Who said I denied everything? I said the reports against him are suspect because they come from BIASED SOURCES.

Thanks...

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

He ran a documentary on TV stating that breast implants reduce cancer. I don't know how you couldn't come to the conclusion that he is a kook right there.

Biased sources, such as the same scientist he featured in his documentary?

Besides, regardless of the sources, the fact still remains that he claimed implants reduce cancer risks. That's obvious bullshit right there.

It was one of 5 sources to show you that he made that documentary since you asked for sources. Throw that one out and you still have the TV station, the science program, and his own production company claiming he did it.

There are many scientists in his documentary, the raw data speaks for itself anyways.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

You dont listen well do you liberal puke?
I never said he didnt make that program lol. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Dont be cherry pickin biatch hehe.... Ok now I will

I said he produced the documentary. You said to cite sources. I cited one and you said it was a bad source and couldn't be trusted. So I cited 5 others.

Scroll up, it's right there. If you didn't say he didn't make the program, why did you ask for so many sources to prove he did?

I am not a liberal by any means. I just don't listen to Rush Limbaugh and repeat everything he says. :)

Studies or not, the FDA still requested undisclosed improvements before reallowing them. :upsidedow

If you believe humans are the cause of global warming you are worse than a liberal you are an idiot.

I never said I believe humans are the cause of global warming. I just said I don't take everything Sean Hannity says and post it on GFY.

So what's an unbiased source, genius? :1orglaugh

How bout humans being a contributor?

I don't think Limbaugh went over that today, he'll have to get back to you.

Does he broadcast on Sundays?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming
I am sure those cavemen factories really contributed to the rise back then.

So humans have had 0 effect?

Humans have had a negligible effect on the cyclic patterns of global warming at best. Do you even know WHAT has caused these patterns of hot and cold?

Why are so many scientists saying humans are having an effect? I mean there were thousands in that one report.

What he said.

Many scientists agree.

Yep, they closed my account too - all I had it running on was a personal blog/software site, and an image host. Their reasoning was "Click Fraud."

Yeah, Google, that's why it took me over a year to hit payout.. those $0.03/day stats.

by many, you mean a vast minority right?

You must have shitty, non-productive traffic.

Yeah. I opted not to violate their TOS. Silly me.

Do you really think they shut down your account because of a political view yet hid it as click fraud?

Right, the misconstrued data in his report outweighs decades of research proving otherwise.

Are you just playing the devil's advocate or do you have a crush on Durkin?

Or you must suck at placing ads or a whole host of other reasons.

I read that from your link, however, you guys are missing a fact here.... you are talking about geological time.... geological time is measured in 1000's and 1,000,000 of years. not OUR lifetime... that is not even a blink... and what they are saying... if you listen, is that a .005% change should happen over 1000's of years... not 100. What they are saying is that a .05% change (not in 1 city or contiment...) globally can have bad results(as in the poles)... not now, but for the generations to come. If anyone thinks that the exponential population growth is nothing... they should feel lucky they will not be around in 500 years to see who was correct

151 Republican Sheep

but... I don't think humans will be around then anyway... we are too good at killin one another... and ourselves

When did environmentalism become a political thing, anyways?

First you must know what causes global warming and cooling, obviously you have no clue.

Ask Al Gore.

When one party started making unrealistic demands and the other refused to budge.

I have the answer to your question.. Page 4... Wondering if it got answered already...

The Answer

Click that and you will get your answer.

Adsense is for websites with their own content. Not for content aggregation sites like your friend is running.

Yeah... all of your articles are just reposts... Google lays it out about that not being OK...

Another example.

One party receives huge donations from the oil industry that would be impacted by any attempts at cleaning up the environment. The only reason Republicans are against it is because of that. They just make up some other crap and the sheep eat it up.

Seriously, it's just one special interest group vs another special interest group.