. Misleading domain names on the Internet
...
(b) Whoever knowingly uses a misleading domain name on the Internet with the intent to deceive a minor into viewing material that is harmful to minors on the Internet shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 4 years, or both.

(c) For the purposes of this section, a domain name that includes a word or words to indicate the sexual content of the site, such as ?sex? or ?porn?, is not misleading.

So domain names such as these are OK?

kids-enter-here-square-pants-porn.com
mydisneytripsex.com
fun-mp3-beanie-baby-porn.com
mybabysittersexstories.com
mommy-dickcheneytouchedmeinaprivatearea-sex.com

will76 07-31-2006 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks
So domain names such as these are OK?

kids-enter-here-square-pants-porn.com
mydisneytripsex.com
fun-mp3-beanie-baby-porn.com
mybabysittersexstories.com
mommy-dickcheneytouchedmeinaprivatearea-sex.com

I wouldn't touch any of those domain even before this law went into effect, but you have to be down right nuts to register the two bellow. Those two are really really bad IMO and definetly meet the "deceptive url" standard.

kids-enter-here-square-pants-porn.com
fun-mp3-beanie-baby-porn.com


"kids enter here porn "? are you insaine ?

JD 07-31-2006 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76
I wouldn't touch any of those domain even before this law went into effect, but you have to be down right nuts to register the two bellow. Those two are really really bad IMO and definetly meet the "deceptive url" standard.

kids-enter-here-square-pants-porn.com
fun-mp3-beanie-baby-porn.com


"kids enter here porn "? are you insaine ?

anyone that would really reg those would be certified bat shit insane


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123