If you want something more visually interesting AND even more informative, then check out Alex Jones' newest and most kick-ass documentary, now online on Google Video:

TERROR STORM

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...&q=terrorstorm

:thumbsup :thumbsup

this is a better link, the other one does not work.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...&q=terrorstorm

This is who created 9/11

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/darkside/

All about big bizz. Don't give me a smart reply till you watch this. Last I checked PBS and Frontline was a credible source of information.

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=cspan+911

Is it the Alex Jones one posted July 8th... or a different one?

last i checked, PBS was primarily funded by oil companies

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Thats what this is all about : )
Old money and a disapearing resource.

it is the same one:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...46892514662399

Mayby....BUT:

The towers were struck by hijacked Boeing 767 jet planes, American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175. A typical Boeing 767 is 180 feet (55 m) long and has a wingspan of 156 feet (48 m), with a capacity of up to 24,000 US gallons (91 m³) of jet fuel. The planes hit the towers at very high speeds. Flight 11 was traveling roughly 490 mph (790 km/h) when it crashed into the 1 WTC, the north tower; flight 175 hit 2 WTC, the south tower, at about 590 mph (950 km/h).

buildings had in fact been designed to withstand the impact of the largest airliner of the day, the Boeing 707-320, lost in fog while looking to land. The modeled aircraft weighed 263,000 lb (119 metric tons) with a flight speed of 180 mph (290 km/h), as in approach and landing.[2]The 767s that hit the towers had a kinetic energy more than seven times greater than the modeled impact. Nonetheless, the impacts alone did not cause the towers to collapse.

And here's a link to all of you who think that Bush had anything to do with this.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...93973848835726

i think this video says it all, i have not read this thread.

Hopefully you have checked the Viewers Guide also to that video, cause that video says nothing.

to all americains here.....please watch loose change on google video and if you can give me all the answers to all those open questions, then but only then i'll give up the idea that your goverment had something to do with it

watch also the latest movie with george clooney and matt damion, sorry forgot the title, but very interessting

You're wasting your time.. if it's more than a 2 minute clip or not a new blowjob trailer very few will watch it.
People are basically lazy and would rather just accept the 'official report' as being just that and not bother thinking beyond it..

Example: wtc7's owner stated (the video is out there) that they decided to pull the bldg. .. within a few hours of the attack because of the damage.. My how fast the demo team was to do weeks worth of work in a few hours..
bldg. 7 was several times stronger than the others due to what it held, yet it was supposedly extensively damaged by a few fires..
Buildings much closer that were hit by the falling towers had lots of damage and fires, but were fine..

Bldg. 7 fell due to a controlled demolition, the 2 towers fell in the exact same manner, yet people won't even bother to ask how that could be.
They just choose to go with the jet fuel (most of which exploded outside the buildings) melting the steel which caused both buildings to fall straight down into nice neat piles.. It's never happend before.. yet two side by side fall in identical manners..
Choosing to say coincidence relieves people from having to actually use any thought process..

The same folks that produced this official report also officially reported, "They have weapons of mass destruction and we know where they are."

We're being blatantly lied to and people just toss it under the rug and go on with their sheltered little lives because they can't be inconvenienced by something if it isn't happening in their own back yard..

And for those who bitch about this thread still going.. why are you wasting such precious time to come here to do so?
Much easier to scroll an extra inch so you can read about yayhoo stickin' his finger up his ass..

First, my personal view is that the U.S. government did NOT directly carry out the 911 attacks, BUT many officials were aware that something "big" was likely to happen in NYC ...

And more to the point, the U.S. government went out of its way to take advantage of the situation to further restrict freedoms; there are reports that indicate the Bush administration prior to 911 was seeking to use (in other words hoping for) some major disaster to push through more laws / restrictions.

Tried travelling lately on a commercial flight ... can't even bring a bottle of water on board ... it's crazy!

To digress a bit, I'm thinking of building a new website all about how "security sucks" ... it will be named, you guessed it, SecuritySucks.com ... still under development, and only an idea at this point, but could be a real winner, since many people want to vent about the flaws / absurdity of "security" in general; probably be a great venue for marketing security products, etc ... anyways, I'm brainstorming out loud.

Getting back to 911 ... if anyone here has a website about 911 tapes (many more were just released the other day), email me ... I have 911Tapes.com that I'm looking to develop or sell...

If interested, please contact me via PM at Domagon ( http://forums.domagon.com ) or email me at [email protected]

Ron

p.s. some say building #7 was blown up, etc because it fell so fast ... a more realistic possibility is that it was built like crap - keep in mind that in the main twin towers, the designers specified "drywall" instead of concrete for around the elevator shafts and other critical areas. Who knows for sure with all the 911 coverups going on, but often the simpliest explaination is the correct one; building #7 was probably built like crap and thus could take much abuse to its structure.