GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - Whats better 100 sites making 1.00 a day or 100.00 a day on 1 site

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - Whats better 100 sites making 1.00 a day or 100.00 a day on 1 site (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=645008)

does the phrase - don't put all your eggs in one basket mean anything?

this industry varies so often that soon enough a few of those sites will tank - to rely on one site and one site only is a risky game - unless you have content that is so unique and timeless - then you have a few years staying power until the masses get board and another unique site comes along

Quote:

Originally Posted by potter

1 site / $100 day.

Various reasons:

Less work managing one single site.
Less money hosting one domain
In theory it should be easier to create more sites onto your network with one massive one which can send more traffic rather than a bunch of scrawny sites.
It's easier to understand your traffic and sales statistics looking over reports for one site rather than 100.
With the same logic, it's easier to manage and test your ads and marketing with one site rather than 100.
It's easier and cheaper to manage new deisgns and scripts with a single site
If we're talking paysites, it's WAY WAY cheaper to purchase/make content for one rather than 100.

I could go on and on, but I think I made my point.

1) As I mentioned above, I was assuming it was $1 / $100 per day profit, not gross.
2) I doubt he was referring to paysites at $1 profit per day :)
3) You fail to see the potential in having many sites produce revenue (even if it's a small amount), the upside is SO much greater.

Ideally, you'd spend a little time on each one until a few start to grow/increase revenue. Now, if a few really catch on (i'm talking even $15 - $20 net profit/day), hire some cheap help to manage while you get the others going.

About 2 years ago i had one main site doing well and nothing else. To be safe I started a little network ... it then became a big network. Most of these micro-sites were built, linked up, and left for dead. A few months later my main site got thrashed by the SEs and the network was all I had ... (some are still producing today)

So, I kept building and a few "blossomed", earning up to $500 / month each. Not to be content, I built out more, spread them around, tried new things (kind of like market research) and lo and behold a few of my big earners got killed off.

Rinse, repeat.

Main point here: Having a network of 100+ sites (or even 10, 20...) allows you to test, expand, cover your ass and most of all, potential for a few to really take off.

So, certainly in my .02, the 100 option is the easy choice.

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno

Ariel Rebel, andi pink and Katie fey.

Othet than that i do great w ith karina 18 and liz vicious. if you want ref codes. hit me up.

I think you're lost :)

I'd perfer one site ;]

People ask this about blog networks as well

both are good - so long as your pocketbook is the same in the end

He didnt say 1 buck for each of the 100 sites ... lol.. running 100 sites to end up with 1 buck at the end of the day. or running one site ending up with 100 bucks at the end of the day. THAT is what he is saying.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sebastian Sands

No not really I ment to say 100.00 Just how to get that 100.00

i'd go with 50 sites making 50 cents each