![]() |
Fuck .XXX.
It's a bunch of nonsense... |
Quote:
When I voted in this pole there was only 1 yes vote and 1 no vote. After looking deeper into the various implications of the dot xxx extension I would surely change my vote to NO!:321GFY Scarlett :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
been nonsense from 5 years ago when it started, thats why I think most of us don't go out of our way anymore to fight it.. It's just a fooking joke and so riduculous we can't waste a moments breath on it |
and for those who have fear and think they have to buy into .xxx preregs' Don't bother... can't stop us from going back to IP based, since its ip based to begin with.... anyone sell me their 69.69.69.69 class range?? :)
|
F.U.B.A.R. Votes NO:thumbsup
|
Absolutely NOT! :321GFY -> .xxx
|
Quote:
Look at his post count, he can hardly be considered someone "in the know" Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 70 With that and the personal convos I have had with them I truelly believe he is being honest! |
Quote:
Thanks for your input :thumbsup your right :) of course im an idiot! but since reading the posts and various other websites I have decided to change my mind! this xxx bolini has been taked about for years... it will probably never happen anyway... |
Bump for some more votes... The more we have the better, no mater which way they are voted...
|
Bumperooney...
|
no no no no no!!!!
|
No.. I don't want them to approve it.
|
Quote:
|
Anybody know anything about the below "Yes" or "I Don't Care" folks, e.g., their sites, employers, etc??
NO! A1R3K, AbsolutePorn, AgentCash, AK, Aussie Rebel, Axel XXX, azzam, baddog, Barefootsies, basschick, Batts, Biggy, Big_Red, Bjorn, Bossman, BoyAlley, breaker, c-lo, candyflip, CDSmith, Chris Mac, ClickBuster, crockett, Cyndalie, czarina, d00t, DamageX, darksoul, davecummings, Dcat, deanberkeley, DirtyRider, Doctor Dre, Doctor T, ePorn, escorpio, esnem, FetishWeb, Freedoom, FreeHotZone, Gaybucks, GeorgeK, GigoloMason, Got Porn?, gtp, Gunni, he-fox, hent, hjnet, HomerSimpson, I am chauncy, IllTestYourGirls, JackStroke, jact, Jake, JamesK, jayeff, JFK, Jon Clark, kane, kermey, kicks, Kimo, knewon, LadyMischief, lazycash, loreen, Lycanthrope, Martin3, martinsc, massive-x, Matt 26z, mikeyddddd, milambur, Mrs F.U.B.A.R., Murderous, Nasty, Nodtveidt, notabook, pocketkangaroo, polish_aristocrat, Poon, Porn Farmer, pornguy, Probono, Quickdraw, Radiate, RawAlex, RF_Erick, Rhesus, Sands, sarettah, scardog, Scroto, sextoyking, SlickCash, spacedog, spazlabz, SPeRMiNaToR, SPW Guru, StarkReality, SteveLightspeed, stickyfingerz, surferbob, Sveindt Beindt, teksonline, Tempest, The Freestyler, tical, tony404, tranza, TreasureBucks, vicki, will76, WWC-Pajio, xclusive, YNOTBob, Z 118 90.77% Yes! blofer80, blonda80, Degenerate, englishpatient, Headless, ronbotx, RSS, scarlettcontent 8 6.15% I do not care! bossku69, Cyber-Hu$tler, Gambit, scottybuzz 4 3.08% Voters: 130. |
Quote:
We do not want ICM to be able to say the supported did not vote out of fear... I do know that most of them are young webmasters, sig whores or people that are not in the know about this issue... I have spoken to John from ScarlettContent about this and he now understands and no longer is a yes voter, which he publicly stated in this thread! I have also spoken with Cyber-Hu$tler and he did not understand how serious this is and has withdrew his "does not care" postion in this thread... I believe englishpatient is someone from ICM as they have no post and registered her in January... The rest I have no clue why they have tooken there position! |
bump for more votes...
|
And I think a few more votes will make our point a little stronger :2 cents:
|
Quote:
Voting just to vote, whether you understand or not, is not a good policy. |
Quote:
You are correct... But I think that the votes have been honest for the most part.. The few people I have talked to after there vote are just more edicated and now have changed there position... Either way it is a landslide, a solid 90% do not want this sTLD to be approved and that is what really matters and I hope icann realizes that no matter what kind of spin ICM puts on things these numbers are true and honest and can't be spun :2 cents: |
Still 90% strong against it.... :)
|
:thumbsup :thumbsup
|
Quote:
The maturity of this board is truly amazing :Oh crap anyway, this poll probably served its purpose already... :) |
the 10 votes for "yes" are probably by the same person logging in from different IPs :1orglaugh
|
Quote:
I see that now... No post by that person... How stupid and childish can they be? Could it be someone from ICM? I wonder...! ANyway, I think it did serve its purpose and proove the point... We will find out in a few days :) |
Quote:
More importantly, some of those who elected to abstain have perhaps been forced to reveal more than they would wish :winkwink: |
monitoring or not..i think they already have decided about damn xxx..:(
in case they are monitoring i say: NO, NO, NO!!!! :) |
bump
and big NO NO to stupid .xxx ! |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:46 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123