GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   legally risky niches (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=684918)

Pleasurepays 12-08-2006 08:09 PM

50 legal risks blamed solely on Republicans

woj 12-08-2006 08:09 PM

51.......doh :(

madawgz 12-08-2006 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlamDesigns (Post 11488013)
I don't see what people see in piss and scat sites. That's just some nasty stuff there.

yep, its pretty disturbing...

DaddyHalbucks 12-08-2006 11:17 PM

Another closely related question:

Let's say you don't run a pay site or host any content on any of these themes, you just act as an affiliate and hyperlink to a sponsor with extreme material. How does this change the liability issue?

Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life 12-08-2006 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 11491262)
Somehow I doubt After Shock Media is saying bestality and incest are "legit" in North America.

There are also not "legit" in most countries on the planet - including "third world type shitholes".

well sorry if i offended anyone with a reference to "third world shitholes" but where do the majority of beastiality based websites come from? not your leading nations i'm quite sure...

Webby 12-08-2006 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 11492012)
Another closely related question:

Let's say you don't run a pay site or host any content on any of these themes, you just act as an affiliate and hyperlink to a sponsor with extreme material. How does this change the liability issue?

Suppose it's up to a jury again DH :) And how much any prosecutors are intent in making a mark.

Doubt linking to an "obscene" website would carry much weight - other than possible conspiracy. The publisher of alleged obscene material in that instance would be the sponsor.

Webby 12-09-2006 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ismokeblunts (Post 11492067)
well sorry if i offended anyone with a reference to "third world shitholes" but where do the majority of beastiality based websites come from? not your leading nations i'm quite sure...

Hehe... na - no offense :winkwink:

You got a point, tho was trying to say the truth is kinda different in the main.

If you look at the source of illegal sites - these (at least mainly) are in industrialized countries where there is a monetory benefit from marketing. Sure, the same individuals in these industrialized countries may go to other jurisdictions to shoot material, even tho it is illegal, but the instigators are normally from computer savy regions.

On child abuse - here's some stats for 2006:

50% of child abuse content traced to US
15% child abuse content traced to Russia
12% child abuse content traced to Japan
9% child abuse content traced to Spain

The flipside is there are other countries not listed as major, who still have websites operational for up to five years after having been reported to international law agencies.

Of the nations where these offenses are occurring in the main, the stats are increasing annually - so much for law enforcement efforts. These "incidents" also include a degree of filesharing on free hosts etc and not only instances for commercial gain - ie paysites.

Bottom line - underneath this stuff is more than just "CP imaging" - it's about offenses against children. Generally, with odd exception, these offenses are generally on the increase, even if no CP is involved. This has reached a level in some popular "third world countries" where they now warn incoming airline passengers that they will be thrown in jail for 16 years if caught messing with kids - and a fair number of people from industrialized countries are spending time in jail on foreign soil, or being escorted via US Marshal LearJet back to the US to stand trial. "Sex destination" tourism is fine for consenting adults - but kids and animal stuff is definately out.

dev777 12-09-2006 12:09 AM

pseudo-snuff is pretty risque.

DaddyHalbucks 12-18-2006 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mediachick (Post 11489817)
What about pretending to hurt a model; meaning the model acts as if there was pain involved along with special effects such as stage blood and props like that although without depiction of a sexual situation (just nudity/topless?)

I saw site doing that kind of scenes and always wondered how high the risk was to display such content.


I believe that kind of violent sexual stuff is illegal in Canada.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123