GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Do you want icann to approved .xxx, lets vote here and get it out in the open... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=714663)

LiveDose 03-15-2007 09:52 PM

Fuck .XXX.

It's a bunch of nonsense...

scarlettcontent 03-16-2007 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YNOTBob (Post 12083980)
was just curious why you support this?

Hi Bob, :error

When I voted in this pole there was only 1 yes vote and 1 no vote.

After looking deeper into the various implications of the dot xxx extension I would surely change my vote to NO!:321GFY

Scarlett :)

baddog 03-16-2007 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scarlettcontent (Post 12093868)
Hi Bob, :error

When I voted in this pole there was only 1 yes vote and 1 no vote.

After looking deeper into the various implications of the dot xxx extension I would surely change my vote to NO!:321GFY

Scarlett :)

You voted yes because of two other votes? You truly are an idiot, and I believe the only reason you are changing your position is because you now realize that you have slit your own throat.

teksonline 03-16-2007 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveDose (Post 12087119)
Fuck .XXX.

It's a bunch of nonsense...

^---- OMG, someone on GFY has the real clues!!!!! Exactly.. its NONSENSE
been nonsense from 5 years ago when it started, thats why I think most of us don't go out of our way anymore to fight it.. It's just a fooking joke and
so riduculous we can't waste a moments breath on it

teksonline 03-16-2007 04:36 PM

and for those who have fear and think they have to buy into .xxx preregs' Don't bother... can't stop us from going back to IP based, since its ip based to begin with.... anyone sell me their 69.69.69.69 class range?? :)

JFK 03-16-2007 04:39 PM

F.U.B.A.R. Votes NO:thumbsup

ePorn 03-16-2007 04:43 PM

Absolutely NOT! :321GFY -> .xxx

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 03-16-2007 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 12093977)
You voted yes because of two other votes? You truly are an idiot, and I believe the only reason you are changing your position is because you now realize that you have slit your own throat.

Thruth is he had no real clue about what .xxx would do to our biz, he just thought it was gonna be another extention that would be no big deal like .mobi, I explained to him deeply what it is all about and now he does understand and does not want this sTDL approved..

Look at his post count, he can hardly be considered someone "in the know"
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 70

With that and the personal convos I have had with them I truelly believe he is being honest!

scarlettcontent 03-16-2007 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 12093977)
You voted yes because of two other votes? You truly are an idiot, and I believe the only reason you are changing your position is because you now realize that you have slit your own throat.


Thanks for your input :thumbsup

your right :) of course im an idiot! but since reading the posts and various other websites I have decided to change my mind!

this xxx bolini has been taked about for years... it will probably never happen anyway...

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 03-17-2007 12:38 PM

Bump for some more votes... The more we have the better, no mater which way they are voted...

Gaybucks 03-17-2007 02:03 PM

Bumperooney...

blonda80 03-17-2007 02:09 PM

no no no no no!!!!

crockett 03-17-2007 02:11 PM

No.. I don't want them to approve it.

polish_aristocrat 03-17-2007 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blonda80 (Post 12099965)
no no no no no!!!!

but you voted "yes" :Oh crap :Oh crap

davecummings 03-17-2007 03:08 PM

Anybody know anything about the below "Yes" or "I Don't Care" folks, e.g., their sites, employers, etc??

NO!
A1R3K, AbsolutePorn, AgentCash, AK, Aussie Rebel, Axel XXX, azzam, baddog, Barefootsies, basschick, Batts, Biggy, Big_Red, Bjorn, Bossman, BoyAlley, breaker, c-lo, candyflip, CDSmith, Chris Mac, ClickBuster, crockett, Cyndalie, czarina, d00t, DamageX, darksoul, davecummings, Dcat, deanberkeley, DirtyRider, Doctor Dre, Doctor T, ePorn, escorpio, esnem, FetishWeb, Freedoom, FreeHotZone, Gaybucks, GeorgeK, GigoloMason, Got Porn?, gtp, Gunni, he-fox, hent, hjnet, HomerSimpson, I am chauncy, IllTestYourGirls, JackStroke, jact, Jake, JamesK, jayeff, JFK, Jon Clark, kane, kermey, kicks, Kimo, knewon, LadyMischief, lazycash, loreen, Lycanthrope, Martin3, martinsc, massive-x, Matt 26z, mikeyddddd, milambur, Mrs F.U.B.A.R., Murderous, Nasty, Nodtveidt, notabook, pocketkangaroo, polish_aristocrat, Poon, Porn Farmer, pornguy, Probono, Quickdraw, Radiate, RawAlex, RF_Erick, Rhesus, Sands, sarettah, scardog, Scroto, sextoyking, SlickCash, spacedog, spazlabz, SPeRMiNaToR, SPW Guru, StarkReality, SteveLightspeed, stickyfingerz, surferbob, Sveindt Beindt, teksonline, Tempest, The Freestyler, tical, tony404, tranza, TreasureBucks, vicki, will76, WWC-Pajio, xclusive, YNOTBob, Z 118 90.77%


Yes!
blofer80, blonda80, Degenerate, englishpatient, Headless, ronbotx, RSS, scarlettcontent 8 6.15%


I do not care!
bossku69, Cyber-Hu$tler, Gambit, scottybuzz 4 3.08%
Voters: 130.

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 03-17-2007 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davecummings (Post 12100134)
Anybody know anything about the below "Yes" or "I Don't Care" folks, e.g., their sites, employers, etc??

In all honesty I do not think making it look as though Yes and I don't care voters will be retaliated against in this thread is smart as I have said over and over..

We do not want ICM to be able to say the supported did not vote out of fear...


I do know that most of them are young webmasters, sig whores or people that are not in the know about this issue... I have spoken to John from ScarlettContent about this and he now understands and no longer is a yes voter, which he publicly stated in this thread! I have also spoken with Cyber-Hu$tler and he did not understand how serious this is and has withdrew his "does not care" postion in this thread...


I believe englishpatient is someone from ICM as they have no post and registered her in January...

The rest I have no clue why they have tooken there position!

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 03-19-2007 01:12 AM

bump for more votes...

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 03-19-2007 08:19 AM

And I think a few more votes will make our point a little stronger :2 cents:

baddog 03-19-2007 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Clark (Post 12095712)
Thruth is he had no real clue about what .xxx would do to our biz, he just thought it was gonna be another extention that would be no big deal like .mobi, I explained to him deeply what it is all about and now he does understand and does not want this sTDL approved..

Look at his post count, he can hardly be considered someone "in the know"
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 70

With that and the personal convos I have had with them I truelly believe he is being honest!

With all due respect, join dates and post counts mean jack all.

Voting just to vote, whether you understand or not, is not a good policy.

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 03-19-2007 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 12109504)
With all due respect, join dates and post counts mean jack all.

Voting just to vote, whether you understand or not, is not a good policy.


You are correct... But I think that the votes have been honest for the most part.. The few people I have talked to after there vote are just more edicated and now have changed there position...


Either way it is a landslide, a solid 90% do not want this sTLD to be approved and that is what really matters and I hope icann realizes that no matter what kind of spin ICM puts on things these numbers are true and honest and can't be spun :2 cents:

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 03-25-2007 12:09 PM

Still 90% strong against it.... :)

CyberHustler 03-25-2007 12:22 PM

:thumbsup :thumbsup

polish_aristocrat 03-25-2007 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Clark (Post 12145252)
Still 90% strong against it.... :)

I see 10 votes pro-.xxx already, one of them seems to be "jan clork", obviously a fake nickname to make fun of you for some reason.

The maturity of this board is truly amazing :Oh crap

anyway, this poll probably served its purpose already... :)

Persignup Qon 03-25-2007 01:35 PM

the 10 votes for "yes" are probably by the same person logging in from different IPs :1orglaugh

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 03-25-2007 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by polish_aristocrat (Post 12145287)
I see 10 votes pro-.xxx already, one of them seems to be "jan clork", obviously a fake nickname to make fun of you for some reason.

The maturity of this board is truly amazing :Oh crap

anyway, this poll probably served its purpose already... :)


I see that now...

No post by that person... How stupid and childish can they be?

Could it be someone from ICM?

I wonder...!




ANyway, I think it did serve its purpose and proove the point... We will find out in a few days :)

GregE 03-25-2007 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 12109504)
Voting just to vote, whether you understand or not, is not a good policy.

This is true but polls such as this are not half bad tools for gauging public sentiment nonetheless.

More importantly, some of those who elected to abstain have perhaps been forced to reveal more than they would wish :winkwink:

Neveena 03-25-2007 06:08 PM

monitoring or not..i think they already have decided about damn xxx..:(

in case they are monitoring i say: NO, NO, NO!!!! :)

Unlimited 03-25-2007 06:21 PM

bump
and big NO NO to stupid .xxx !

Jon Clark - BANNED FOR LIFE 08-27-2008 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neveena (Post 12146441)
monitoring or not..i think they already have decided about damn xxx..:(

in case they are monitoring i say: NO, NO, NO!!!! :)

They where monitoring.... Seems the whole industry forgot about what (we) did here though.... :(


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123