GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   quickbucks say: verify and send copy of driving licene or passport (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=708714)

Quick Buck 02-23-2007 10:17 AM

*late edit*

And do you want to know what 95% of all of our sales do have in common?

They come from people we *know personally*. We know their wives, we know where they live and work, we send eachother kwanza cards and vacation together.

Most mid to large sized programs could close their programs entirely to people they don't know personally and see only a small decline in sales.

u-Bob 02-23-2007 10:22 AM

verifying a persons address ( http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...&postcount=117 ) wouldn't that provide more security than asking for IDs?

Quick Buck 02-23-2007 10:25 AM

yes u-Bob, that is a good idea and one I had not considered. I'll look into doing that although I would think that from an administrative standpoint that could be difficult, only because of things like "I didn't get my mail with the code printed on it!"... but that is a very creative solution.

u-Bob 02-23-2007 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayeff (Post 11962301)
2. Any operator wishing to follow the tax code properly should also be asking non-US payees to complete a W8.

That's a common myth. A W8 form is not required by law. You can use a substitute form (This can even be a simple webbased "I confirm that I am not a US citizen and that... etc"-button (like Google does)).

LiveDose 02-23-2007 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobby666 (Post 11959429)

must i fax a statement of my girl that she allows me to earn money with porn?



Haha, that's funny.:1orglaugh

LadyMischief 02-23-2007 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 11959525)
its not just them you have to worry about , its every employee , cleaning lady , secretary , programmer , maintenance man etc any of them could steal your identity and then your screwed.

Im really serious here you gotta be deadly serious these days about your i.d.

All it takes is one bad apple and your whole life could be turned upsidedown. look at the 9/11 hijackers. most of whom were actually on stolen id's of real people who had no connection at all "i.e. id theft"

I had my identity stolen years ago and it's still messing with me. It's easy enough to happen but the damage takes years to recover from.

LadyMischief 02-23-2007 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 11963087)
8 great reasons why you should NEVER let your id leave your side or reside on someone else's computer you have no control over.

Now ill list some thing you DONT need to show your id for.

You dont need your id to get paid with google

You dont need your id to get paid from yahoo

You dont need your id to get paid from adsense

and the list goes on to include every sponsor i have ever heard of..

Any sponsor can make any rule they want your right and nobody has to use them , but i see no reason to ostricise your affiliates by instituting plans that havent been thought out.

It does take some guts to admit when your wrong, maybe in your mind your not, thats cool too. but i think by some of the responses show many do not think its a wise idea.

Why not just start a new thread "QUICKBUCK OFFICIAL STATEMENT"
Due to recent worries about our "ID or else" policy we have decided to hold up on enforcing this policy until we can better ascertain its usefullness. We at quickbuck listen to our affiliates and we of course do not want to make it harder for you to get paid. We feel by preventing fraud we can INCREASE payouts to honest webmasters. We apologize for any confusion and look forward to a rewarding relationship with our affil's in 2007

An even better idea would be to simply incorporate a privacy statement/agreement in their terms of service so that if anything comes up that they need id confirmation on, they have let people know up front, and there's accountability for what they do with the person's id, so people would be more comfortable sending it. That would also square them up on many laws in many countries with regards to identification.

vvq 02-23-2007 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 11960571)
lol think a bit deeper , as i pointed out this would be useless to protect fraud..

Fraudster simply makes a fake id. quickbuck has no authority to check the validity of id's end of story

It makes it 10 times worse if your id is now on some sponsors computers you have no access and dont know who has access to this information.

1 disgruntled employee and your "fraud deterent" turns into massive fraud.

Like i said this isn't attack on quickbuck , i applaud them for trying to deter fraud , but i think from the points i have made its obviously clear this wouldnt do that.. the only thing that might happen is it would cause worse fraud.

It's a deterrent, not a end all fraud solution. It's one extra step a fraudster has to go through.

Splum 02-23-2007 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963374)
*late edit* And do you want to know what 95% of all of our sales do have in common? They come from people we *know personally*. We know their wives, we know where they live and work, we send each other kwanza cards and vacation together. Most mid to large sized programs could close their programs entirely to people they don't know personally and see only a small decline in sales.

Blah its not worth commenting on this stupid thread anymore. Quickbucks runs business like the Bush administration. Please dont reply to my rant.

Peaches 02-23-2007 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Splum (Post 11963662)
...aka if you are just an average run of the mill adult webmaster we dont want your traffic? I always knew the adult industry was a "good ole boy" clique. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Welcome to 2004.

Personally I think you're going to more and more of this from the older established programs. In addition, you can also plan on them "firing" the bottom feeders. It's just not cost efficient to hire people to take care of webmasters making you a total of $10K a year.

SmokeyTheBear 02-23-2007 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
And if you were running quickbuck it would be your prerogative to do so, but I'm running it and I have years of experience running it. I know the one thing that all affiliate fraud has in common, it comes from people we don't know.

and you have yet to explain how seeing an id would change that in any way.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
You think it's wrong. I don't. You say it hasn't worked, I say that it is and has worked.

I never said it didnt work .

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
You say it is costing me business, I say I don't want your business

umm ok, you have your way i have mine i can live with that..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
if you wont abide by our policy and that it in fact has improved profitability and our ability to do high priced promos.

yet you havent shown 1 single way this has worked..

Just because someone doesnt have a passport or drivers license doesnt mean you "stopped fraud" it just means someone hasnt sent in their id yet, guilty until proven innocent ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
The good thing about it is that this is a free country and you are welcome to believe what you like and make up theories about anything you choose.

"make up theories " ? like that the top 10 sponsor on the net dont require this ? its not a theory its called a fact if you have trouble with facts .
Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
If you think I'm wrong then you should start your own program and come up with all sorts of wiz bang neato ways to keep fraud in check.

So if you think the war is wrong you should start your own war ? that makes no sense.. yes you have made it quite clear that you can do what you want its your own program , we all realise this, we also realise that anyone can give their opinion. When i have wiz bang fraud detection in my affiliate program your welcome to tell me if its useless and cumbersome.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
You say *many* think it's wrong, perhaps you underestimate how many affiliates we have.

nope i just counted the responses for and against.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
Yahoo does not require an id to advertise with them, because you are the one sending *them* money.

wrong they send me money

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
Google also requires you to sign a contract and send articles of incorporation if you want an XML feed.

but no passport or id, reason being it means they have to protect these id's under the law
Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
Adsense? Come on man, they control the content, they control the path to the advertiser, and they control where their ads appear or don't appear. If you want to give me the ability to control your quickbuck ads then by all means I'm happy to make an exception to the "we require an id" rule.

huh ? they are an affiliate proram that pays without passport or id..
Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
And please... Send me money, I promise I won't ask for any information about who you are when I'm cashing the check.

first send me your passport and id please

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)

CCbill requires contracts and proof of id, Paycom requires contracts and proof of id...

wrong , been paid by both no i.d.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
For every example of somebody who doesn't require proof of id (for the company or the individual if you're not a company) I will show you a company that does.

ok every sponsor on gfy but you. ( and perhaps ars )

so now name me 30 who do require i.d.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
Why do you think CCBill doesn't just open up their procesisng up to everybody who can submit a form?

you are not a processor.. we are talking about sponsors.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
Ask ANY processor and ANY bank what the NUMBER ONE way to prevent fraud is in affiliate marketing? The #1 answer is to KNOW YOUR AFFILIATES. KNOW how they are promoting you, KNOW what they are promoting and KNOW who they are.

Looking at an i.d. then tossing it doesnt help you know your affiliates.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
Constructive criticism doesn't mean saying "your idea is stupid", it means saying "your idea is stupid, here is a better way of doing it".

A) i never said that

B) i gave plenty of constructive critique maybe you missed it , read up..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
Bottom line is that if you want me to write you a check for 1k, 5k, 10k or 100k, you need to show me an id so that if you decide you want to play games with stolen cards, promote us from kp sites or violate can spam that I can come after you.

You said you toss the id after looking at it , so how are you going to do that ?



Quote:

Originally Posted by Quick Buck (Post 11963340)
The day I take a GFY thread as a blueprint of how to run my business is the day that I will shut our doors.

i never heard one person give you a blueprint.. i heard some affilites voice concern over a measure i have shown to be both dangerous and useless, you choose to ignore your affiliates and anyone who tries to help.

I dont know why you feel offended or the need to call your affiliates and others "attackers" because they are concerned with your measures.

I have only read one deragotory remark in this thread towards quickbuck, everyone else is just concerned .. ( and they should be )

But what this boils down to is its your program you can do what you want , this is gfy we can comment on what we want.. i hold no negativity towards your decision. There isn't a sponsor around that does everything perfect. I just wish you would lighten up and try to appease your affiliates and potentials instead of calling them "attackers" and avoiding any diologue on the topic.. the foremost being . "you cant verify i.d. therefore what good does it do "

BlackCrayon 02-23-2007 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 11963668)
Welcome to 2004.

Personally I think you're going to more and more of this from the older established programs. In addition, you can also plan on them "firing" the bottom feeders. It's just not cost efficient to hire people to take care of webmasters making you a total of $10K a year.

better tell them to stop buying advertising on gfy then.

SmokeyTheBear 02-23-2007 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vvq (Post 11963564)
It's a deterrent, not a end all fraud solution. It's one extra step a fraudster has to go through.

lets be realistic here. do you really think a fraudster cant photochop an id ?

Do you think there are more fraudsters that dont know how to photochop an id than legit webmasters that just dont have a passport drivers license ? so who would lose out.. ?

tony286 02-23-2007 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kimmykim (Post 11960394)
Oh for God's sake, they can ask for DNA samples if they want to, and it's up to you to decide whether or not to give it to them.

Sponsors have the right to protect themselves from fraudulent affiliates, and honest affiliates should be glad for that. It's like shoplifting -- cheater affiliates cost honest ones money.

Amen, I think also if all programs wanted this stuff. A there would be less bullshit and b a more serious affiliate. If you want to do commission sales for a bricks and mortar company they would have all that info.Also this their going to steal my id bullshit, considering most have credit score around 500, its not worth much. lol Also for age verification dont want 16 yr olds promoting porn.

TheDoc 02-23-2007 11:25 AM

Do they require this on every webmaster? Not everyone has a DL or Passport, you don't need either to own a company and have a tax id. I really don't understand how a DL or Passport can stop fraud.

I live in Arizona, my address is to the other address in AZ, my company and payment details would be out of Las Vegas, and my phone numbers don't match either. The only way to know I am legit is my Tax ID and/or SSN. Both of which can be ran through the SS Offices to make sure they are valid and match the the name on record. Or maybe I should give you my Canadian DL?

1) I don't cash checks - I'm not 16 or broke.
2) While they use my ID to make sure it's me, bars, stores, ect do not copy and keep the ID, they look
at the picture and the birth date and hand it back. With buying beer, I don't hand them ID, I show it to them.
3) You do not have to have an ID to rent an apartment.
4) You do not have to show your ID to rent a video, only to get the card, or go online and no ID is needed.
5) You do not have to have a ID to get a job, you only need a SSN.
6) My sons do not have ID's and get on planes......
7) You ask for ID's on cock suckers to make sure she is 18 or over and because of laws, you don't do any fraud checks to make sure this bitch wont kill you though.

BradShaw 02-23-2007 11:27 AM

I see zero problem with it. I like to know who I am doing biz with, especially if they are "new" webmasters overseas.

SmokeyTheBear 02-23-2007 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 11963668)
Welcome to 2004.

Personally I think you're going to more and more of this from the older established programs. In addition, you can also plan on them "firing" the bottom feeders. It's just not cost efficient to hire people to take care of webmasters making you a total of $10K a year.

i guess google has it all wrong having the largest amount of "bottom feeders"

Personally i think there will be even more diversity in the affiliate game , less whales , more smaller affiliates. Personally i would rather have 1 million "bottom feeders" making $200 a month than 2 whales making a million a year

Peaches 02-23-2007 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 11963741)
5) You do not have to have a ID to get a job, you only need a SSN.
6) My sons do not have ID's and get on planes......

Interesting. Now, I admit I haven't worked for anyone since the early 90's, but IIRC, back in the 80's there was a law passed where you had to show at least one form of ID to an employer and they had to fill out a form saying you showed it.

And I've had to show my ID get on a plane. From what I know, only if you're under 16 do you not have to do that, and we aren't talking about under 16 year olds here.

I also had to show ID for my son when he was under 16 and we were going out of the country.

SmokeyTheBear 02-23-2007 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradShaw (Post 11963750)
I see zero problem with it. I like to know who I am doing biz with, especially if they are "new" webmasters overseas.

i have zero problem with it also.. other than it wont help in any way..

You cant legaly verify the id is correct therefore what use does it serve other than a false sense of security and none of your legit webmaster who made you money that dont have a dl or passport dont get paid..

SmokeyTheBear 02-23-2007 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 11963775)
Interesting. Now, I admit I haven't worked for anyone since the early 90's, but IIRC, back in the 80's there was a law passed where you had to show at least one form of ID to an employer and they had to fill out a form saying you showed it.

google doesnt..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 11963775)

And I've had to show my ID get on a plane. From what I know, only if you're under 16 do you not have to do that, and we aren't talking about under 16 year olds here.

I also had to show ID for my son when he was under 16 and we were going out of the country.

they actually just changed the laws on that a bit , but your correct

http://www.usatoday.com/travel/news/...-borders_x.htm

pornguy 02-23-2007 11:35 AM

call quickbuck about it.

Peaches 02-23-2007 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 11963766)
i guess google has it all wrong having the largest amount of "bottom feeders"

Personally i think there will be even more diversity in the affiliate game , less whales , more smaller affiliates. Personally i would rather have 1 million "bottom feeders" making $200 a month than 2 whales making a million a year

I know several people who own non-adult businesses who "fire" the bottom 20% of their customers each and every year. It's not uncommon. Google is like Dell - they have enough cheap labor to be able to use them to deal with the bottom feeders.

Not for nuthin' but Hooper seems to have done pretty well running an adult affiliate program. And as I stated previously, they're one of the handful of people I'd trust with my info. My dog sitter has more access to my person info and in reference to low paid employees, has more reason to steal my identity :)

jayeff 02-23-2007 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 11963668)
It's just not cost efficient to hire people to take care of webmasters making you a total of $10K a year.

Oh dear. Repeating something which is plain wrong, only makes it right in online adult. Here is the reality.

When I started in this business there was a crop of well-known names. The vast majority of those names are now just distant memories. In a few more years, most of today's names will similarly have faded away. That's business, any business.

A sponsor need not depend on affiliates at all. And if he does, so long as his program is the envy of the industry and people are queuing to join, he can leave it to others to work with newcomers. But most sponsors are at best ordinary, so if they want whales tomorrow they have to work with the minnows today.

The single most common mistake sponsors make is in making so little effort to actually develop affiliates. They hire reps who know little or nothing about the business and who can thus only answer standard questions with standard answers. The theory is that by signing up enough affiliates, among that number will be some decent traffic generators. But how terrible would it be to make sure of that and at the same time improve the odds that when some of these small-fry do find their feet, they are still supporting your program?

Of course there is no way to get an immediate return on all levels of affiliate development. But it would make a lot more sense, instead of paying someone to be a speaking FAQ's page, to hire people to work in a way which would generate earlier and more certain returns.

SmokeyTheBear 02-23-2007 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 11963794)

Not for nuthin' but Hooper seems to have done pretty well running an adult affiliate program. And as I stated previously, they're one of the handful of people I'd trust with my info. My dog sitter has more access to my person info and in reference to low paid employees, has more reason to steal my identity :)

I totally agree with you here.. Of all the programs i would trust quickbuck near the top , merely from word of mouth. BUT this particular method seems cumbersome and useless and nobody has yet to explain how it would prevent fraud in ANY way..

Gnus 02-23-2007 11:39 AM

Well in the US if you fill out a W9 for an employer that 1099s you, the W9 requires the company to obtain a copy of two forms id for that person and to have it on file with the W9. So basically legally if a sponsor or company makes you file out a W9 you must provide them two forms of id. I see more and more sponsors doing this especially if they are US based.

Gary

tony286 02-23-2007 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peaches (Post 11963775)
Interesting. Now, I admit I haven't worked for anyone since the early 90's, but IIRC, back in the 80's there was a law passed where you had to show at least one form of ID to an employer and they had to fill out a form saying you showed it.

And I've had to show my ID get on a plane. From what I know, only if you're under 16 do you not have to do that, and we aren't talking about under 16 year olds here.

I also had to show ID for my son when he was under 16 and we were going out of the country.

You are correct also you have to show id to get a blockbuster card.To me if you have nothing to hide presenting id shouldnt be a problem.

SmokeyTheBear 02-23-2007 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gnus (Post 11963812)
Well in the US if you fill out a W9 for an employer that 1099s you, the W9 requires the company to obtain a copy of two forms id for that person and to have it on file with the W9. So basically legally if a sponsor or company makes you file out a W9 you must provide them two forms of id. I see more and more sponsors doing this especially if they are US based.

Gary

and if they dont file a 1099 .. then.. wouldnt it make sense they dont ask for id, as they arent required nor would it be of any use ?

Like the largest affiliate program around google ?

Splum 02-23-2007 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 11963814)
You are correct also you have to show id to get a blockbuster card.To me if you have nothing to hide presenting id shouldnt be a problem.

So I suppose you are not opposed to a national ID card etc. That kind of thinking is quite "republican" isnt it tony?

SmokeyTheBear 02-23-2007 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 11963814)
You are correct

google must be the largest illegal sponsor on the net then

TheDoc 02-23-2007 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gnus (Post 11963812)
Well in the US if you fill out a W9 for an employer that 1099s you, the W9 requires the company to obtain a copy of two forms id for that person and to have it on file with the W9. So basically legally if a sponsor or company makes you file out a W9 you must provide them two forms of id. I see more and more sponsors doing this especially if they are US based.

Gary

I don't think w9's need copies of ID's.. You could be paying an LLC.
I think thats w2 employee wage forms which needs some form of ID, like a SSN and a local bill that as your name and address on it.

SmokeyTheBear 02-23-2007 11:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony404 (Post 11963814)
To me if you have nothing to hide presenting id shouldnt be a problem.


then post your id here if you have nothing to hide ..:winkwink:

Gnus 02-23-2007 11:53 AM

Well I am talking about companies that 1099 and make you fill out a W9 not the ones that don't. So if the company is US based and deducting what they are paying and sending out 1099s you then you are required to obtain ids.

Gary

TheDoc 02-23-2007 11:56 AM

See 1099's don't deduct anything.. They are only to report individuals and LLC's incomes to the IRS. They aren't required for International people or Incorporated Business. Even though some people still ask for them, as a backup.

W9's don't require ID's.. The employee wage forms, w2 do.

Gnus 02-23-2007 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 11963897)
See 1099's don't deduct anything.. They are only to report individuals and LLC's incomes to the IRS. They aren't required for International people or Incorporated Business. Even though some people still ask for them, as a backup.

W9's don't require ID's.. The employee wage forms, w2 do.

You might be correct on that one. Been a while since I filled one out.

Gary

tranza 02-23-2007 12:02 PM

Wow, this thread got big fast....

Peaches 02-23-2007 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 11963868)
I don't think w9's need copies of ID's.. You could be paying an LLC.

They've said articles of incorporation are acceptable.

And yes, I was referring to when I was an actual employee when I had to show ID.

Quick Buck 02-23-2007 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 11963807)
I totally agree with you here.. Of all the programs i would trust quickbuck near the top , merely from word of mouth. BUT this particular method seems cumbersome and useless and nobody has yet to explain how it would prevent fraud in ANY way..

This has gotten to be silly.

Yes you're right about everything, you're really smart, I'm just a dumb idiot living in my moms basement who has no experience and no idea how to do anything.

If you want to make money with quickbuck, show us an id or articles of incorporation, it's that simple.

Bouncers let kids into bars with fake id's in sometimes, but if they didn't even CHECK the Id's they would let a lot more in.

If anybody has any legitimate questions or questions with a purpose I'm happy to anwer them.

Wiseman 02-23-2007 12:16 PM

This is gay! I didnt realize that all you guys owned my company and made the rules for it. Well then please start making our payouts for us and paying all the fucking scammers for us to. This is our company and this is what we decided to do. Now for those of you who didnt get it before


$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$7 5$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$ 75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75 $75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$7 5$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$75$ 75

Now again please if you get your info in before the end of the monthand email me between the 1st and the 5th with your nembers we will pay you a shit load more.

I have nothing more to say here

Wiseman 02-23-2007 12:17 PM

OH P.S Let me add some more fuel to the fire. I allow lots of people to not send in there Info if they are someone I know has been doing buisness with us and I know and trust. Its not that fucking hard. Its just our rules.

Thank you drive through.

interracialtoons 02-23-2007 12:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jace (Post 11959565)
when someone gets hired for a new job, don't employers require an ID?

what is the laws regarding working in the USA as "contract labor"? don't they NEED your ID by law if you reach a certain payout amount?

The only thing required is a tax-ID or SSN.
And that is only needed to file IRS Form 1099.
If the "employer" is not going to file a 1099 then they don't even need that.

If the sponsor is not paying matching Social Security Tax for you and unemployment insurance for you then they are not your "Employer", because if they were your "employer" then they would be breaking the law by not paying those taxes.

Affiliates are 1099 contractors.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123