100 conspiracy theories.

I love when people pretend there's some debate on topics like global warming or intelligent design where one doesn't actually exist.

GE has a few commercials out now pushing new projects they're doing. Water purification, green energy, etc. Amazing how many different things GE is involved with.

I'm afraid I don't know Bechtel, is it a big AU company or has my head been in the sand?

Apparently, it's America's largest engineering company. I've never heard of it either.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bechtel_Corporation

Yeah, like dumping tons of polychlorinated biphenyls into the Hudson River.

GE is involved in just about everything. Aviation, high finances, health, consumer finances, televisoin (they own NBC). Chances are, they've got something to do with whatever credit card you use too.

Bechtel are one of the world's largest engineering firms. My father has worked several contracts with them over the years.

the way i see it all this "global warming" business is just screaming $$$ opportunity for a lot of entrepreneurs.
regardless if its true or not theres a good chunk of money to be made in any sector that can pull of a "envio friendly" "tree loving" ad campaign for their product.

The guy who made the documentary also made one a few years back saying silicone breast implants reduce the risk of cancer. :upsidedow

On this, we agree.

Please cite sources.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/st...181798,00.html

The guy made the documentary, ignored scientists who gave him contradicting evidence, and took quotes out of context (for which the station apologized for).

Sounds like the guy you want to get your "scientific facts" from. :winkwink:

You are fucking kidding me you just linked to The Guardian news commentary column. You do realize it is one of the most liberal "news" outlets in the world dont you? Thats like me using a FOX news EDITORIAL link to get my point across. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

PS there are facts outside of your little liberal bubble

If you doubt how liberal that rag is check this out: http://www.reportingwars.com/guardian_bbc.php

As I recall they just legalized silicon breast implants again.

I'm pretty sure they did, but with some improvements, no?

Wow. You're really dense, aren't you? Commentary or not, it's referring to an existing documentary. Or are you insinuating that The Guardian lied about the content of Durkin's documentary?

The guy has a history of misrepresenting the people he quotes as well as more or less straight out fabricating stories and representing them as fact.

http://news.independent.co.uk/enviro...cle2326210.ece

http://news.independent.co.uk/enviro...cle2347526.ece

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_...on_director%29

Yeah, this Durkin fellow sounds exactly like the type of guy I'd have no trouble believing. He's also not a scientist, as you claimed earlier.

Are you trying to argue that the documentary was never made?

Here is the actual program the show was shot for:

http://equinox.virtek.com/Equinox-Pr...in+a+dcup.html

Here is a chat on the television stations website with the director:

http://www.channel4.com/community/sh...n_a_D-Cup.html

Here is his own production company taking credit for it:

http://www.wagtv.com/acatalog/About_Wag.html

Here are some other sites that discuss it:

http://ftvdb.bfi.org.uk/sift/title/625540
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_...on_director%29

Are you seriously going to deny he made it now?

They don't lower the risk of cancer.

yeah, they are legal again

I saw a special on that and the guy who sued all the breast implant companies and basically put them out of business years ago. Turns out that although some of the breast implants caused problems, he was suing these companies for everything and winning. They basically portrayed him to be a scumbag who shut down businesses, made millions, all off of a lie.

Who said I denied everything? I said the reports against him are suspect because they come from BIASED SOURCES.

Thanks...

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

He ran a documentary on TV stating that breast implants reduce cancer. I don't know how you couldn't come to the conclusion that he is a kook right there.

Biased sources, such as the same scientist he featured in his documentary?

Besides, regardless of the sources, the fact still remains that he claimed implants reduce cancer risks. That's obvious bullshit right there.

It was one of 5 sources to show you that he made that documentary since you asked for sources. Throw that one out and you still have the TV station, the science program, and his own production company claiming he did it.

There are many scientists in his documentary, the raw data speaks for itself anyways.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

You dont listen well do you liberal puke?
I never said he didnt make that program lol. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Dont be cherry pickin biatch hehe.... Ok now I will

I said he produced the documentary. You said to cite sources. I cited one and you said it was a bad source and couldn't be trusted. So I cited 5 others.

Scroll up, it's right there. If you didn't say he didn't make the program, why did you ask for so many sources to prove he did?

I am not a liberal by any means. I just don't listen to Rush Limbaugh and repeat everything he says. :)

Studies or not, the FDA still requested undisclosed improvements before reallowing them. :upsidedow

If you believe humans are the cause of global warming you are worse than a liberal you are an idiot.

I never said I believe humans are the cause of global warming. I just said I don't take everything Sean Hannity says and post it on GFY.

So what's an unbiased source, genius? :1orglaugh

How bout humans being a contributor?

I don't think Limbaugh went over that today, he'll have to get back to you.

Does he broadcast on Sundays?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming
I am sure those cavemen factories really contributed to the rise back then.

So humans have had 0 effect?

Humans have had a negligible effect on the cyclic patterns of global warming at best. Do you even know WHAT has caused these patterns of hot and cold?

Why are so many scientists saying humans are having an effect? I mean there were thousands in that one report.

What he said.

Many scientists agree.

Yep, they closed my account too - all I had it running on was a personal blog/software site, and an image host. Their reasoning was "Click Fraud."

Yeah, Google, that's why it took me over a year to hit payout.. those $0.03/day stats.

by many, you mean a vast minority right?

You must have shitty, non-productive traffic.

Yeah. I opted not to violate their TOS. Silly me.

Do you really think they shut down your account because of a political view yet hid it as click fraud?

Right, the misconstrued data in his report outweighs decades of research proving otherwise.

Are you just playing the devil's advocate or do you have a crush on Durkin?

Or you must suck at placing ads or a whole host of other reasons.