|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/...CLZZZZZZZ_.jpg http://images.amazon.com/images/P/03...CLZZZZZZZ_.jpg |
since when was clinton the bad dyde?
|
Quote:
|
the 9-11 Commission found that Clinton’s actions were not diverted by the sex scandal. In fact, he drew much criticism from the right about “Wagging the Dog” in the only attempt to kill Osama.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This is something interesting, seems there is a religious connection to the ABC movie. Very interesting indeed:
The Path to 9/11 is a movie rife with historical inaccuracies that blames President Clinton while heaping praise on President Bush. The docudrama was written by avowed conservative Cyrus Nowrasteh, who once spoke on a panel entitled: ?Rebels With A Cause: How Conservatives Can Lead Hollywood?s Next Paradigm Shift.? But the ideological slant behind this movie goes far deeper than Nowrasteh. Research conducted by a reader at Democratic Underground has revealed that the Path to 9/11 was the result of a project hatched out by a small group of evangelical activists who sought to ?transform Hollywood from the inside out.? Here is what we know: Cunningham Linked To YWAM. David Cunningham was contracted by ABC to direct Path to 9/11. Cunningham is the son of Loren and Darlene Cunningham, the founders of Youth With a Mission (YWAM), a Christian evangelical group that actively tries to get ?youth into short-term mission work and to give them opportunities to reach out in Jesus? name.? YWAM Sponsored the Film Institute To Change Hollywood. YWAM created an ?auxillary? group called the Film Institute, which was explicitly aimed at achieving a Godly transformation and revolution TO and THROUGH the Film and Television industry.? Film Institute Began the ?Untitled History Project.? The Film Institute?s first project was simply referred to as the ?Untitled History Project? (UHP). In July 2005, Fox News reported that filming had begun on an ABC miniseries about 9/11 that ABC officials and producers were referring to it as the ?Untitled History Project.? A production company entitled ?UHP Productions,? which was co-founded with Disney began filming Path to 9/11 in late 2005. UHP Became Path to 9/11. UHP Productions has only produced one movie. Harvey Keitel, who stars as FBI special agent John O?Neill in the movie, said that when he received the original script, ?it said ABC History Project.? As Chewbacca would say? WrrrRRaaaaAAAAAaaaaarr |
What your really not thinking about, is the fact that this was aired without comericals, on ABC. Did I say there were no comericals?
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And this below is just a bit of irony I had to post. Quote:
|
|
what about bin laden still being loose thats all history W is president now and bin laden is loose.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And btw Clinton had many an opportunity to get Bin Laden prior to Monicagate. He was offered up cuffed and ready to go and he refused. This was after the cole bombings. The FEDERAL GOVERMENTS proceedings for going after Clinton for LYING UNDER OATH IN A FEDERAL COURTROOM had nothing to do with stopping him from getting Bin Laden. Amazing how much the liberal media has twisted history into what you folks belive to be truth now. And if you cannot see how obvious the intentions for the missle strike were then I cant help you. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
His duty is to the American people, just like President Bush, not the Republican Party and its right wing. |
9/11 HAPPENED ON BUSH'S WATCH PERIOD.
Takes some responsiblity you fucking idiots! Even life long Republicans can see the mistakes of the BUSH administration on the "War on Terror". Saddam did not plan 9/11 you dumb shits, it was OSAMA. |
Quote:
Its on audio tape. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Sure are some real sicko assholes in the US - awesome demonstration of hate at it's best.
They collect like flies to a fucking flypaper - wish they'd get stuck there :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
|
There was nothing that damning of Clinton - at least in the 1st episode.
In hindsight of course lots of things could have been done to stop 9/11 - but in the real world thats not how it works. |
As a non American I am kind of curious if Americans ever debate serious issues outside of the Republican/Democrat divide. Judging by this thread apparently not.
The Clinton/bin Laden issue is like the Ho Chi Min issue in the 1940's where he was assisted by and worked for the CIA or the Taliban movement in the 1980's which was also partly funded and assisted by the Americans. In short it was judged to be the correct decision at the time. Clinton had no grounds for 'getting' bin Laden as no crime had been committed against America or American interests and the seeds of Al Qaeda were cultivated in part with American aid back in the 1980's prior to Clinton's presidency. Trying to get Clinton on this is absurd and pointless save for trying to score points in a Republican/Democrat slanging match. Frankly if the gist of the Republican argument is that this is all Clinton's fault then quite clearly the current administration must be in bigger trouble on this issue then we realise. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123