GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   1st fatality on "To Catch a Predator" (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=708157)

SmokeyTheBear 02-22-2007 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 11959133)
The ones I've seenthe guys are saying "I knew I was doing something wrong", "I've seen this on TV, I don't know why I fell for it", "I've never done this before". I've not seen one where they said "I thought she was 21! I left the room for 5 minutes - that's must have been when she said she was 13". Nope, they all seem quite willing to admit they're guilty.

like i said , not all of them are this way... sometimes the suspects dont say anything.. many times they are obviously guilty , but you dont tar and feather everyone using the same brush

Huggles 02-22-2007 02:00 PM

I far prefer castrations on the spot

SmokeyTheBear 02-22-2007 02:04 PM

btw the first video i checked the guy says he thought she was 19 , she only mentioned she was 13 twice in a fast public chatroom.. the decoy was over 30

https://youtube.com/watch?v=3KvQL7J148I

edit you must not watch very often .. i just watched several more , they all had pretty much the same story. now of course i'm not so foolish at to believe all of them , but it makes you wonder.

Gunni 02-22-2007 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 11951579)
Yep that would be great,but one is wishes and second is reality.I was just readed in newspapers how they plan in hungary to legalize child porn(they will reduce minimal age from 18 to 14 years)

minimum age in Iceland is 14, porn is still illegal...

Huggles 02-22-2007 02:44 PM

https://youtube.com/watch?v=HWUJp8ZOt...elated&search=


Fuck, the jewish guy



WOW



Listen to the perv laugh at the beginning

AbulletAway 02-22-2007 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMM (Post 11951897)

Did you read about the prosecutor's computers? The police experts couldn't even get into it, there were so many locks on the HD's. They had to send the computer to Sony to see if they could get in. Wonder what they are going to find.

I hope the show continues, and even if it doesn't, I hope the stings do, to an even greater extent.

I've only seen the show once and I didn't see this episode. I don't know if I agree with the show or not as the whole thing just grosses me out. But, I am glad these people are getting caught. But, I would have preferred a trial for the guy. Do we really know it was him on the computer? Did they compare his voice to the one in the phone call? The clip I saw never said so.

Now as for the computer being locked up with all the encryption stuff. He works for the DA's office. I know a few DDA's and every single one of them brings their work home and every single one of them has intense security features set up on their PC's so should it ever be stolen, the case files, victim addy's and so on can not be recovered. So, to me it was totally misleading for them to say that his PC was very protected, leaving us to conclude it was because he had CP on it.

On a side note, I have no issues with pedo's shooting themselves in the head. But, as for me, I won't jump for joy over it ever unless those shooting themselves actually did it.

Huggles 02-22-2007 02:55 PM

You know, the only logical thing here, the reason why there is such a huge problem with this, is there must be a large number of very young people on the internet hooking up. Why would they be able to find so many men if they aren't successful with some young girls? It's like, you don't find a ton of woodbugs unless they're eating wood, ya know?


This is why I think a big problem is the parents of the minors.

Huggles 02-22-2007 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AbulletAway (Post 11959540)
On a side note, I have no issues with pedo's shooting themselves in the head. But, as for me, I won't jump for joy over it ever unless those shooting themselves actually did it.


However, they have had a fantasy about it. Doesn't that make him a pedo?

Huggles 02-22-2007 03:20 PM

https://youtube.com/watch?v=QcjNr...elated&search=


Ok at the end, 21 year old goes to hook up with a 14 year old. They call him a pedo.


Wait a sec, 21 and 14 year old? in a shitty neighborhood that's not much of a difference. That's what I remember the bad 14 year olds doing in my school, hell, in fact, I knew a few dozen broads like that in my grade 8-9 classes.

SmokeyTheBear 02-22-2007 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 11959756)
It's just hard to understand why they will sign a legal release and talk without a lawyer?

that is nuts.. have you ever seen "48 hours' its a tv show about 48 hours with a homicide detective. Almost every episode one of the people fess's up to murder / life in prison when if they had just kept quiet they would have been innocent.. even the detectives said if he doesnt talk were gonna have to let him go because they had no evidence

Huggles 02-22-2007 03:27 PM

https://youtube.com/watch?v=jWlNq...elated&search=



Listen to what the DA says, but the news people COMPLETELY ignore his very last word before they cut him off.

JMM 02-22-2007 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 11959256)
btw the first video i checked the guy says he thought she was 19 , she only mentioned she was 13 twice in a fast public chatroom.. the decoy was over 30

https://youtube.com/watch?v=3KvQL7J148I

edit you must not watch very often .. i just watched several more , they all had pretty much the same story. now of course i'm not so foolish at to believe all of them , but it makes you wonder.

You are 10000% wrong.

These conversations DO NOT take place in the public chatroom. The conversations take place in private one on one chats. Period. They make it VERY clear in the PRIVATE one on one chats the age, VERY CLEAR.

What all of you are missing is this....how many times have you heard these guys say "I swear, I have never done this before, this is my first time." Almost all of them say it and almost all of them are full of shit. What does that tell you? It tells me that there are CHILDREN out there that these scum have already victimized.

Blame the parents all you want, blame the real kids all you want if it makes you feel better. The problem is with these predators. They should be outed. There is nothing illegal or unconstitutional about what Dateline is doing and I wish they would do more of it. Without the "outing", the teachers, the ministers, the rabbis, the prosecutors would get arrested, post bond, and be back at work the next day watching over YOUR children. What Dateline does, in addition to deterring other scum, is insure that the scum they catch won't be going back to their positions of authority with children.

More power to Dateline and PJ.

JMM 02-22-2007 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AbulletAway (Post 11959540)
I've only seen the show once and I didn't see this episode. I don't know if I agree with the show or not as the whole thing just grosses me out. But, I am glad these people are getting caught. But, I would have preferred a trial for the guy. Do we really know it was him on the computer? Did they compare his voice to the one in the phone call? The clip I saw never said so.

Now as for the computer being locked up with all the encryption stuff. He works for the DA's office. I know a few DDA's and every single one of them brings their work home and every single one of them has intense security features set up on their PC's so should it ever be stolen, the case files, victim addy's and so on can not be recovered. So, to me it was totally misleading for them to say that his PC was very protected, leaving us to conclude it was because he had CP on it.

On a side note, I have no issues with pedo's shooting themselves in the head. But, as for me, I won't jump for joy over it ever unless those shooting themselves actually did it.

They were 100% certain it was him. Remember, he talked to the decoy on the phone for some time. It was him. It was his phone number. It was his phone.

And, BTW, there were 3 computers. Did he use all of them for work?

JMM 02-22-2007 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huggles (Post 11959825)
https://youtube.com/watch?v=jWlNq...elated&search=



Listen to what the DA says, but the news people COMPLETELY ignore his very last word before they cut him off.

Man..are you really this dense? Yes, the problem also lies with the parents. Yes, parents should monitor the internet activities of children. Computers should be in open spaces in the house and the children should be watched, closely.

However, there are lots of parents who shouldn't be parents and will never get the message. There are lots of parents that use computers and the internet as a babysitter, just like they used to with TV's. That is why programs and stings like this are soooooooooo necessary. You cannot rely on parents to protect their children from these threats.

DaddyHalbucks 02-22-2007 04:40 PM

They are really turning up the heat on predators, good to see.

:)

Peaches 02-22-2007 04:40 PM

I love:

Jeff
JR
CD

:)

(just thought a little love needed to be spread ;) )

CuriousToyBoy 02-22-2007 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 11950313)
net work execs everywhere are high fiving each other

in ten years...on the spot executions from to catch a predator

right after wife swapping and dare to scare( the show where you get money for not drowning or getting eaten by sharks)

Right on the money Brad !

:thumbsup

SmokeyTheBear 02-22-2007 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMM (Post 11960109)
You are 10000% wrong.

These conversations DO NOT take place in the public chatroom. The conversations take place in private one on one chats. Period. They make it VERY clear in the PRIVATE one on one chats the age, VERY CLEAR.

hmm screencaps show several people in the private chat..

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMM (Post 11960109)
What all of you are missing is this....how many times have you heard these guys say "I swear, I have never done this before, this is my first time." Almost all of them say it and almost all of them are full of shit. What does that tell you? It tells me that there are CHILDREN out there that these scum have already victimized.

Like i said i have no sympathy for true sicko's but explain me this.. some horny guy gets on chat , gets in with some girl who hasnt identified her age. at some point he goes to get a glass of milk , she mentions her age but its gets pushed down the chat screen.

Now she wants to hookup , he goes , shows up on dateline nbc. now everyone thinks he is a pedo because he went to the fridge for a glass of milk.. is this fair ? do you think anyone is going to believe you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMM (Post 11960109)
Blame the parents all you want, blame the real kids all you want if it makes you feel better.

umm i never blamed either of them..
Quote:

Originally Posted by JMM (Post 11960109)
The problem is with these predators. They should be outed. There is nothing illegal or unconstitutional about what Dateline is doing and I wish they would do more of it. Without the "outing", the teachers, the ministers, the rabbis, the prosecutors would get arrested, post bond, and be back at work the next day watching over YOUR children. What Dateline does, in addition to deterring other scum, is insure that the scum they catch won't be going back to their positions of authority with children.

More power to Dateline and PJ.

Shouldnt the police be doing this ? couldnt they do it the same way but we would have the complete story not half of it

CDSmith 02-22-2007 06:38 PM

JMM is dead nuts on point with those last three posts of his.

End of debate as far as I'm concerned.

SmokeyTheBear 02-22-2007 06:54 PM

p.s. i just looked at the transcripts from perverted justice and i was wrong when i said above that these were in public chatrooms, it appears from the transcripts that they are in private rooms , that pretty well rules out my "confusion of age" point , but theres still lots of wiggle room , sometimes the age is only mentioned once and the "dupe" often mentions the chat software crashing losing messages

Aussie Rebel 02-22-2007 06:56 PM

I love hearing stories about pedo's dying, but personally I would rather hear about them dying from having a chainsaw shoved up their ass

JaneB 02-22-2007 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huggles (Post 11955676)
Aren't you content? Don't you have some cock to suck?

Wow you just proved you are an idiot. That is a real good response. You must have a very low IQ if you have to resort to that. :)

JaneB 02-22-2007 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 11957570)
in the dateline show that doesnt usually seem to be the case. you always hear the guys say in the chats that they should be careful, that they could get into trouble because they are so much older ect. besides the guy who lied saying he was 26 (which still isn't much betteris 26 and 13 ok??) i can't recall a single one i saw where the guy pretended to be a teenager himself. i used to spend some time in chat room 5 years back or so and there were girls there who were 13-15 who would lie about their age say they were 20 and talk sexual with older guys, and even ones who weren't lieing about their ages trying to engage in sexual chat with older guys. i saw the cnn glenn beck show about a girl who purposely went into chat rooms to find older guys for sex. they are out there, it does happen and more than parents would like to think.

Yes there have been many that lied about their ages and some have pretended to be teens. I remember one guy told the girl he was 17 but he was really 24 or 25. I can't remember what city it was in since they have so many shows on this. I am not saying that kids are not out there flirting and hitting on older men online, but the men are grown adults and they know better. If a 14 year old hit on me online I would not go to their house with sex toys and expect to have sex with them. I would tell them I am to old for them and leave the chat room. That is what responsible people and not sicko's do. It is wrong to blame kids who are dumb and it is also up to the parents to monitor their kids.

AbulletAway 02-22-2007 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huggles (Post 11959687)
However, they have had a fantasy about it. Doesn't that make him a pedo?

No, fucking little boys and girls makes someone a pedo, fantasizing about it just makes them sick in the head.

JaneB 02-22-2007 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 11959810)
that is nuts.. have you ever seen "48 hours' its a tv show about 48 hours with a homicide detective. Almost every episode one of the people fess's up to murder / life in prison when if they had just kept quiet they would have been innocent.. even the detectives said if he doesnt talk were gonna have to let him go because they had no evidence

It is called The First 48 and is on A&E. I watch it each week. In most of those cases they have enough evidence to charge the people, they want a confession to make the case more strong. Most of them confess because they know they did it and they know there is evidence or witnesses that will prove them quilty in court. They hardly ever say on there that if they do not confess they will have to let them go.

AbulletAway 02-22-2007 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMM (Post 11960120)
They were 100% certain it was him. Remember, he talked to the decoy on the phone for some time. It was him. It was his phone number. It was his phone.

And, BTW, there were 3 computers. Did he use all of them for work?

So the decoy new him personally? Is that how they knew it was him? God I am gonna stop letting my friends use my phone, hell one of them even sounds like me, how fucked would that be if he was calling little boys on my phone. That's it, no one is allowed to use my phone but me.

Oh and I have two computers here, soon to be three. I use them all for business and personal, I better only keep one computer, and I might as well get rid of any security I have on it. I originally thought it was good idea to keep my pc's secure as when I get my kids for the weekend I don't want them viewing all my content. But, if having more than one computer or having it very secure makes me a pedo, well damn it all to hell. I am getting rid of all securtiy features and extra PC's now.

JMM 02-22-2007 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AbulletAway (Post 11961227)
So the decoy new him personally? Is that how they knew it was him? God I am gonna stop letting my friends use my phone, hell one of them even sounds like me, how fucked would that be if he was calling little boys on my phone. That's it, no one is allowed to use my phone but me.

Oh and I have two computers here, soon to be three. I use them all for business and personal, I better only keep one computer, and I might as well get rid of any security I have on it. I originally thought it was good idea to keep my pc's secure as when I get my kids for the weekend I don't want them viewing all my content. But, if having more than one computer or having it very secure makes me a pedo, well damn it all to hell. I am getting rid of all securtiy features and extra PC's now.

Great..another one.

Yes, they KNEW it was him. His internet account. His house. His phone. If it was a friend using his computer and his phone from his house, perhaps the prosecutor should have opened the door when the police knocked. Perhaps the prosecutor should have said, "hey, my friend Jon has been using my internet account at my house and my phone to pick up little kids" when the police made entry. Instead, the prosecutor told the police he wasn't going to hurt them and proceeded to put a bullet in his brain while the police were entering.

As for security on the computers...this was security beyond anything the experts at the computer crime lab were able to crack. They had to send it to the manufacturer. I don't care if the hard drives were blank, the guy was soliciting little boys on the internet for sex. He didn't deserve to die, but he did deserve a long and harsh punishment. The death penalty was his choice.

SmokeyTheBear 02-22-2007 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 11961195)
It is called The First 48 and is on A&E. I watch it each week. In most of those cases they have enough evidence to charge the people, they want a confession to make the case more strong. Most of them confess because they know they did it and they know there is evidence or witnesses that will prove them quilty in court. They hardly ever say on there that if they do not confess they will have to let them go.


hmm we must be watching a diff feed :) last weeks episod those were his exact words:winkwink: im not saying every guy , just that it happens alot.

uno 02-22-2007 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huggles (Post 11959633)
You know, the only logical thing here, the reason why there is such a huge problem with this, is there must be a large number of very young people on the internet hooking up. Why would they be able to find so many men if they aren't successful with some young girls? It's like, you don't find a ton of woodbugs unless they're eating wood, ya know?


This is why I think a big problem is the parents of the minors.

Of course. Don't you know that this generations babysitter is the internet, just as television has been the babysitter of the past?

Huggles 02-22-2007 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 11961152)
Wow you just proved you are an idiot. That is a real good response. You must have a very low IQ if you have to resort to that. :)


Shhhh cock garage

BlackCrayon 02-22-2007 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JaneB (Post 11961180)
Yes there have been many that lied about their ages and some have pretended to be teens. I remember one guy told the girl he was 17 but he was really 24 or 25. I can't remember what city it was in since they have so many shows on this. I am not saying that kids are not out there flirting and hitting on older men online, but the men are grown adults and they know better. If a 14 year old hit on me online I would not go to their house with sex toys and expect to have sex with them. I would tell them I am to old for them and leave the chat room. That is what responsible people and not sicko's do. It is wrong to blame kids who are dumb and it is also up to the parents to monitor their kids.

fact is you could run the sting 24/7 for 50 years and never run out of guys who come to the house. would these same guys come if the girl was say 9 or 10? i very much doubt it, at least not most of them. are they preying on the naivity of young girls? for sure, but society sexualizes girls at a young age and for whatever reason tens of thousands of guys like the idea of a willing young girl.

Nismo 02-22-2007 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huggles (Post 11952938)
Last thing,


Several years ago my cousin Adrian was in town. She's a really attractive girl who matured very young. I took her to the mall and I noticed a TON of guys check her out, which made me slightly uncomfortable given her age. She bet me that she looked old enough to go into the nearest cold beer and wine store and could buy me a 6-pack, as she does at home for her mom. ( She doesn't drink, well, not then )

I thought she had a 50/50 chance of being id'd, as passing for 19... ehh.... maybe.

We went down the street from the mall and she picked up a 6 pack of Moosehead beer for me, without getting id'd. She was *14* years old!!!!


Now, if men are sexually attracted to her, and if they don't know her age, did that make them pedos? I wouldn't post her picture up on here, but she looked a bit like Avril Lavene(sp), but with a bigger chest and not as skinny.

Her mom had a handful of problems with her over the next year, and even caught the plumber leaving her daughter his phone number. Albeit Adrian is a bitch sometimes and told the guy she was 18.

send this story to penthouse

AbulletAway 02-22-2007 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JMM (Post 11961251)
Great..another one.

Yes, they KNEW it was him. His internet account. His house. His phone. If it was a friend using his computer and his phone from his house, perhaps the prosecutor should have opened the door when the police knocked. Perhaps the prosecutor should have said, "hey, my friend Jon has been using my internet account at my house and my phone to pick up little kids" when the police made entry. Instead, the prosecutor told the police he wasn't going to hurt them and proceeded to put a bullet in his brain while the police were entering.

As for security on the computers...this was security beyond anything the experts at the computer crime lab were able to crack. They had to send it to the manufacturer. I don't care if the hard drives were blank, the guy was soliciting little boys on the internet for sex. He didn't deserve to die, but he did deserve a long and harsh punishment. The death penalty was his choice.

I don't doubt it was him that made the calls. What I have issue with was all the conclusions people are drawing with almost no facts. And, the security went beyond what the "experts" at their little crime lab could deal with? I'm sure that little hick town had real CSI team trained in computer crime. I'd be willing to bet their experts were some geeks from the local best buy.

And why didn't he say it was a friend? Maybe he's not a snitch, maybe it was someone he cared about and was lost in a moment of confusion? Maybe, when he said, "I wasn't going to hurt them..." he was talking about the mass of cops that just raided his home and saw him waving his gun around. Why did he kill himself? We'll never know. Maybe he didn't want to deal with the bullshit. Once you get accused of something like that publicly, you're not coming back from it. His career was over no matter what. And, he could have thought there was just no recovering from it. Depression can make people do stupid things. Most people who kill themselves do it out of depression, not because they committed some crime they can't live with. I've known two people that killed themselves and both of them were fucking morons. They really had nothing to complain about all. Nice homes, nice families, good friends, nice jobs but in both cases they just got this idea in their heads that the problems they thought they had were just too great to overcome.

My point is, we don't know what happened. At least not yet. We only know what it looks like based on nothing more than a phone call and some emails. All of which, for all we really know could have been faked. Now realistically, it's a stretch, I won't deny it. But, seriously, I've been accused of shit I didn't do. Nothing like that of course but it ain't no fun and no matter what kinda proof I had that should have cleared my name to those involved, it didn't matter. In their shallow little eyes I was guilty, end of story. Everything was explained and backed up by fact. But, at the time, I sure did like guilty though. Everyone sounded like you, "Oh he did it, why did he do this and that, why didn't he just try and explain himself then and so on." Sometimes you can't for whatever reasons and it makes ya look guilty as hell. So, as for me, when it comes to proclaiming someone's guilt, it's gonna take a lot for me to believe anything, especially the DA's office and from the cops. They fuck up all the time. And, the only reason it doesn't come out more is because the poor fools getting charged with shit ain't got the money to properly defend themselves.

But, in the long run, I don?t really care. Like you, I think he did it. I think he?s totally guilty based on what I?ve heard. I just think it?s amazingly funny how fast people are to believe every little thing they?re told. I mean there is some doubt in my mind at this point but for the most part, I feel he?s totally guilty and the bullet to his head saved the tax payers a lot of money. However, I can?t help but wonder about a society that is so easily willing to hang the man out to dry with out any hard facts. And, a fact isn?t the kid on the phone who says, ?Yep that was the DA talking.? A fact would be a voice comparison by professionals. Now what he said before he killed himself is a fact as long as enough people confirm what he said. But, does it mean he was talking about the kids? Hell, for all we know he just got home and lost his temper on the road and flashed his gun at some asshole and his friends in a car that just cut him off. In the DA?s mind he?s thinking the cops showed up to arrest to him for that and he said, ?I wasn?t going to hurt them?. We don?t know for sure what was going through his mind at the time. The only thing we truly know that went through his mind was the bullet a few seconds later.


Any ways, I gotta get back to my site updates on my highly secured computers. It's been fun and I'll try to stop in later to see if ya responded. It's been fun. Thanks for the discussion.

V_RocKs 02-23-2007 12:45 AM

Almost 200 pedos

tony286 02-23-2007 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by V_RocKs (Post 11961800)
Almost 200 pedos

Actually they are scumbags but not pedos according the text book definition:

The APA's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition,


* Over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years or younger).
* The person has acted on these urges, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty.
* The person is at least age 16 years and at least 5 years older than the child or children in Criterion A.

Do not include an individual in late adolescence involved in an ongoing sexual relationship with a 12 or 13-year-old.

Peaches 02-23-2007 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 11961821)
Actually they are scumbags but not pedos according the text book definition:

The APA's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th edition,


* Over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent, intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children (generally age 13 years or younger).
* The person has acted on these urges, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulty.
* The person is at least age 16 years and at least 5 years older than the child or children in Criterion A.

Do not include an individual in late adolescence involved in an ongoing sexual relationship with a 12 or 13-year-old.

Sexual predator laws are different in all states and countries. You can easily be found guilty for being a sexual predator if you're 18 and you're screwing a 15 year old in many states.

tony286 02-23-2007 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 11963237)
Sexual predator laws are different in all states and countries. You can easily be found guilty for being a sexual predator if you're 18 and you're screwing a 15 year old in many states.

What does that have to with the textbook definition of pedo ?Did I say anything about law? lol

Peaches 02-23-2007 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 11963577)
What does that have to with the textbook definition of pedo ?Did I say anything about law? lol

These people are being ARRESTED, they aren't being committed to psychiatric institutions. So yes, it's about the law.

Seriously, what's behind you constantly looking for ways to make these guys look better than the total scum of the earth that they are?? :helpme

CDSmith 02-23-2007 12:02 PM

I think Tony is just pointing out the distinction between what constutes a "pedo" and what constitutes a "sexual predator" who goes after young teens. People do tend to lump every guy like this into the pedo category, but a guy going after a 13-17 yr old by definition isn't a pedophile.

I don't think it's about making any of them out to be any better than they are, it's about keeping things straight and correct in people's minds. And frankly it's hard to imagine anyone, at least any normal-thinking person out there who isn't elated at the fact that these guys are being nabbed and publicly shamed and in some cases put behind bars. Should be all cases, but it looks like several states are bringing in harshers laws soon. (maybe partially due to the efforts of the show)

V_RocKs 01-12-2011 11:07 AM

This thread must have been made before rule #7.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123