GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   are sites michellelynn.com pedo sites? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=650950)

jacked 09-01-2006 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanno
The point is these sites make girls look underage and cater to pedos and its sites like this that makes the general public think we are all pushing CP and does us no good.

There are 2 teen niches the normal -20 hot girls "teen" niche and the "teen girls made to look underage so perverts signup" niche.


there you go thats a lot different then what you were saying above yes it does bring unwanted attention to the industry and to the sites within this niche but theres not much the public or the law can do if the girl is over the age of 18.

go surf around and take a look at 90% of the other teen sites not just solo sites out there you will find atleast 1 girl on the sites that looks like she could possibly be underage and thats why 2257 is such a big issue and why the government is cracking down so hard and why so many companies are finally getting their shit together.

you can't just single out one site when it comes to this stuff

i honestly think little summer and little april look much younger than michelle lynn

s9ann0 09-01-2006 10:23 AM

>> i honestly think little summer and little april look much younger than michelle lynn

yea teenrevenue whatever they are a bunch of pedo sites too

jacked 09-01-2006 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
You are wrong.

You would be charged with "visual depiction of minors engaged in a sex act such as intercourse, oral sex, or masturbation as well as the lascivious depictions of the genitals"

atleast 3 sites named in this thread do it... but how do they justify what is considered border line and not just an 18 year old being an 18 year old or an 18 year old being a 17 year old which like you said would be illegal?

spazlabz 09-01-2006 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacked
there you go thats a lot different then what you were saying above yes it does bring unwanted attention to the industry and to the sites within this niche but theres not much the public or the law can do if the girl is over the age of 18.

go surf around and take a look at 90% of the other teen sites not just solo sites out there you will find atleast 1 girl on the sites that looks like she could possibly be underage and thats why 2257 is such a big issue and why the government is cracking down so hard and why so many companies are finally getting their shit together.

you can't just single out one site when it comes to this stuff

i honestly think little summer and little april look much younger than michelle lynn

right! :thumbsup that is exactly why sites that deal with teen content really need to have their shit together and i would bet everyone of the sites you mentioned are very prepared for an investigation if the gov turned up at their doors.

I think if your going to be dealing with this niche in particular you need to pay close attention to staying within the legal guidelines

thumbsdepot 09-01-2006 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geeezer
If you wank over a 14 year old girl you ARE either a pedo or a wannabe pedo or a future pedo, simple as that.

What the fuck you talking about 12, in this country and i should imagine most, a 14, 15, 16 and even 17 year old are classed as children.


Believe it or not everyone who has a mother and/or father is classified as children it doesn't matter what age they are.

CDSmith 09-01-2006 10:25 AM

I don't often find myself agreeing with Dark Jedi about anything, but in this case he is pretty much correct. The true definition of "pedophilia" has to do with one having a sexual affinity for pre-pubescent children, which means around the age of 12 and younger.

It's just easier for people to toss the word "pedo" around even for underage minors 13-17, but it's not accurate.

Is it right that older guys are slathering over underaged girls? Of course not. But if the models are all 18+ and there are docs to prove it, then the only issue is if the authorities want to argue over her "appearing to be underage".

I'm not up on what exactly that law (if it exists) entails in the USA. (or Canada for that matter). I think I did hear a while back that they (the US gov't) was trying to create a law where they could go after such sites that blatantly make up their 18+ models to look younger and sexualize them on adult sites, non-nude included. But I don't know if it went into effect yet.

CIVMatt 09-01-2006 10:27 AM

This thread is funny because I just setup a promotion for her this morning

s9ann0 09-01-2006 10:28 AM

Dressing your wife up is perfectly ok! getting her to hug teddybears and suck lollypops thru cosmetic dental braces while you pretend she is your daughter is not!

DarkJedi 09-01-2006 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacked
atleast 3 sites named in this thread do it... but how do they justify what is considered border line and not just an 18 year old being an 18 year old or an 18 year old being a 17 year old which like you said would be illegal?

Are you trolling me or are you really an idiot?

jacked 09-01-2006 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanno
Dressing your wife up is perfectly ok! getting her to hug teddybears and suck lollypops thru cosmetic dental braces while you pretend she is your daughter is not!



:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

thats taking things to a whole other level

s9ann0 09-01-2006 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CIVMatt
This thread is funny because I just setup a promotion for her this morning

yer I am not going to change anyones minds who promotes that shit so they should be thanking me really for the promo

jacked 09-01-2006 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
Are you trolling me or are you really an idiot?


i'll let you decide :thumbsup


and i'm not disagreeing with a lot of what your saying you right for the most part...

Geeezer 09-01-2006 10:51 AM

I don't know about other countries but over here if a bloke was having sex with 13-14 year old girls he would be classed as a nonce (paedophile) and arrested. He would also be put on the sex offenders register.

If you went to someones house and they had pics of 13-14 year old girls naked and or sucking cock and fucking, as well a stack of DVD's, would you think he was perfectly normal?

Without seeing the girls ID you nor he would know for sure how old the girls are, so for all intents and puposes he is wanking over 13-14 year old girls. Now if anyone thinks there is nothing wrong with that then maybe they have a problem.

ForceWielder 09-01-2006 11:07 AM

She's 18, end of story.

I'd be worried about the sick fucks that jerk off to vids of 5 yr olds getting it from older guys. Ran across that shit clicking thru hard links on various teen tgp sites to see what other sites had, and behold I was sent to a pedo tgp. Reported it immediately. Sick shit.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123