| Troels |
12-14-2006 07:43 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrafficHog
(Post 11524403)
Troels,
Since you are so upset about this subject you must have an idea of how much Zango is stealing from you. This amount must be enough to make you really upset given your post. Can you tell me how much Zango is stealing from you?
I hear from word of mouth and from real tests that Zango is 0.005% of the US Internet. Now given that Zango does not pop on EVERY single bidded target if the client has already had a pop recently(I don't know exactly how it works but I know they won't pop every single time you hit a target thats bidded on as a fact. They try not to over do it). So that should break down that 0.005%(half a percent for the slow) to a smaller amount. Then, given the fact that surfers are aware of and mostly have experienced popups, we would assume a majority of the surfers would close this window. So this 0.005% really get's dropped down somewhere in the 0.00011% of your traffic.
Ok to sum it up your traffic must be soooo huge that somewhere around 0.00011% of your traffic is enough to get so upset about. If I were you and this was upsetting me as much as it's upsetting you I would make sure my hosting provider has 100% uptime. Otherwise, I would be so upset I would be posting on boards and bitching like crazy. Because 0.0015% of your hosting being down at anytime during the month is costing you MORE money than Zango. Infact, by you even taking an interest and following this subject, you yourself are costing you more money then this problem, that is has been so over exagerated, by taking time away from producing just enough money to cover 0.0015% more money for yourself. I am not attacking you. Just trying to show you the real truth. Not the propaganda.
|
First of all. I see you are Brian Muir, the same guy if I recall that had the BLATANT CHEATER LIST on ynot back in the day. Remember?
Try and think back and ask yourself what you would classify zango and zango promoters as if they were around back then...
The number of daily zango installs I hear is an outrageous number. It's too big a number for me not to care, and zango are certainly big enough for AFF to keep supporting them. Certainly big enough for FTC to give a damn, and thereby certainly big enough for me to worry considering the 75mill+ sponsor hits we have sent this year.
If they weren't big AFF wouldn't have to "protect" (ahem) their terms from sexsearch.
Call me stubborn, call me grumpy, I don't care. Anyone supporting zango is a target for me and I will move signups around just to influence decisions that could cost either zango, aff or sexsearch money, because their actions ARE costing ME money. |
