Originally Posted by dig420

yeah. You always beat me up, just like theking used to hahahahahahaha

hey has it EVER rang a suspicious bell with you that the hostages were released just moments after Reagan was inaugurated? That doesn't seem a little.... fishy?

oh of course not, the movie actor just scared the bejesus out of ayatollah khomeini and the suicide bomber types who took the hostages. Just had them shaking in their little boots. It's just a coincidence :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by dig420

hey davidd, your president is a chicken hawk draft-dodging deserter and a spoiled rich boy with a fetish for cowboy clothes. Why do you like sucking his dick so much?

Originally Posted by davidd

So it appears you agree with Jimmy Carter driving the country into the ground economically. Good, case closed.

As for the Iranians... Yes, the Iranians knew Jimmy Carter as a pussy and that Ronald Reagan (as stated countless times in his run for the presidency) would have handled Iran differently. Did you forget the speeches leading up to the election??

Originally Posted by davidd

As I have said for years, I am a Federalist. So currently I am not represented.

Originally Posted by dig420

idiot. scumbag. traitor. anti-american. fool. pinhead. wannabe. broke-ass loser. sycophant.

Originally Posted by davidd

It is okay, I understand your inferiority complex. What is next... threats of violence? That is usually the final step when you have lost a debate.

"I am ghetto fabulous and I will kick your ass"
-dig420

Originally Posted by dig420

I'm not violent as long as nobody gets violent with me. We're not having a debate, there's no point in debating someone like you. I'm just calling you names for my own personal enjoyment because you're a conservatard and you deserve it.

Originally Posted by Sly

This thread isn't near as entertaining as I thought it would be.

Originally Posted by dig420

yeah. You always beat me up, just like theking used to hahahahahahaha

hey has it EVER rang a suspicious bell with you that the hostages were released just moments after Reagan was inaugurated? That doesn't seem a little.... fishy?

oh of course not, the movie actor just scared the bejesus out of ayatollah khomeini and the suicide bomber types who took the hostages. Just had them shaking in their little boots. It's just a coincidence :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by 12clicks

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/01/wo...ge&oref=slogin

The country?s missile defense system passed a crucial test today as an interceptor missile launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California picked off a target missile over the Pacific Ocean, the Pentagon announced.
?I?m pleased to announce that the test that we executed today was a total success,? General Obering, the director of the Missile Defense Agency, said at a news briefing. ?In fact, it exceeded even our primary objective on the test. And we also met all the secondary objectives of the test.?

Originally Posted by Webby

Far be it for me to be to have any desire to correct your errors dear chap - but could you are least get the spelling/typos correct in your thread titles??

"I'd like to take this opportunity to than Ronald Reagan"

Can you also give CNN a call and tell them how to spell Pentagon? Much appreciated!



http://edition.cnn.com/2006/US/09/01....ap/index.html

Back to the subject - good news dear boy! It's nice to know the bunker hatches can be battened down and the seige mentality is embedded :winkwink:

To make real progress - try doing ten tests/day at a cost of $750mill. Sure, it means more taxes, but hey - it's in a good cause. Should take less than a year for the nation to reach the poverty line :thumbsup

Originally Posted by davidd

Translation - "Every time I go toe to toe with you I lose. So it is easier to call you names and detract from the truth you are typing"

-dig420

The article - Actually made me laugh... You guys can try, but the facts are all that are needed to show the way.

Originally Posted by Temp1

Why don't you offer a reasonable rebuttal to his post rather

Originally Posted by 12clicks

you know what they say about the intellect of people who want to point out typos don't you?

Originally Posted by Webby

Always wondered who "they" were. Never met a "they" yet dear chap. "They" were always used as an excuse.

Originally Posted by 12clicks

they would be we. We find children who point out typos insufferable. When the adults are speaking, we'd rather not be interrupted by children trying to show us how smart they are by shouting,"you forgot the e"

Originally Posted by 12clicks

you mean a post like this?

"""The conservatives are totally corrupt. Either you're a brownshirt or you're not""""





because you know, its such a reasoned argument to rebutt:winkwink:

Originally Posted by Webby

Just wanted to say thanks for contacting CNN and pointing out their spelling error chap - they have now corrected this:



Just as well - else we'd have the President referring to the Pentagon as the "Penatagon". He's got enough problems with speech without adding to them :thumbsup

Originally Posted by pocketkangaroo

Democrats and Republicans. Two people that wake up in the morning and have to grab a memo to tell them what they should believe.

Originally Posted by dig420

you're exactly the type of person I'm talking about above. So convinced you're smarter than everyone else, so 'above the fray', that it makes you an idiot.

Originally Posted by dig420

So convinced you're smarter than everyone else, so 'above the fray', that it makes you an idiot.

Originally Posted by dig420

there is no middle ground in this debate. The conservatives are totally corrupt. Either you're a brownshirt or you're not,

Originally Posted by dig420

wow I guess the military rags have a liberal bias now too!
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=51777
Just how dumb are you people, to eat this shit up the way you do?

OH, the media is SOOOOOOO liberal!!

"Note: This was written before September 11th, so don't
write to explain that Barbara Olson is dead, OK?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Myth of the "liberal" media

Let's do a "what if" so I can make a point. I think it's a good one.
I think it's so good, I'd like to hear from anyone who disagrees.

What if a show like Dateline did a "hatchet job" on George W. Bush?
It wouldn't have to really be a hatchet job, but any honest appraisal of that idiot's
qualifications would prove he's a non-thinking rich man's boy - and that's all.
But what would happen if Dateline did an unflattering portrait of Bush?

I'll tell you what would happen:

The vulgar Pigboy would spend at least three hours saying it wasn't true
and he'd offer hours of rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Bill O'Reilly would spend at least an hour on his show saying
it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Sean Hannity would walk all over Alan Colmes for an hour that night,
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Eva Von Zahn would spend at least an hour that night saying it wasn't true
and she'd offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

The Beltway Boys would spend at least an hour that night saying it
wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Brit Hume and Tony Snow would spend at least an hour on Sunday
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Juan Williams and Mara Liason would spend their entire allotted time
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

John McLaughlin would spend at least an hour on his syndicated show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Chris the Screamer would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

G. Gordon Liddy would spend at least three hours on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Laura the Whore would spend at least an hour on her radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Michael Medved would spend at least an hour on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Sam and Cokie would spend at least an hour on This Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

George (Judas Maximus) Steffi and George (dumb as a chimp) Will
would spend their entire allotted time swearing that it wasn't true.

Bob Scheiffer would spend at least an hour on Face the Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Tim the Catholic would spend at least an hour on Meet the Whore
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

John Hockenberry would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Ollie North would spend at least an hour on his radio show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Robert Novak would spend at least an hour on his cable TV show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Paul Weyrich would spend at least an hour on his cable TV show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Still with me? We're close to the end...

BSNBC's Brian Williams would spend at least an hour on his show
saying it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Wolf the Whore would spend at least an hour on his show saying
it wasn't true and offer rebuttal as to why Dateline was lying.

Bill Schneider and Candy Crowley would do an hour special on CCN
(Clinton Cock Network) saying it wasn't true, and offering rebuttal.

John Stossel would have a special on ABC: Is lying OK for liberals?

Then Howie Kurtz would spend 30 minutes on Reliable Sources asking
if the media wasn't being too hard on a developmently-disabled child.

Barbara Olson would write a book condemning Dateline.
Ann Coulter would write a book condemning Dateline.
Laura Ingraham would write a book condemning Dateline.
Peggy Noonan would write a book condemning Dateline.
Andrew Sullivan would write a book condemning Dateline.
William Safire would write a book condemning Dateline.

OK, we're going to call the above "Exhibit A."

Now, everyone on that list has done at least a dozen hit pieces on Clinton.

My question is, Where is "Exhibit B?"

When those 38 people attack Clinton and his cock, who does the rebuttal?

Even you ditto-sheep have to admit that nobody on that list
has EVER defended a fabricated lie against the president.

There is no "Exhibit B," because there are so few liberal voices on television.
The closest you can get is Eleanor on McLaughlin or Geraldo, but there is barely
a liberal whisper on television, even though there are DOZENS of right-wing,
Smirk-apologist shows whose livelyhood is lying about liberals.

I don't think you ditto-heads can offer an answer."

http://www.bartcop.com/libmedia.htm
Do yourself and this great nation a big favor: Educate yourself or stop voting.

Originally Posted by devilspost

I guess you dont know how fake that shit is. They know when where how and have tracking on the missle and everything else. and it is still luck if its true.

Originally Posted by dig420

you're exactly the type of person I'm talking about above. So convinced you're smarter than everyone else, so 'above the fray', that it makes you an idiot.

Originally Posted by tony404

That is so true and I cant believe the sheep dont see it? How they talk about Michael Moore, when there is at least 40 hrs of right wing crap on every fucking week.Ann Coulter says some of the most irresponsible fucked up shit and its no big deal. If Al Franken said the same thing about the 911 widows their would of been calls for his head. Also if the media was so liberal the national enquirer wouldn't of broke the Rush Limbaugh drug story, the so called liberal media would of jumped all over it. If the Clinton admin given a gay whore press credentials under a fake name during a time of so called increased security who only threw the president soft ball questions, it would of been months of talk, a few books and senate review.

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

there have been many tests, the last major ones were world news and the subject of much debate... this was not the first.

you not only need to get back on your meds... you need to up the dosage.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by Sly

Why Lincoln? I don't know much about him so I'm just curious what was so bad. Though I do know he gets way too much credit for the abolition of slavery.

Originally Posted by escorpio

How is this statment any different than a republican saying "If you're against the Patriot Act, you're with the terrorists. You're either for us or against us!"?

Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

welcome to politics... both sides arguing about why the other is fucked up.... and both being absolutely positive they are right about everything.

wisdom is knowing that both views are opposite sides of the same coin and neither is more correct more often than the other... hence their existence and balance they bring to each other.

Originally Posted by Sly

This thread isn't near as entertaining as I thought it would be.

Originally Posted by 12clicks

I'd like to take this opportunity to than(sic) Ronald Reagan